Search results for 'Douglas K. Charles' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Robert J. Jeske & Douglas K. Charles (eds.) (2003). Theory, Method, and Practice in Modern Archaeology. Praeger.
  2. John Stuart Mill & Charles Mackinnon Douglas (1897). The Ethics of John Stuart Mill [a System of Logic, Book 6 and Utilitarianism] Ed. With Intr. Essays by C. Douglas.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. C. E. Douglas (1920). R. H. Charles, The Revelation of St John. [REVIEW] Hibbert Journal 19:379.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. V. Douglas (2003). The International Institute Charles Perrault, France (IICP). Diogenes 198 (2):120-122.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. K. Lennon & D. Charles (eds.) (1992). Reduction, Explanation, and Realism. Oxford University Press.
    Reduction has long been a favourite method of analysis in all areas of philosophy, but in recent years there has been a reaction against it. The contributors to this volume examine the motivations for such anti-reductionist views and assess their coherence and success in a number of fields.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  7. P. M. Ryan & K. Douglas (2005). The Politics of Representation. In Thomas E. Wartenberg & Angela Curran (eds.), The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and Readings. Blackwell Pub. 213--224.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  42
    Charles Douglas, Ian Kerridge & Rachel Ankeny (2008). Managing Intentions: The End-of-Life Administration of Analgesics and Sedatives, and the Possibility of Slow Euthanasia. Bioethics 22 (7):388-396.
    There has been much debate regarding the 'double-effect' of sedatives and analgesics administered at the end-of-life, and the possibility that health professionals using these drugs are performing 'slow euthanasia.' On the one hand analgesics and sedatives can do much to relieve suffering in the terminally ill. On the other hand, they can hasten death. According to a standard view, the administration of analgesics and sedatives amounts to euthanasia when the drugs are given with an intention to hasten death. In this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  24
    Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny (2013). Narratives of 'Terminal Sedation', and the Importance of the Intention-Foresight Distinction in Palliative Care Practice. Bioethics 27 (1):1-11.
    The moral importance of the ‘intention–foresight’ distinction has long been a matter of philosophical controversy, particularly in the context of end-of-life care. Previous empirical research in Australia has suggested that general physicians and surgeons may use analgesic or sedative infusions with ambiguous intentions, their actions sometimes approximating ‘slow euthanasia’. In this paper, we report findings from a qualitative study of 18 Australian palliative care medical specialists, using in-depth interviews to address the use of sedation at the end of life. The (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  11
    Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny (2014). Double Meanings Will Not Save the Principle of Double Effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (3):304-316.
    In an article somewhat ironically entitled “Disambiguating Clinical Intentions,” Lynn Jansen promotes an idea that should be bewildering to anyone familiar with the literature on the intention/foresight distinction. According to Jansen, “intention” has two commonsense meanings, one of which is equivalent to “foresight.” Consequently, questions about intention are “infected” with ambiguity—people cannot tell what they mean and do not know how to answer them. This hypothesis is unsupported by evidence, but Jansen states it as if it were accepted fact. In (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  30
    Charles Douglas (1898). Critical Notices. Mind 7 (25):92-101.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  95
    Charles Douglas (2009). End-of-Life Decisions and Moral Psychology: Killing, Letting Die, Intention and Foresight. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):337-347.
