Search results for 'Editing' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. George A. Lozano (2014). Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):363-377.score: 18.0
    Scientists of many countries in which English is not the primary language routinely use a variety of manuscript preparation, correction or editing services, a practice that is openly endorsed by many journals and scientific institutions. These services vary tremendously in their scope; at one end there is simple proof-reading, and at the other extreme there is in-depth and extensive peer-reviewing, proposal preparation, statistical analyses, re-writing and co-writing. In this paper, the various types of service are reviewed, along with authorship (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Dale Hample, Ben Warner & Dorian Young (2009). Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments. Argumentation 23 (1):21-37.score: 18.0
    Since argument frames precede most other arguing processes, argument editing among them, one’s frames may well predict one’s preferred editorial standards. This experiment assesses people’s arguing frames, gives them arguments to edit, and tests whether the frames actually do predict editorial preferences. Modest relationships between argument frames and argument editing appear. Other connections among frames, editing, and additional individual differences variables are more substantial. Particularly notable are the informative influences of psychological reactance. A new theoretical contribution is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Harvey Marcovitch (2008). What Medical Journal Editing Means to Me. Mens Sana Monographs 6 (1):237.score: 15.0
    _Papers in medical journals are often difficult to understand and tedious to read. An editor's first loyalty should be to readers, by prioritising readability over merely producing a repository of data for the scientific community generally. The web now provides infinite repository space so there is even less excuse for journals to be unreadable. I give examples of how I attempted to improve one journal, despite external pressures and regardless of how it might affect the Impact Factor. As a postscript (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Willemijn M. Gommans, Sean P. Mullen & Stefan Maas (2009). RNA Editing: A Driving Force for Adaptive Evolution? Bioessays 31 (10):1137-1145.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. M. Hunter (2003). Whither Editing? - The Correspondence of John Flamsteed, First Astronomer Royal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):805-820.score: 12.0
    This is a review essay of printed editions of the correspondence of John Flamsteed, Jan Jonston and John Wallis, and of the CD-ROM edition of the Hartlib Papers. It raises various issues concerning the relationship between editions of correspondence and their archival base, and about the criteria used to decide what is appropriate to include as 'correspondence'. It also addresses the rationale of the electronic edition of the Hartlib Papers, particularly the second edition, which extends its remit from the main (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joseph P. Magliano & Jeffrey M. Zacks (2011). The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation. Cognitive Science 35 (8):1489-1517.score: 12.0
    Filmmakers use continuity editing to engender a sense of situational continuity or discontinuity at editing boundaries. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of continuity editing on how people perceive the structure of events in a narrative film and to identify brain networks that are associated with the processing of different types of continuity editing boundaries. Participants viewed a commercially produced film and segmented it into meaningful events, while brain activity was recorded with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard Rogers (1992). Investigating Psychology's Taboo: The Ethics of Editing. Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):253 – 261.score: 12.0
    The ethics of editing have remained largely unexplored despite their far-ranging consequences to careers of individual psychologists. I examine three ethical issues as they relate to the editorial process: welfare of the consumer, dual relationships, and objectivity. I conclude that the current practices do not adequately take into account professional ethics, and I offer detailed recommendations on how these practices could be improved.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Holly Randell-Moon, Nicole Anderson, Tracey Bretag, Anthony Burke, Sue Grieshaber, Anthony Lambert, David Saltmarsh & Nicola Yelland (2011). Journal Editing and Ethical Research Practice: Perspectives of Journal Editors. Ethics and Education 6 (3):225 - 238.score: 12.0
    This article offers perspectives from academics with recent journal editing experience on a range of ethical issues and dilemmas that regularly pose challenges for those in editorial roles. Each contributing author has provided commentary and reflection on a select topic that was identified in the research literature concerning academic publishing and journal editing. Topics discussed include the ethical responsibilities of working with international and early career contributors to develop work for publication, balancing influence and responsibility to a journal's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Günther Witzany (2006). Natural Genome-Editing Competences of Viruses. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (4).score: 12.0
    It is becoming increasingly evident that the driving forces of evolutionary novelty are not randomly derived chance mutations of the genetic text, but a precise genome editing by omnipresent viral agents. These competences integrate the whole toolbox of natural genetic engineering, replication, transcription, translation, genomic imprinting, genomic creativity, enzymatic inventions and all types of genetic repair patterns. Even the non-coding, repetitive DNA sequences which were interpreted as being ancient remnants of former evolutionary stages are now recognized as being of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. S. A. Jawaid (2006). What Medicine and Medical Journal Editing Mean to Me. Mens Sana Monographs 4 (1):62.score: 12.0
    Medicine and medical journalism are both noble professions. Those who are infected with the materialistic virus and want to make quick money should not take up these as professional careers. Editing a good quality peer reviewed medical journal in a developing third world country is extremely frustrating. An editor has to work under considerable stress and strain, and face numerous pressures. However, it is a joy and pleasure to be a successful medical editor. The mere fact that one can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Nicholas C. Burbules (2014). Philosophical Reflections on Editing. Educational Theory 64 (4):317-331.score: 12.0
