5 found
Ekow N. Yankah [5]Ekow Nyansa Yankah [1]
  1.  18
    Ekow N. Yankah (2012). Crime, Freedom and Civic Bonds: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):255-272.
    There is no question Arthur Ripstein’s Force and Freedom is an engaging and powerful book which will inform legal philosophy, particularly Kantian theories, for years to come. The text explores with care Kant’s legal and political philosophy, distinguishing it from his better known moral theory. Nor is Ripstein’s book simply a recounting of Kant’s legal and political theory. Ripstein develops Kant’s views in his own unique vision illustrating fresh ways of viewing the entire Kantian project. But the same strength and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  8
    Ekow N. Yankah (2013). Legal Vices and Civic Virtue: Vice Crimes, Republicanism and the Corruption of Lawfulness. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):61-82.
  3.  13
    Ekow N. Yankah (2012). When Justice Can't Be Done: The Obligation to Govern and Rights in the State of Terror. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 31 (6):643-672.
    This article explores a view nearly absent from modern political theory, that there is a duty to create and secure government which imposes on some a duty to govern. This duty is grounded in philosophers as disparate as Aquinas, Locke, Hobbes and Finnis. To fail one's duty to govern, especially over the range of goods that can only be secured by government, is to have committed a wrong against another. If there is an obligation to govern that is rooted in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4.  5
    Ekow N. Yankah (2015). Republican Responsibility in Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):457-475.
    Retributivism so dominates criminal theory that lawyers, legal scholars and law students assert with complete confidence that criminal law is justified only in light of violations of another person’s rights. Yet the core tenet of retributivism views criminal law fundamentally through the lens of individual actors, rendering both offender and victim unrecognizably denuded from their social and civic context. Doing so means that retributivism is unable to explain even our most basic criminal law practices, such as why we punish recidivists (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Ekow N. Yankah (2010). Review of Peter de Marneffe, Liberalism and Prostitution. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (4).
      Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography