Search results for 'Embryonic stem cells Law and legislation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Judit Sándor & Violeta Beširević (eds.) (2009). Perfect Copy?: Law and Ethics of Reproductive Medicine. Cenger for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Judit Sándor & Violeta Beširević (eds.) (2009). Perfect Copy?: Law and Ethics of Reproductive Medicine. Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Minou Bernadette Friele (2008). Rechtsethik der Embryonenforschung: Rechtsharmonisierung in Moralisch Umstrittenen Bereichen. Mentis.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  18
    William M. Sage (2010). Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
    Embryonic stem cells are actively debated in political and public policy arenas. However, the connections between stem cell innovation and overall health care policy are seldom elucidated. As with many controversial aspects of medical care, the stem cell debate bridges to a variety of social conversations beyond abortion. Some issues, such as translational medicine, commercialization, patient and public safety, health care spending, physician practice, and access to insurance and health care services, are core health policy (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  33
    A. -K. M. Andersson (2011). Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.
    This article contributes to the current debate on human embryonic stem cell researchers’ possible complicity in the destruction of human embryos and the relevance of such complicity for the issue of commodification of human embryos. I will discuss if, and to what extent, researchers who destroy human embryos, and researchers who merely use human embryos destroyed by others, have moral use rights, and/or moral property rights, in these embryos. I argue that the moral status of the human embryo, (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  47
    P. S. Copland (2004). The Roman Catholic Church and Embryonic Stem Cells. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):607-608.
    Skene and Parker1 raise a number of concerns about religious doctrine unduly influencing law and public policy through amicus curiae contributions to civil litigations or direct lobbying of politicians. Oakley2 picks this up in the same issue with an emphasis on the Roman Catholic Church’s interest in preventing the destruction of embryos for embryonic stem cell research. Skene, Parker, and Oakley seem to be concerned mostly with religious views having undue influence on public policy. My concern is the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  27
    Patrick L. Taylor (2005). The Gap Between Law and Ethics in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Overcoming the Effect of U.S. Federal Policy on Research Advances and Public Benefit. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):589-616.
    Key ethical issues arise in association with the conduct of stem cell research by research institutions in the United States. These ethical issues, summarized in detail, receive no adequate translation into federal laws or regulations, also described in this article. U.S. Federal policy takes a passive approach to these ethical issues, translating them simply into limitations on taxpayer funding, and foregoes scientific and ethical leadership while protecting intellectual property interests through a laissez faire approach to stem cell patents (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  1
    Dong‐Bo Ou, Hong‐Juan Lang, Rui Chen, Xiong‐Tao Liu & Qiang‐Sun Zheng (2009). Using Embryonic Stem Cells to Form a Biological Pacemaker Via Tissue Engineering Technology. Bioessays 31 (2):246-252.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. William M. Sage (2010). Will Embryonic Stem Cells Change Health Policy? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):342-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  2
    Michael Sean Pepper, C. Gouveia & M. Nőthling Slabbert (2015). Legislation Governing Pluripotent Stem Cells in South Africa. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 8 (2):23.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  31
    Mi-Kyung Kim (2009). Oversight Framework Over Oocyte Procurement for Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Comparative Analysis of the Hwang Woo Suk Case Under South Korean Bioethics Law and U.S. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):367-384.
    We examine whether the current regulatory regime instituted in South Korea and the United States would have prevented Hwang’s potential transgressions in oocyte procurement for somatic cell nuclear transfer, we compare the general aspects and oversight framework of the Bioethics and Biosafety Act in South Korea and the US National Academies’ Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and apply the relevant provisions and recommendations to each transgression. We conclude that the Act would institute centralized oversight under governmental (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  27
    Demetrio Neri (2011). The Race Toward 'Ethically Universally Acceptable' Human Pluripotent (Embryonic-Like) Stem Cells: Only a Problem of Sources? Bioethics 25 (5):260-266.
    Over the past few years, several proposals aimed at procuring human pluripotent (embryonic-like) stem cells without involving the destruction of a human embryo have been proposed and widely discussed. This article focuses on a basic aspect of the debate, namely the plausibility of one or more of these new proposals being able to meet the ethical requirements that those who regard the human embryo as sacred have tried to impose on stem cells research in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  6
    H.-W. Denker (2006). Potentiality of Embryonic Stem Cells: An Ethical Problem Even with Alternative Stem Cell Sources. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):665-671.
    The recent discussions about alternative sources of human embryonic stem cells , while stirring new interest in the developmental potential of the various abnormal embryos or constructs proposed as such sources, also raise questions about the potential of the derived embryonic stem cells. The data on the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells that seem relevant for ethical considerations and aspects of patentability are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the meaning (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  1
    Hans-Werner Denker (2006). Potentiality of Embryonic Stem Cells: An Ethical Problem Even with Alternative Stem Cell Sources. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):665-671.
    The recent discussions about alternative sources of human embryonic stem cells , while stirring new interest in the developmental potential of the various abnormal embryos or constructs proposed as such sources, also raise questions about the potential of the derived embryonic stem cells. The data on the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells that seem relevant for ethical considerations and aspects of patentability are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  11
    Godfrey B. Tangwa (2007). Moral Status of Embryonic Stem Cells: Perspective of an African Villager. Bioethics 21 (8):449–457.
  16.  3
    Roman J. Krawetz, Xiangyun Li & Derrick E. Rancourt (2009). Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Caught Between a ROCK Inhibitor and a Hard Place. Bioessays 31 (3):336-343.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  35
    Nicholas Agar (2007). Embryonic Potential and Stem Cells. Bioethics 21 (4):198–207.
  18.  3
    Frank Zenker (2010). Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A Case Study on the Opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an Amendment of the Stem Cell Law. Informal Logic 30 (1):62-91.
    This paper analyzes and evaluates the 2007 majority opinion of the German National Ethics Council which seeks to establish new information (as to the inferior quality of legally procurable human embryonic stem cells) as a sufficient reason for a relaxation of the 2002 Stem Cell Law. A micro-level analysis of the opinion’s central section is conducted and evaluated vis à vis the strongest known opponent position in the national debate at that time. The argumentation is claimed (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Philip J. Nickel (2008). Ethical Issues in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. In Kristen Renwick Monroe, Ronald B. Miller & Jerome Tobis (eds.), Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical & Political Issues. University of California Press
    As a moral philosopher, the perspective I will take in this chapter is one of argumentation and informed judgment about two main questions: whether individuals should ever choose to conduct human embryonic stem cell research, and whether the law should permit this type of research. I will also touch upon a secondary question, that of whether the government ought to pay for this type of research. I will discuss some of the main arguments at stake, and explain how (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  6
    J. R. Meyer (2000). Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Respect for Life. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):166-170.
    The purpose of this essay is to stimulate academic discussion about the ethical justification of using human primordial stem cells for tissue transplantation, cell replacement, and gene therapy. There are intriguing alternatives to using embryos obtained from elective abortions and in vitro fertilisation to reconstitute damaged or dysfunctional human organs. These include the expansion and transplantation of latent adult progenitor cells.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  7
    F. Simonstein (2008). Embryonic Stem Cells: The Disagreement Debate and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Israel. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):732-734.
    While some people claim that the present disagreement over embryonic stem cell research cannot be resolved, others argue that developing transparency and trust are key elements that could resolve the existing disagreements over such research. This paper reveals that transparency is not necessarily a requirement for advancing ES cell research, since in Israel, for instance, there is no transparency, and research nevertheless flourishes. Moreover, trust is not independent of cultural values and religious beliefs. Because of these beliefs, the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  15
    Frederic Bretzner, Frederic Gilbert, Françoise Baylis & Robert M. Brownstone (2011). Target Populations for First-In-Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Spinal Cord Injury. Cell Stem Cell 8 (5):468-475.
    Geron recently announced that it had begun enrolling patients in the world's first-in-human clinical trial involving cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). This trial raises important questions regarding the future of hESC-based therapies, especially in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We address some safety and efficacy concerns with this research, as well as the ethics of fair subject selection. We consider other populations that might be better for this research: chronic complete SCI patients for (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  27
    Joseph J. Fins & Madeleine Schachter (2002). Patently Controversial: Markets, Morals, and the President's Proposal for Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):265-278.
    : This essay considers the implications of President George W. Bush's proposal for human embryonic stem cell research. Through the perspective of patent law, privacy, and informed consent, we elucidate the ongoing controversy about the moral standing of human embryonic stem cells and their derivatives and consider how the inconsistencies in the president's proposal will affect clinical practice and research.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  29
    Jan P. Beckmann (2004). On the German Debate on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):603 – 621.
    Germany since 1990 has one of the strictest human embryo protection laws, yet according to the Stem Cell Act of 2002 allows, under strict conditions, the import and use of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) for high priority research goals. The author tries to show how this is taken to be coherent by the parliamentary majority (though not necessarily by the general public) in Germany. In doing so, he firstly looks into the chronicle of the debate (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  18
    David B. Resnik (2002). The Commercialization of Human Stem Cells: Ethical and Policy Issues. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 10 (2):127-154.
    The first stage of the human embryonic stem(ES) cell research debate revolved aroundfundamental questions, such as whether theresearch should be done at all, what types ofresearch may be done, who should do theresearch, and how the research should befunded. Now that some of these questions arebeing answered, we are beginning to see thenext stage of the debate: the battle forproperty rights relating to human ES cells. The reason why property rights will be a keyissue in this debate (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  26.  18
    S. Aksoy (2005). Making Regulations and Drawing Up Legislation in Islamic Countries Under Conditions of Uncertainty, with Special Reference to Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):399-403.
    Stem cell research is a newly emerging technology that promises a wide variety of benefits for humanity. It has, however, also caused much ethical, legal, and theological debate. While some forms of its application were prohibited in the beginning, they have now started to be used in many countries. This fact obliges us to discuss the regulation of stem cell research at national and international level. It is obvious that in order to make regulations and to draw up (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  57
    Françoise Baylis (2009). For Love or Money? The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):385-396.
    In 2004 and 2005, Woo-Suk Hwang achieved international stardom with publications in Science reporting on successful research involving the creation of stem cells from cloned human embryos. The wonder and success all began to unravel, however, when serious ethical concerns were raised about the source of the eggs for this research. When the egg scandal had completely unfolded, it turned out that many of the women who provided eggs for stem cell research had not provided valid consents (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  9
    Melinda Bonnie Fagan (2016). Stem Cells and Systems Models: Clashing Views of Explanation. Synthese 193 (3):873-907.
    This paper examines a case of failed interdisciplinary collaboration, between experimental stem cell research and theoretical systems biology. Recently, two groups of theoretical biologists have proposed dynamical systems models as a basis for understanding stem cells and their distinctive capacities. Experimental stem cell biologists, whose work focuses on manipulation of concrete cells, tissues and organisms, have largely ignored these proposals. I argue that ‘failure to communicate’ in this case is rooted in divergent views of explanation: (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  7
    Geron Ethics Advisory Board (forthcoming). Research with Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Ethical Considerations. Hastings Center Report.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30. Audrey R. Chapman (2009). The Ethics of Patenting Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):pp. 261-288.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  92
    Karen Lebacqz, Michael M. Mendiola, Ted Peters, Ernlé W. D. Young & Laurie Zoloth‐Dorfman (1999). Research with Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Ethical Considerations. Hastings Center Report 29 (2):31-36.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  55
    Sophie Bridge (2013). Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: An Alternative to Embryonic Stem Cells? Asian Bioethics Review 5 (1):25-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  22
    William B. Hurlbut (2005). Altered Nuclear Transfer as a Morally Acceptable Means for the Procurement of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (2):211-228.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34.  17
    Zubin Master & Bryn Williams-Jones (2007). The Global Hla Banking of Embryonic Stem Cells Requires Further Scientific Justification. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):45 – 46.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35.  18
    Jeffrey L. Ecker & Patricia Pearl O'Rourke (2007). An Immodest Proposal: Banking Embryonic Stem Cells for Solid Organ Transplantation is Problematic and Premature. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):48 – 50.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  3
    David Haig (2015). Going Retro: Transposable Elements, Embryonic Stem Cells, and the Mammalian Placenta. Bioessays 37 (11):1154-1154.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Melinda Bonnie Fagan (forthcoming). Generative Models: Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Multiple Modeling Relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  4
    Maureen L. Condic & Edward J. Furton (2007). Harvesting Embryonic Stem Cells From Deceased Human Embryos. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 7 (3):507-526.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alexandra L. Joyner (1991). Gene Targeting and Gene Trap Screens Using Embryonic Stem Cells: New Approaches to Mammalian Development. Bioessays 13 (12):649-656.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  2
    M. M. Mendiola, T. Peters, E. W. Young & L. Zoloth-Dorfman (1999). Research with Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Ethical Considerations. By Geron Ethics Advisory Board. Hastings Center Report 29 (2):31.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  2
    Anna-Karin M. Andersson (2011). Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Norman Ford (2000). Therapeutic Use of Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 6 (1):11.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    Rebecca Dresser (2002). Embryonic Stem Cells: Expanding the Analysis. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):40 – 41.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Fernando Miguel Pérez Herranz (2010). Gnoseología de Las «Células Madre Embrionarias»; Gnoseology of «Embryonic Stem Cells». Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 43:309 - 336.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    Pablo Navarro & Philip Avner (2010). An Embryonic Story: Analysis of the Gene Regulative Network Controlling Xist Expression in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Bioessays 32 (7):581-588.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  1
    G. Badura-Lotter (2001). Ethical, Biological and Legal Aspects in the Use of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Germany. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (2):38.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. William B. Hurlbut (2005). Altered Nuclear Transfer as a Morally Acceptable Means for the Procurement of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (1):145-151.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Harold Morowitz (2003). Embryonic Stem Cells. Complexity 8 (3):10-11.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Christine Mummery (2007). Cardiomyocytes From Human Embryonic Stem Cells: More Than Heart Repair Alone. Bioessays 29 (6):572-579.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Michel Revel (2010). Research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Cloning for Stem Cells. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):4-14.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000