4 found
  1. E. G. Zahar (1995). The Problem of the Empirical Basis. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:45-74.
    In this paper I shall venture into an area with which I am not very familiar and in which I feel far from confident; namely into phenomenology. My main motive is not to get away from standard, boring, methodological questions like those of induction and demarcation; but the conviction that a phenomenological account of the empirical basis forms a necessary complement to Popper's falsificationism. According to the latter, a scientific theory is a synthetic and universal, hence unverifiable proposition. In fact, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. E. G. Zahar (1997). Poincarés Philosophy of Geometry, or Does Geometric Conventionalism Deserve its Name? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):183-218.
  3.  19
    E. G. Zahar (1983). The Popper-Lakatos Controversy in the Light of 'Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (2):149-171.
  4.  5
    E. G. Zahar (2004). Alain Boyer, Hors du temps: Un essai sur Kant:Hors du temps: Un essai sur Kant. Ethics 114 (4):806-810.
      Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography