1.  13
    Doris Liebwald (2013). Law's Capacity for Vagueness. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (2):391-423.
    This paper deals with the particularities of vagueness in law. Thereby the question of the law’s capacity for vagueness is closely related to the question of the impact of vagueness in law, since exaggerated vagueness combined with the elasticity of legal interpretation methodology may affect the constitutional principles of legal certainty, the division of powers, and the binding force of statute. To represent vagueness and the instability of legal concepts and rules, a Hyperbola of Meaning is introduced, opposing Heck’s metaphor (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  56
    Erich Schweighofer & Doris Liebwald (2007). Advanced Lexical Ontologies and Hybrid Knowledge Based Systems: First Steps to a Dynamic Legal Electronic Commentary. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2):103-115.
    Legal Information Retrieval (IR) research has stressed the fact that legal knowledge systems should be sufficiently capable to interpret and handle the semantics of a database. Modeling (expert-) knowledge by using ontologies enhances the ability to extract and exploit information from documents. This contribution presents theories, ideas and notions regarding the development of dynamic electronic commentaries based on a comprehensive legal ontology.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  1
    Doris Liebwald (2015). On Transparent Law, Good Legislation and Accessibility to Legal Information: Towards an Integrated Legal Information System. Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (3):301-314.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography