33 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Elisabeth Camp [32]Elisabeth Maura Camp [1]
  1.  82
    Elisabeth Camp (2013). Slurring Perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3):330-349.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  33
    Elisabeth Camp (forthcoming). Why Metaphors Make Good Insults: Perspectives, Presupposition, and Pragmatics. Philosophical Studies:1-18.
    Metaphors are powerful communicative tools because they produce ‘framing effects’. These effects are especially palpable when the metaphor is an insult that denigrates the hearer or someone he cares about. In such cases, just comprehending the metaphor produces a kind of ‘complicity’ that cannot easily be undone by denying the speaker’s claim. Several theorists have taken this to show that metaphors are engaged in a different line of work from ordinary communication. Against this, I argue that metaphorical insults are rhetorically (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Elisabeth Camp (2012). Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Noûs 46 (4):587 - 634.
    Traditional theories of sarcasm treat it as a case of a speaker's meaning the opposite of what she says. Recently, 'expressivists' have argued that sarcasm is not a type of speaker meaning at all, but merely the expression of a dissociative attitude toward an evoked thought or perspective. I argue that we should analyze sarcasm in terms of meaning inversion, as the traditional theory does; but that we need to construe 'meaning' more broadly, to include illocutionary force and evaluative attitudes (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  4.  83
    Elisabeth Camp (2007). Thinking with Maps. Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):145–182.
    Most of us create and use a panoply of non-sentential representations throughout our ordinary lives: we regularly use maps to navigate, charts to keep track of complex patterns of data, and diagrams to visualize logical and causal relations among states of affairs. But philosophers typically pay little attention to such representations, focusing almost exclusively on language instead. In particular, when theorizing about the mind, many philosophers assume that there is a very tight mapping between language and thought. Some analyze utterances (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5. Elisabeth Camp (2006). Contextualism, Metaphor, and What is Said. Mind and Language 21 (3):280–309.
    On a familiar and prima facie plausible view of metaphor, speakers who speak metaphorically say one thing in order to mean another. A variety of theorists have recently challenged this view; they offer criteria for distinguishing what is said from what is merely meant, and argue that these support classifying metaphor within 'what is said'. I consider four such criteria, and argue that when properly understood, they support the traditional classification instead. I conclude by sketching how we might extract a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  6. Elisabeth Camp (2009). Two Varieties of Literary Imagination: Metaphor, Fiction, and Thought Experiments. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (1):107-130.
    Recently, philosophers have discovered that they have a lot to learn from, or at least to ponder about, fiction. Many metaphysicians are attracted to fiction as a model for our talk about purported objects and properties, such as numbers, morality, and possible worlds, without embracing a robust Platonist ontology. In addition, a growing group of philosophers of mind are interested in the implications of our engagement with fiction for our understanding of the mind and emotions: If I don’t believe that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  7. Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):154-170.
    Philosophers have often adopted a dismissive attitude toward metaphor. Hobbes (1651, ch. 8) advocated excluding metaphors from rational discourse because they “openly profess deceit,” while Locke (1690, Bk. 3, ch. 10) claimed that figurative uses of language serve only “to insinuate wrong ideas, move the passions, and thereby mislead the judgment; and so indeed are perfect cheats.” Later, logical positivists like Ayer and Carnap assumed that because metaphors like..
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8. Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor and That Certain 'Je Ne Sais Quoi'. Philosophical Studies 129 (1):1 - 25.
    Philosophers have traditionally inclined toward one of two opposite extremes when it comes to metaphor. On the one hand, partisans of metaphor have tended to believe that metaphors do something different in kind from literal utterances; it is a ‘heresy’, they think, either to deny that what metaphors do is genuinely cognitive, or to assume that it can be translated into literal terms. On the other hand, analytic philosophers have typically denied just this: they tend to assume that if metaphors (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  88
    Elisabeth Camp (2009). Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2):275-311.
    I argue that we can reconcile two seemingly incompatible traditions for thinking about concepts. On the one hand, many cognitive scientists assume that the systematic redeployment of representational abilities suffices for having concepts. On the other hand, a long philosophical tradition maintains that language is necessary for genuinely conceptual thought. I argue that on a theoretically useful and empirically plausible concept of 'concept', it is necessary and sufficient for conceptual thought that a thinker be able to entertain many of the (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  10.  39
    Elisabeth Camp (2004). The Generality Constraint and Categorial Restrictions. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):209–231.
    We should not admit categorial restrictions on the significance of syntactically well formed strings. Syntactically well formed but semantically absurd strings, such as ‘Life’s but a walking shadow’ and ‘Caesar is a prime number’, can express thoughts; and competent thinkers both are able to grasp these and ought to be able to. Gareth Evans’ generality constraint, though Evans himself restricted it, should be viewed as a fully general constraint on concept possession and propositional thought. For (a) even well formed but (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  11.  53
    Elisabeth Camp (2009). A Language of Baboon Thought? In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press 108--127.
    Does thought precede language, or the other way around? How does having a language affect our thoughts? Who has a language, and who can think? These questions have traditionally been addressed by philosophers, especially by rationalists concerned to identify the essential difference between humans and other animals. More recently, theorists in cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and developmental psychology have been asking these questions in more empirically grounded ways. At its best, this confluence of philosophy and science promises to blend the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12.  30
    Elisabeth Camp (2004). The Generality Constraint and Categorial Restrictions. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):209-231.
    I argue that we should not adopt categorial restrictions on the significance of syntactically well-formed strings. Even syntactically well-formed but semantically absurd strings, such as ‘Life is but a walking shadow’ and ‘Caesar is a prime number’, can express thoughts; and competent thinkers both can and ought to be able to grasp such thoughts. A more specific way of putting this claim is that Gareth Evans’ Generality Constraint should be viewed as a fully general constraint on concept possession and propositional (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  13.  59
    Elisabeth Camp (2008). Showing, Telling and Seeing. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3:1-24.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14. Marga Reimer & Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. OUP Oxford
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    Elisabeth Camp (2015). Conventions’ Revenge: Davidson, Derangement, and Dormativity. Inquiry 59 (1):113-138.
    Davidson advocates a radical and powerful form of anti-conventionalism, on which the scope of a semantic theory is restricted to the most local of contexts: a particular utterance by a particular speaker. I argue that this hyper-localism undercuts the explanatory grounds for his assumption that semantic meaning is systematic, which is central, among other things, to his holism. More importantly, it threatens to undercut the distinction between word meaning and speaker’s meaning, which he takes to be essential to semantics. I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  72
    Elisabeth Camp (2005). Review: Josef Stern, Metaphor in Context. [REVIEW] Noûs 39 (4):715-731.
    Metaphor is a crucially context-dependent linguistic phenomenon. This fact was not clearly recognized until some time in the 1970’s. Until then, most theorists assumed that a sentence must have a fixed set of metaphorical meanings, if it had any at all. Often, they also assumed that metaphoricity was the product of grammatical deviance, in the form of a category mistake. To compensate for this deviance, they thought, at least one of the sentence’s constituent terms underwent a meaning-changing ‘metaphorical twist’, which (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  17.  43
    Elisabeth Camp (2005). Josef Stern, Metaphor in Context (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000). Noûs 39 (4):715–731.
  18. Elisabeth Maura Camp (2003). Saying and Seeing-As: The Linguistic Uses and Cognitive Effects of Metaphor. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
    Metaphor is a pervasive and significant feature of language. We use metaphor to talk about the world in familiar and innovative ways, and in contexts ranging from everyday conversation to literature and scientific theorizing. However, metaphor poses serious challenges for standard philosophical theories of meaning, because it straddles so many important boundaries: between language and thought, between semantics and pragmatics, between rational communication and mere causal association. ;In this dissertation, I develop a pragmatic theory of metaphorical utterances which reconciles two (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  19. Elisabeth Camp, Perspectives in Imaginative Engagement with Fiction.
    I take up three puzzles about our emotional and evaluative responses to fiction. First, how can we even have emotional responses to characters and events that we know not to exist, if emotions are as intimately connected to belief and action as they seem to be? One solution to this puzzle claims that we merely imagine having such emotional responses. But this raises the puzzle of why we would ever refuse to follow an author’s instructions to imagine such responses, since (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Marga Reimer & Elisabeth Camp (2006). 33.1 What is Metaphor?: A Tentative Characterization. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press 845.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  9
    Elisabeth Camp (2007). Showing, Telling and Seeing. Metaphor and “Poetic” Language. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (1).
    Theorists often associate certain “poetic” qualities with metaphor – most especially, producing an open-ended, holistic perspective which is evocative, imagistic and affectively-laden. I argue that, on the one hand, non-cognitivists are wrong to claim that metaphors only produce such perspectives: like ordinary literal speech, they also serve to undertake claims and other speech acts with propositional content. On the other hand, contextualists are wrong to assimilate metaphor to literal loose talk: metaphors depend on using one thing as a perspective for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  91
    Elisabeth Camp, Poesis Without Metaphor (Show and Tell).
    Theorists often associate certain “poetic” qualities with metaphor — most especially, open-endedness, evocativeness, imagery and affective power. However, the qualities themselves are neither necessary nor sufficient for metaphor. I argue that many of the distinctively “poetic” qualities of metaphor are in fact qualities of aspectual thought, which can also be exemplified by parables, “telling details,” and “just so” stories. Thinking about these other uses of language to produce aspectual thought forces us to pinpoint what is distinctive about metaphor, and also (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  90
    Elisabeth Camp & John Hawthorne (2008). Sarcastic 'Like': A Case Study in the Interface of Syntax and Semantics. Noûs 42 (1):1 - 21.
    The expression ‘Like’ has a wide variety of uses among English and American speakers. It may describe preference, as in (1) She likes mint chip ice cream. It may be used as a vehicle of comparison, as in (2) Trieste is like Minsk on steroids.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Elisabeth Camp & John Hawthorne (2008). Sarcastic ‘Like’: A Case Study in the Interface of Syntax and Semantics. Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Elisabeth Camp (2007). Prudent Semantics Meets Wanton Speech Act Pluralism. In G. Preyer (ed.), Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. Oxford University Press 194--215.
  26. Elisabeth Camp (2007). 1. Semantic Methodology. In G. Preyer (ed.), Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. Oxford University Press 194.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Elisabeth Camp (2006). Metaphor and That Certain ‘Je Ne Sais Quoi’. Philosophical Studies 129 (1):1-25.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Elisabeth Camp, Version Presented at the 2006 Pacific APA Why Isn't Sarcasm Semantic, Anyway?* Nearly Everyone Assumes That Sarcasm is a Pragmatic Phenomenon. But We Can Also Construct a Prima Facie Plausible..
    Nearly everyone shares the intuition that sarcasm or verbal irony1 is a use of language in which speaker meaning and sentence meaning come apart. Two millennia ago, Quintilian defined irony as speech in which “we understand something which is the opposite of what is actually said.”2 More recently, Josef Stern sharply distinguishes metaphor, which he argues is semantic, from irony: in the latter case, he says, we are not “even tempted to posit an ironic meaning in the utterance in addition (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Elisabeth Camp (2007). Introduction. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (1).
    Here, I offer a rapid overview of the theory of metaphor, in order to situate the contributions to this volume in relation to one another and within the field more generally.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Elisabeth Camp (2007). Introduction. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Elisabeth Camp, Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence and the Generality Constraint.
    A venerable philosophical tradition claims that only language users possess concepts. But this makes conceptual thought out to be an implausibly rarified achievement. A more recent tradition, based in cognitive science, maintains that any creature who can systematically recombine its representational capacities thereby deploys concepts. But this makes conceptual thought implausibly widespread. I argue for a middle ground: it is sufficient for conceptual thought that one be able to entertain many of the thoughts produced by recombining one.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Elisabeth Camp, Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Stimulus-Independence and the Generality Constraint.
    A venerable philosophical tradition claims that only language users possess concepts. But this makes conceptual thought out to be an implausibly rarified achievement. A more recent tradition, based in cognitive science, maintains that any creature who can systematically recombine its representational capacities thereby deploys concepts. But this makes conceptual thought implausibly widespread. I argue for a middle ground: it is sufficient for conceptual thought that one be able to entertain many of the thoughts produced by recombining one’s representational capacities, so (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Elisabeth Camp (2007). Showing, Telling and Seeing. Metaphor and “Poetic” Language. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography