PhilPapers is currently in read-only mode while we are performing some maintenance. You can use the site normally except that you cannot sign in. This shouldn't last long.
166 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Erik Weber [98]Eric Thomas Weber [22]Eugen Weber [12]E. Weber [8]
Elisabeth Weber [8]Elke U. Weber [6]Édouard-Henri Wéber [6]Elijah Weber [4]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Eric Thomas Weber (University of Mississippi)
Profile: Elijah Weber (Bowling Green State University)
  1. Eli Weber (2015). Vulnerability, Dependence, and Special Obligations to Domesticated Animals: A Reply to Palmer. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):683-694.
    Clare Palmer has recently argued that most humans have special obligations to assist domesticated animals, because domestication creates vulnerable, dependent individuals, and most humans benefit from the institution of domestication. I argue that Palmer has given us no grounds for accepting this claim, and that one of the key premises in her argument for this claim is false. Next, I argue that voluntarism, which is the view that one acquires special obligations only by consenting to those obligations in some way, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eric Thomas Weber (2015). Lessons From America's Public Philosopher. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29 (1):118-135.
    This article argues for a definition of public philosophy inspired by John Dewey’s understanding of the “supreme intellectual obligation.” The first section examines five strong reasons why more public philosophy is needed and why the growing movement in public philosophy should be encouraged. The second section begins with a review of common understandings of public philosophy as well as some initial challenges that call for widening our conception of the practice. Then, it applies Dewey’s argument in “The Supreme Intellectual Obligation” (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joachim Frans & Erik Weber (2014). Mechanistic Explanation and Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 22 (2):231-248.
    Although there is a consensus among philosophers of mathematics and mathematicians that mathematical explanations exist, only a few authors have proposed accounts of explanation in mathematics. These accounts fit into the unificationist or top-down approach to explanation. We argue that these models can be complemented by a bottom-up approach to explanation in mathematics. We introduce the mechanistic model of explanation in science and discuss the possibility of using this model in mathematics, arguing that using it does not presuppose a Platonist (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dingmar van Eck & Erik Weber (2014). Function Ascription and Explanation: Elaborating an Explanatory Utility Desideratum for Ascriptions of Technical Functions. Erkenntnis 79 (6):1367-1389.
    Current philosophical theorizing about technical functions is mainly focused on specifying conditions under which agents are justified in ascribing functions to technical artifacts. Yet, assessing the precise explanatory relevance of such function ascriptions is, by and large, a neglected topic in the philosophy of technical artifacts and technical functions. We assess the explanatory utility of ascriptions of technical functions in the following three explanation-seeking contexts: why was artifact x produced?, why does artifact x not have the expected capacity to ϕ?, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eric Thomas Weber (2014). Converging on Culture: Rorty, Rawls, and Dewey on Culture’s Role in Justice. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 22 (2):231-261.
    In this essay, I review the writings of three philosophers whose work converges on the insight that we must attend to and reconstruct culture for the sake of justice. John Rawls, John Dewey, and Richard Rorty help show some of the ways in which culture can enable or undermine the pursuit of justice. They also offer resources for identifying tools for addressing the cultural challenges impeding justice. I reveal insights and challenges in Rawls’s philosophy as well as tools and solutions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Erik Weber & Merel Lefevere (2014). The Role of Unification in Micro-Explanations of Physical Laws. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (1):41-56.
    In the literature on scientific explanation, there is a classical distinction between explanations of particular facts and explanations of laws. This paper is about explanations of laws, more specifically about microexplanations of laws in physics. We investigate whether providing unificatory information has a surplus value in micro-explanations of physical laws. Unificatory information is information that provides ontological unification in the sense defined by Uskali Mäki. We argue that providing unificatory information may lead to explanations with more explanatory power and that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Brian E. Butler, Matthew J. Brown, Phillip Deen, Loren Goldman, John Kaag, John Ryder, Patricia Shields, Joseph Soeters & Eric Thomas Weber (2013). Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lexington Books.
    Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations bridges the gap between philosophical pragmatism and international relations, two disciplinary perspectives that together shed light on how to advance the study and conduct of foreign affairs. Authors in this collection discuss a broad range of issues, from policy relevance to peacekeeping operations, with an eye to understanding how this distinctly American philosophy, pragmatism, can improve both international relations research and foreign policy practice.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Raoul Gervais & Erik Weber (2013). Inferential Explanations in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):356-364.
    Among philosophers of science, there is now a widespread agreement that the DN model of explanation is poorly equipped to account for explanations in biology. Rather than identifying laws, so the consensus goes, researchers explain biological capacities by constructing a model of the underlying mechanism.We think that the dichotomy between DN explanations and mechanistic explanations is misleading. In this article, we argue that there are cases in which biological capacities are explained without constructing a model of the underlying mechanism. Although (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Raoul Gervais & Erik Weber (2013). Plausibility Versus Richness in Mechanistic Models. Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):139-152.
    In this paper we argue that in recent literature on mechanistic explanations, authors tend to conflate two distinct features that mechanistic models can have or fail to have: plausibility and richness. By plausibility, we mean the probability that a model is correct in the assertions it makes regarding the parts and operations of the mechanism, i.e., that the model is correct as a description of the actual mechanism. By richness, we mean the amount of detail the model gives about the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Bert Leuridan & Erik Weber (2013). Causality and Explanation in the Sciences: The Rest of the Best. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 78 (2):147-151.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. E. Weber, T. A. C. Reydon, M. Boon, W. Houkes & P. E. Vermaas (2013). The ICE-Theory of Technical Functions. Metascience 22 (1):23-44.
    The ICE-theory of technical functions Content Type Journal Article Category Book Symposium Pages 1-22 DOI 10.1007/s11016-012-9642-9 Authors E. Weber, Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University (UGent), Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium T. A. C. Reydon, Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167 Hannover, Germany M. Boon, Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands W. Houkes, Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Elisabeth Weber (ed.) (2013). Living Together: Jacques Derrida's Communities of Violence and Peace. Fordham University Press.
    " In this volume, the paradoxes, impossibilities, and singular chances that haunt the necessity of "living together" are evoked in Derrida's essay "Avowing--The Impossible: 'Returns,' Repentance, and Reconciliation," around which the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel & Leen De Vreese (2013). Scientific Explanation. Springer.
    When scientist investigate why things happen, they aim at giving an explanation. But what does a scientific explanation look like? In the first chapter (Theories of Scientific Explanation) of this book, the milestones in the debate on how to characterize scientific explanations are exposed. The second chapter (How to Study Scientific Explanation?) scrutinizes the working-method of three important philosophers of explanation, Carl Hempel, Philip Kitcher and Wesley Salmon and shows what went wrong. Next, it is the responsibility of current philosophers (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Bert Leuridan & Erik Weber (2012). Causality and Explanation in the Sciences. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (2):133-136.
    Editors’ introduction to the special issue on the Causality and Explanation in the Sciences conference, held at the University of Ghent in September 2011.Presentación del número monográfico sobre el congreso Causality and Explanation in the Sciences, celebrado en la Universidad de Gante en septiembre de 2011.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Dunja Šešelja & Erik Weber (2012). Rationality and Irrationality in the History of Continental Drift: Was the Hypothesis of Continental Drift Worthy of Pursuit? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):147-159.
  16. Elijah Weber (2012). Context-Dependence in Searle's Impossibility Argument: A Reply to Butchard and D'Amico. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):433-444.
    John Searle claims that social-scientific laws are impossible because social phenomena are physically open-ended. William Butchard and Robert D’Amico have recently argued that, by Searle’s own lights, money is a social phenomena that is physically closed. However, Butchard and D’Amico rely on a limited set of data in order to draw this conclusion, and fail to appreciate the implications of Searle’s theory of social ontology with regard to the physical open-endedness of money. Money is not physically open-ended in the strong (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Eric Thomas Weber (2012). Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint (Review). The Pluralist 7 (3):136-139.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eric Thomas Weber (2012). Review Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint Kellogg Frederic R. Cambridge UP New York. The Pluralist 7 (3):136-139.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Erik Weber & Leen De Vreese (2012). Causation in Perspective. Are All Causal Claims Equally Warranted? Philosophica 84.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel & Merel Lefevere (2012). The Role of Unification in Explanations of Facts. In Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer
    In the literature on scientific explanation, there is a classical distinction between explanations of facts and explanations of laws. This paper is about explanations of facts. Our aim is to analyse the role of unification in explanations of this kind. We discuss five positions with respect to this role, argue for two of them and refute the three others.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2012). Rationally Evaluating Inconsistent Theories. Philosophica 86.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Erik Weber, Dietlinde Wouters & Joke Meheus (2012). Introduction. Philosophica 86 (4):319-322.
    This introduction clarifies the ideas behind the Logic, Reasoning and Rationality congress from which the papers in this issue are selected. These ideas are situated in the history of 20th century philosophy (Vienna Circle, Kuhn, ...). We also give an overview of the papers in this issue.
    Direct download (18 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jeroen Van Bouwel, Erik Weber & Leen De Vreese (2011). Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive Explanations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):33 - 46.
    Instances of explanatory reduction are often advocated on metaphysical grounds; given that the only real things in the world are subatomic particles and their interaction, we have to try to explain everything in terms of the laws of physics. In this paper, we show that explanatory reduction cannot be defended on metaphysical grounds. Nevertheless, indispensability arguments for reductive explanations can be developed, taking into account actual scientific practice and the role of epistemic interests. Reductive explanations might be indispensable to address (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Raoul Gervais & Erik Weber (2011). The Covering Law Model Applied to Dynamical Cognitive Science: A Comment on Joel Walmsley. Minds and Machines 21 (1):33-39.
    In a 2008 paper, Walmsley argued that the explanations employed in the dynamical approach to cognitive science, as exemplified by the Haken, Kelso and Bunz model of rhythmic finger movement, and the model of infant preservative reaching developed by Esther Thelen and her colleagues, conform to Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim’s deductive-nomological model of explanation (also known as the covering law model). Although we think Walmsley’s approach is methodologically sound in that it starts with an analysis of scientific practice rather (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Bert Leuridan & Erik Weber (2011). The IARC and Mechanistic Evidence. In Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press 91--109.
    The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is an organization which seeks to identify the causes of human cancer. Per agent, such as betel quid or Human Papillomaviruses, they review the available evidence deriving from epidemiological studies, animal experiments and information about mechanisms (and other data). The evidence of the different groups is combined such that an overall assessment of the carcinogenicity of the agent in question is obtained. In this paper, we critically review the IARC’s carcinogenicity evaluations. First (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John J. Stuhr, Richard Shusterman, Mary Magada-Ward, Jessica Wahman, William S. Lewis, Michael Hg Hoffmann, Eric Thomas Weber & Jacquelyn Ak Kegley (2011). 1. Front Matter Front Matter (Pp. I-Iv). Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (1).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jeroen van Bouwel & Erik Weber (2011). Explanation in the Social Sciences. In Ian Jarvie Jesus Zamora Bonilla (ed.), The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Sage
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jeroen van Bouwel, Erik Weber & Leen de Vreese (2011). Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive Explanations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):33-46.
    Instances of explanatory reduction are often advocated on metaphysical grounds; given that the only real things in the world are subatomic particles and their interaction, we have to try to explain everything in terms of the laws of physics. In this paper, we show that explanatory reduction cannot be defended on metaphysical grounds. Nevertheless, indispensability arguments for reductive explanations can be developed, taking into account actual scientific practice and the role of epistemic interests. Reductive explanations might be indispensable to address (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Elke U. Weber & Eric J. Johnson (2011). Query Theory: Knowing What We Want by Arguing with Ourselves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):91-92.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Eric Thomas Weber (2011). What Experimentalism Means in Ethics. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (1):98-115.
    The factors which have brought society to its present pass and impasse contain forces which, when released and constructively utilized, form the positive basis of an educational philosophy and practice that will recover and will develop our original national ideals. The basic principle in that philosophy and practice is that we should use that method of experimental action called natural science to form a disposition which puts a supreme faith in the experimental use of intelligence in all situations of life.In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Estelle Weber (2011). Présences féminines dans l’espace urbain à Metz au XVIIe siècle. In Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, Jean El Gammal & Gabriele Clemens (eds.), Städtischer Raum Im Wandel/Espaces Urbains En Mutation: Modernität - Mobilität - Repräsentationen/Modernités - Mobilités - Représentations. Akademie Verlag 221-236.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Leen Vreese, Erik Weber & Jeroen Bouwel (2010). Explanatory Pluralism in the Medical Sciences: Theory and Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (5):371-390.
    Explanatory pluralism is the view that the best form and level of explanation depends on the kind of question one seeks to answer by the explanation, and that in order to answer all questions in the best way possible, we need more than one form and level of explanation. In the first part of this article, we argue that explanatory pluralism holds for the medical sciences, at least in theory. However, in the second part of the article we show that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Eric Thomas Weber (2010). Morality, Leadership, and Public Policy: On Experimentalism in Ethics. Bloomsbury.
    In Morality, Leadership, and Public Policy, Eric Weber argues for an experimentalist approach to moral theory in addressing practical problems in public policy. The experimentalist approach begins moral inquiry by examining public problems and then makes use of the tools of philosophy and intelligent inquiry to alleviate them. -/- Part I surveys the uses of practical philosophy and answers criticisms - including religious challenges - of the approach, presenting a number of areas in which philosophers' intellectual efforts can prove valuable (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eric Thomas Weber (2010). On Applying Ethics: Who's Afraid of Plato's Cave? Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):91-103.
    The present paper is a response to Gerald Gaus, who has argued that philosophers should not apply ethics. After a critical evaluation of Gaus's arguments, I present several ways which Sidney Hook has outlined for philosophers to bring their skills to bear fruitfully on public policy matters. Following Hook's list, I offer three of my own suggestions for further ways in which philosophers can positively contribute to the application of ethics and of philosophy generally. Finally, I propose the venue of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Eric Thomas Weber (2010). Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism. Continuum International Publishing Group.
    Examines problems in Rawls' epistemology, approached from a Deweyan perspective, to argue for a thoroughly constructivist idea of justice and its practical implications for education. >.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Erik Weber (2010). Causal Methodology. A Comment on Nancy Cartwright's Hunting Causes and Using Them. [REVIEW] Analysis 70 (2):318-325.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Erik Weber, Jan Willem Wieland & Tim Mey (2010). Introduction. Logique Et Analyse 53.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jan Willem Wieland & Erik Weber (2010). Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries. Logique and Analyse 53 (211):345-365.
    The general view is that metaphysical explanation is asymmetric. For instance, if resemblance facts can be explained by facts about their relata, then, by the asymmetry of explanation, these latter facts cannot in turn be explained by the former. The question however is: is there any reason to hold on to the asymmetry? If so, what does it consist in? In the paper we approach these questions by comparing them to analogous questions that have been investigated for scientific explanations. Three (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jan Willem Wieland & Erik Weber (2010). Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries. Logique Et Analyse 53 (211):345.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Eric Thomas Weber (2009). James, Dewey, And Democracy. William James Studies 4:90-110.
    In this paper I examine John Dewey's correspondence and selected writings to illuminate Dewey's understanding of and possible shaping of William James's work as it pertains to politics and democracy. I suggest a way of seeing a richer connection between the thinkers than has been portrayed and a picture of influence flowing from Dewey to James.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Eric Thomas Weber (2009). The Responsibilities and Dangers of Pragmatism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):123-129.
    John Lachs has argued that the value of academic philosophers rests not in their scholarly writing, but fundamentally in their ability to educate minds to be critical and open. In this paper, I show the continuity of this outlook on the work of philosophers with Lachs's stoic pragmatism. Stoic pragmatism is the view that the pragmatic optimism of thinkers like James, Royce, and Dewey must be tempered by a stoic acceptance of our limitations as human beings. While I support Lachs's (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Eric Thomas Weber & Andrew F. Smith (2009). Religion and Democratic Citizenship: Inquiry and Conviction in the American Public Square By J. Caleb Clanton. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (3):449-456.
  43. Eric Thomas Weber & Andrew F. Smith (2009). Religion and Democratic Citizenship: Inquiry and Conviction in the American Public Square (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (3):449-456.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Erik Weber (2009). How Probabilistic Causation Can Account for the Use of Mechanistic Evidence. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):277-295.
    In a recent article in this journal, Federica Russo and Jon Williamson argue that an analysis of causality in terms of probabilistic relationships does not do justice to the use of mechanistic evidence to support causal claims. I will present Ronald Giere's theory of probabilistic causation, and show that it can account for the use of mechanistic evidence (both in the health sciences—on which Russo and Williamson focus—and elsewhere). I also review some other probabilistic theories of causation (of Suppes, Eells, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Erik Weber (2009). Varieties of Democracy in Science Policy. In Jeroen Van Bouwel (ed.), The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan
  46. Erik Weber & Leen De Vreese (2009). Conceptual Analysis of Causation and Theoretical Utility in Everyday Contexts. Logique Et Analyse 206:177-190.
    In this paper we elaborate Ned Hall's theoretical utility perspective for causation in everyday contexts. We do this by presenting some instances of it, thereby adding some flesh to the skeleton that Hall has provided. Our elaboration of the theoretical utility perspective also provides arguments for it: the instances we present show the fruitfulness of the approach. A question raised by Hall's proposal is: should we give up descriptive analysis of causation (and descriptive analysis in general) completely? We argue that, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Erik Weber & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2009). Causation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of Facts. Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 24 (3):301-320.
    Pluralism with respect to the structure of explanations of facts is not uncommon. Wesley Salmon, for instance, distinguished two types of explanation: causal explanations (which provide insight in the causes of the fact we want to explain) and unification explanations (which fit the explanandum into a unified world view). The pluralism which Salmon and others have defended is compatible with several positions about the exact relation between these two types of explanations. We distinguish four such positions, and argue in favour (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Erik Weber & Leen Vreese (2009). Conceptual Analysis of Causation and Theoretical Utility in Everyday Contexts. Logique Et Analyse 52.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jeroen Van Bouwel & Erik Weber (2008). De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests. Human Studies 31 (4):423 - 442.
    In a recent paper on realism and pragmatism published in this journal, Osmo Kivinen and Tero Piiroinen have been pleading for more methodological work in the philosophy of the social sciences—refining the conceptual tools of social scientists—and less philosophically ontological theories. Following this de-ontologizing approach, we scrutinize the debates on social explanation and contribute to the development of a pragmatic social science methodology. Analyzing four classic debates concerning explanation in the social sciences, we propose to shift the debate away from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Leen De Vreese & Erik Weber (2008). Confusion and Bad Arguments in the Conceptual Analysis of Causation. Logique Et Analyse 201:81-99.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 166