Search results for 'Doris Allhutter' (try it on Scholar)

521 found
Order:
  1.  16
    Karen Kastenhofer & Doris Allhutter (2010). Technoscience and Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):1-4.
    Technoscience and technology assessment Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10202-010-0080-8 Authors Karen Kastenhofer, Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of Technology Assessment Strohg. 45/5 1030 Wien Austria Doris Allhutter, Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of Technology Assessment Strohg. 45/5 1030 Wien Austria Journal Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science Online ISSN 1615-6617 Print ISSN 1615-6609 Journal Volume Volume 7 Journal Issue Volume 7, Numbers 1-2.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  7
    Roswitha Hofmann & Doris Allhutter (2010). Situated (Un-)Learning in Software Design: A Deconstructive Approach. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):87-98.
    Constructive technology assessment aims at anticipating societal impacts of technological innovations and suggests incorporating reflexivity and social learning into technology development. Social learning involves fostering the ability of diverse social actors to cultivate sociotechnical critical skills, thus allowing technological and social change to be governed with consideration for social values and diverging interests. Based on this demand, our paper presents a discourse-theoretical, interventionist approach to software design introducing deconstruction and (un-)learning as reflective practices to guide development processes. Inspired by Donna (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  75
    Nomy Arpaly & John Doris (2005). Review: Comments on "Lack of Character" by John Doris. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):643-647.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4. John M. Doris (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a provocative contribution to contemporary ethical theory challenging foundational conceptions of character that date back to Aristotle. John Doris draws on behavioral science, especially social psychology, to argue that we misattribute the causes of behavior to personality traits and other fixed aspects of character rather than to the situational context. More often than not it is the situation not the nature of the personality that really counts. The author elaborates the philosophical consequences of this research for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   181 citations  
  5. John M. Doris (2014). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a provocative contribution to contemporary ethical theory challenging foundational conceptions of character that date back to Aristotle. John Doris draws on behavioral science, especially social psychology, to argue that we misattribute the causes of behavior to personality traits and other fixed aspects of character rather than to the situational context. More often than not it is the situation not the nature of the personality that really counts. The author elaborates the philosophical consequences of this research for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. John M. Doris (2015). Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency. OUP Oxford.
    Do we know what we're doing, and why? Psychological research seems to suggest not: reflection and self-awareness are surprisingly uncommon and inaccurate. John M. Doris presents a new account of agency and responsibility, which reconciles our understanding of ourselves as moral agents with empirical work on the unconscious mind.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7. John M. Doris (2005). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a provocative contribution to contemporary ethical theory challenging foundational conceptions of character that date back to Aristotle. John Doris draws on behavioral science, especially social psychology, to argue that we misattribute the causes of behavior to personality traits and other fixed aspects of character rather than to the situational context. More often than not it is the situation not the nature of the personality that really counts. The author elaborates the philosophical consequences of this research for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8. John M. Doris (1998). Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics. Noûs 32 (4):504-530.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   72 citations  
  9.  32
    Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2006). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition: Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. Cognition 100 (2):283-301.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  10. John M. Doris & Stephen P. Stich (2005). As a Matter of Fact : Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  11. John M. Doris (2009). Skepticism About Persons. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):57-91.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  12.  72
    Lauren Olin & John M. Doris (2014). Vicious Minds. Philosophical Studies 168 (3):665-692.
    While there is now considerable anxiety about whether the psychological theory presupposed by virtue ethics is empirically sustainable, analogous issues have received little attention in the virtue epistemology literature. This paper argues that virtue epistemology encounters challenges reminiscent of those recently encountered by virtue ethics: just as seemingly trivial variation in context provokes unsettling variation in patterns of moral behavior, trivial variation in context elicits unsettling variation in patterns of cognitive functioning. Insofar as reliability is a condition on epistemic virtue, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13. Stephen Stich, John M. Doris & Erica Roedder (2010). Altruism. In John M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
    We begin, in section 2, with a brief sketch of a cluster of assumptions about human desires, beliefs, actions, and motivation that are widely shared by historical and contemporary authors on both sides in the debate. With this as background, we’ll be able to offer a more sharply focused account of the debate. In section 3, our focus will be on links between evolutionary theory and the egoism/altruism debate. There is a substantial literature employing evolutionary theory on each side of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  14.  97
    John M. Doris, Joshua Knobe & Robert L. Woolfolk (2007). Variantism About Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):183–214.
  15. John M. Doris & Dominic Murphy (2007). From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The Moral Psychology of Atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):25–55.
    While nothing justifies atrocity, many perpetrators manifest cognitive impairments that profoundly degrade their capacity for moral judgment, and such impairments, we shall argue, preclude the attribution of moral responsibility.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  16.  26
    Maria Merritt, John Doris & Gilbert Harman (2010). Character. In John Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17. Joshua Knobe & John Doris (2010). Responsibility. In John Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
    Much of the agenda for contemporary philosophical work on moral responsibility was set by Strawson’s (1962) essay ‘Freedom and Resentment.’ In that essay, Strawson suggests that we focus not so much on metaphysical speculation as on understanding the actual practice of moral responsibility judgment. The hope is that we will be able to resolve the apparent paradoxes surrounding moral responsibility if we can just get a better sense of how this practice works and what role it serves in people’s lives. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  18. John Doris & Stephen Stich, Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Moral psychology investigates human functioning in moral contexts, and asks how these results may impact debate in ethical theory. This work is necessarily interdisciplinary, drawing on both the empirical resources of the human sciences and the conceptual resources of philosophical ethics. The present article discusses several topics that illustrate this type of inquiry: thought experiments, responsibility, character, egoism v . altruism, and moral disagreement.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19. John M. Doris (2010). Heated Agreement: Lack of Character as Being for the Good. Philosophical Studies 148 (1):135-146.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20. Joshua Knobe & John M. Doris (2010). Responsibility. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
    A great deal of fascinating research has gone into an attempt to uncover the fundamental criteria that people use when assigning moral responsibility. Nonetheless, it seems that most existing accounts fall prey to one counterexample or another. The underlying problem, we suggest, is that there simply isn't any single system of criteria that people apply in all cases of responsibility attribution. Instead, it appears that people use quite different criteria in different kinds of cases. [This paper was originally circulated under (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  15
    John M. Doris (2015). Doing Without Desert. Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2625-2634.
    This paper is a critical discussion of Manuel Vargas’ Building Better Beings, focusing on the treatment of desert therein. By means of an analogy between morality and sport, I examine some seemingly peculiar implications of Vargas’ teleological and revisionary account of desert. I also consider some general questions of philosophical methodology provoked by revisionary approaches.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  32
    John M. Doris (2005). Replies: Evidence and Sensibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):656–677.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  23. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & & John M. Darley (2007). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition : Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. In Joshua Knobe (ed.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press
  24.  72
    John M. Doris (2005). Précis of Lack of Character. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):632–635.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  99
    Gillian K. Russell & John M. Doris (2008). Knowledge by Indifference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):429 – 437.
    Is it harder to acquire knowledge about things that really matter to us than it is to acquire knowledge about things we don't much care about? Jason Stanley 2005 argues that whether or not the relational predicate 'knows that' holds between an agent and a proposition can depend on the practical interests of the agent: the more it matters to a person whether p is the case, the more justification is required before she counts as knowing that p. The evidence (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Chun Kit Chui, Julian Chuk-Ling Lai, Kam Hung Wong, M. W. Tse Doris & Ho Mun Chan (2015). End-of-Life Decision Making in Hong Kong: The Appeal of the Shared Decision Making Model. In Ruiping Fan (ed.), Family-Oriented Informed Consent. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Stephen Stich, John M. Doris & Erica Roedder (2010). 1. Philosophical Background. In John Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press 147.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. R. Woolfolk, J. Doris & J. Darley (2006). Attribution and Alternate Possibilities: Identification and Situational Constraint as Factors in Moral Cognition. Cognition 100:283-301.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  29.  82
    John M. Doris (2009). Genealogy and Evidence: Prinz on the History of Morals. Analysis 69 (4):704-713.
    Jesse Prinz’s The Emotional Construction of Morals is among the most significant of illuminations of human morality to appear in recent years. This embarrassment of riches presents the space-starved commentator with a dilemma: survey the book’s extraordinary sweep, and slight the textured argumentation, or engage a fraction of the argumentation, and slight the sweep. I’ll fall on the second horn, and focus mostly on Chapter 7, ‘The Genealogy of Morals’. Like Prinz , 1 I think that genealogical arguments have not, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2008). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition. In Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press 61.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  10
    Louise Antony, Owen McLeod, Paul Benson, Diane T. Meyers, Lawrence Blum, Albert Mosley, John P. Christman, Jerome Neu, John Doris & Marina Oshana (2002). Manuscript Referees for The Journal of Ethics Volume 6: November 2001–August 2002. Journal of Ethics 6 (411):411-411.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. Gillian Russell with John Doris, Knowledge by Indifference.
    Is it harder to acquire knowledge about things that really matter to us than it is to acquire knowledge about things we don’t much care about? Jason Stanley (2005) argues that whether or not the relational predicate “knows that” holds between an agent and a proposition can depend on the practical interests of the agent: the more it matters to a person whether p is the case, the more justification is required before she counts as knowing that p.2 In Stanley’s (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  27
    John M. Doris (2005). Review: Précis of "Lack of Character". [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):632 - 635.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Sebastian Doris (1932). A Handbook of Fundamental Theology. New Scholasticism 6 (4):374-375.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Stephen Stich & Doris & John (2005). Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  26
    John M. Doris (2000). Paul E. Griffiths, What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories:What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Ethics 110 (3):617-619.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  18
    Robert L. Woolfolk & John M. Doris (2002). Rationing Mental Health Care: Parity, Disparity, and Justice. Bioethics 16 (5):469–485.
  38.  19
    John M. Doris (2009). Review of Kwame Anthony Appiah, Experiments in Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    Seán O. Nualláin & Tom Doris (2012). Consciousness is Cheap, Even If Symbols Are Expensive; Metabolism and the Brain's Dark Energy. Biosemiotics 5 (2):193-210.
    Use of symbols, the key to the biosemiotics field as to many others, required bigger brains which implied a promissory note for greater energy consumption; symbols are obviously expensive. A score years before the current estimate of 18–20% for the human brain’s metabolic demand on the organism, it was known that neural tissue is metabolically dear. This paper first discusses two evolutionary responses to this demand, on both of which there is some consensus. The first, assigning care of altricial infants (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  20
    John M. Doris (2007). Review of Dominic Murphy, Psychiatry in the Scientific Image. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (10).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. R. Breheny, M. Carreiras, J. Cole-Virtue, M. Coltheart, M. Curtis, J. M. Darley, M. A. Defeyter, J. M. Doris, A. Fernald & W. T. Fitch (2006). Acuna-Farina, C., 217 Betancort, M., 217 Bharucha, JJ, 131 Bigand, E., 100. Cognition 100:543.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  1
    John M. Doris (2010). Heated Agreement: Lack of Character as Being for the Good. Philosophical Studies 148 (1):135-146.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  10
    John M. Doris (2005). Review: Replies: Evidence and Sensibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):656 - 677.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. John M. Doris (2010). Introduction. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. John Doris (ed.) (2010). Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
    The Moral Psychology Handbook offers a survey of contemporary moral psychology, integrating evidence and argument from philosophy and the human sciences.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. John M. Doris (2010). Serial Killers - Philosophy for Everyone: Being and Killing. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  67
    John Michael Doris (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
    The Moral Psychology Handbook offers a survey of contemporary moral psychology, integrating evidence and argument from philosophy and the human sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. John M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. OUP Oxford.
    The Moral Psychology Handbook offers a comprehensive discussion of how the human mind influences, and is influenced by, human morality. Each chapter is a collaborative effort, covering major issues in moral psychology, written by leading researchers in both philosophy and psychology.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. S. Waller & John M. Doris (2011). Serial Killers - Philosophy for Everyone. John Wiley & Sons.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  20
    Manuel R. Vargas (2015). Desert, Responsibility, and Justification: A Reply to Doris, McGeer, and Robinson. Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2659-2678.
    Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility argues that the normative basis of moral responsibility is anchored in the effects of responsibility practices. Further, the capacities required for moral responsibility are socially scaffolded. This article considers criticisms of this account that have been recently raised by John Doris, Victoria McGeer, and Michael Robinson. Robinson argues against Building Better Beings’s rejection of libertarianism about free will, and the account of desert at stake in the theory. considers methodological questions that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 521