Search results for 'Dostoevsky' (try it on Scholar)

170 found
Sort by:
  1. N. K. Gavrtushin & F. M. Dostoevsky (2000). Self-Knowledge as a Mystery. Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (3):55-88.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. Bakunin, F. Dostoevsky, K. Leont'ev & A. L. Yanov (2007). Three Utopias. Russian Studies in Philosophy 46 (2):52-70.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Dewey, P. Dhillon, J. Diamond, E. Diener, S. E. Dimond, W. Dodds, J. M. Dostoevsky, D. D'Souza, C. Dyer & A. Edelstein (2010). Day, J., 167 Deci, EL, 56 De Ruyter, 62 Descarte, R., 41. In Yvonne Raley & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), Philosophy of Education in the Era of Globalization. Routledge. 231.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dana Freibach-Heifetz (2008). Giving Sense to Generosity-Ethics: A Philosophical Reading of Dostoevsky's the Idiot. Philosophia 36 (4):575-591.score: 24.0
    This paper presents a philosophical reading of The Idiot , which perceives its main protagonist, Prince Myshkin, as a literary hero who chooses the path of generosity. The paper exposes Dostoevsky’s generosity-ethics against the background of Christian ethics, virtue ethics, and the Nietzschean notion of generosity; it further analyzes the problematic aspects of Myshkin’s version of generosity-ethics, and discusses several possible explanations of its catastrophic outcomes in the novel. The paper consists of three parts. The first part presents the rich (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Derek Allan (2014). A Logical Redeemer: Kirillov in Dostoevsky’s 'Demons'. Journal of European Studies 44 (2).score: 24.0
    The engineer Kirillov, a major character in Dostoevsky's 'Demons', has provoked considerable critical disagreement. In 'The Myth of Sisyphus', Albert Camus argues that he expresses the theme of ‘logical suicide’ with ‘the most admirable range and depth’. Some recent commentators, however, have dismissed Kirillov as a madman in the grip of a mad theory. -/- While dissenting from Camus’s analysis in certain respects, this article offers an interpretation consistent with his basic argument. Kirillov’s suicide is based on a simple, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Evgenia V. Cherkasova (2004). Kant on Free Will and Arbitrariness: A View From Dostoevsky's Underground. Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):367-378.score: 18.0
    Are freedom, rationality, and morality intrinsically connected? Or perhaps freedom's very nature is transgression, going beyond rationality and ethics? These questions are the center of my discussion of free will and arbitrariness in Kant's late writings. Kant's interlocutor here is Dostoevsky's underground man, a passionate proponent of the Russian _volia--("freedom," "unfettered, arbitrary will"). The underground man questions freedom's relationship to rationality and moral law and insists that free will, arbitrariness and even tyranny are inseparable. Finally, in its attack on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Elizabeth A. Blake & Rubén Rosario (2007). Journey to Transcendence: Dostoevsky's Theological Polyphony in Barth's Understanding of the Pauline KRISIS. Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):3 - 168.score: 18.0
    Anticipating Mikhail Bakhtin’s appreciation for the unfinalizability of Fedor Dostoevskij’s universe, prominent Protestant theologian Karl Barth celebrates the Russian novelist’s presentation of “the impenetrable ambiguity of human life” characteristic of both the ending of Dostoevsky’s novels and Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Barth’s unique reading of The Brothers Karamazov not only demonstrates the barrenness of the “theocratic dream” but also complements Bakhtin’s discussion of polyphony with an explicitly theological dimension by focusing on the dialogue between Creator and the created. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Peter Roberts (2012). Education and the Limits of Reason: Reading Dostoevsky. Educational Theory 62 (2):203-223.score: 18.0
    Philosophers of education have had a longstanding interest in the nature and value of reason. Literature can provide an important source of insight in addressing questions in this area. One writer who is especially helpful in this regard is Fyodor Dostoevsky. In this essay Peter Roberts provides an educational reading of Dostoevsky's highly influential shorter novel, Notes from Underground. This novel was Dostoevsky's critical response to the emerging philosophy of rational egoism. In this close reading of Notes (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peter Roberts (2012). The Stranger Within: Dostoevsky's Underground. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (4):396-408.score: 18.0
    In Fyodor Dostoevsky?s influential novel Notes from underground, we find one of the most memorable characters in nineteenth century literature. The Underground Man, around whom everything else in this book revolves, is in some respects utterly repugnant: he is self-centred, obsessive and cruel. Yet he is also highly intelligent, honest and reflective, and he has suffered significantly at the hands of others. Reading Notes from underground can be a harrowing experience but also an educative one, for in an encounter (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard Findler (2012). Dostoevsky and Kant: Dialogues on Ethics. By Evgenia Cherkasova. The European Legacy 17 (7):953-954.score: 18.0
    (2012). Dostoevsky and Kant: Dialogues on Ethics. By Evgenia Cherkasova. The European Legacy: Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 953-954. doi: 10.1080/10848770.2012.717914.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Irina Avramets (2000). On the definition of genre of Dostoevsky's works. Sign Systems Studies 28:199-215.score: 18.0
    On the definition of genre of Dostoevsky's works. The article mostly addresses Dostoevsk's own definitions of genres of his works, either explicated in the texts (subtitles, prefaces) or contained in the writer's letters; or rather the relationship between the scholarly strategies of defining genres and the writer's own view, as evidenced. by subtitles which, in some sense, are part of the text (in nearly, but not precisely, the same way as the titles themselves are). The writer's own definitions, then, (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Nikita D. Roodkowsky (1972). Dostoevsky. Thought 47 (4):587-598.score: 18.0
    Some of the most characteristic features of the Soviet totalitarian system were foreseen by Dostoevsky through his knowledge of the radical Russian intelligentsia of his day.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrea Zink (2010). The Culture of Justice: Reflections on Punishment in Dostoevsky's "The Idiot". Studies in East European Thought 62 (3/4):413 - 429.score: 18.0
    The article investigates Dostoevsky's juridical discourse and demonstrates that the apologist of the Russian soul had a genuinely European mind. In his novel The Idiot in particular, in which the death penalty and imprisonment are explored, Dostoevsky unmasks— more radically even than Victor Hugo— the supposedly civilised and lenient forms of modern criminal justice. Dostoevsky's criticism is ahead of its time; his arguments resemble those subsequently put forward by Foucault. A comparison with Anatoly Pristavkin's report on post-Communist (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Timothy O'Connor (2009). Theodicies and Human Nature: Dostoevsky on the Saint as Witness. In Kevin Timpe (ed.), Metaphysics and God. Routledge.score: 15.0
  15. James Patrick Scanlan (1999). The Case Against Rational Egoism in Dostoevsky's Notes From Underground. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3):549-567.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nel Grillaert (2007). Sarah Hudspith, Dostoevsky and the Idea of Russianness: A New Perspective on Unity and Brotherhood, BASEES/RoutledgeCurzon Series on Russian and East European Studies,. Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):159-161.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jeffrie G. Murphy (2009). The Case of Dostoevsky's General. The Monist 92 (4):556-582.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. A. Yanov (2007). Three Utopias: M. Bakunin, F. Dostoevsky, and K. Leont'ev. Russian Studies in Philosophy 46 (2):52-70.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Martha M. Montello & John D. Lantos (2002). The Karamazov Complex: Dostoevsky and DNR Orders. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (2):190-199.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Susan McReynolds (2004). Dostoevsky and Schiller: National Renewal Through Aesthetic Education. Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):353-366.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David Patterson (1979). The Unity of Existential Philosophy and Literature as Revealed by Shestov's Approach to Dostoevsky. Studies in East European Thought 19 (3):219-231.score: 15.0
  22. Yuri Glazov (1977). The Devils by Dostoevsky and the Russian Intelligentsia. Studies in East European Thought 17 (4):309-330.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Edward Wasiolek (1977). Dostoevsky, Camus, and Faulkner: Transcendence and Mutilation. Philosophy and Literature 1 (2):131-146.score: 15.0
  24. C. A. Miller (1975). The Nihilist as Tempter-Redeemer: Dostoevsky's “Man-God” in Nietzsche's Notebooks. Nietzsche-Studien 4 (1).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nikolai Fedorov, Friedrich Nietzsche & S. G. Semenova (2002). Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: Toward a New Metaphysics of Man. Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (3):33-62.score: 15.0
  26. C. H. Whiteley (1959). The Idealist Tradition. Edited, with an Introduction and Commentary, by A. C. Ewing. (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Pp. 362. Price $5.50.)Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Edited, Selected and Introduced by Walter Kaufmann. (London: Thames and Hudson. Pp. 319. Price 12s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 34 (130):269-.score: 15.0
  27. I. I. Evlampiev (2002). Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: Toward a New Metaphysics of Man. Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (3):7-32.score: 15.0
  28. John Goodliffe (1988). Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (Review). Philosophy and Literature 12 (1):152-154.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. S. Williams (2003). Book Reviews : Remembering the End: Dostoevsky as Prophet to Modernity, by P. Travis Kroeker and Bruce K. Ward. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001. 280 Pp. Pb. 21.99. ISBN 0-8133-6608-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 16 (1):112-115.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Igor' L. Volgin (2011). Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Russian Studies in Philosophy 50 (3):57-67.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. D. Bastable (1957). Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Philosophical Studies 7:200-202.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. V. C. C. (1957). Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Review of Metaphysics 10 (3):547-547.score: 15.0
  33. Diane Christine Raymond (2003). Dostoevsky the Thinker (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (4):568-569.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. C. A. Miller (1973). Nietzsche's “Discovery” of Dostoevsky. Nietzsche-Studien 2 (1).score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Evert van der Zweerde (2004). James P. Scanlan, Dostoevsky the Thinker. Studies in East European Thought 56 (1):76-79.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. Wesley Boyd (1991). Narrative Constructions and Sanity in Dostoevsky and Freud. Journal of Medical Humanities 12 (4):163-171.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Gary Wihl (1988). The Bounds of Reason. Cervantes, Dostoevsky, Flaubert (Review). Philosophy and Literature 12 (1):114-117.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Joe Barnhardt & Joe Barnhart (forthcoming). Bowne, Dostoevsky and Brightman: Three Personalists Who Confronted the Problem of Evil. The Personalist Forum.score: 15.0
  39. Kate Holland (2007). Cassedy, Steven, Dostoevsky's Religion. Studies in East European Thought 59 (1-2):163-165.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Ronald LeBlanc (1996). Deconstructing Dostoevsky: God, Guilt, and Morality in Woody Allen's Crimes and Misdemeanors. Film and Philosophy 3:84.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Patrick Madigan (2013). Barth and Dostoevsky: A Study of the Influence of the Russian Writer Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky on the Development of the Swiss Theologian Karl Barth, 1915–1922. By Paul H. Brazier. Pp. Xix, 237, Paternoster Theological Monographs, Milton Keynes, 2007, $34.00. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (6):1064-1065.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Reid (2013). Dostoevsky's Democracy. By Nancy Ruttenburg. The European Legacy 18 (1):109-110.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Iu V. Sineokaia (2002). Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: Toward a New Metaphysics of Man. Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (3):63-81.score: 15.0
  44. Konstantin A. Barsht (2011). Religious Thought and Scientific Knowledge in the Artistic System of Dostoevsky. Russian Studies in Philosophy 50 (3):34-47.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Beth Brait & Irene Machado (2011). The Gifted Underground's Meeting Between Bakhtin and Dostoevsky. Bakhtiniana 6 (1):24 - 43.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jude P. Dougherty (2005). Dostoevsky's Spiritual Art. Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):908-909.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. F. Laszlo Foldenyi (forthcoming). Dostoevsky Reads Hegel in Siberia and Bursts Into Tears. Common Knowledge 10 (1):93-104.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. L. F. Foldenyi (2004). Dostoevsky Reads Hegel in Siberia and Bursts Into Tears. Common Knowledge 10 (1):93-104.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. G. M. Fridlende (1972). The Esthetics of Dostoevsky. Russian Studies in Philosophy 11 (2):148-169.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 170