    In contemplating any life and death moral dilemma, one is often struck by the possible importance of two distinctions; the distinction between killing and “letting die”, and the distinction between an intentional killing and an action aimed at some other outcome that causes death as a foreseen but unintended “side-effect”. Many feel intuitively that these distinctions are morally significant, but attempts to explain why this might be so have been unconvincing. In this paper, I explore the problem from an explicitly (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  20
    E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  47
    S. F., E. F. Stevenson, B. Russell, G. E. Moore, Charles Douglas, Henry Sturt, G. Dawes Hicks & C. A. F. Rhys-Davids (1898). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 7 (28):557-580.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  2
    Charles Douglas & Emily Proudfoot (2013). Nudging and the Complicated Real Life of “Informed Consent”. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):16-17.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  7
    Charles Douglas, Melanie Jansen & Ian Kerridge (2012). The Devil Is in the Detail: Best Practice, or Catholic Practice? American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):38 - 39.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 7, Page 38-39, July 2012.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Vasiliki K. Douglas (2010). The Inuulitsivik Maternities: Culturally Appropriate Midwifery and Epistemological Accommodation. Nursing Inquiry 17 (2):111-117.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  2
    W. R. Sorley, Margaret Washburn, W. B. Pillsbury, Hubert M. Foston, Charles Douglas, Alexander F. Shand, B. A. W. Russell, James Lindsay & W. R. Scott (1896). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 5 (17):119-133.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Andrew Halliday Douglas, Charles Douglas & R. P. Hardie (1911). The Philosophy and Psychology of Pietro Pomponazzi. Philosophical Review 20 (3):320-323.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  1
    M. Broggiato, W. Bruce, M. B. Charles, M. R. Cosgrove, A. Cucchiarelli, I. C. Cunningham, F. K. Drogula, M. M. Erginel, A. Faulkner & S. Francis (2011). Bobo de la Peña, M., Monochord And. Classical Quarterly 61:769-772.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Charles Douglas (1898). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 7 (28):569-a-569.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. P. L. Cannon, H. W. Carmichael, C. S. Casey, R. Catrambone, R. I. Charles, V. M. Chase, P. W. Cheng, M. T. H. Chi, M. Chiu & K. N. Clayton (1997). D Daehler, MW, 130,131,149,152, 153,155,156,157,172,183 Damasio, A., 88 Dattel, AR, 149,150,152,153,154. In Lyn D. English (ed.), Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images. L. Erlbaum Associates
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Camille Z. Charles, Mary J. Fischer, Margarita A. Mooney & Douglas S. Massey (2009). Taming the River: Negotiating the Academic, Financial, and Social Currents in Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton University Press.
    Building on their important findings in The Source of the River, the authors now probe even more deeply into minority underachievement at the college level. Taming the River examines the academic and social dynamics of different ethnic groups during the first two years of college. Focusing on racial differences in academic performance, the book identifies the causes of students' divergent grades and levels of personal satisfaction with their institutions. Using survey data collected from twenty-eight selective colleges and universities, Taming the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Timothy Paul Cronan, Jeffrey K. Mullins & David E. Douglas (forthcoming). Further Understanding Factors That Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework. Journal of Business Ethics.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Charles Douglas (1895/1978). John Stuart Mill: A Study of His Philosophy. R. West.
  26. Charles Douglas (1897). The ethics of John Stuart Mill, with introductory essays; 1 vol. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 44:219-220.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Charles Douglas (1897). Viii.—New Books. Mind 6 (4):571-a-571.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Charles Douglas (1896). Viii.—New Books. Mind 5 (1):124-a-124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Charles Douglas (1897). Vii.—Critical Notices. Mind 6 (1):107-112.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Mark Kelly, Andrew Mcgettigan, Matthew Charles & Douglas Spencer (2009). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 153.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  2
    John Stuart Mill & Charles Mackinnon Douglas (1897). The Ethics of John Stuart Mill. William Blackwood.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. David Charles (1999). Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):205–223.
    [David Charles] Aristotle, it appears, sometimes identifies well-being (eudaimonia) with one activity (intellectual contemplation), sometimes with several, including ethical virtue. I argue that this appearance is misleading. In the Nicomachean Ethics, intellectual contemplation is the central case of human well-being, but is not identical with it. Ethically virtuous activity is included in human well-being because it is an analogue of intellectual contemplation. This structure allows Aristotle to hold that while ethically virtuous activity is valuable in its own right, the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  12
    Sébastien Charles (2002). Berkeley's Principles and Dialogues. Background Source Materials Charles J. McCracken Et Ian C. Tipton Collection «Cambridge Philosophical Texts in Context» Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, X, 300 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (04):807-.
  34. S. Charles (forthcoming). Session of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Semiotics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Douglas K. Erlandson (1977). A New Look at Miracles: DOUGLAS K. ERLANDSON. Religious Studies 13 (4):417-428.
    Recently several philosophers have claimed that miracles cannot occur or that belief in them involves a misunderstanding of the scientific enterprise. In this paper I will argue that these claims, particularly the latter, are mistaken. By examining the characteristics of the believer's conception of the miraculous I will be able to show how he can meet these sceptical challenges. In particular, I will argue that the believer can hold that certain particular events are the result of intervention by divine agency (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Shōbōgenzō Zuimonki Dōgen (1997). Who is Arguing About the Cat? Moral Action and Enlightenment According to Dōgen By Douglas K. Mikkelson Philosophy East and West Vol. 47, No. 3 (July 1997). [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 47 (3):383-397.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Rhc Davis (1984). Douglas, David , Charles, 1898-1982-a Memoir. Proceedings of the British Academy 69:513-542.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Charles Burnett (ed.) (1999). Abū Ma‘Šar on Historical Astrology: The Book of Religions and Dynasties : Volume I: The Arabic Original: Abū Ma‘Šar, K. Al-Milal Wa D-Duwal . Arabic Text Edited by Keiji Yamamoto, with an English Translation by Keiji Yamamoto and Charles Burnett. Volume Ii: The Latin Versions: Albumas. [REVIEW] Brill.
    These volumes provide the Arabic, Latin and English versions of the major text on political astrology of the Middle Ages, generally attributed to Abū Ma‘šar , with a commentary and Latin-Arabic and Arabic-Latin glossaries.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Steven Yearley (1990). Reviews : Charles Crothers, Robert K. Merton (Key Sociologists Series), London: Tavistock, 1987, Paper £4.25, 176 Pp. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 3 (1):144-146.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Zenon Szablowinski (2015). Getting Even: Revenge as a Form of Justice. By Charles K. B. Barton. Pp. Xviii, 180, Open Court, 1999, £1.67. Ancient Forgiveness: Classical, Judaic, and Christian. Edited by Charles L. Griswold and David Konstan. Pp. Xv, 260, Cambridge University Press, 2012, £46.12. Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. By Linda Radzik. Pp. X, 244, Oxford University Press, 2009, £19.99. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 56 (5):863-865.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Lois A. Ebin (1987). Walter Scheps and J. Anna Looney, Middle Scots Poets: A Reference Guide to James I of Scotland, Robert Henryson, William Dunbar, and Gavin Douglas. (A Reference Guide to Literature.) Boston: G. K. Hall, 1986. Pp. Xvi, 292. $55. [REVIEW] Speculum 62 (4):1035-1036.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Arthur S. Peake (1909). Hegemonius: Ada Archelai, herausgegeben im Auftrage der Kirchenväter-Commission der K. Preuss. Ak. der Wiss. Von Charles Henry Beeson. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung. 1906. lvi + 134. Price M. 6. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (03):91-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  5
    George C. W. Warr (1895). In Memoriam: Charles Thomas Newton, K.C.B In Memoriam: Charles Thomas Newton, K.C.B. The Classical Review 9 (01):85-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  12
    J. P. Postgate (1902). Some Recent American Work in Latin Grammar The Subjunctive Substantive Clauses in Plautus Not Including Indirect Questions. By Charles L. Durham. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, No. Xiii. The Macmillan Company, 1901. Pp. Vi. 120. Price 80 Cents. The Stimulative Subjunctive in Latin. By Prof Charles E. Bennett, Cornell University. Transactions of the American Philological Association (Ginn & Co.) for 1900, Pp. 223–250. A Study in Case Rivalry Being an Investigation Regarding the Use of the Genitive and the Accusative in Latin with Verbs of Remembering and Forgetting. By Clinton L. Babcock. Cornell Studies, Xiv. The Macmillan Co. 1901. Pp. Vi. 120. Price 60 Cents. The Case Constructions After the Comparative in Latin. By K. P. R. Neville. Cornell Studies, Xv. The Macmillan Co. 1901. Pp. 87. Price 80 Cents. The Latin Pronouns is, Hio, Iste, Ipse. By Clarence Linton Meadee, Ph.D. Instructor in Latin in the University of Michigan. The Macmillan Co. New York; Macmillans. London. 1901. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (4):226-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  18
    Gerard McGill (2008). Bioethics: A Systematic Approach. By Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver, K. Danner Clouserbioethic: An Anthology. 2nd Edition. By Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer, Eds.Worth and Welfare in the Controversy Over Abortion. By Christopher Miles Coope. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 49 (3):507–510.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  13
    V. C. Chappell (1959). Book Review:Language, Thought, and Culture. Roger W. Brown, Irving M. Copi, Don E. Dulaney, William K. Frankena, Paul Henle, Charles L. Stevenson. [REVIEW] Ethics 70 (1):84-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    John R. Williams (2012). New Directions in Development Ethics: Essays in Honor of Denis Goulet. Edited by Charles K. Wilber and Amitava Krishna Dutt . Pp. Xv, 495, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 2010, $60.00. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (5):895-895.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  11
    Dan W. Brock (2000). Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver, and K. Danner Clouser, Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals:Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Ethics 110 (3):614-617.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  9
    William H. Panning (1981). Book Review:Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving Charles E. Lindblom, David K. Cohen. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (1):162-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000