Search results for 'Earl Brink Conee' (try it on Scholar)

998 found
Sort by:
  1. Earl Brink Conee (2005/2007). Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.score: 870.0
    Personal identity -- Fatalism -- Time -- God -- Why not nothing? -- Free will and determinism -- Constitution -- Universals -- Possibility and necessity -- What is metaphysics?
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Earl Brink Conee (2004). Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.score: 870.0
    Evidentialism is a view about the conditions under which a person is epistemically justified in having a particular doxastic attitude toward a proposition. Evidentialism holds that the justified attitudes are determined entirely by the person's evidence. This is the traditional view of justification. It is now widely opposed. The essays included in this volume develop and defend the tradition. Evidentialism has many assets. In addition to providing an intuitively plausible account of epistemic justification, it helps to resolve the problem of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Earl Conee (1994). Phenomenal Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (2):136-150.score: 240.0
  4. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (1985). Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.score: 240.0
  5. Earl Conee, Opposing Skepticism Disjunctively.score: 240.0
    Disjunctivists hold that perceiving external objects is fundamentally different from any experiential state that is not a perception. In fact, roughly speaking, disjunctivists say that they have nothing in common. Suppose that it appears to someone as though she perceives something. Disjunctivists say that there are two disparate sorts of facts that could make this true. Either she is genuinely perceiving something, or she is in an experiential state of merely apparent perception. An apparent perception is fundamentally unlike a perception. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Earl Conee (1980). Propositional Justification. Philosophical Studies 38 (1):65 - 68.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2004). Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
    Evidentialism holds that the justified attitudes are determined entirely by the person's evidence. This is the traditional view ofjustification.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Earl Conee (2004). Externalism, Internalism, and Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):78–90.score: 240.0
  9. Earl Conee (2013). The Specificity of the Generality Problem. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):751-762.score: 240.0
    In “Why the generality problem is everybody’s problem,” Michael Bishop argues that every theory of justification needs a solution to the generality problem. He contends that a solution is needed in order for any theory to be used in giving an acceptable account of the justificatory status of beliefs in certain examples. In response, first I will describe the generality problem that is specific to process reliabilism and two other sorts of problems that are essentially the same. Then I will (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Earl Conee (2007). Disjunctivism and Anti-Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):16–36.score: 240.0
  11. Earl Conee (2009). Criterial Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 143 (3):417--426.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Earl Conee (2009). Peerage. Episteme 6 (3):313-323.score: 240.0
    Experts take sides in standing scholarly disagreements. They rely on the epistemic reasons favorable to their side to justify their position. It is argued here that no position actually has an overall balance of undefeated reasons in its favor. Candidates for such reasons include the objective strength of the rational support for one side, the special force of details in the case for one side, and a summary impression of truth. All such factors fail to justify any position.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Earl Conee (2005). The Comforts of Home. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):444–451.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Earl Conee (2008). Critical Notices: Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):837-840.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2001). Internalism Defended. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1):1 - 18.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Earl Conee (1985). Physicalism and Phenomenal Properties. Philosophical Quarterly 35 (July):296-302.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Earl Conee (2012). Self—Support. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):419-446.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Earl Conee (1982). Against Moral Dilemmas. Philosophical Review 91 (1):87-97.score: 240.0
    E j lemmon, B a o williams, Bas van fraassen, And ruth marcus have argued on behalf of the existence of moral dilemmas, I.E., Cases where an agent is subject to conflicting absolute moral obligations. The paper criticizes this support and contends that no moral dilemma is possible.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Earl Conee (1985). The Possibility of Absent Qualia. Philosophical Review 94 (July):345-66.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Earl Conee (1995). Supervenience and Intentionality. In Elias E. Savellos & Ümit D. Yalçin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Needham Heights: Cambridge.score: 240.0
  21. Earl Conee (1982). Instrumental Value Without Intrinsic Value? Philosophia 11 (3-4):345-359.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Earl Conee (1998). Seeing the Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):847-857.score: 240.0
    Some propositions are obvious in their own right. We can `just see' that they are true. So there is some such epistemic phenomenon as seeing the truth of a proposition. This paper investigates the nature of this phenomenon. The aptness of the visual metaphor is explained. Accounts of the phenomenon requiring qualia by which the truth is apprehended are disputed. A limited theory is developed and applied.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Earl Conee (1992). The Truth Connection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):657-669.score: 240.0
  24. Earl Conee (1984). A Defense of Pain. Philosophical Studies 46 (September):239-48.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2002). Typing Problems. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):98-105.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Earl Conee (2001). Comments on Bill Lycan's Moore Against the New Skeptics. Philosophical Studies 103 (1):55 - 59.score: 240.0
  27. Earl Conee (1991). The Possibility of Power Beyond Possibility. Philosophical Perspectives 5:447-473.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Earl Conee (2001). Heeding Misleading Evidence. Philosophical Studies 103 (2):99-120.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Earl Conee (1989). Why Moral Dilemmas Are Impossible. American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (2):133 - 141.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Earl Conee (1987). Evident, but Rationally Unacceptable. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (3):316 – 326.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Earl Conee (2000). The Moral Value in Promises. Philosophical Review 109 (3):411-422.score: 240.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Earl Conee (1994). The Nature and the Impossibility of Moral Perfection. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):815-825.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Earl Conee (1985). Physicalism and Phenomenal Qualities. Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):296-302.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eva Bodanszky & Earl Conee (1981). Isolating Intrinsic Value. Analysis 41 (1):51 - 53.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Earl Conee (2007). Review of Jonathan Sutton, Without Justification. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Theodore Sider & Earl Conee (2005/2007). Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics. Oxford.score: 240.0
    No philosophical background is required to enjoy this book: anyone who has thought about life's most profound questions will find plenty to provoke and entertain them here.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Earl Conee (2002). Innocuous Infallibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):406-408.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2001). Internalism Defended. In Hilary Kornblith (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Blackwell. 1 - 18.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Earl Conee (1994). Against an Epistemic Dilemma. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (4):475 – 481.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Earl Conee (2002). Typing Problems. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):98 - 105.score: 240.0
  41. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (1983). Stich and Nisbett on Justifying Inference Rules. Philosophy of Science 50 (2):326-331.score: 240.0
    Stich and Nisbett offer an analysis of the concept of a justified inference rule, building upon the efforts of Goodman. They fault Goodman's view on the grounds that it is incompatible with some recent psychological research on reasoning. We criticize their proposal by arguing that it is subject to much the same objections as those they raise against other accounts.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Earl Conee (2000). Reply to Timothy Chappell. Mind 109 (434):281-283.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Earl Conee (2008). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):837-840.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Earl Conee (2002). Review of Jonathan Adler, Belief's Own Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (10).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Earl Conee (1982). Utilitarianism And Rationality. Analysis 42 (January):55-59.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2005). Some Virtues of Evidentialism. Veritas 50 (4).score: 240.0
    O evidencialismo é, primordialmente, uma tese sobre a justificação epistêmica e, secundariamente, uma tese sobre o conhecimento. Sustenta que a justificação epistêmica é superveniente da evidência. As versões do evidencialismo diferem quanto ao que conta como evidência, quanto ao que seja possuir algo como evidência e quanto ao que um dado corpo de evidência apóia. A tese secundária é a de que o apoio evidencial é necessário ao conhecimento. O evidencialismo ajuda a formular as questões epistemológicas de uma forma que (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Earl Conee (1995). Isolation and Beyond. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):129-146.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Earl Conee (2009). Review: Criterial Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 143 (3):417 - 426.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Earl Conee (1988). The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification. The Monist 71 (3):389-404.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 998