Search results for 'Dr Kathleen Lennon' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  36
    Kathleen Lennon (1997). Feminist Epistemology as Local Epistemology: Kathleen Lennon. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):37–54.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Stephen Burwood, Paul Gilbert & Kathleen Lennon (1999). Philosophy of Mind Stephen Burwood, Paul Gilbert and Kathleen Lennon.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Kathleen Lennon (2015). Imagination and the Imaginary. Routledge.
    The concept of the imaginary is pervasive within contemporary thought, yet can be a baffling and often controversial term. In Imagination and the Imaginary , Kathleen Lennon explores the links between imagination - regarded as the faculty of creating images or forms - and the imaginary, which links such imagery with affect or emotion and captures the significance which the world carries for us. Beginning with an examination of contrasting theories of imagination proposed by Hume and Kant, (...) argues that the imaginary is not something in opposition to the real, but the very faculty through which the world is made real to us. She then turns to the vexed relationship between perception and imagination and, drawing on Kant, Merleau-Ponty and Sartre, explores some fundamental questions, such as whether there is a distinction between the perceived and the imagined; the relationship between imagination and creativity; and the role of the body in perception and imagination. Invoking also Spinoza and Coleridge, Lennon argues that, far from being a realm of illusion, the imaginary world is our most direct mode of perception. She then explores the role the imaginary plays in the formation of the self and the social world. A unique feature of the volume is that it compares and contrasts a philosophical tradition of thinking about the imagination - running from Kant and Hume to Strawson and John McDowell - with the work of phenomenological, psychoanalytic, poststructuralist and feminist thinkers such as Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Lacan, Castoriadis, Irigaray, Gatens and Lloyd. This makes I magination and the Imaginary essential reading for students and scholars working in phenomenology, philosophy of perception, social theory, cultural studies and aesthetics. Cover Image: Bronze Bowl with Lace , Ursula Von Rydingsvard, 2014. Courtesy the artist, Galerie Lelong and Yorkshire Sculpture Park. Photo Jonty Wilde. (shrink)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    Kathleen Lennon (1993). Explaining Human Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):726-731.
  5.  29
    Kathleen Lennon (2011). Imagination and the Expression of Emotion. Ratio 24 (3):282-298.
    Many writers offer accounts of our grasp of the expressive gestures of others, or of the expressive content of works of art, in terms of our imagining the experiences of another, or ourselves having certain experiences, or, in the case of works of art, a persona to have experiences. This invocation of what Kant would term, the reproductive imagination, in the perception of expressive content, is contested in this paper. In its place it is suggested that the detection of expressive (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  29
    Kathleen Lennon & Margaret Whitford (eds.) (1994). Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. Routledge.
    This collection is one of the first to offer feminist perspectives on epistemology from thinkers outside North America. It presents essays from an international group of contributors, including Rosi Braidotti, Gemma Corradi Fiumara, Anna Yeatman, Sabina Lovibond and Liz Stanley. Using approaches and methods from both analytic and continental philosophy, the contributors engage with questions of traditional epistemology and with issues raised by postmodernist critiques. The essays deal with the central question of difference: the difference which a feminist perspective yields (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  16
    Kathleen Lennon (2003). Naturalizing and Interpretive Turns in Epistemology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):245 – 259.
    In this paper I want to suggest that causal and interpretive approaches to epistemology are in tension with one another. Drawing on the work of hermeneutic writers I suggest that epistemological justification is an interpretive process. The possibility of rational justification requires attention to our locatedness within the domain of reasons, into which we have been culturally initiated. The recognition that there is no transcendent processes of rational justification has to be addressed from within this framework and cannot be resolved (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  32
    Kathleen Lennon (2000). Normativity, Naturalism and Perspectivity. Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):138 – 151.
    Normative links have been considered a problem for reductionist theories of mind, primarily because of lack of isomorphism between intentional and non-intentional conceptual schemes. The paper suggests a more radical tension between normative rationality and scientific naturalism. Normative explanations involve the recognition that agents are also subjects of experience. The distinctive form of intelligibility they bestow requires engagement with such subjectivity.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  34
    Kathleen Lennon (2004). Imaginary Bodies and Worlds. Inquiry 47 (2):107 – 122.
    In this paper I distil a concept of the imaginary with which to make good the claim that our mode of embodied subjectivity is an imaginary embodiment in an imaginary world. The concept of the imaginary employed is not one in which imaginary worlds are contrasted with the real, but one in which imagination is a condition of there being a real for us. The images and forms in terms of which our imagined bodies and worlds are constituted carry, in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  20
    Kathleen Lennon (1984). Anti-Reductionist Materialism. Inquiry 27 (December):363-380.
    This paper characterizes a form of materialism which is strongly anti?reductionist with regard to mental predicates. It argues against the functionalist views of writers such as Brian Loar on the basis that the counterfactual interdependencies of intentional states are governed by constraints of rationality embodied in semantic links which cannot be captured in non?intentional, functionalist terms. However, contrary to what is commonly supposed, such anti?reductionism requires neither instrumentalism about the mental nor opposition to a causal explanatory view of intentional explanation. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  27
    Kathleen Lennon (2009). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing – Miranda Fricker. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):177-178.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  21
    Kathleen Lennon (2010). Feminist Perspectives on the Body. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  11
    Ismay Barwell & Kathleen Lennon (1982). The Principle of Sufficient Reason. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:19 - 33.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    Kathleen Lennon (1986). Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals. Philosophical Books 27 (3):183-185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  2
    Kathleen Lennon (2004). Feminist Epistemology. In M. Sintonen, J. Wolenski & I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Kluwer 1013--1026.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Jennifer Hornsby, Carl Ginet, Kathleen Lennon & Carlos J. Moya (1991). On Action.Explaining Human Action.The Philosophy of Action: An Introduction. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):498.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Kathleen Lennon (1988). Women in Western Political Philosophy: Kant to Nietzsche. Philosophical Books 29 (4):204-205.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  2
    Kathleen Lennon (1985). The Man of Reason. Philosophical Books 26 (4):221-223.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Steve Burwood, Kathleen Lennon & Paul Gilbert (1998). Philosophy of Mind. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    The authors explain the ideas of philosophers such as Wittgenstein, Putnam, Fodor, Davidson, Dennett, and Merleau-Ponty and examine the famous examples these and other philosophers have introduced. They also provide an overview of the issues and debates involving reductionism, functionalism, computational theories of mind, connectionism, the language of thought, externalism versus internalism in the theory of thought content, interpretationism, the problem of consciousness, and theories of experience. The fresh and incisive perspective of Philosophy of Mind will be of interest to (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Steve Burwood, Kathleen Lennon & Paul Gilbert (1998). Philosophy of Mind. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    The authors explain the ideas of philosophers such as Wittgenstein, Putnam, Fodor, Davidson, Dennett, and Merleau-Ponty and examine the famous examples these and other philosophers have introduced. They also provide an overview of the issues and debates involving reductionism, functionalism, computational theories of mind, connectionism, the language of thought, externalism versus internalism in the theory of thought content, interpretationism, the problem of consciousness, and theories of experience. The fresh and incisive perspective of Philosophy of Mind will be of interest to (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. David Charles & Kathleen Lennon (eds.) (1992). Reduction, Explanation, and Realism. Oxford University Press.
    The contributors to this volume examine the motivations for anti-reductionist views, and assess their coherence and success, in a number of different fields, including moral and mental philosophy, psychology, organic biology, and the social sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Paul Gilbert & Kathleen Lennon (1998). Philosophy of Mind. Routledge.
    A welcome introduction to one of the most intellectually demanding areas of the undergraduate philosophy curriculum. The authors provide a clear framework within which students can fit contemporary developments in the Anglo-American tradition which provide the core themes of philosophy of mind and which connect to their other work in epistemology and philosophy of language.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Paul Gilbert & Kathleen Lennon (2005). Philosophy of Mind. Routledge.
    A welcome introduction to one of the most intellectually demanding areas of the undergraduate philosophy curriculum. The authors provide a clear framework within which students can fit contemporary developments in the Anglo-American tradition which provide the core themes of philosophy of mind and which connect to their other work in epistemology and philosophy of language.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jean Grimshaw & Kathleen Lennon (1995). Conference Report: Chinese Women and Feminist Thought, Beijing,22-24 June 1995. Radical Philosophy 74.
  25. Kathleen Lennon (1982). Intentional Explanation and its Implications for the Philosophy of Mind.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Kathleen Lennon (1992). Judith Butler. "Gender Trouble". [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):125.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Kathleen Lennon & Margaret Whitford (eds.) (2012). Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. Routledge.
    Including contributions from an international list of renowned authors, this text seeks to address the controversial issue of difference in feminist philosophy, using approaches from both analytic and continental thinking.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Kathleen Lennon (1988). Len Doyal and Roger Harris, Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality. Radical Philosophy 48:49.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Kathleen Lennon (2006). Making Life Livable-Transsexuality and Bodily Transformation. Radical Philosophy 140:26-34.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Kathleen Lennon (1992). Reduction, Causality and Normativity. In K. Lennon & D. Charles (eds.), Reduction, Explanation, and Realism. Oxford University Press 225--38.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Kathleen Lennon (1999). Simple Mindedness: In Defense of Naive Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 94.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Kathleen Lennon (1996). The Essential Difference. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 79.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Kathleen Lennon (1998). The Mechanical Mind; Philosophy of Mind and Cognition; Philosophy of Mind; Contemporary Philosophy of Mind; Mental Reality; The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory; The Mind and Its World; Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 87.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Kathleen Lennon (1996). The ‘Racial’ Economy of Science. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 75.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Wayne I. Henry (1994). David Charles and Kathleen Lennon, Eds., Reduction, Explanation, and Realism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (2):79-82.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  8
    M. W. Rowe (1995). Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology Edited By Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford Routledge,London 1994, 300 Pp., £12.99(Pb) £37.50(Hb). [REVIEW] Philosophy 70 (271):127-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  3
    Constance Harris, Kazuhiko Matsuda & David B. Sattelle (2013). Dr. Kathleen Drew‐Baker,“Mother of the Sea”, a Manchester Scientist Celebrated Each Year for Half a Century in Japan. Bioessays 35 (9):838-839.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Karl Pfeifer (1991). Kathleen Lennon, Explaining Human Action Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 11 (4):263-265.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. J. Grimshaw (forthcoming). Kathleen Lennon and Margaret Whitford, Eds, Knowing the Difference. Radical Philosophy.
  40. Karl Pfeifer (1991). Kathleen Lennon, Explaining Human Action. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 11:263-265.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Alessandra Tanesini, The Nature and Content of Experience: The World, The Flesh and the Subject by Paul Gilbert and Kathleen Lennon [Commentary].
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Jane Heal (1995). Lennon, Kathleen and Whitford, Margaret Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. [REVIEW] Philosophy 70:127.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  35
    Kathleen Penton (2002). Dr. Russell McCutcheon Religious Studies 490-001 2 May 2002 Success Found in Defeat. Religious Studies 490:001.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  17
    Kathleen C. Gerbasi, Laura L. Scaletta, C. Nuka Plante & Penny L. Bernstein (2011). Why so FURious? Rebuttal of Dr. Fiona Probyn-Rapsey's Response to Gerbasi Et Al.'S Furries From A to Z (Anthropomorphism to Zoomorphism)”. Society and Animals 19 (3):302-304.
    This is a rebuttal to Fiona Probyn-Rapsey’s criticisms of the original furry research conducted in 2006 and published in 2008. Her focus on gender identity disorder misses the main point of the study, which was that it was the first empirical study to collect data scientifically and report findings on the furry fandom, an often misrepresented subculture.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  6
    Kathleen C. Gerbasi, Penny L. Bernstein, Laura L. Scaletta & C. Nuka Plante (2011). Why so FURious? Rebuttal of Dr. Fiona Probyn-Rapsey’s Response to Gerbasi Et Al.'s Furries From A to Z ”. Society and Animals 19 (3):302-304.
    This is a rebuttal to Fiona Probyn-Rapsey’s criticisms of the original furry research conducted in 2006 and published in 2008. Her focus on gender identity disorder misses the main point of the study, which was that it was the first empirical study to collect data scientifically and report findings on the furry fandom, an often misrepresented subculture.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  1
    Kathleen Cranley Glass (1995). Reply to Dr. Ellen Burgess. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 23 (2):212-212.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Kathleen Cranley Glass (1995). Reply to Dr. Ellen Burgess. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):212-212.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    Desh Raj Sirswal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Modern Indian Philosopher.
    Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is one of the names that changed social order of the age-old tradition of suppression and humiliation. He was an intellectual, scholar & statesman and contributed greatly in the nation building. He led a number of movements to emancipate the downtrodden masses and to secure human rights to millions of depressed classes. He has left an indelible imprint through his immense contribution in framing the modern Constitution of free India. He stands as a symbol of struggle for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  4
    Desh Raj Sirswal, The Role of Religious and Spiritual Values in Shaping Humanity (A Study of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s Religious Philosophy).
    Values are an important part of human existence, his society and human relations. All social, economic, political, and religious problems are in one sense is reflection of this special abstraction of human knowledge. We are living in a globalized village and thinking much about values rather than practice of it. If we define religion and spirituality we can say that religion is a set of beliefs and rituals that claim to get a person in a right relationship with God, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Dr Michael D. Coovert, Kathleen McNelis, Kamesh Ramakrishna & Eduardo Salas (1989). Preferences for Power in Expert Systems by Novice Users. AI and Society 3 (1):59-61.
1 — 50 / 1000