79 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Earl Conee [69]E. Conee [7]Earl Brink Conee [3]Earl B. Conee [1]
  1.  370 DLs
    Earl Conee (1994). Phenomenal Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (2):136-150.
  2.  284 DLs
    Earl Conee, Opposing Skepticism Disjunctively.
    Disjunctivists hold that perceiving external objects is fundamentally different from any experiential state that is not a perception. In fact, roughly speaking, disjunctivists say that they have nothing in common. Suppose that it appears to someone as though she perceives something. Disjunctivists say that there are two disparate sorts of facts that could make this true. Either she is genuinely perceiving something, or she is in an experiential state of merely apparent perception. An apparent perception is fundamentally unlike a perception. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  273 DLs
    Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
  4.  233 DLs
    E. Conee & R. Feldman (1998). The Generality Problem for Reliabilism. Philosophical Studies 89 (1):1-29.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  169 DLs
    Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2004). Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.
    Evidentialism holds that the justified attitudes are determined entirely by the person's evidence. This is the traditional view ofjustification.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  166 DLs
    Earl Conee (1980). Propositional Justification. Philosophical Studies 38 (1):65 - 68.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7.  140 DLs
    E. Conee (1999). Metaphysics and the Morality of Abortion. Mind 108 (432):619-646.
    Conclusions about the morality of abortion have been thought to receive some support from metaphysical doctrines about persons. The paper studies four instances in which philosophers have sought to draw such morals from metaphysics. It argues that in each instance the metaphysics makes no moral difference, and the manner of failure seems indicative of a general epistemic irrelevance of metaphysics to the moral issue.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8.  134 DLs
    Earl Conee (2001). Heeding Misleading Evidence. Philosophical Studies 103 (2):99-120.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  122 DLs
    Earl Conee (2004). Externalism, Internalism, and Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):78–90.
  10.  118 DLs
    Earl Brink Conee (2005/2007). Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
    Personal identity -- Fatalism -- Time -- God -- Why not nothing? -- Free will and determinism -- Constitution -- Universals -- Possibility and necessity -- What is metaphysics?
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11.  114 DLs
    Earl Conee (2013). The Specificity of the Generality Problem. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):751-762.
    In “Why the generality problem is everybody’s problem,” Michael Bishop argues that every theory of justification needs a solution to the generality problem. He contends that a solution is needed in order for any theory to be used in giving an acceptable account of the justificatory status of beliefs in certain examples. In response, first I will describe the generality problem that is specific to process reliabilism and two other sorts of problems that are essentially the same. Then I will (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12.  111 DLs
    Earl Brink Conee (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Evidentialism is a view about the conditions under which a person is epistemically justified in having a particular doxastic attitude toward a proposition. Evidentialism holds that the justified attitudes are determined entirely by the person's evidence. This is the traditional view of justification. It is now widely opposed. The essays included in this volume develop and defend the tradition. Evidentialism has many assets. In addition to providing an intuitively plausible account of epistemic justification, it helps to resolve the problem of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13.  98 DLs
    Earl Conee (2007). Disjunctivism and Anti-Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):16–36.
  14.  82 DLs
    Earl Conee (2009). Criterial Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 143 (3):417--426.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15.  78 DLs
    Earl Conee (2009). Peerage. Episteme 6 (3):313-323.
    Experts take sides in standing scholarly disagreements. They rely on the epistemic reasons favorable to their side to justify their position. It is argued here that no position actually has an overall balance of undefeated reasons in its favor. Candidates for such reasons include the objective strength of the rational support for one side, the special force of details in the case for one side, and a summary impression of truth. All such factors fail to justify any position.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16.  73 DLs
    Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2001). Internalism Defended. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1):1 - 18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17.  68 DLs
    E. Conee (2011). Modal Realism, Counterpart Theory, and the Possibility of Multiversal Rectitude. Analysis 71 (4):680-684.
    Jim Stone has argued that a multiversal version of Modal Realism together with Counterpart Theory cannot account for a certain intuitive possibility. Roughly, it is the possibility that all free moral choices of a certain sort are the right choices in all cases in the multiverse. The present work offers an explanation of how the metaphysics in question can account for the intuitive possibility in question.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18.  64 DLs
    Earl Conee (2005). The Comforts of Home. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):444–451.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19.  62 DLs
    Earl Conee (1985). The Possibility of Absent Qualia. Philosophical Review 94 (July):345-66.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20.  62 DLs
    Earl Conee (2008). Critical Notices: Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):837-840.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21.  60 DLs
    Earl Conee (1985). Physicalism and Phenomenal Properties. Philosophical Quarterly 35 (July):296-302.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22.  60 DLs
    Earl Conee (1982). Against Moral Dilemmas. Philosophical Review 91 (1):87-97.
    E j lemmon, B a o williams, Bas van fraassen, And ruth marcus have argued on behalf of the existence of moral dilemmas, I.E., Cases where an agent is subject to conflicting absolute moral obligations. The paper criticizes this support and contends that no moral dilemma is possible.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23.  58 DLs
    Earl Conee (2012). Self—Support. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):419-446.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24.  56 DLs
    Eva Bodanszky & Earl Conee (1981). Isolating Intrinsic Value. Analysis 41 (1):51 - 53.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25.  53 DLs
    Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2001). Internalism Defended. In Hilary Kornblith (ed.), American Philosophical Quarterly. Blackwell 1 - 18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26.  51 DLs
    Earl Conee (1995). Supervenience and Intentionality. In Elias E. Savellos & Ümit D. Yalçin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Needham Heights: Cambridge
  27.  47 DLs
    Earl Conee (1992). The Truth Connection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):657-669.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28.  46 DLs
    Theodore Sider & Earl Conee (2005/2007). Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics. Oxford.
    No philosophical background is required to enjoy this book: anyone who has thought about life's most profound questions will find plenty to provoke and entertain them here.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29.  45 DLs
    Earl Conee (1982). Instrumental Value Without Intrinsic Value? Philosophia 11 (3-4):345-359.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30.  43 DLs
    Earl Conee (1998). Seeing the Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):847-857.
    Some propositions are obvious in their own right. We can `just see' that they are true. So there is some such epistemic phenomenon as seeing the truth of a proposition. This paper investigates the nature of this phenomenon. The aptness of the visual metaphor is explained. Accounts of the phenomenon requiring qualia by which the truth is apprehended are disputed. A limited theory is developed and applied.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31.  43 DLs
    E. Conee (2001). Friendship and Consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):161 – 179.
  32.  39 DLs
    Earl Conee (2000). Reply to Timothy Chappell. Mind 109 (434):281-283.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33.  39 DLs
    Earl Conee (2001). Comments on Bill Lycan's Moore Against the New Skeptics. Philosophical Studies 103 (1):55 - 59.
  34.  39 DLs
    Earl Conee (1994). The Nature and the Impossibility of Moral Perfection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):815-825.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35.  37 DLs
    Earl Conee (1984). A Defense of Pain. Philosophical Studies 46 (September):239-48.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36.  37 DLs
    Earl Conee (1991). The Possibility of Power Beyond Possibility. Philosophical Perspectives 5:447-473.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37.  36 DLs
    Earl Conee (2000). The Moral Value in Promises. Philosophical Review 109 (3):411-422.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38.  36 DLs
    Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2002). Typing Problems. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):98-105.
    Guided by the work of William Alston, Jonathan Adler and Michael Levin propose a solution to the generality problem for reliabilism. In some respects their proposal improves on those we have discussed. We argue that the problem remains unsolved.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39.  33 DLs
    Earl Conee (1987). Evident, but Rationally Unacceptable. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (3):316 – 326.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40.  31 DLs
    Earl Conee (1989). Why Moral Dilemmas Are Impossible. American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (2):133 - 141.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41.  29 DLs
    Earl Conee (2002). Typing Problems. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):98 - 105.
    Guided by the work of William Alston, Jonathan Adler and Michael Levin propose a solution to the generality problem for reliabilism. In some respects their proposal improves on those we have discussed. We argue that the problem remains unsolved.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42.  25 DLs
    Earl Conee (1985). Physicalism and Phenomenal Qualities. Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):296-302.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43.  25 DLs
    Earl Conee (1994). Against an Epistemic Dilemma. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (4):475 – 481.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44.  24 DLs
    Earl Conee (2007). Review of Jonathan Sutton, Without Justification. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45.  24 DLs
    Earl Conee (forthcoming). Debasing Skepticism Refuted. Episteme:1-11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46.  22 DLs
    Earl Conee (2008). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):837-840.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47.  21 DLs
    Earl Conee (2002). Innocuous Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):406-408.
    Alan Sidelle has offered an argument to show that internalism about justification implies us to have a certain sort of infallibility concerning some internal facts. This is true but harmless to internalism.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48.  18 DLs
    Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2005). Some Virtues of Evidentialism. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 50 (4):95-108.
    O evidencialismo é, primordialmente, uma tese sobre a justificação epistêmica e, secundariamente, uma tese sobre o conhecimento. Sustenta que a justificação epistêmica é superveniente da evidência. As versões do evidencialismo diferem quanto ao que conta como evidência, quanto ao que seja possuir algo como evidência e quanto ao que um dado corpo de evidência apóia. A tese secundária é a de que o apoio evidencial é necessário ao conhecimento. O evidencialismo ajuda a formular as questões epistemológicas de uma forma que (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49.  18 DLs
    Earl Conee (1988). Why Solve the Gettier Problem? In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 55--58.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50.  15 DLs
    E. Conee (2001). Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Philosophical Review 110 (3):428-430.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 79