Search results for 'Ella Segev' (try it on Scholar)

469 found
Order:
  1.  63
    Joseph Y. Halpern, Dov Samet & Ella Segev (2009). Defining Knowledge in Terms of Belief: The Modal Logic Perspective. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):469-487.
    The question of whether knowledge is definable in terms of belief, which has played an important role in epistemology for the last 50 years, is studied here in the framework of epistemic and doxastic logics. Three notions of definability are considered: explicit definability, implicit definability, and reducibility, where explicit definability is equivalent to the combination of implicit definability and reducibility. It is shown that if knowledge satisfies any set of axioms contained in S5, then it cannot be explicitly defined in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  22
    Joseph Y. Halpern, Dov Samet & Ella Segev (2009). On Definability in Multimodal Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):451-468.
    Three notions of definability in multimodal logic are considered. Two are analogous to the notions of explicit definability and implicit definability introduced by Beth in the context of first-order logic. However, while by Beth’s theorem the two types of definability are equivalent for first-order logic, such an equivalence does not hold for multimodal logics. A third notion of definability, reducibility, is introduced; it is shown that in multimodal logics, explicit definability is equivalent to the combination of implicit definability and reducibility. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  22
    Re'em Segev (2008). Online Exclusive: Response To Whitley Kaufman: The Distributive Justice Theory Of Self-Defense. Ethics & International Affairs 22.
    Segev argues for a theory of distributive justice and considers its implications. This theory includes a principle of responsibility that was endorsed by others within an account of defensive force. Kaufman criticizes this account, which he refers to as the "distributive justice theory of self- defense ". In this paper, Segev responds to this criticism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Re'em Segev (2010). Is the Criminal Law (So) Special? Comments on Douglas Husak’s Theory of Criminalization. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 1 (1):3-20.
    This is Re'em Segev's contribution to the symposium on Douglas Husak's book "Overcriminalization.".
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Alon Segev (2008). The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference Heidegger's Critique of Hegel. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  15
    Re’em Segev (forthcoming). Should We Prevent Deontological Wrongdoing? Philosophical Studies.
    Is there a reason to prevent deontological wrongdoing – an action that is wrong due to the violation of a decisive deontological constraint (when there is no consequential reason against it)? This question is perplexing. On the one hand, the intuitive response seems to be positive, both when the question is considered in the abstract and when it is considered with regard to paradigmatic cases of deontological wrongdoing such as Bridge and Transplant. On the other hand, common theoretical accounts of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  83
    Mor Segev (2014). 'Obviously All This Agrees with My Will and My Intellect': Schopenhauer on Active and Passive Nous in Aristotle's De Anima Iii.5. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):535-556.
    In one of the unpublished parts of his manuscript titled the Spicilegia, Arthur Schopenhauer presents an uncharacteristically sympathetic reading of an Aristotelian text. The text in question, De anima III. 5, happens to include the only occurrence of arguably the most controversial idea in Aristotle, namely the distinction between active and passive nous. Schopenhauer interprets these two notions as corresponding to his own notions of the ?will? and the ?intellect? or ?subject of knowledge?, respectively. The result is a unique interpretation, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  55
    Re'em Segev (2009). Second-Order Equality and Levelling Down. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):425 – 443.
    Many think that equality is an intrinsic value. However, this view, especially when based on a consequential foundation, faces familiar objections related to the claim that equality is sometimes good for none and bad for some: most notably the levelling down objection. This article explores a unique (consequential) conception of equality, as part of a more general conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts, which is not exposed to these objections.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9.  77
    Re'em Segev (2006). Well-Being and Fairness. Philosophical Studies 131 (2):369-391.
    The article explores the interaction of two, potentially clashing, considerations, each reflecting a different conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts. According to the Equal Chance Principle, the harm for each person should be minimized in a significant and (roughly) equal degree; when this is impossible, each person should be accorded the highest possible equal chance to avoid the harm. According to the Importance Principle, the danger to the person who would otherwise suffer the more serious harm should (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  72
    Re'em Segev (2006). Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justificaton! Law and Philosophy 25 (1):31-79.
    According to a famous maxim, ignorance or mistake of law is no excuse. This maxim is supposed to represent both the standard and the proper rule of law. In fact, this maxim should be qualified in both respects: ignorance and mistake of law sometimes are, and (perhaps even more often) should be, excused. But this dual qualification only reinforces the fundamental and ubiquitous assumption which underlies the discussions of the subject, namely, that the only ground of exculpation relevant to ignorance (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  27
    Re'em Segev (2012). Justification Under Uncertainty. Law and Philosophy 31 (5):523-563.
    There is a controversy as to the moral status of an action in the face of uncertainty concerning a non-moral fact that is morally significant (according to an applicable moral standard): According to the objective conception, the right action is determined in light of the truth, namely the actual state of affairs (regarding the pertinent fact), whereas according to the subjective conception, the right action depends on the epistemic state of the agent, namely her (justified) belief (concerning the pertinent fact). (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  67
    Re'em Segev (2010). Hierarchical Consequentialism. Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
    The paper considers a hierarchical theory that combines concern for two values: individual well-being – as a fundamental, first-order value – and (distributive) fairness – as a high-order value that its exclusive function is to complete the value of individual well-being by resolving internal clashes within it that occur in interpersonal conflicts. The argument for this unique conception of high-order fairness is that fairness is morally significant in itself only regarding what matters – individual well-being – and when it matters (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  64
    Re'em Segev (2005). Well-Being and Fairness in the Distribution of Scarce Health Resources. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):231 – 260.
    Based on a general thesis regarding the proper resolution of interpersonal conflicts, this paper suggests a normative framework for the distribution of scarce health resources. The proposed thesis includes two basic ideas. First, individual well-being is the fundamental value. Second, interpersonal conflicts affecting well-being should be resolved in light of several conceptions of fairness, reflecting the independent value of persons and the moral significance of responsibility of individuals for the existence of interpersonal conflicts. These ideas are elaborated in several principles (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  41
    Re'em Segev (2014). Moral Rightness and the Significance of Law: Why, How and When Mistake of Law Matters. University of Toronto Law Journal, Forthcoming 64:36-63.
    The question of whether a mistake of law should negate or mitigate criminal liability is commonly considered to be pertinent to the culpability of the agent, often examined in light of the (epistemic) reasonableness of the mistake. I argue that this view disregards an important aspect of this question, namely whether a mistake of law affects the rightness of the action, particularly in light of the moral significance of the mistake. I argue that several plausible premises, regarding moral rightness under (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  31
    Bilha Segev & J. C. Wells (2001). A Light-Fronts Approach to a Two-Center Time-Dependent Dirac Equation. Foundations of Physics 31 (6):993-1015.
    The two center time dependent Dirac equation, for an electron in the external field of two colliding ultrarelativistic heavy ions is considered. In the ultrarelativistic limit, the ions are practically moving at the speed of light and the electromagnetic fields of the ions are confined to the light fronts by the extreme Lorentz contraction and by the choice of gauge, designed to remove the long-range Coulomb effects. An exact solution to the ultrarelativistic limit of the two-center Dirac equation is found (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  39
    Re'em Segev (2013). Making Sense of Discrimination. Ratio Juris 27 (1):47-78.
    Discrimination is a central moral and legal concept. However, it is also a contested one. Particularly, accounts of the wrongness of discrimination often rely on controversial and particular assumptions. In this paper, I argue that a theory of discrimination that relies on premises that are general (rather than unique to the concept of discrimination) and widely accepted provides a plausible (exhaustive) account of the concept of wrongful discrimination. According to the combined theory, wrongful discrimination consists of allocating a benefit that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  56
    Mordechai Kremnitzer & Re'em Segev (2000). The Legality of Interrogational Torture: A Question of Proper Authorization or a Substantive Moral Issue. Israel Law Review 34 (2):509-559.
    The article explores the Israeli Supreme Court main judgment regarding the legality of the use of special interrogation methods in order extract information concerning future acts of terror. The Judgment's main conclusion was that while there might be a justification for using exceptional interrogation measures in order to save lives, based on the concept of lesser evil as embedded in the criminal defense of necessity, the government is nevertheless not authorized to use such means in the absence of explicit legislation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  20
    Mor Segev (2012). The Teleological Significance of Dreaming in Aristotle. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:107-141.
    In his discussions of dreaming in the Parva Naturalia, Aristotle neither claims nor denies that dreams serve a natural purpose. Modern scholarship generally interprets dreaming as useless and teleologically irrelevant for him. I argue that Aristotle's teleology permits certain types of dream to have a natural role in end-directed processes. Dreams are left-overs from waking experience, but they may, like certain bodily residues, be used by nature, which does ‘nothing in vain’ and makes use of available resources, for the benefit (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  48
    Re'em Segev (2007). Lesser Evil and Responsibility: Comments on Jeff McMahan's Analysis of the Morality of War. Israel Law Review 40 (3):709-729.
    The main aim of Jeff McMahan's manuscript on the morality of war is to answer the question: why and accordingly when is it justified or permissible to kill people in war? However, McMahan argues that the same principles apply to individual actions and to war. McMahan rejects all doctrines of collective responsibility and liability. His claim is that every individual is liable for what he has done and not for the actions of others - even if both are part of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  47
    Re'em Segev (2008). Responsibility and Moral Luck: Comments on Benjamin Zipursky, 'Two Dimensions of Responsibility in Crime, Tort, and Moral Luck'. Theoretical Inquiries in Law Forum 9 (1):39-46.
    The essence of the moral luck question is whether the responsibility of persons is determined only in light of actions that are within their control or also in light of factors, such as the consequences of their actions, which are beyond their control. Most people seem to have contrasting intuitions regarding this question. On the one hand, there is a common intuition that the responsibility of persons should be judged only in light of what is within their control. On the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  34
    Re'em Segev (2008). The Distributive Justice Theory of Self-Defense: A Response to Whitley Kaufman. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
    In several papers, I have argued for a theory of distributive justice and considered its implications. This theory includes a principle of responsibility that was endorsed by others within an account of defensive force (self-defense and defense of others). Whitley Kaufman criticizes this account which he refers to as the "distributive justice theory of self-defense" (DJ theory). In this paper, I respond to this criticism. I argue that Kaufman presents the theory inaccurately, that his standard of evaluation of the theory (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Alon Segev (2008). The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  26
    Re'em Segev (2005). Review of Michael Ignatieff, The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. [REVIEW] Ethics 115 (4):821-824.
    How should a democratic state fight terrorism? This is the question discussed by Michael Ignatieff in his latest book. Ignatieff explores several possible positions as a response to this question. The review considers the analysis of these positions.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  18
    Re'em Segev (2011). Governmental Power: Quality or Identity? Comment on Alon Harel's Argument Against Outsourcing Violence. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2):416-423.
    What is the appropriate division of power between public officials and private individuals? The straightforward answer to this question, it seems, is that an official should have a power if she employs it (morally) better compared to a private individual. However, Alon Harel argues that this answer is misguided, or at least partially, since there are some decisions—mainly concerning the employment of violence—that should be made and implemented only by public officials regardless of the (relative) moral quality of the decision (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  11
    Re'em Segev (2013). The Argument for (Living) Originalism: Comments on Jack Balkin's Theory of Constitutional Interpretation. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies.
    In this comment I consider Jack Balkin’s general argument for his method of constitutional interpretation – the question of why interpret (the United States Constitution) in this way (as presented in his book Living Originalism). I contrast this question with the way in which the conclusion of this argument should be implemented with regard to specific clauses – the question of how to interpret (the United States Constitution). While the former question is concerned with the general form of the argument, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  12
    Re’em Segev (2010). Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.
    Justificatory defenses apply to actions that are generally wrong and illegal—mainly since they harm people—when they are justified—usually since they prevent harm to others. A strict conception of justification limits justificatory defenses to actions that reflect all pertinent principles in the optimal manner. A more relaxed conception of justification applies to actions that do not reflect all pertinent principles optimally due to mistake but are not too far from this optimum. In the paper, I consider whether justificatory defenses should reflect (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  1
    Re’em Segev (2006). Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justificaton! Law and Philosophy 25 (1):31-79.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  16
    Re'em Segev (2009). Balancing, Judicial Review and Disobedience: Comments on Richard Posner’s Analysis of Anti-Terror Measures (Not a Suicide Pact). Israel Law Review 43 (2):234-247.
    The general assumption that underlines Richard Posner’s argument in his book Not a Suicide Pact is that decisions concerning rights and security in the context of modern terrorism should be made by balancing competing interests. This assumption is obviously correct if one refers to the most rudimentary sense of balancing, namely, the idea that normative decisions should be made in light of the importance of the relevant values and considerations. However, Posner advocates a more specific conception of balancing, both substantively (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  5
    M. S. Marinov & Bilha Segev (1997). Causality and Time Dependence in Quantum Tunneling. Foundations of Physics 27 (1):113-132.
    Quantal penetration through a (stationary) one-dimensional potential barrier is considered as a time evolution of an initially prepared wave packet. The large-time asymptotics of the process is concerned. Locality of the potential imposes certain analytical properties of the interaction amplitudes in the energy representation. The results are presented in terms of development of the phase-space (Wigner's) quasi-distribution. The phase-space evolution kernel is constructed, and it is shown that in the presence of a positive potential no part of the distribution is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Galit Segev, Sarit Nisim & Orly Benjamin (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility as Shaped by Managers’ Role Dissonance: Cleaning Services Procurement in Israel. Journal of Business Ethics 130 (1):209-221.
    Public procurement provides an excellent window into the shaping of corporate social responsibility of companies contracted by the government. To this emerging scholarly realization, we want to add that public procurement provides also the opportunity to examine corporate social responsibility as practiced by public sector organizations. This opportunity enables the investigation of the conditions under which public sector organizations endorse CSR guidelines, adherence to which demonstrates accountability for their service providers’ legal, employment-related practices. Our study examined the possibility that public (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  2
    Re’em Segev (forthcoming). Responsibility and Justificatory Defenses. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-14.
    Criminal prohibitions typically forbid harming people. Justificatory defenses, such as lesser evil, justifying necessity and justifying self-defense, provide exceptions to such prohibitions if certain conditions are met. One common condition is that the agent is not responsible for the conflict. The questions whether justificatory defenses should include such a condition, and if so what should be its content, are controversial. I argue that responsibility for a conflict counts against protecting the responsible person at the expense of a non-responsible or a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. George Melvyn Ella (2012). The Practical Divinity of Universal Learning: John Durie's Educational Pansophism. Verlag Für Kultur Und Wissenschaft (Culture and Science Publ.) Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Tom Rockmore & Csikós Ella (2002). Hegel és az analitikus hegelianizmus korlátai. Magyar Filozofiai Szemle 1.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  32
    Re'em Segev (2001). Freedom of Expression Against Governmental Authorities. Israel Democracy Institute.
    The subject of this study is the justification for limiting negative expression directed at the government: its institutions and public officials, in order to preserve public faith in government. This paper is an abstract of a book that considers this question. The conclusion is that since the value of speech concerned with the performance of government is very high and the interest in protecting the status of government is limited and typically not substantial, there is generally no justification for legal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  52
    Re'em Segev (2008). Freedom of Expression: Justifications & Restrictions. Israel Democracy Institute.
    "Freedom of expression" is a complex notion that reflects various considerations and raises many questions related to their content and interaction. This paper is an abstract of a book that considers general aspects regarding the justification and the limits of freedom of expression and analyzes exiting law in light of this normative discussion. Particularly, it considers the way to determine the proper scope of freedom of expression; first-order and second-order considerations in favor and against freedom of expression, both in general (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Alon Segev (2008). Leaving the “Real Hume” in Peace and Reading the Dialogues From a Moral Perspective. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 8 (2).
    This paper offers a new reading of Hume’s much discussed Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779/2000) which shows that, in contrast to what commentators tend to ascribe to Hume, the crux of the text is not epistemological-ontological – that is, not the arguments in favour of and against God’s existence – but moral. It is shown that, although most of the epistemologicalontological pro-and-contra arguments are quite weak, Hume’s interlocutors nevertheless cling to their theses from beginning to end, with the reason for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Re’em Segev (2006). Well-Being and Fairness. Philosophical Studies 131 (2):369-391.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  30
    Re'em Segev (2008). Weighing Values and Balancing Interests. Israel Democracy Institute.
    One of the central normative questions regards a decision between conflicting moral values. A decision of this nature is often required in disciplines such as philosophy, economics and law. According to common terminology, a decision between conflicting values reflects a balance of values, considerations or interests. Several types of questions arise in this context. One category includes substantive questions: which values exist, which considerations should be derived from these values, what is the degree of importance of these considerations, and which (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Yoel Yinon, Aharon Bizman, Sarah Cohen & Arde Segev (1976). Effects of Guilt-Arousal Communications on Volunteering to the Civil Guard: A Field Experiment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (6):493-494.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    John Kaag (2011). Idealism, Pragmatism, and Feminism: The Philosophy of Ella Lyman Cabot. Lexington.
    Idealism, Pragmatism, and Feminism provides an account of the life and writings of Ella Lyman Cabot (1866-1934), a woman who received formal training, but not formal recognition, in the field of classical American philosophy. It highlights the themes of idealism, pragmatism and feminism as they emerged in the course of career as an educational reformer and ethicist that spanned nearly four decades. Cabot's writings, developed in graduate seminars at Harvard and Radcliffe at the turn of the century complement, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  28
    John Kaag (2008). Women and Forgotten Movements in American Philosophy: The Work of Ella Lyman Cabot and Mary Parker Follett. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 134-157.
    This paper recovers and investigates the work of two forgotten figures in the history of American philosophy: Ella Lyman Cabot and Mary Parker Follett. It focuses on Cabot's work, developed between 1889 and 1906. During this period, Cabot took several classes given by Josiah Royce at Radcliffe College. Cabot's work creatively extends Royce's early thinking on the issues of growth, unity, and loyalty. This paper claims that Cabot's writing serves as a valuable type of Roycean interpretation—an interpretation that sheds (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Ella Lyman Cabot & John Kaag (2008). Project MUSE Journals Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy Volume 44, Number 1, Winter 2008 Women and Forgotten Movements in American Philosophy: The Work of Ella Lyman Cabot and Mary Parker Follett. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Farah Ghaderi & Karim Sadeghi (2016). Appropriating Difference in Ella C. Sykes’ Through Persia on a Side-Saddle. Angelaki 21 (2):163-176.
    This article teases out Ella Sykes’ responses to the differences she encounters in the contact zone in Persia in her much-neglected travel narrative Through Persia on a Side-Saddle. The authors argue that Ella Sykes’ position/self-positioning in relation to difference is shaped by various, and at times opposing, factors, which contribute to the ambivalent nature of her representations of Persia and its people in her travel narrative. The paper proposes that even though Through Persia seems to be moulded by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. John Kaag (2013). Idealism, Pragmatism, and Feminism: The Philosophy of Ella Lyman Cabot. Lexington Books.
    This is an intellectual biography in the most literal sense; at no point in the history of American philosophy has an individual embodied the ideals that they wrote about at length. Philosophical idealism, pragmatism and feminism served as guides for Ella Lyman Cabot as she entered the discipline of philosophy, a discipline that continues to marginalize the work of women to this very day.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  10
    John Kaag (2011). Narrative and Moral Psychology in the Philosophy of Ella Lyman Cabot. The Pluralist 6 (3):64-79.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  1
    Marcus B. Weaver-Hightower (forthcoming). Losing Thomas & Ella: A Father’s Story. Journal of Medical Humanities.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  9
    Geraldine Muhlmann (2007). Hannah Arendt and the Liberal Tradition: Heritage and Differences (Translated by Ella Brians). Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 28 (2):117-138.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    H. Stuart Jones (1917). Two Roman Towns Aquae Sextiae: Histoire d'Aix-En-Provence Dans L'Antiquityé. By Michel Clerc: 10″ × 6½″. One Vol. Pp. 576, with 42 Plates, and 24 Figures in Text. Aix-En-Provence: A. Dragon. A Study of Tibur, Historical, Literary, and Epigraphical, From the Earliest Times to the Close of the Roman Empire (Johns Hopkins University Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy). By Ella Bourne. 9½″X6½″. One Vol. Pp. 75. The Collegiate Press, George Banta Publishing Company, Menasha, Wisconsin, 1916. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (3-4):106-107.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  6
    Daniel Attas & Fragmenting Property (2006). Bebhinn Donnelly/the Epistemic Connection Between Nature and Value in New and Traditional Natural Law Theory 1–29 Re'em Segev/Justification, Rationality and Mistake: Mistake of Law is No Excuse? It Might Be a Justification! 31–79. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 25:673-674.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  5
    Manuel García-Carpintero (2012). La filosofía analítica y nuestra contribución a ella: Respuesta a Guillermo Hurtado. Dianoia 57 (69):151-158.
    En este comentario se ofrece una explicación alternativa a la que dio Guillermo Hurtado en su diagnóstico de la filosofía analítica actual en general y de su ejercicio en el mundo latinoamericano, y, por consiguiente, se concluye con una muy diferente apreciación de los méritos de la filosofía analítica. This note provides an alternative explanation to the one offered by Guillermo Hurtado in his diagnostics of present-day Analytic Philosophy and its practice in the Latin-American world, and as a result offers (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 469