    In this essay Nicholas C. Burbules reviews his experiences and the lessons he learned as editor of Educational Theory for more than twenty years, and he explores some of the normative choices that are inevitably made by any editor in carrying out his or her role. Burbules examines the relationship of a journal to its intellectual field; the review process; communications and interactions with authors; the process of editing and revising manuscripts; questions of representativeness in a theoretically pluralistic field; (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Serge Mouraviev (2013). Editing Heraclitus (1999-2012). Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):195-218.score: 10.0
    I shall tell you the story, propose an overview, and show the structure, goal, and peculiarities of this monstrous edition that I undertook forty-four years ago: the Heraclitea, of which ten volumes have appeared since 1999. One volume was published in November 2011 and a few others are still in preparation. While telling you this story, I shall strive to show the radical differences between my approaches and the standard ones taught worldwide in the departments of classics and ancient philosophy (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Passmore (1994). Editing Russell's Papers. Grazer Philosophische Studien 49:189-205.score: 10.0
    This paper is both a slice of history, a warning and a congratulation. The history is about how the Russell papers found their way to a steel-town in Canada and how it came about that they have gradually been published. The warning is that it is extremely difficult to conduct such an enterprise on a co-operative basis, which may help to explain why so many enterprises of this kind have issued in failure. The congratulations are for those who have edited (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Christoph Fehige (2005). Editing Hutcheson's Inquiry. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):563 – 574.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Brian Barry (1979). On Editing Ethics. Ethics 90 (1):1-6.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Schofer (2003). The Redaction of Desire: Structure and Editing of Rabbinic Teachings Concerning Ye#Duser ("Inclination"). Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (1):19-53.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Patricia Bizzell (2003). Editing the Rhetorical Tradition. Philosophy and Rhetoric 36 (2):109-118.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. Angelo Corlett (2008). The Ethics of Academic Journal Editing. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):205-209.score: 9.0
    This paper amounts to a reply to Professor Donald G. Brown’s thoughtful comment on my “Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review”, which appeared in this journal.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ignas K. Skrupskelis (2007). The Ashes of Usucly: Reflections After Editing William James. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):250-275.score: 9.0
    : The essay consists of two somewhat independent parts. In the first, I recount some of my experiences as editor, reflecting on interpretative contexts as a source of error, the role of chance, and dependence upon the work of others, especially the arrangement and cataloguing of libraries and archives. I note some of the changes libraries have undergone, including computerization, and sketch out some likely effects on scholarship. In the second part, I report some of my idle thoughts about William (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Donald W. Crawford (1993). Reflections on Editing the JAAC. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (2).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Frances Chaput Waksler (2002). On Editing and Human Studies. Human Studies 25 (4):413-415.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Dayo Duyile (1990). Manual for African Journalists: News Reporting and Editing. Gong Communication Publishers.score: 9.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thom Brooks (2012). The Academic Journal Editor: Secrets Revealed. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):313-325.score: 6.0
    Academic publishing is a world filled with more mystery than revelation. Often the best advice is made available only to those lucky enough to hear it by word of mouth. This is no less true with editing academic journals. I have enjoyed the honour of launching the Journal of Moral Philosophy and serving as its editor for the last ten years. I actively sought out the best advice on a number of issues from editors serving on leading journals as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Christy Mag Uidhir (2009). Unlimited Additions to Limited Editions. Contemporary Aesthetics 7.score: 6.0
    In this paper I target the relationship between two prints that are roughly qualitatively identical and share a causal history. Is one an artwork if and only if the other is an artwork? To answer this, I propose two competing principles. The first claims that certain intentional relations must be shared by the prints (e.g., editioned prints vs. non-editioned prints). The second, which I endorse, appeals only to minimal print ontology, claiming that the two prints need only be what I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David G. Stern, Gabriel Citron & Brian Rogers (forthcoming). Moore's Notes on Wittgenstein's Lectures, Cambridge 1930-1933: Text, Context, and Content. Nordic Wittgenstein Review.score: 6.0
    Wittgenstein’s writings and lectures during the first half of the 1930s play a crucial role in any interpretation of the relationship between the Tractatus and the Philosophical Investigations . G. E. Moore’s notes of Wittgenstein’s Cambridge lectures, 1930-1933, offer us a remarkably careful and conscientious record of what Wittgenstein said at the time, and are much more detailed and reliable than previously published notes from those lectures. The co-authors are currently editing these notes of Wittgenstein’s lectures for a book (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Irwin C. Lieb & Charles Hartshorne (1970). An Interview by Irwin C. Lieb: Charles Hartshorne's Recollections of Editing the Peirce Papers. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 6 (3/4):149 - 159.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jonathan Schofer (2003). The Redaction of Desire: Structure and Editing of Rabbinic Teachings Concerning Ye#Duser ("Inclination"). Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (1):19-53.score: 6.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. D. M. Lewis (1971). Sterling Dow: Conventions in Editing. (Greek, Roman and Byzantine Scholarly Aids, 2) Pp. Vi+37. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University, 1969. (Obtainable From Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, Box 144, Cambridge, Mass.) Paper, $2. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (02):309-310.score: 6.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard Bernstein & Paul Weiss (1970). An Interview by Richard Bernstein: Paul Weiss's Recollections of Editing the Peirce Papers. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 6 (3/4):161 - 188.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. W. M. Lindsay (1911). The Editing of Isidore Etymologiae. Classical Quarterly 5 (01):42-.score: 6.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Monica J. Taylor (2011). Integrating the Personal, Professional and Political: Moral Learning in Editing theJME. Journal of Moral Education 40 (3):277-288.score: 6.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. N. G. Wilson (1991). Editing Classical Texts John N. Grant (Ed.): Editing Greek and Latin Texts. Papers Given at the Twenty-Third Annual Conference on Editorial Problems, University of Toronto, 6–7 November 1987. Pp. Xii + 197. New York: AMS Press, 1989. $29.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):208-210.score: 6.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Guy Barry & John S. Mattick (2012). The Role of Regulatory RNA in Cognitive Evolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (10):497-503.score: 6.0
    The evolution of the human brain has resulted in the emergence of higher-order cognitive abilities, such as reasoning, planning and social awareness. Although there has been a concomitant increase in brain size and complexity, and component diversification, we argue that RNA regulation of epigenetic processes, RNA editing, and the controlled mobilization of transposable elements have provided the major substrates for cognitive advance. We also suggest that these expanded capacities and flexibilities have led to the collateral emergence of psychiatric fragilities (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. J. L. Butrica (1997). Editing Propertius. Classical Quarterly 47 (01):176-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. James Diggle (1977). The Classical Text E. J. Kenney: The Classical Text: Aspects of Editing in the Age of the Printed Book. Pp. Xii + 174. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974. Cloth, £4·50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (01):85-86.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. B. Hall (1990). Editing the Historia Apollonii Regis Tyri Gareth Schmeling (Ed.): Historia Apollonii Regis Tyri. (Bibliotheca Teubneriana.) Pp. Xxxii+144. Leipzig: Teubner, 1988. DM 45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):291-294.score: 6.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. E. J. Kenney (2000). Experientia does it G. W. most (ed.): Editing texts, texte edieren . (Aporemata: Kritische studien zur philologiegeschichte, 2.) pp. XVI + 268. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998. Paper, dm 98. isbn: 3-525-25901-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):118-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Edward C. Moore & Arthur W. Burks (1992). Three Notes on the Editing of the Works of Charles S. Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (1):83 - 106.score: 6.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Christopher Collard (1984). The Re-Editing of Euripides. The Classical Review 34 (01):9-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter C. Hodgson (ed.) (2006). Hegel: Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: One-Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827. OUP Oxford.score: 6.0
    The Hegel Lectures Series Series Editor: Peter C. Hodgson -/- Hegel's lectures have had as great a historical impact as the works he himself published. Important elements of his system are elaborated only in the lectures, especially those given in Berlin during the last decade of his life. The original editors conflated materials from different sources and dates, obscuring the development and logic of Hegel's thought. The Hegel Lectures series is based on a selection of extant and recently discovered transcripts (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Eugen Baer (forthcoming). Editing the Text of a Disease: Semiotic and Ethical Aspects of Therapeutic Genetic Engineering. Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William Blissett (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):346-350.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Eleni Bozia (2014). (S.) Harrison, (C.) Stray (Edd.) Expurgating the Classics. Editing Out in Greek and Latin. Pp. Viii + 224, Ills. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2012. Cased, £65. ISBN: 978-1-84966-892-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (1):301-303.score: 6.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Christopher Collard (1984). The Re-Editing of Euripides James Diggle: Euripidis Fabulae, Tomus II: Supplices, Electra, Hercules, Troades, Iphigenia in Tauris, Ion. (Oxford Classical Texts.) Pp. Xiii+373. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981. £6.25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (01):9-15.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. P. E. Easterling (1966). Teach Yourself Editing. The Classical Review 16 (03):372-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. P. E. Easterling (1966). Teach Yourself Editing Reinhold Merkelbach, Helmut van Thiel: Griechisches Leseheft Zur Einführung in Paläographie Und Textkritik. (Studienhefte Zur Altertumswissenschaft, 10.) Pp. Xii+111 (of Plates). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1965. Paper, DM. 16.80. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (03):372-373.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Professor Robert H. Fletcher & Professor Suzanne W. Fletcher (1997). Evidence for the Effectiveness of Peer Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.score: 6.0
    Scientific editors’ policies, including peer review, are based mainly on tradition and belief. Do they actually achieve their desired effects, the selection of the best manuscripts and improvement of those published? Editorial decisions have important consequences—to investigators, the scientific community, and all who might benefit from correct information or be harmed by misleading research results. These decisions should be judged not just by intentions of reviewers and editors but also by the actual consequences of their actions. A small but growing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jasper Griffin (1965). Editing the Argonautica. The Classical Review 15 (02):165-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. B. Hall (forthcoming). Editing Latin Grammarians. Classical Review.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Tobi Kozakewich, Kirsten Macleod & Juliet Mcmaster (2000). Editing Jane: Austen's Juvenilia in the Classroom. Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 19:187.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000