Search results for 'Doris Allhutter' (try it on Scholar)

372 found
Sort by:
  1. Karen Kastenhofer & Doris Allhutter (2010). Technoscience and Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):1-4.score: 540.0
    Technoscience and technology assessment Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10202-010-0080-8 Authors Karen Kastenhofer, Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of Technology Assessment Strohg. 45/5 1030 Wien Austria Doris Allhutter, Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute of Technology Assessment Strohg. 45/5 1030 Wien Austria Journal Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science Online ISSN 1615-6617 Print ISSN 1615-6609 Journal Volume Volume 7 Journal Issue Volume 7, Numbers 1-2.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Roswitha Hofmann & Doris Allhutter (2010). Situated (Un-)Learning in Software Design: A Deconstructive Approach. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):87-98.score: 240.0
    Constructive technology assessment aims at anticipating societal impacts of technological innovations and suggests incorporating reflexivity and social learning into technology development. Social learning involves fostering the ability of diverse social actors to cultivate sociotechnical critical skills, thus allowing technological and social change to be governed with consideration for social values and diverging interests. Based on this demand, our paper presents a discourse-theoretical, interventionist approach to software design introducing deconstruction and (un-)learning as reflective practices to guide development processes. Inspired by Donna (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nomy Arpaly & John Doris (2005). Review: Comments on "Lack of Character" by John Doris. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):643 - 647.score: 180.0
  4. John M. Doris (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    This book is a provocative contribution to contemporary ethical theory challenging foundational conceptions of character that date back to Aristotle. John Doris draws on behavioral science, especially social psychology, to argue that we misattribute the causes of behavior to personality traits and other fixed aspects of character rather than to the situational context. More often than not it is the situation not the nature of the personality that really counts. The author elaborates the philosophical consequences of this research for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John M. Doris (1998). Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics. Noûs 32 (4):504-530.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John M. Doris (2009). Skepticism About Persons. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):57-91.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Stich, John M. Doris & Erica Roedder (2010). Altruism. In John M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    We begin, in section 2, with a brief sketch of a cluster of assumptions about human desires, beliefs, actions, and motivation that are widely shared by historical and contemporary authors on both sides in the debate. With this as background, we’ll be able to offer a more sharply focused account of the debate. In section 3, our focus will be on links between evolutionary theory and the egoism/altruism debate. There is a substantial literature employing evolutionary theory on each side of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John M. Doris (2010). Heated Agreement: Lack of Character as Being for the Good. Philosophical Studies 148 (1):135-146.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Joshua Knobe & John Doris (2010). Responsibility. In John Doris & The Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Much of the agenda for contemporary philosophical work on moral responsibility was set by Strawson’s (1962) essay ‘Freedom and Resentment.’ In that essay, Strawson suggests that we focus not so much on metaphysical speculation as on understanding the actual practice of moral responsibility judgment. The hope is that we will be able to resolve the apparent paradoxes surrounding moral responsibility if we can just get a better sense of how this practice works and what role it serves in people’s lives. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John M. Doris & Dominic Murphy (2007). From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The Moral Psychology of Atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):25–55.score: 30.0
    While nothing justifies atrocity, many perpetrators manifest cognitive impairments that profoundly degrade their capacity for moral judgment, and such impairments, we shall argue, preclude the attribution of moral responsibility.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Doris & Stephen Stich, Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
    Moral psychology investigates human functioning in moral contexts, and asks how these results may impact debate in ethical theory. This work is necessarily interdisciplinary, drawing on both the empirical resources of the human sciences and the conceptual resources of philosophical ethics. The present article discusses several topics that illustrate this type of inquiry: thought experiments, responsibility, character, egoism v . altruism, and moral disagreement.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John M. Doris & Stephen P. Stich (2005). As a Matter of Fact : Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Doris (ed.) (2010). Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    The Moral Psychology Handbook offers a survey of contemporary moral psychology, integrating evidence and argument from philosophy and the human sciences.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John M. Doris (2005). Précis of Lack of Character. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):632–635.score: 30.0
  15. Gillian K. Russell & John M. Doris (2008). Knowledge by Indifference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):429 – 437.score: 30.0
    Is it harder to acquire knowledge about things that really matter to us than it is to acquire knowledge about things we don't much care about? Jason Stanley 2005 argues that whether or not the relational predicate 'knows that' holds between an agent and a proposition can depend on the practical interests of the agent: the more it matters to a person whether p is the case, the more justification is required before she counts as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John M. Doris (2009). Genealogy and Evidence: Prinz on the History of Morals. Analysis 69 (4):704-713.score: 30.0
  17. John M. Doris, Joshua Knobe & Robert L. Woolfolk (2007). Variantism About Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):183–214.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Michael Doris (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    The Moral Psychology Handbook offers a survey of contemporary moral psychology, integrating evidence and argument from philosophy and the human sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Lauren Olin & John M. Doris (2014). Vicious Minds. Philosophical Studies 168 (3):665-692.score: 30.0
    While there is now considerable anxiety about whether the psychological theory presupposed by virtue ethics is empirically sustainable, analogous issues have received little attention in the virtue epistemology literature. This paper argues that virtue epistemology encounters challenges reminiscent of those recently encountered by virtue ethics: just as seemingly trivial variation in context provokes unsettling variation in patterns of moral behavior, trivial variation in context elicits unsettling variation in patterns of cognitive functioning. Insofar as reliability is a condition on epistemic virtue, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John M. Doris (2005). Review: Précis of "Lack of Character". [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):632 - 635.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John M. Doris (2000). Paul E. Griffiths, What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories:What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Ethics 110 (3):617-619.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gillian Russell with John Doris, Knowledge by Indifference.score: 30.0
    Is it harder to acquire knowledge about things that really matter to us than it is to acquire knowledge about things we don’t much care about? Jason Stanley (2005) argues that whether or not the relational predicate “knows that” holds between an agent and a proposition can depend on the practical interests of the agent: the more it matters to a person whether p is the case, the more justification is required before she counts as knowing that p.2 In Stanley’s (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John M. Doris (2005). Replies: Evidence and Sensibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):656–677.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John M. Doris (2007). Review of Dominic Murphy, Psychiatry in the Scientific Image. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (10).score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John M. Doris (2009). Review of Kwame Anthony Appiah, Experiments in Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert L. Woolfolk & John M. Doris (2002). Rationing Mental Health Care: Parity, Disparity, and Justice. Bioethics 16 (5):469–485.score: 30.0
  27. Maria Merritt, John Doris & Gilbert Harman (2010). Character. In John Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Joshua Knobe & John M. Doris (2010). Responsibility. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    A great deal of fascinating research has gone into an attempt to uncover the fundamental criteria that people use when assigning moral responsibility. Nonetheless, it seems that most existing accounts fall prey to one counterexample or another. The underlying problem, we suggest, is that there simply isn't any single system of criteria that people apply in all cases of responsibility attribution. Instead, it appears that people use quite different criteria in different kinds of cases. [This paper was originally circulated under (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John M. Doris (2005). Review: Replies: Evidence and Sensibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):656 - 677.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2006). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition: Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. Cognition 100 (2):283-301.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Louise Antony, Owen McLeod, Paul Benson, Diane T. Meyers, Lawrence Blum, Albert Mosley, John P. Christman, Jerome Neu, John Doris & Marina Oshana (2002). Manuscript Referees for The Journal of Ethics Volume 6: November 2001–August 2002. Journal of Ethics 6 (411).score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Bruce Osborne, Fiona Doris, Ann Cullen, Rosa McDonald, Garret Campbell & Martin Steer (1991). Gunnera Tinctoria: An Unusual Nitrogen-Fixing Invader. BioScience 41 (4):224-234.