Search results for 'E. C. W. Krabbe' (try it on Scholar)

5 found
Sort by:
  1. D. van Dalen, H. Mulder, E. C. W. Krabbe & A. Visser (1986). Finite Kripke Models of ${\Rm HA}$ Are Locally ${\Rm PA}$. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (4):528-532.score: 502.5
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Erik C. W. Krabbe (1985). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 63 (3):295 - 328.score: 315.0
    Section 1 contains a survey of options in constructing a formal system of dialogue rules. The distinction between material and formal systems is discussed (section 1.1). It is stressed that the material systems are, in several senses, formal as well. In section 1.2 variants as to language form (choices of logical constants and logical rules) are pointed out. Section 1.3 is concerned with options as to initial positions and the permissibility of attacks on elementary statements. The problem of ending a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Erick C. W. Krabbe (1984). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.score: 315.0
    Section 1 contains a survey of options in constructing a formal system of dialogue rules. The distinction between material and formal systems is discussed (section 1.1). It is stressed that the material systems are, in several senses, formal as well. In section 1.2 variants as to language form (choices of logical constants and logical rules) are pointed out. Section 1.3 is concerned with options as to initial positions and the permissibility of attacks on elementary statements. The problem of ending a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Erik C. W. Krabbe (2007). On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage. Argumentation 21 (3):233-242.score: 315.0
    Any well-structured argumentative exchange must be preceded by some preparatory stages. In the pragma-dialectical four-stage model of critical discussion, the clarification of issues and positions is relegated to the confrontation stage and the other preparatory matters are dealt within the opening stage. In the opening stage, the parties involved come to agree to discuss their differences and to do so by an argumentative exchange rather than by, say, a sequence of bids and offers. They should also come to agree on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Woods (2007). Agendas, Relevance and Dialogic Ascent. Argumentation 21 (3):209-221.score: 51.0
    E. C. W. Krabbe characterizes a metadialogue as a dialogue about a dialogue, which in turn, is characterized as a ground level dialogue. Krabbe raises a number of interesting questions about this distinction, of which the most pressing is whether the difference between ground level and metadialogues can be drawn in a principled and suitably general way. In this note, I develop the idea that something counts as a metadialogue to the extent that it stands to its ground (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation