Search results for 'Edward Campbell' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Edward Campbell (2010). Boulez, Music and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Preparing the ground; 2. Early influences and movements; 3. Dialectic, negation and binary oppositions; 4. Boulez, Adorno and serial critique; 5. Deduction and the scientific model; 6. Serialism and structuralism; 7. Post-structuralist encounters; 8. Boulez, difference and repetition; 9. Expanding the virtual; 10. Continuity and discontinuity of space and time; Conclusion; Bibliography.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John J. Bradley, Isis Brook, Katie Campbell, Edward S. Casey & Bernard Debarbieux (2011). Andrew Benjamin is Professor of Critical Theory and Philosophical Aes-Thetics at Monash University, Where He is Also Director of the Research Unit in European Philosophy. His Most Recent Books Are Of Jews and Animals (2010) and Writing Art and Architecture (2010). [REVIEW] In Jeff Malpas (ed.), The Place of Landscape: Concepts, Contexts, Studies. Mit Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Patricia Ashton, Edward G. Rozycki, Garvey F. Lundy, William T. Pink, Svi Shapiro, Ellen Giarelli, Ann Hassenpflug, Henry W. Hodysh, Malcolm B. Campbell & Henry J. Perkinson (2011). Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW] Educational Studies 26 (1-2):1-59.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Edward F. Campbell (1975). Moses and the Foundations of Israel. Interpretation 29 (2):141-154.score: 240.0
    The historical question about the beginning of Israel and its faith is first of all a question about the figure of Moses and the character of his contribution to that beginning.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Joseph L. Devitis, Thomas A. Brindley, Elmer John Thiessen, James C. Albisetti, Gary K. Clabaugh, Terry L. Birdwhistell, Paul Theobald, David N. Campbell, Edward H. Berman & Jj Chambliss (1991). Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW] Educational Studies 22 (2):158-203.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Maxine Feletti, Brooke Home, Katherine Imrie, Tony Lo Pilato, Clifford Simpson, Jonathon Colbran, Edward Campbell & Russell Patrick (forthcoming). Annual Dinner. Ethos.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andrew G. Fountain, John L. Campbell, Edward Ag Schuur, Sharon E. Stammerjohn, Mark W. Williams & Hugh W. Ducklow (2012). The Disappearing Cryosphere: Impacts and Ecosystem Responses to Rapid Cryosphere Loss. BioScience 62 (4):405-415.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Judith Butler, David Campbell, Rey Chow, Fred Dallmayr, Enrique Dussell, Kim Dae Jung, Hwa Yol Jung, Lydia H. Liu, Kishore Mahbubani, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Thich Nhat Hanh, Nishida Kitaro, Bhikhu Parekh, Edward W. Said, Calvin O. Schrag, Watsuji Tetsuro, Tu Weiming & Zhang Longxi (2002). Comparative Political Culture in the Age of Globalization: An Introductory Anthology. Lexington Books.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Craig Kridel, John A. Beineke, Malcolm B. Campbell, Wayne J. Urban, Bruce Anthony Jones, Lynda Stone, Patricia A. Major, John R. Thelin, Edward H. Berman & Donald Vandenberg (1994). Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW] Educational Studies 25 (2):101-152.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Geoffrey C. Williams, Richard M. Frankel, Thomas L. Campbell & Edward L. Deci (2003). The Science of the Art of Medicine: Research on the Biopsychosocial Approach to Health Care. In Richard M. Frankel, Timothy E. Quill & Susan H. McDaniel (eds.), The Biopsychosocial Approach: Past, Present, and Future. University of Rochester Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Campbell, An Interventionist Approach to Causation in Psychology by John Campbell.score: 180.0
    My project in this paper is to extend the interventionist analysis of causation to give an account of causation in psychology. Many aspects of empirical investigation into psychological causation fit straightforwardly into the interventionist framework. I address three problems. First, the problem of explaining what it is for a causal relation to be properly psychological rather than merely biological. Second, the problem of rational causation: how it is that reasons can be causes. Finally, I look at the implications of an (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Campbell (2012). Cogito Ergo Sum: Christopher Peacocke and John Campbell: II—Lichtenberg and the Cogito. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3):361-378.score: 180.0
    Our use of ‘I’, or something like it, is implicated in our self-regarding emotions, in the concern to survive, and so seems basic to ordinary human life. But why does that pattern of use require a referring term? Don't Lichtenberg's formulations show how we could have our ordinary pattern of use here without the first person? I argue that what explains our compulsion to regard the first person as a referring term is our ordinary causal thinking, which requires us to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gordon Campbell (2012). As a Matter of Fact: Gordon Campbell in Conversation with Joseph Shub. The European Legacy 17 (2):213 - 232.score: 180.0
    The European Legacy, Volume 17, Issue 2, Page 213-232, April 2012.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Courtney S. Campbell & Jessica C. Cox (forthcoming). Courtney S. Cox and Jessica C. Campbell Reply. Hastings Center Report 41 (4):8-9.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jim Campbell (2009). Letter From President Jim Campbell on the State of the Society. Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 37 (108):4-4.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. Y. Campbell (1940). Campbell's Agamemnon in English. The Classical Review 54 (04):217-218.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Douglas S. Campbell (1995). Quality Crab Grass: A Book Review by Douglas S. Campbell. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):55.score: 180.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. C. A. Campbell (1950). Mr. Edwards on “Ordinary Language and Absolute Certainty”. Philosophical Studies 1 (4):60 - 63.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Permission To Die (1994). 130 Rem Blanchard Edwards and Glenn Campbell Graber. Bioethics 1:130.score: 40.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Edward H. Madden & Dennis W. Madden (1982). The Great Debate: Alexander Campbell Vs. Robert Owen. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (3):207 - 226.score: 36.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Edward L. Keenan & Denis Paperno (2011). Erratum To: Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in Language and Logic. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):91-91.score: 30.0
    Erratum to: Stanley Peters and Dag Westerståhl: Quantifiers in language and logic Content Type Journal Article Category Erratum Pages 1-1 DOI 10.1007/s10988-011-9094-5 Authors Edward L. Keenan, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Los Angeles, 3125 Campbell Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543, USA Denis Paperno, Department of Linguistics, University of California at Los Angeles, 3125 Campbell Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1543, USA Journal Linguistics and Philosophy Online ISSN 1573-0549 Print ISSN 0165-0157.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Edward F. Walter & Arthur Minton (1975). Soft Determinism, Freedom, and Rationality. Personalist 56:364-384.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mohan P. Matthen (2006). On Visual Experience of Objects: Comments on John Campbell's Reference and Consciousness. Philosophical Studies 127 (2):195-220.score: 24.0
    John Campbell argues that visual attention to objects is the means by which we can refer to objects, and that this is so because conscious visual attention enables us to retrieve information about a location. It is argued here that while Campbell is right to think that we visually attend to objects, he does not give us sufficient ground for thinking that consciousness is involved, and is wrong to assign an intermediary role to location. Campbell’s view on (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Franz M. Wuketits (2001). The Philosophy of Donald T. Campbell: A Short Review and Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 16 (2):171-188.score: 24.0
    Aside from his remarkable studies in psychology and the social sciences, Donald Thomas Campbell (1916–1996) made significant contributions to philosophy, particularly philosophy of science,epistemology, and ethics. His name and his work are inseparably linked with the evolutionary approach to explaining human knowledge (evolutionary epistemology). He was an indefatigable supporter of the naturalistic turn in philosophy and has strongly influenced the discussion of moral issues (evolutionary ethics). The aim of this paper is to briefly characterize Campbells work and to discuss (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Austen Clark (2006). Attention & Inscrutability: A Commentary on John Campbell, Reference and Consciousness for the Pacific APA Meeting, Pasadena, California, 2004. Philosophical Studies 127 (2):167-193.score: 24.0
    We assemble here in this time and place to discuss the thesis that conscious attention can provide knowledge of reference of perceptual demonstratives. I shall focus my commentary on what this claim means, and on the main argument for it found in the first five chapters of Reference and Consciousness. The middle term of that argument is an account of what attention does: what its job or function is. There is much that is admirable in this account, and I am (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Andrew Botterell (2002). Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Campbell. Dialogue 41 (1):155-161.score: 24.0
    Neil Campbell has argued that certain problems with the doctrine of psycho-physical supervenience can be overcome if supervenience is viewed as a relation between predicates rather than as a relation between properties. Campbell suggests that, when properly understood, this predicate version of supervenience "expresses a form of psycho-physical dependence that might be useful to those who wish to argue for a supervenience-based physicalism”. In this note I indicate why I think we ought to resist this suggestion. First, I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Christian Maurer (2014). What Can an Egoist Say Against an Egoist? On Archibald Campbell's Criticisms of Bernard Mandeville. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 12 (1):1-18.score: 24.0
    Like Bernard Mandeville, Archibald Campbell develops a profoundly egoistic conception of human psychology. However, Campbell attacks numerous points in Mandeville’s moral philosophy, in particular Mandeville’s treatment of self-love, the desire for esteem, and human nature in general as corrupt. He also criticises Mandeville’s corresponding insistence on self-denial and his rigorist conception of luxury. Campbell himself is subsequently attacked by Scottish orthodox Calvinists - not for his egoism, but for his optimism regarding postlapsarian human nature and self-love. This (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andreas Dorschel (1992). Über die funktionale Erklärung des normativen Geltungsanspruchs und das Konzept einer 'evolutionären Ethik'. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 14 (2):309 - 328.score: 24.0
    Neodarwinian ethology, today above all represented by sociobiology, is conceived of by responsible exponents as a descriptive and explanatory theory that cannot include any normative declarations. Still other, indeed notable, authors belonging to the discipline in question, either underhand or frankly employ prescriptive or evaluative judgments, — or they claim (what is not an insight of natural science) that it is impossible to provide a rational foundation for prescriptive or evaluative judgments. (Michael Ruse and Edward O. Wilson even assert (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mihaela Paraschivescu (2011). Joseph Campbell and the Jungian Reading of Myth. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 10 (28):216-227.score: 24.0
    Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Review of Ritske Rensma, The Innateness of Myth: A New Interpretation of Joseph Campbell’s Reception of C. G. Jung (New York/London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009).
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Edward F. Campbell Jr (forthcoming). Book Review: Ruth: A Commentary. [REVIEW] Interpretation 53 (1):82-83.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. G. J. Toomer (2012). Edward Pocockes Arabic Translation of Grotius, De Veritate. Grotiana 33 (1):88-105.score: 24.0
    This article recounts the history of the composition, publication and dissemination of Edward Pococke’s translation into Arabic of Grotius, De Veritate , the motivation for making it alleged both by Grotius and by Pococke, and the changes in the text which were introduced by Pococke. An Appendix provides, for the two chapters which are most different from Grotius’s original, the Arabic text, a literal translation, Grotius’s Latin, and details of the sources of Grotius and Pococke for their accusations against (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Christian Maurer, Doctrinal Issues Concerning Human Nature and Self-Love, and the Case of Archibald Campbell's Enquiry.score: 24.0
    This essay explores doctrinal issues in the philosophical and theological debates on human nature and self-love in the early 18th century. It focuses on the arguments between the Scottish philosopher and theologian Archibald Campbell and the Committee for Purity of Doctrine concerning Campbell’s Enquiry into the Original of Moral Virtue (1733). These centre in particular on Campbell’s supposedly unorthodox account of self-love as a virtuous principle and the connected more general view of human nature as tending towards (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. María G. Navarro (forthcoming). George Campbell and Richard Whately: Two Examples of Rhetoric Rationality in the Enlightenment. In Brunhilde Wehinger (ed.), Forschungszentrum Europäische Aufklärung. Wehrhahn Verlag.score: 24.0
    So wohl Campbell als auch Whately sind sehr besorgt um die verschiedenen argumentations Formen zu analisieren, aber nicht in seiner abstrecten Vielfalt, sondern den verschiedenen Ableihungen des gebrauches oder der gegenwärtigen argumentations absicht im Entwurf jedes Arguments. In seiner Analyse haben sie beobachtet, dass die etische Begründung bemerkensmert verschieden als die Wissenschafliche. Beide Verfasser sind damit einverstanden dass es einen grossen Unterschied gibt zwischen: der existenten Prämisse in der Wissenchaftlichen Probe, und zweitens, die Form in der die Prämissen im (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Steve Edwards (2010). William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones: Interlacings; The Poetry of Chartism: Aesthetics, Politics, History. Historical Materialism 18 (2):165-176.score: 22.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Tim Bayne & Elisabeth Pacherie (2004). Bottom-Up or Top-Down: Campbell's Rationalist Account of Monothematic Delusions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 11 (1):1-11.score: 21.0
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Brian Loar (1996). Comments on John Campbell, Molyneux's Question. Philosophical Issues 7:319-324.score: 21.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jose Luis Bermudez (1995). Aspects of the Self: John Campbell's Past, Space, and Self. Inquiry 38 (4):1-15.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David M. Armstrong (1993). Reply to Campbell. In John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M Armstrong. New York: Cambridge University Press.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jonathan Edwards (2009). Jonathan Edwards, Freedom of the Will, The Works of Jonathan Edward, Vol. I. Yale University Press.score: 19.0
    Presents an analysis of Jonathan Edwards' theological position. This book includes a study of his life and the intellectual issues in the America of his time, and examines the problem of free will in connection with Leibniz, Locke, and Hume.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Susanna Siegel (2013). Reply to Campbell. Philosophical Studies 163 (3).score: 18.0
    Reply to John Campbell's contribution to a symposium on *The Contents of Visual Experience*.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Wayne D. Christensen & Clifford A. Hooker (1999). The Organization of Knowledge: Beyond Campbell's Evolutionary Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):249.score: 18.0
    Donald Campbell has long advocated a naturalist epistemology based on a general selection theory, with the scope of knowledge restricted to vicarious adaptive processes. But being a vicariant is problematic because it involves an unexplained epistemic relation. We argue that this relation is to be explicated organizationally in terms of the regulation of behavior and internal state by the vicariant, but that Campbell's selectionist approach can give no satisfactory account of it because it is opaque to organization. We (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Struan Jacobs (2007). Edward Shils' Theory of Tradition. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):139-162.score: 18.0
    Edward Shils presented his book Tradition (1981) as the first extensive study of the subject. This article casts light on Shils' multifaceted understanding of tradition, comprising pragmatic, Burkean, veridical, and evolutionist perspectives. His typology of traditions is noted, and his view of institutional bearers of tradition described. In assessing Shils' theory, however, we find that it overreaches, collapsing differences that exist between traditions, transmissions, and the traditional. Key Words: tradition • transmission • rationalization • antitradition • science.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter Richerson, Evolution: The Darwinian Theory of Social Change, an Homage to Donald T. Campbell.score: 18.0
    One of the earliest and most influential papers applying Darwinian theory to human cultural evolution was Donald T. Campbell’s paper “Variation and Selective Retention in Sociocultural Systems.” Campbell’s programmatic essay appeared as a chapter in a book entitled Social Change in Developing Areas (Barringer et al., 1965). It sketched a very ambitious project to apply Darwinian principles to the study of the evolution of human behavior. His essential theses were four.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Matthew H. Slater, How Necessary is the Past? Reply to Campbell.score: 18.0
    Joe Campbell has identified an apparent flaw in van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument. It apparently derives a metaphysically necessary conclusion from what Campbell argues is a contingent premise: that the past is in some sense necessary. I criticise Campbell’s examples attempting to show that this is not the case (in the requisite sense) and suggest some directions along which an incompatibilist could reconstruct her argument so as to remain immune to Campbell’s worries.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Kristin Shrader-Frechette (2010). Conceptual Analysis and Special-Interest Science: Toxicology and the Case of Edward Calabrese. Synthese 177 (3):449 - 469.score: 18.0
    One way to do socially relevant investigations of science is through conceptual analysis of scientific terms used in special-interest science (SIS). SIS is science having welfare-related consequences and funded by special interests, e.g., tobacco companies, in order to establish predetermined conclusions. For instance, because the chemical industry seeks deregulation of toxic emissions and avoiding costly cleanups, it funds SIS that supports the concept of "hormesis" (according to which low doses of toxins/carcinogens have beneficial effects). Analyzing the hormesis concept of its (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. H. G. Callaway (1997). Review of James Campbell, Understanding John Dewey. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):272-275.score: 18.0
    James Campbell's Understanding John Dewey represents the latest of his series of recent books, focused on the classical pragmatist tradition. In The Community Reconstructs. Campbell capably explored the meaning and relevance of pragmatic social thought, urging that the social pragmatists combined 'the inquiring and critical spirit of Peirce' with 'issues of general and direct human concern that interested James. Dewey is 'the most important figure of this movement' and the "primary figure' for the earlier book. Campbell now (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Edward Slowik (2007). Review of Edward J. Khamara, Space, Time, and Theology in the Leibniz-Newton Controversy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (1).score: 18.0
  48. Edward McGushin (2004). Béatrice Han, Foucault's Critical Project, Trans. Edward Pile (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002), 241 Pp. ISBN 0-80473-708-8 (Cloth), US 60.00, 0-80473-709-6 (Paper), US60.00, 0-80473-709-6 (Paper), US 24.95. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (4).score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Tony Pitson (2006). George Campbell's Critique of Hume on Testimony. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (1):1-15.score: 18.0
    Abstract At stake in the dispute between Campbell and Hume is the basis for our acceptance of testimony. Campbell argues that, contrary to Hume, our acceptance of testimony is prior to experience, while Hume continues to maintain that the appropriation through testimony of the experience of others depends ultimately on one's own experience. I argue that Hume's remarks about testimony provide a non-circular account of the process by which the experience of others may become one's own; and I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Christian Maurer (2012). Archibald Campbell's Views of Self-Cultivation and Self-Denial in Context. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):13-27.score: 18.0
    This paper discusses the accounts of self-cultivation and self-denial of Archibald Campbell (1691–1756). It analyses how he attempts to make room for moral self-improvement and for the control of the passions in a thoroughly egoistic psychological framework, and with a theory of moral motivation that focuses on a specific kind of self-love, namely the desire for esteem. Campbell's views are analysed in the context of his criticisms of both Francis Hutcheson's benevolence-based moral philosophy and of Bernard Mandeville's version (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999