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. R. Breheny, M. Carreiras, J. Cole-Virtue, M. Coltheart, M. Curtis, J. M. Darley, M. A. Defeyter, J. M. Doris, A. Fernald & W. T. Fitch (2006). Acuna-Farina, C., 217 Betancort, M., 217 Bharucha, JJ, 131 Bigand, E., 100. Cognition 100:543.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Sebastian Doris (1932). A Handbook of Fundamental Theology. New Scholasticism 6 (4):374-375.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stephen Stich & Doris & John (2005). Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oup Oxford.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John M. Doris (2010). Introduction. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John M. Doris (2010). Serial Killers - Philosophy for Everyone: Being and Killing. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Seán O. Nualláin & Tom Doris (2012). Consciousness is Cheap, Even If Symbols Are Expensive; Metabolism and the Brain's Dark Energy. Biosemiotics 5 (2):193-210.score: 30.0
    Use of symbols, the key to the biosemiotics field as to many others, required bigger brains which implied a promissory note for greater energy consumption; symbols are obviously expensive. A score years before the current estimate of 18–20% for the human brain’s metabolic demand on the organism, it was known that neural tissue is metabolically dear. This paper first discusses two evolutionary responses to this demand, on both of which there is some consensus. The first, assigning care of altricial infants (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen Stich, John M. Doris & Erica Roedder (2010). 1. Philosophical Background. In John Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press. 147.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. R. Woolfolk, J. Doris & J. Darley (2006). Attribution and Alternate Possibilities: Identification and Situational Constraint as Factors in Moral Cognition. Cognition 100:283-301.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & & John M. Darley (2007). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition : Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. In Joshua Knobe (ed.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
  42. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2008). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition. In Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 61.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John R. Cook (2005). Review of Doris Olin's Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review (6):422-424.score: 18.0
    Doris Olin's Paradox is a very helpful book for those who want to be introduced to the philosophical treatment of paradoxes, or for those who already have knowledge of the general area and would like to have a helpful resource book.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter Schaber (2014). Human Rights and Human Dignity: A Reply to Doris Schroeder. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):155-161.score: 18.0
    According to Doris Schroeder, the view that human rights derive from human dignity should be rejected. She thinks that this is the case for three different reasons: the first has to do with the fact that the dominant concept of dignity is based on religious beliefs which will do no justificatory work in a secular society; the second is that the dominant secular view of dignity, which is the Kantian view, does not provide us with a justification of human (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Nora Hämäläinen (2014). The Ethics of Remembering People and the Fact/Value Dichotomy—: Doris Lessing and Iris Murdoch. The Pluralist 9 (2):84-102.score: 18.0
    through examining the case of Doris Lessing’s varying accounts of her mother, I discuss here the fundamental fact/value entanglement involved in describing people, human situations, and human relations. A serious consideration of the ethical and epistemic challenges involved in biographical narration will provide strong reasons for jettisoning the fact/value dichotomy when thinking about human life.1 Yet, I do not propose such considerations as providing an overall model for rejecting the fact/value dichotomy, but rather suggest that there may be no (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Shahram Kiaei (2012). Sufi Novels and Parables: A Significant Change in Doris Lessing's Writing. Asian Culture and History 4 (1):p41.score: 18.0
    Doris Lessing, the Persian-born, African-raised and London-residing novelist enjoys a writing career which has spanned more than 50 years. Critics have labeled her as Marxist, feminist, Sufist and even psycho-analyst. It is my contention to prove that latent Sufi characteristics are inherent in her works, and this premise marks a difference between my study and other research on Lessing. To prove that even Lessing’s early works contain Sufi characteristics, this paper looks at her early fictions which lend themselves to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Julia Annas (2005). Comments on John Doris's Lack of Character. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):636–642.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Sylvia Burrow (2003). Review: Lack of Character, John Doris. [REVIEW] Metapsychology Online Review 7 (11).score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jesse Prinz (2009). The Significance of Moral Variation: Replies to Tiberius, Gert and Doris. Analysis 69 (4):731-745.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Frank H. Knight (1944). The Rights of Man and Natural Law:The Rights of Man and Natural Law. Jacques Maritain, Doris C. Anson. Ethics 54 (2):124-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 372