Search results for 'Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Leigh Eric Schmidt (1998). Elizabeth C. Hirschman. Semiotica 118 (1/2):193-200.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  19
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2015). Strength of Mind and the Calm and Violent Passions. Res Philosophica 92 (3):1-21.
    Hume’s distinction between the calm and violent passions is one whose boundaries are not entirely clear. However, it is crucial to understanding his motivational theory and to identifying an unusual virtue he calls “strength of mind,” the motivational prevalence of the calm passions over the violent. In this paper, I investigate the boundaries of the calm passions and consider the constitution of strength of mind and why Hume regards it as an admirable trait. These are provocative issues for two reasons. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2006). Moral Internalism and Moral Cognitivism in Hume's Metaethics. Synthese 152 (3):353 - 370.
    Most naturalists think that the belief/desire model from Hume is the best framework for making sense of motivation. As Smith has argued, given that the cognitive state (belief) and the conative state (desire) are separate on this model, if a moral judgment is cognitive, it could not also be motivating by itself. So, it looks as though Hume and Humeans cannot hold that moral judgments are states of belief (moral cognitivism) and internally motivating (moral internalism). My chief claim is that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4.  30
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2012). The Inertness of Reason and Hume's Legacy (On-Line Publication 2015, Issue Backdated to 2012). Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):117-133.
    Hume argues against the seventeenth-century rationalists that reason is impotent to motivate action and to originate morality. Hume's arguments have standardly been considered the foundation for the Humean theory of motivation in contemporary philosophy. The Humean theory alleges that beliefs require independent desires to motivate action. Recently, however, new commentaries allege that Hume's argument concerning the inertness of reason has no bearing on whether beliefs can motivate. These commentaries maintain that for Hume, beliefs about future pleasurable and painful objects on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  10
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2015). Hume's Psychology of the Passions: The Literature and Future Directions. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (4):565-605.
    in a recent article entitled “Hume on the Passions,” Stephen Buckle opens with the claim that Hume’s theory of the passions has largely been neglected. “Apart from a couple of famous sections in the Treatise concerning the sources of action,” he writes, “the subject matter has rarely excited interest.”1 His analysis of why the subject of the passions in Hume has been uninspiring points to the fact that readers have largely misunderstood the point of Hume’s theory. They usually regard the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Katherine Schmidt, Pooja Patnaik & Elizabeth A. Kensinger (2011). Emotion's Influence on Memory for Spatial and Temporal Context. Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):229-243.
  7.  80
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1999). Hume on the Generation of Motives: Why Beliefs Alone Never Motivate. Hume Studies 25 (1-2):101-122.
    Hume’s thesis that reason alone does not motivate is taken as the ground for this theory: Reason produces beliefs only, and beliefs are mere representations of fact, which, without passions for the objects the beliefs concern, cannot move anyone at all. Discussions of the Humean theory of motivation usually begin with the motivating passions in place without asking about their genesis. This emphasis, I think, overlooks a good deal of what Hume’s thesis concerning the motivational impotence of reason is about: (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2008). The Humean Theory of Motivation and its Critics. In A Companion to Hume. Wiley-Blackwell
  9.  40
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1994). Hume on Motivating Sentiments, the General Point of View, and the Inculcation of "Morality". Hume Studies 20 (1):37-58.
    That Hume 's theory can be interpreted in two widely divergent ways-as a version of sentimentalism and as an ideal observer theory-is symptomatic of a puzzle ensconced in Hume 's theory. How can the ground of morality be internal and motivating when an inference to the feelings of a spectator in "the general point of view" is typically necessary to get to genuine moral distinctions? This paper considers and rejects the suggestion that in moral education, for Hume, the inculcation of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  68
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1996). How Does the Humean Sense of Duty Motivate? Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):383-407.
    On Hume's account, when we lack virtues that would typically prompt moral action, we can instead be motivated by the "sense of duty." Surprisingly, Hume seems to maintain that, in such cases, we are motivated by a desire to avoid the unpleasantness of "self-hatred" evoked in us when we realize we lack certain traits others possess. This account has led commentators to argue that Hume is not a moral internalist, since motivation by duty is motivation by a self-interested desire. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  72
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2008). Reason, Morality, and Hume's "Active Principles" : Comments on Rachel Cohon's Hume's Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Hume Studies 34 (2):267-276.
    Rachel Cohon's Hume is a moral sensing theorist, who holds both that moral qualities are mind-dependent and that there is such a thing as moral knowledge. He is an anti-rationalist about motivation, arguing that reason alone does not motivate, but allows that both beliefs and passions are motivating. And he is both a descriptive and a normative moral theorist who, despite having resources for putting checks on our sentimentally-based moral evaluations, does end up with a kind of a relativistic account (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  34
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1997). Kantian Tunes on a Humean Instrument: Why Hume Is Not Really a Skeptic About Practical Reasoning. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):247 -.
  13.  31
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2012). Reasons From The Humean Perspective. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):777-796.
    Humeans about practical reasoning have tried to explain how some of our desires are reason‐giving and some are not. On one account, we act from reasons only when we act on desires that cohere in a consistent set. On another account, we act on reasons only when we act on desires that do not undermine our values. Both accounts are problematic. First, the notion of a consistent set of desires is vague and introduces a criterion not necessarily rooted in the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  35
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2011). Ruling Passions. The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):85-89.
    A radical implication of Hume’s theory of motivation is that it makes no sense, strictly speaking, to call actions rational or irrational. So, he claims, it is not contrary to reason for me to prefer the destruction of the world to getting a scratch on my finger.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  37
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2004). Love and Benevolence in Hutcheson's and Hume's Theories of the Passions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):631 – 653.
  16.  13
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2013). Moral Sentimentalism and the Reasonableness of Being Good. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2013 (no. 263):9-27.
    In this paper, I discuss the implications of Hutcheson’s and Hume’s sentimentalist theories for the question of whether and how we can offer reasons to be moral. Hutcheson and Hume agree that reason does not give us ultimate ends. Because of this, on Hutcheson’s line, the possession of affections and of a moral sense makes practical reasons possible. On Hume’s view, that reason does not give us ultimate ends means that reason does not motivate on its own, and this makes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  13
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1994). Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study in the Unity of A Treatise of Human Nature (Review). [REVIEW] Hume Studies 19 (2):324-326.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2015). Moral and Scientific Realism: Essays in Honor of Richard N. Boyd and Nicholas L. Sturgeon. Philosophical Studies 172 (4):841-841.
  19.  5
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1997). The British Moralists and the Internal 'Ought': 1640-1740. Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (3):470-472.
  20.  17
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1984). Kenny's Aquinas on Dispositions for Human Acts. New Scholasticism 58 (4):424-446.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  13
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1999). Religion and Faction in Hume's Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Faith and Philosophy 16 (4):569-573.
  22.  14
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1994). Hume on Passion, Pleasure, and the Reasonableness of Ends. Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (2):1-11.
  23.  16
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2001). A Cultivated Reason: An Essay on Hume and Humeanism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 110 (3):443-446.
  24. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2007). Moral Naturalism and the Possibility of Making Ourselves Better. In Brad Wilburn (ed.), Moral Cultivation. Lexington Books
  25.  19
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2007). Review of Michael B. Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (8).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  15
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2004). Introduction. Utilitas 16 (2):119-123.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1986). Hutcheson's Perceptual and Moral Subjectivism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):407 - 421.
  28. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe & Carol J. White (eds.) (1993). Faith in Theory and Practice: Essays on Justifying Religious Belief. Open Court.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  6
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2006). Review of Joyce Jenkins, Jennifer Whiting, Christopher Williams (Eds.), Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (2).
  30.  4
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe & Michael J. Meyer (2001). Carol Jean White, 1946-2000. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 74 (5):251 - 253.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Calvin K. Lai, Allison L. Skinner, Erin Cooley, Sohad Murrar, Markus Brauer, Thierry Devos, Jimmy Calanchini, Y. Jenny Xiao, Christina Pedram, Christopher K. Marshburn, Stefanie Simon, John C. Blanchar, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, John Conway, Liz Redford, Rick A. Klein, Gina Roussos, Fabian M. H. Schellhaas, Mason Burns, Xiaoqing Hu, Meghan C. McLean, Jordan R. Axt, Shaki Asgari, Kathleen Schmidt, Rachel Rubinstein, Maddalena Marini, Sandro Rubichi, Jiyun-Elizabeth L. Shin & Brian A. Nosek (forthcoming). Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: II. Intervention Effectiveness Across Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  25
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (ed.) (2008). A Companion to Hume. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Comprised of twenty-nine specially commissioned essays, _A Companion to Hume_ examines the depth of the philosophies and influence of one of history's most remarkable thinkers. Demonstrates the range of Hume's work and illuminates the ongoing debates that it has generated Organized by subject, with introductions to each section to orient the reader Explores topics such as knowledge, passion, morality, religion, economics, and politics Examines the paradoxes of Hume's thought and his legacy, covering the methods, themes, and consequences of his contributions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (ed.) (2011). A Companion to Hume. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Comprised of twenty-nine specially commissioned essays, _A Companion to Hume_ examines the depth of the philosophies and influence of one of history's most remarkable thinkers. Demonstrates the range of Hume's work and illuminates the ongoing debates that it has generated Organized by subject, with introductions to each section to orient the reader Explores topics such as knowledge, passion, morality, religion, economics, and politics Examines the paradoxes of Hume's thought and his legacy, covering the methods, themes, and consequences of his contributions (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2002). Review of DANCY, J.-Practical Reality. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 43 (4):312-312.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2002). Francis Hutcheson. In Steven Nadler (ed.), A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Blackwell
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1992). Francis Hutcheson's Moral Theory. [REVIEW] Ethics 102:882.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2012). Hume and the Passions as Original Existences. In Lorenzo Greco & Alessio Vaccari (ed.), Hume Readings. Edizioni di Storia E Letteratura
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2004). Is Physicalism Near Enough? On Jaegwon Kim’s ‘Physicalism or Something Near Enough’. In João Sàágua (ed.), A Explicação da Interpretação Humana/The Explanation of Human Interpretation. Edições Colibri 111-16.
  39.  38
    Elizabeth S. Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Jayprakash Vaidya (eds.) (2007). Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Part of the _Blackwell Readings in the History of Philosophy_ series, this survey of late modern philosophy focuses on the key texts and philosophers of the period whose beliefs changed the course of western thought. Gathers together the key texts from the most significant and influential philosophers of the late modern era to provide a thorough introduction to the period. Features the writings of Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Leibniz, Kant, Rousseau, Bentham and other leading thinkers. Examines such topics as empiricism, rationalism, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2000). On Hume. Wadsworth.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1997). Morality (Ethics). In Edward Barbarell Don Garrett (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Empiricism (Greenwood Press). 269-73.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1987). Review of D.D. Raphael, Adam Smith (Oxford University Press, 1985). [REVIEW] Philosophical Review:612-15.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (1995). Review of David Fate Norton (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 104:275-77.
  44.  8
    Helmut Schmidt (1987). Alcock's Critique of Schmidt's Experiments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):609.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Hermann-Josef Cloeren & Siegfried J. Schmidt (1971). Philosophie Als Sprachkritik Im 19. Jahrhundert. Textauswahl. Hrsg. Von Hermann-Josef Cloeren [Und Siegfried J. Schmidt.]. [REVIEW] Frommann-Holzboog.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Ludwig Feuerbach & Gerhart Schmidt (1967). Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft Kritische Ausgabe Mit Einleitung Und Anmerkungen von Gerhart Schmidt. V. Klostermann.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Adam Jankowski, Robert Lettner, Burghart Schmidt, Dieter Ronte, Anne Marie Freybourg & Philipp Stadler (eds.) (2010). Adam Jankowski, Robert Lettner, Burghart Schmidt: Philosophie der Landschaft: Zwischen Denken Und Bild. Jovis.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Matthias Jung, Klaus-jürgen Grün & Alfred Schmidt (1991). Idee, Natur Und Geschichte Alfred Schmidt Zum Sechzigsten Geburtstag.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Immanuel Kant & Heinrich Schmidt (1908). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, Herausg. Von H. Schmidt. Volksausg.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Martin Luther & Sebastian Schmidt (1664). Beati Patris Martini Lutheri Liber de Servo Arbitrio, Contra Desid. Erasmum Roterodamum [de Libero Arbitrio] Cum Brevibus Annotationibus Ed. À S. Schmidt. [REVIEW]
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000