Search results for 'Douglas J. Dempster' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  27
    Douglas J. Dempster (1985). Aesthetic Experience and Psychological Definitions of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 44 (2):153-165.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  19
    Douglas J. Dempster (1989). Exemplification and the Cognitive Value of Art. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (3):393-412.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. J. Conrad, V. Crapanzano, M. Crick, J. Cripps, M. David, J. Derrida, N. B. Dirks, T. Docherty, N. Dorian & M. Douglas (1997). Collard, J. 54 Comito, T. 198 Condor, J. 205n2 Condry, E. 87-8, 90, 91. In Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Lorna Hockey & Andrew H. Dawson (eds.), After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. Routledge 264.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  12
    A. E. Douglas (1985). Seneca's Troades Elaine Fantham: Seneca's Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Xii + 412. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. £31.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):33-34.
  6.  11
    A. E. Douglas (1967). James J. Murphy: Quintilian on the Early Education of the Citizen-Orator. Pp. Xxx + 122. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965. Paper, $1.45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (1):106.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    J. W. B. Douglas & J. M. Blomfield (1957). Maternal Employment and the Welfare of Children: An Account of a Survey in Progress. The Eugenics Review 49 (2):69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  32
    E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1).
    Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    J. A. Douglas & J. M. Edmonds (1950). John Phillips's Geological Maps of the British Isles. Annals of Science 6 (4):361-375.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  12
    J. F. Douglas, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & A. J. Cronin (2011). Transplant Research and Deceased Donors: Laws, Licences and Fear of Liability. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):140-145.
    Transplantation research on samples and organs from deceased donors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is under threat. The key problems relate to difficulties encountered in gaining consent for research projects, as distinct from consent to donation for clinical transplantation. They are due partly to the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (the 2004 Act), and partly to its interpretation by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA). They include excessive interaction with donor representatives regarding ‘informed consent’ to research projects, uncertainty (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    A. J. Cronin, J. Douglas & S. Sacks (2012). Licenced to Transplant: UK Overkill on EU Organ Directive Provides Golden Opportunity for Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):593-595.
    Progress in transplantation outcomes depends on continuing research into both donor and recipient factors that may enhance graft and patient survival. A system of licencing for transplantation research, introduced by the Human Tissue Act 2004, which separates it from the transplantation process (then exempt from licencing), has damaged this vital activity by a combination of inflexible interpretation of the 2004 Act and fear of criminal liability on the part of researchers. Now, following the European Union (EU) Directive (2010) on standards (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    A. J. Cronin, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & J. F. Douglas (2011). British Transplant Research Endangered by the Human Tissue Act. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):512-514.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    J. F. Douglas & A. J. Cronin (2010). Requested Allocation of a Deceased Donor Organ: Laws and Misconceptions. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):321-321.
    In the Laura Ashworth case in 2008, the Human Tissue Authority considered itself bound to overturn a deceased daughter's alleged wish that one of her kidneys should go to her mother, who at the time had end stage kidney failure and was on dialysis. 12 This was so even though Laura's earlier wish to be a living donor would most likely have been authorised, had the formal assessment process begun. The decision provoked much criticism. The recent Department of Health document (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    J. A. Douglas (1921). The Redemption of Saint Sophia. Journal of Hellenic Studies 41:307.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Js Cohen & J. Douglas (1986). Differential Reinforcement Expectancies and Successive Dmts Performance in Rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):321-321.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. L. Gránásy, T. Pusztai, T. Börzsönyi, G. I. Tóth, G. Tegze, J. A. Warren & J. F. Douglas (2006). Polycrystalline Patterns in Far-From-Equilibrium Freezing: A Phase Field Study. Philosophical Magazine 86 (24):3757-3778.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  45
    T. Douglas & J. Savulescu (2010). Synthetic Biology and the Ethics of Knowledge. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):687-693.
    Synthetic biologists aim to generate biological organisms according to rational design principles. Their work may have many beneficial applications, but it also raises potentially serious ethical concerns. In this article, we consider what attention the discipline demands from bioethicists. We argue that the most important issue for ethicists to examine is the risk that knowledge from synthetic biology will be misused, for example, in biological terrorism or warfare. To adequately address this concern, bioethics will need to broaden its scope, contemplating (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  19.  86
    Andrew J. Douglas (2013). C.L.R. James and the Struggle for Humanism. Constellations 20 (1):85-101.
  20.  24
    E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  18
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (2015). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Thinking and Reasoning 22 (1):57-77.
    We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with higher conspiracy belief. In Study 1 participants were more likely to agree with a range of conspiracy theories if they also tended to attribute intentionality and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  16
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Disease, Normality, and Current Pharmacological Moral Modification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):135-137.
  23.  64
    Douglas Dempster (1993). Renaturalizing Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (3):351-361.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  8
    Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews & Alan Regenberg (2015). Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  3
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu, Are You Morally Modified? : The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals.
    A number of concerns have been raised about the possible future use of pharmaceuticals designed to enhance cognitive, affective, and motivational processes, particularly where the aim is to produce morally better decisions or behavior. In this article, we draw attention to what is arguably a more worrying possibility: that pharmaceuticals currently in widespread therapeutic use are already having unintended effects on these processes, and thus on moral decision making and morally significant behavior. We review current evidence on the moral effects (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  12
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Are You Morally Modified?: The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):111-125.
  27.  14
    Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney (1985). Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:129-153.
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  5
    Andrew J. Douglas (2011). In a Milieu of Scarcity: Sartre and the Limits of Political Imagination. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3):354.
  29.  1
    Michael J. Wood & Karen M. Douglas (2015). Online Communication as a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  23
    A. J. Douglas (2010). Democratic Darkness and Adorno's Redemptive Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7):819-836.
    Adorno’s critical theory aims to open space for the expression of alternative futures, but its insistence on dialectical reflection encourages at the same time our sustained attentiveness to the psychic and material constraints that may prevent the very possibilities we imagine. In this article, I argue that dialectical reflection signals a location at which transcendental claims enter our thinking and that, for Adorno, such reflection provides a locus for a critically animating interplay between rhetorical figurations of darkness and redemption, or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Judith Boss, Giordano Bruno, Vere Chappell, John Cottingham, Peter A. Danielson, Rene Descartes, Thomas Douglas, John Finis, R. J. Hollingdale & Vittorio Hösle (1999). Boss, Judith and James M. Nuzum. Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):237.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  2
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (forthcoming). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories:1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  5
    J. J. B. Dempster, Thomas Kelly, J. P. Tuck, A. C. F. Beales, M. K. Richardson, Jean Floud, H. C. Barnard, P. P. Brown, Geoffrey Tillotson & Evelyn Lawrence (1957). Review Articles. British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (2):170-190.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  4
    Robert J. Douglas (1979). The Hippocampus and its Apparent Migration to the Parietal Lobe. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):498-499.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  11
    Douglas Dempster (1994). How Does Debussy's Sea Crash? How Can Jimi's Rocket Red Glare?: Kivy's Account of Representation in Music. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):415-428.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    A. E. Douglas & M. J. Lossau (1966). Untersuchungen Zur Antiken Demosthenesexegese. Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:190.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  3
    Douglas Dempster (2006). A experiência estética e as definições psicológicas de arte. Critica.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    Robert J. Douglas (1979). Working Memory, Interference, and Inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3):327-328.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. John M. Bartholow, Aaron J. Douglas & Jonathan G. Taylor (1995). Balancing Hydropower and Environmental Values: The Resource Management Implications of the US Electric Consumers Protection Act and the AWARE Software. Environmental Values 4 (3):257-270.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. P. P. Brown & J. J. B. Dempster (1956). Secondary Modern SchoolsPurpose in the Modern School. British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (1):92.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Marcus Tullius Cicero, J. G. F. Powell & A. E. Douglas (1990). Cicero, Laelius, on Friendship & the Dream of Scipio = Laelius de Amicitia & Somnium Scipionis. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  42. Eastern Church Committee, Rev J. A. Douglas & V. McN (1921). Canterbury and Constantinople. New Blackfriars 2 (16):249-251.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. J. J. B. Dempster, H. A. Ree, Harold Loukes & Robin Pedley (1957). The Essential Grammar SchoolSecondary ModernComprehensive Education: A New Approach. British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (2):170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. R. J. Douglas & R. Fletcher (1975). An Experimental Test of the Thermopower Equation. Philosophical Magazine 32 (1):73-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Andrew J. Douglas (2011). In a Milieu of Scarcity: Sartre and the Limits of Political Imagination. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3):354-371.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Andrew J. Douglas (2013). In the Spirit of Critique: Thinking Politically in the Dialectical Tradition. State University of New York Press.
    _Offers a new perspective on the political significance of the Hegelian dialectical legacy._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Andrew J. Douglas (2014). In the Spirit of Critique: Thinking Politically in the Dialectical Tradition. State University of New York Press.
    _Offers a new perspective on the political significance of the Hegelian dialectical legacy._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Susan J. Douglas (1987). Shifting Gears: Technology, Literature, Culture in Modernist AmericaCecelia Tichi. Isis 78 (4):661-662.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Susan J. Douglas (1990). Technology and SocietyThe Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of TechnologyWiebe E. Bijker Thomas P. Hughes Trevor Pinch. Isis 81 (1):80-83.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Carol G. Kelley, Amy R. Lipson, Barbara J. Daly & Sara L. Douglas (2006). Use of Advance Directives in the Chronically Critically Ill. Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 8 (2):42-47.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000