Search results for 'Emanuela Campisi' (try it on Scholar)

112 found
Sort by:
  1. Marco Mazzone & Emanuela Campisi (2010). Are There Communicative Intentions? In L. A. Perez Miranda & A. I. Madariaga (eds.), Advances in Cognitive Science: Learning, Evolution, and Social Action. IWCogSc-10 Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Cognitive Science.score: 240.0
    Grice in pragmatics and Levelt in psycholinguistics have proposed models of human communication where the starting point of communicative action is an individual intention. This assumption, though, has to face serious objections with regard to the alleged existence of explicit representations of the communicative goals to be pursued. Here evidence is surveyed which shows that in fact speaking may ordinarily be a quite automatic activity prompted by contextual cues and driven by behavioural schemata abstracted away from social regularities. On the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marco Mazzone & Emanuela Campisi (2012). Distributed Intentionality: A Model of Intentional Behavior in Humans. Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):267 - 290.score: 240.0
    (2013). Distributed intentionality: A model of intentional behavior in humans. Philosophical Psychology: Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 267-290. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2011.641743.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michele Campisi (2005). On the Mechanical Foundations of Thermodynamics: The Generalized Helmholtz Theorem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (2):275-290.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Joseph Campisi (2011). Feast and Famine. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (2):34-46.score: 30.0
    Philosophical analyses of fast food have been relatively nonexistent. One of the only philosophers who provides a theoretical analysis of fast food is Douglas Kellner, who maintains that fast food is "dehumanizing." The most prominent scholarly or academic treatment of fast food is that of the sociologist George Ritzer, who advances the "McDonaldization" thesis, while claiming that fast food is "dehumanizing." Neither Kellner nor Ritzer offer a sustained analysis in defense of this claim. This paper will attempt to provide such (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Etienne Balibar (2011). Philosophy and the Frontiers of the Political. A Biographical-Theoretical Interview with Emanuela Fornari. Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):23-64.score: 18.0
    Philosophy and the Frontiers of the Political is the title of a biographical-theoretical interview between Emanuela Fornari and Étienne Balibar. The interview falls into three parts. The first part retraces the theoretical and intellectual climate in which Balibar received his education in the early 1960s: in this context the study of classical thinkers such as Spinoza went hand in hand with a radical rethinking of the relations between politics and philosophy, conducted in the context of an attempt to provide (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. A. F. Norman (1991). Emanuela Masaracchia (ed., tr.): Giuliano Imperatore Contra Galilaeos. Introduzione, testo critico e traduzione. (Testi e commenti, 9.) Pp. 398. Rome: Ateneo, 1990. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (2):478-479.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. David Thomas (1991). Emanuela Battaglia: 'ARTOS' il lessico della panificazione nei papiri greci. (Bibliotheca di Aevum Antiquum, 2 [Istituto di Filologia Classica e di Papirologia].) Pp. 252; 10 plates. Milan: Vita e Pensiero, 1989. Paper, L. 30,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):520-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Teresa Brennan, Drucilla Cornell & Jacques Derrida (1999). And Emanuela Bianchi (Chair). In Emanuela Bianchi (ed.), Is Feminist Philosophy Philosophy? Northwestern University Press. 26.score: 15.0
  9. Enrico Di Giacomo (2011). Emanuela Usai, All'ombra della Lunga casa: Lega irochese e Imperi coloniali europei in Nord America nel XVII secolo. Información Filosófica 8 (16):160-162.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Maureen C. Miller (2007). Emanuela Lanza ed., Le carte del capitolo della cattedrale di Verona, 2: (1152–1183). Introductory essay by Gian Maria Varanini. (Fonti per la Storia della Terraferma Veneta, 22.) Rome: Viella, 2006. Pp. lxxix, 347 plus 16 black-and-white plates. [REVIEW] Speculum 82 (3):716-717.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Étienne Balibar (2009). La filosofia e le frontiere del politico. Intervista teorico-biografica. A cura di Emanuela Fornari. Iride 22 (1):31-70.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Maria Accame (2012). Bessarione E la sua accademia presentazione Del libro curato da Andrzej gutkowski E Emanuela prinzivalli. Miscellanea Francescana 112 (1-2):252-260.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Elvio Baccarini (2011). Emanuela Ceva, Giustizia E Conflitti di Valori: Una Proposta Procedurale (Justice and Conflicts of Values: A Proceduralist Proposal). Croatian Journal of Philosophy 32:249-255.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. M. Baldini (2009). Caritas italiana e Fondazione Emanuela Zancan, Ripartire dai poveri. Rapporto 2008 su povertà ed esclusione sociale in Italia. Polis 23 (1):157-158.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jacques Derrida (1999). Edited by Judith Friedlander and Emanuela Bianchi. In Emanuela Bianchi (ed.), Is Feminist Philosophy Philosophy? Northwestern University Press. 10.score: 15.0
  16. Simone Galea (2006). Face to Face with Emanuela. Reflections on the Uses of the Memoir in Exploring the Life Story of a Ninteenth Century Woman Teacher. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research 11 (2):35-51.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Anton Markoš & Tomáš Hermann (eds.) (2004). Emanuel Rádl, Vědec a Filosof: Sborník Z Mezinárodní Konference Konané U Příležitosti 130. Výročí Narození a 60. Výročí Úmrtí Emanuela Rádla (Praha 9.-12. Února 2003). [REVIEW] Výzkumné Centrum Pro Dějiny Vědy.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Barbara Santini (2011). Emanuela Pistilli, Tra dogmatismo e scetticismo. Fonti e genesi della filosofia di Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 2:355.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter Verbeek & Frans Bm de Waal (1995). Emanuela Cenami Spada, Filippo Aureli. In P. Rochat (ed.), The Self in Infancy: Theory and Research. Elsevier. 193.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Rafał Włodarczyk (2007). O niszczeniu transcendencji według Emanuela Levinasa. Principia 49.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Emanuela Bianchi (2012). The Interruptive Feminine: Aleatory Time and Feminist Politics. In Henriette Gunkel, Chrysanthi Nigianni & Fanny Söderbäck (eds.), Undutiful Daughters: New Directions in Feminist Thought and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
  22. Emanuela Bianchi (2012). Natal Bodies, Mortal Bodies, Sexual Bodies. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 33 (1):57-84.score: 3.0
  23. Emanuela Ceva (2009). Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation Within a Procedural Theory of Justice. Res Publica 15 (3):219-235.score: 3.0
    Acts of civil disobedience and conscientious objection provide valuable indications of the congruence of political outcomes with citizens’ conceptions of justice and the good. As their primary concern is substantive, their logic seems extraneous to procedural approaches to justice. Accordingly, it has often been argued that these latter condemn citizens to a ‘deaf-and-blind’ acceptance of the outcomes of agreed procedures. A closer analysis of such acts of contestation shall reveal that although, for proceduralism, the outcomes of just procedures cannot be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Emanuela Ceva (2008). Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.score: 3.0
    This paper aims to outline the essential structural traits that a procedural theory of justice for the management of conflicts about values should display in order to combine open-endedness and cogency. To this purpose, it offers an investigation into the characteristics of procedural justice through a critical assessment of John Rawls‟s taxonomy of proceduralism, in terms of perfect, imperfect and pure procedural justice. Given the concessions the two former kinds of proceduralism make to substantive theories, and the potentially misleading characterisation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Emanuela Bianchi (2010). Sexual Topologies in the Aristotelian Cosmos: Revisiting Irigaray's Physics of Sexual Difference. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):373-389.score: 3.0
    Irigaray’s engagement with Aristotelian physics provides a specific diagnosis of women’s ontological and ethical situation under Western metaphysics: Women provide place and containership to men, but have no place of their own, rendering them uncontained and abyssal. She calls for a reconfiguration of this topological imaginary as a precondition for an ethics of sexual difference. This paper returns to Aristotelian cosmological texts to further investigate the topologies of sexual difference suggested there. In an analysis both psychoanalytic and phenomenological, the paper (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Emanuela Ceva, 'Audi Alteram Partem’ but Why? On Procedural Equality and Justice.score: 3.0
    This paper addresses the problem of the foundation of a procedural and minimalist approach to justice in terms of fair hearing. This approach may be summarised in the ‘principle of adversary argument’ (the idea that each side in a conflict should be heard). In particular, I intend to test whether this principle may provide the bases for a conception of justice applicable to conflicts of value in politics. More precisely, the considerations I shall offer aim to answer the following question: (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Emanuela Ceva (2011). Self-Legislation, Respect and the Reconciliation of Minority Claims. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):14-28.score: 3.0
    It is a widely supported claim that liberal democratic institutions should treat citizens with equal respect. I neither dispute nor champion this claim, but investigate how it could be fulfilled. I do this by asking, as a sort of litmus test, how liberal democratic institutions should treat with respect citizens holding minority convictions, and thereby dissenting from a deliberative output. The first step of my argument consists in clarifying the sense in which liberal democracies have a primary concern for the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Emanuela Bianchi (2012). Rewriting Difference: Irigaray and “The Greeks”. Edited by Elena Tzelepis and Athena Athanasiou. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010. [REVIEW] Hypatia 27 (2):455-460.score: 3.0
  29. Emanuela Bianchi (2006). Receptacle/Chōra: Figuring the Errant Feminine in Plato's Timaeus. Hypatia 21 (4):124-146.score: 3.0
    This essay undertakes a reexamination of the notion of the receptacle/chōra in Plato's Timaeus, asking what its value may be to feminists seeking to understand the topology of the feminine in Western philosophy. As the source of cosmic motion as well as a restless figurality, labile and polyvocal, the receptacle/chōra offers a fecund zone of destabilization that allows for an immanent critique of ancient metaphysics. Engaging with Derridean, Irigarayan, and Kristevan analyses, Bianchi explores whether receptacle/chōra can exceed its reduction to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Emanuela Ceva (2012). Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):183-200.score: 3.0
    Whilst legitimacy is often thought to concern the processes through which coercive decisions are made in society, justice has been standardly viewed as a ‘substantial’ matter concerning the moral justification of the terms of social cooperation. Accordingly, theorization about procedures may seem appropriate for the former but not for the latter. To defend proceduralism as a relevant approach to justice, I distinguish three questions: (1) Who is entitled to exercise coercive power? (2) On what terms should the participants to a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Emanuela Ceva (2005). Liberal Pluralism and Pluralist Liberalism. Res Publica 11 (2):201-211.score: 3.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Emanuela Bianchi (ed.) (1999). Is Feminist Philosophy Philosophy? Northwestern University Press.score: 3.0
    Drawing attention to the vexed relationship between feminist theory and philosophy, Is Feminist Philosophy Philosophy? demonstrates the spectrum of significant work being done at this contested boundary. The volume offers clear statements by seventeen distinguished scholars as well as a full range of philosophical approaches; it also presents feminist philosophers in conversation both as feminists and as philosophers, making the book accessible to a wide audience. -/- Table of Contents -/- Opening plenary: Drucilla Cornell, Jacques Derrida, and Teresa Brennan — (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Emanuela Fornari (2007). Modernity Out of Joint: Global Democracy and Asian Values in Jürgen Habermas and Amartya K. Sen. Davies Group.score: 3.0
    Global cultures, local ethics -- Modernity and the West's self-understanding : the discursive paradigm -- Pluriversal justice : Amartya Sen and the capabilities approach.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Emanuela Ceva (2007). Plural Values and Heterogeneous Situations. Considerations on the Scope for a Political Theory of Justice. European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3):359-375.score: 3.0
    This article aims to investigate the way in which a political theory of justice should respond to the endorsement of pluralism. After offering reasons in support of the necessity for such a theory to take pluralism seriously, an argument is put forward for its characterization in minimal and procedural terms. However, taking issue with the straightforward relationship of implication identified by a number of scholars between pluralism and procedural justice, this article contends that a direct relation can only be established (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Emanuela Ceva & Enzo Rossi (eds.) (2012). Justice, Legitimacy, and Diversity: Political Authority Between Realism and Moralism. Routledge.score: 3.0
    Most contemporary political philosophers take justice—rather than legitimacy—to be the fundamental virtue of political institutions vis-à-vis the challenges of ethical diversity. Justice-driven theorists are primarily concerned with finding mutually acceptable terms to arbitrate the claims of conflicting individuals and groups. Legitimacy-driven theorists, instead, focus on the conditions under which those exercising political authority on an ethically heterogeneous polity are entitled to do so. But what difference would it make to the management of ethical diversity in liberal democratic societies if legitimacy (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Emanuela Ceva & Sofia Moratti (2013). Whose Self-Determination? Barriers to Access to Emergency Hormonal Contraception in Italy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (2):139-167.score: 3.0
    It is a standard requirement of democratic theory that all members of society be treated with equal respect as capable of self-determination (Christiano 2004; Dworkin 1977; Gutmann and Thompson 2004; Patten 2011; Waldron 1999). The fulfillment of this requirement is problematic vis-à-vis conscientious dissenters. Conscientious dissenters refuse to comply with legally enforced duties when compliance risks jeopardizing their moral integrity, because the required behavior would compromise their loyalty to (some of) their moral commitments. Coercing conscientious dissenters into behavior they deem (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Emanuela Bianchi (2007). Aristotelian Dunamis and Sexual Difference. Philosophy Today 51 (Supplement):89-97.score: 3.0
  38. Emanuela Ceva (2012). Why Toleration Is Not the Appropriate Response to Dissenting Minorities' Claims. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3).score: 3.0
    For many liberal democrats toleration has become a sort of pet-concept, to which appeal is made in the face of a myriad issues related to the treatment of minorities. Against the inflationary use of toleration, whether understood positively as recognition or negatively as forbearance, I argue that toleration may not provide the conceptual and normative tools to understand and address the claims for accommodation raised by at least one kind of significant minority: democratic dissenting minorities. These are individuals, or aggregates (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Emanuela Ceva & Andrea Fracasso (2010). Seeking Mutual Understanding. A Discourse Theoretical Analysis of the WTO Dispute Settlement System. World Trade Review 9 (3):457-485.score: 3.0
    The WTO Dispute Settlement System (DSS) has been the object of many studies in politics, law, and economics focusing on institutional design problems. This paper contributes to such studies by accounting for the argumentative nature and sophisticated features of the DSS through a philosophical analysis of the procedures through which it is articulated. Jürgen Habermas's discourse theory is used as a hermeneutic device to disentangle the types of ‘orientations’ (compromise, consensus, and mutual understanding) pertaining to DSS procedures. We show that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Emanuela Bianchi (2006). Material Vicissitudes and Technical Wonders: The Ambiguous Figure of Automaton in Aristotle's Metaphysics of Sexual Difference. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):109-139.score: 3.0
    In Aristotle’s physics and biology, matter’s capacity for spontaneous, opaque, chance deviation is named by automaton and marked with a feminine sign, while at the same time these mysterious motions are articulated, rendered knowable and predictable via the figure of ta automata, the automatic puppets. This paper traces how automaton functions in the Aristotelian text as a symptomatic crossing-point, an uncanny and chiasmatic figure in which materiality and logos, phusis, and technē, death and life, masculine and feminine, are intertwined and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Emanuela Ceva & Federico Zuolo, A Matter of Respect. On the Relation Between the Majority and Minorities in a Democracy.score: 3.0
    The relations between the majority and minorities in a democracy have been standardly viewed as the main subject matter of toleration: the majority should refrain from using its dominant position to interfere with some minorities’ practices or beliefs despite its dislike or disapproval of such practices or beliefs. Can the idea of toleration provide us with the necessary resources to understand and respond to the problems arising out of majority/minorities relations in a democracy? We reply in the negative and make (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Emanuela Prinzivalli (2006). La controversia origeniana di fine IV secolo e la diffusione della conoscenza di Origene in Occidente. Augustinianum 46 (1):35-50.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Emanuela Ceva, Toleration. Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.score: 3.0
  44. Emanuela Ceva & Gideon Calder (2009). Values, Diversity and the Justification of EU Institutions. Political Studies 57 (4):828-845.score: 3.0
    Liberal theories of justice typically claim that political institutions should be justifiable to those who live under them – whatever their values. The more such values diverge, the greater the challenge of justifiability. Diversity of this kind becomes especially pronounced when the institutions in question are supra-national. Focusing on the case of the European Union, this paper aims to address a basic question: what kinds of value should inform the justification of political institutions facing a plurality of value systems? One (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Emanuela Scribano (2009). Causalité de la raison et liberté chez Spinoza. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 107 (4):567-582.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Daniela Di Cagno, Emanuela Sciubba & Marco Spallone (2012). Choosing a Gambling Partner: Testing a Model of Mutual Insurance in the Lab. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 72 (4):537-571.score: 3.0
    In this study, we investigate how economic agents choose gambling partners and how paired risky choices differ from individual ones. To this aim, we develop a simple model and design a laboratory experiment that allows us to compare individual versus paired decisions across two treatments, where pairs are, respectively, exogenously and endogenously formed. In both treatments, paired subjects decide individually and independently how to allocate their wealth over a portfolio of lotteries and fully commit to share any winnings. The main (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Emanuela Prinzivalli (1985). Eresia ed eretici nel Corpus Ippolitiano. Augustinianum 25 (3):711-722.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Emanuela Ceva & Federico Zuolo (2013). A Matter of Respect: On Majority‐Minority Relations in a Liberal Democracy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (3):239-253.score: 3.0
    In this article, we engage critically with the understanding of majority-minority relations in a liberal democracy as relations of toleration. We make two main claims: first, that appeals to toleration are unable to capture the procedural problems concerning the unequal socio-political participation of minorities, and, second, that they do not offer any critical tool to establish what judgements the majority is entitled to consider valid reasons for action with respect to some minority. We suggest supplementing the reference to toleration with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Emanuela Ceva (2010). How Should a Theory of Justice Respond to Value Conflicts? Some Meta-Theoretical Reflections. Rivista di Filosofia 101 (1):81-98.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Emanuela Turillazzi & Vittorio Fineschi (2009). How Old Are You? Newborn Gestational Age Discriminates Neonatal Resuscitation Practices in the Italian Debate. BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):19-.score: 3.0
    BackgroundMultidisciplinary study groups have produced documents in an attempt to support decisions regarding whether to resuscitate "at risk" newborns or not. Moreover, there has been an increasingly insistent request for juridical regulation of neonatal resuscitation practices as well as for clarification of the role of parents in decisions regarding this kind of assistance. The crux of the matter is whether strict guidelines, reference standards based on the parameter of gestational age and authority rules are necessary.DiscussionThe Italian scenario reflects the current (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 112