5 found
Order:
  1. E. G. Zahar (1995). The Problem of the Empirical Basis. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:45-74.
    In this paper I shall venture into an area with which I am not very familiar and in which I feel far from confident; namely into phenomenology. My main motive is not to get away from standard, boring, methodological questions like those of induction and demarcation; but the conviction that a phenomenological account of the empirical basis forms a necessary complement to Popper's falsificationism. According to the latter, a scientific theory is a synthetic and universal, hence unverifiable proposition. In fact, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2. E. G. Zahar (1997). Poincarés Philosophy of Geometry, or Does Geometric Conventionalism Deserve its Name? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):183-218.
  3.  20
    E. G. Zahar (1983). The Popper-Lakatos Controversy in the Light of 'Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (2):149-171.
  4.  5
    E. G. Zahar (2004). Alain Boyer, Hors du temps: Un essai sur Kant:Hors du temps: Un essai sur Kant. Ethics 114 (4):806-810.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. E. G. Zahar (1997). Poincarés Philosophy of Geometry, or Does Geometric Conventionalism Deserve its Name? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):183-218.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography