23 found
Sort by:
  1. Donald F. Henze (1977). Descartes Vs. Berkeley: A Study in Early Metaphilosophy. Metaphilosophy 8 (2-3):147-163.
  2. Donald F. Henze (1974). The More Things Change, the More They Remain the Same. Metaphilosophy 5 (1):1–17.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Donald F. Henze (1973). Hume, Treatise, III, I, 1. Philosophy 48 (185):277 - 283.
    The reappearance of Professor Alasdair MacIntyre's far-ranging and provocative article, ‘Hume on “is” and “ought”’, is the proximate cause of this short excursion to an old, well-scarred, and still fascinating battleground. Re-reading MacIntyre's brilliant offensive thrust led me to review the counter-attacks and diversionary movements that followed its first appearance. They in turn sent me back, inevitably and ultimately, to look again at the cause of this philosophic skirmishing: Section 1 of Part i of Book III of Hume's Treatise of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Donald F. Henze (1973). Hume, Treatise, III, I, 1: Donald F. Henze. Philosophy 48 (185):277-283.
    The reappearance of Professor Alasdair MacIntyre's far-ranging and provocative article, ‘Hume on “is” and “ought”’, is the proximate cause of this short excursion to an old, well-scarred, and still fascinating battleground. Re-reading MacIntyre's brilliant offensive thrust led me to review the counter-attacks and diversionary movements that followed its first appearance. They in turn sent me back, inevitably and ultimately, to look again at the cause of this philosophic skirmishing: Section 1 of Part i of Book III of Hume's Treatise of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Donald F. Henze (1973). John Turk Saunders 1929-1974. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:229 -.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Donald F. Henze (1971). Locke on "Particles". Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (2):222-226.
  7. Donald F. Henze (1970). On Some Alleged Humean Insights and Oversights. Religious Studies 6 (4):369 - 377.
  8. Donald F. Henze (1970). On Some Alleged Humean Insights and Oversights: DONALD F. HENZE. Religious Studies 6 (4):369-377.
    The knockdown argument, the logically impregnable position are rarities in philosophy. Indeed, there are some who might argue that no philosophical argument or position is immune from damaging criticism: what seems utterly convincing to one generation of philosophers is 1iable to be held up as a classic blunder by the next. Nevertheless, Hume's presentation of the problem of evil and his allied criticisms of a Christian-type theism have seemed conclusive to an impressive array of nineteenth- and twentieth-century philosophers, and both (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. L. C. Holborow, John Turk Saunders & Donald F. Henze (1970). The Private-Language Problem: A Philosophical Dialogue. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Donald F. Henze (1969). Aldrich's Monstrous Supposition. Analysis 29 (4):137 - 139.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Donald F. Henze (1969). The Art Work as a Rule. Ratio 11 (1):69.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Donald F. Henze (1968). Language-Games and the Ontological Argument. Religious Studies 4 (1):147 - 152.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Donald F. Henze (1968). Language-Games and the Ontological Argument: DONALD F. HENZE. Religious Studies 4 (1):147-152.
    ‘Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.’—Hume, Treatise , I, iv, 7. Several years have elapsed since Professor Malcolm's astonishing revival of St Anselm's ontological argument . The first shock-wave of criticism has likewise passed, having been absorbed by now into the bound volumes of the periodical literature. This note is not intended to add much weight to the common conclusion of that impressive body of criticism, for, though interesting and important logical issues remain (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Donald F. Henze (1967). Faith, Evidence, and Coercion. Philosophy 42 (159):78 - 85.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Donald F. Henze (1966). Creativity and Prediction. British Journal of Aesthetics 6 (3):230-245.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Donald F. Henze (1965). Berkeley on Sensations and Qualities. Theoria 31 (3):174-180.
  17. Donald F. Henze (1964). Creativity and 'Create': A Rejoinder to Brook and Wright. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):103 – 109.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Donald F. Henze (1962). Logic, Creativity and Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):24 – 34.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Donald F. Henze (1961). Contradiction. Analysis 22 (2):25 - 28.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Donald F. Henze (1961). The "Look" of a Work of Art. Philosophical Quarterly 11 (45):360-365.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Donald F. Henze (1960). Are Lexical Definitions True? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (3):383-388.
  22. Donald F. Henze (1957). The Work of Art. Journal of Philosophy 54 (14):429-442.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Donald F. Henze (1955). Is the Work of Art a Construct? A Reply to Professor Pepper. Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation