Search results for 'Emily A. Gale' (try it on Scholar)

128 found
Sort by:
  1. John O. Reiss, Ann C. Burke, Charles Archer, Miquel de Renzi, Hernán Dopazo, Arantza Etxeberría, Emily A. Gale, J. Richard Hinchliffe, Laura Nuño de la Rosa, Chris S. Rose, Diego Rasskin-Gutman & Gerd B. Müller (2008). Pere Alberch: Originator of EvoDevo. Biological Theory 3 (4):351-356.score: 960.0
    In September 2008, 10 years after the untimely death of Pere Alberch (1954–1998), the 20th Altenberg Workshop in Theoretical Biology gathered a group of Pere’s students, col- laborators, and colleagues (Figure 1) to celebrate his contribu- tions to the origins of EvoDevo. Hosted by the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (KLI) outside Vienna, the group met for two days of discussion. The meeting was organized in tandem with a congress held in May 2008 at the Cavanilles Institute (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John O. Reiss, Ann C. Burke, Charles Archer, Miquel De Renzi, Hern an Dopazo, Arantza Etxeberrıa, Emily A. Gale, J. Richard Hinchliffe, Chris S. Rose & Diego Rasskin-Gutman (2008). Pere Alberch: Originator of EvoDevo. Biological Theory 3:4.score: 870.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss (1999). A New Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 35 (4):461-476.score: 420.0
    We will give a new cosmological argument for the existence of a being who, although not proved to be the absolutely perfect God of the great Medieval theists, also is capable of playing the role in the lives of working theists of a being that is a suitable object of worship, adoration, love, respect, and obedience. Unlike the absolutely perfect God, the God whose necessary existence is established by our argument will not be shown to essentially have the divine perfections (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss (2002). A Response to Oppy, and to Davey and Clifton. Religious Studies 38 (1):89-99.score: 420.0
    Our paper ‘A new cosmological argument’ gave an argument for the existence of God making use of the weak Principle of Sufficient Reason (W-PSR) which states that for every proposition p, if p is true, then it is possible that there is an explanation for p. Recently, Graham Oppy, as well as Kevin Davey and Rob Clifton, have criticized the argument. We reply to these criticisms. The most interesting kind of criticism in both papers alleges that the W-PSR can be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Alexander Pruss & Richard M. Gale (2003). A Response to Almeida and Judisch. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):65-72.score: 420.0
    Our new cosmological argument for the existence of God weakens the usual Principle of Sufficient Reason premise that every contingent true proposition has an explanation to a weaker principle (WPSR) that every such proposition could have an explanation. Almeida and Judisch have criticized the premises of our argument for leading to a contradiction. We show that their argument fails, but along the way we are led to clarify the nature of the conclusion of our argument. Moreover, we discuss an argument (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale (2000). Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):109-125.score: 420.0
    History and philosophy complement and overlap each other in subject matter, but the two disciplines exhibit conflict over methodology. Since Hempel's challenge to historians that they should adopt the covering law model of explanation, the methodological conflict has revolved around the respective roles of the general and the particular in each discipline. In recent years, the revival of narrativism in history, coupled with the trend in philosophy of science to rely upon case studies, joins the methodological conflict anew. So long (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Maggie Gale & Linden J. Ball (2009). Exploring the Determinants of Dual Goal Facilitation in a Rule Discovery Task. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (3):294 – 315.score: 420.0
    Wason's standard 2-4-6 task requires discovery of a single rule and leads to around 20% solutions, whereas the dual goal (DG) version requires discovery of two rules and elevates solutions to over 60%. We report an experiment that aimed to discriminate between competing accounts of DG facilitation by manipulating the degree of complementarity between the to-be-discovered rules. Results indicated that perfect rule complementarity is not essential for task success, thereby undermining a key tenet of the goal complementarity account of DG (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Linden J. Ball & Maggie Gale (2011). Exploring the Determinants of Dual Goal Facilitation in a Rule Discovery Task. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (3):294-315.score: 420.0
    Wason's standard 2-4-6 task requires discovery of a single rule and leads to around 20% solutions, whereas the dual goal (DG) version requires discovery of two rules and elevates solutions to over 60%. We report an experiment that aimed to discriminate between competing accounts of DG facilitation by manipulating the degree of complementarity between the to-be-discovered rules. Results indicated that perfect rule complementarity is not essential for task success, thereby undermining a key tenet of the goal complementarity account of DG (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George Gale (1987). A Revised Design: Teleology and Big Questions in Contemporary Cosmology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):475-491.score: 360.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard M. Gale (1969). A Note on Personal Identity and Bodily Continuity. Analysis 30 (June):193-195.score: 360.0
  11. Richard M. Gale (1986). A Priori Arguments From God's Abstractness. Noûs 20 (4):531-543.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard M. Gale (2003). A Response to My Critics. Philo 6 (1):132-165.score: 360.0
    My reply to my critics in this issue deal with the following issues: God and time, James’ will-to-believe, the free will defense, and the cognitivity of mystical experiences.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard M. Gale (2010). John Dewey's Quest for Unity: The Journey of a Promethean Mystic. Prometheus Books.score: 360.0
    Introduction -- Part I: Growth, inquiry, and unity -- Problems with inquiry -- Aesthetic inquiry -- Inquiry, inquiry, inquiry -- Why unification? -- Part II: The metaphysics of unity -- The quest for being QUA being -- Time and individuality -- The Humpty-Dumpty intuition -- The mystical.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Richard M. Gale (1977). A Reply to Oaklander. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.score: 360.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. M. Gale (1996). A. Schiesaro, P. Mitsis, J.S. Clay (edd.): Mega nepios. Il destinatatio nell' epos didascalico. (Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici, 31). Pisa: Giardini, 1993. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (1):62-64.score: 360.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard Gale (2012). Review of Robert B. Talisse, A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):435-440.score: 360.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard M. Gale (1984). Time: A Philosophical Analysis T. Chapman Synthese Library, Vol. 159 Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1982. Pp. Xvi, 162. $29.50 (U.S.). [REVIEW] Dialogue 23 (01):153-157.score: 360.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Monica R. Gale (1995). G. B. Conte: Genres and Readers. Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia. Translated by G. W. Most. With a Foreword by C. Segal. Pp. Xxiii+185. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994 (First Published in Italian in 1991). Cased, £27. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):175-176.score: 360.0
  19. M. Gale (1996). W. Clausen: A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. The Classical Review 46 (1):18-19.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Monica R. Gale (2005). Catullus M. B. Skinner: Catullus in Verona. A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116 . Pp. Xl + 256. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2003. Cased, US$59.95 (CD-ROM, US$9.95). ISBN: 0-8142-0937-8 (0-8142-9023-X CD-ROM). C. Nappa: Aspects of Catullus' Social Fiction . (Studien Zur Klassischen Philologie 125.) Pp. 180. Frankfurt, Etc.: Peter Lang, 2001. Paper, £24. ISBN: 3-631-37808-4 (US ISBN: 0-8204-5387-0). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):511-.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Richard M. Gale (2003). Review of Bruce Kuklick, A History of Philosophy in America 1720-2000. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (7).score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Richard M. Gale (1977). "The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation," by J. L. Mackie. Modern Schoolman 54 (2):173-177.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard M. Gale (1965). Why a Cause Cannot Be Later Than Its Effect. Review of Metaphysics 19 (2):209 - 234.score: 360.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard Gale (1993). A Reply to Paul Helm. Religious Studies 29 (2):257 - 263.score: 360.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard M. Gale (1962). Can a Prediction 'Become True'? Philosophical Studies 13 (3):43 - 46.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Richard M. Gale (2004). The Still Divided Self of William James: A Response to Pawelski and Cooper. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (1):153 - 170.score: 360.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Lew Zipin, Sam Sellar, Marie Brennan & Trevor Gale (2013). Educating for Futures in Marginalized Regions: A Sociological Framework for Rethinking and Researching Aspirations. Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-20.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard M. Gale (1999). A New Argument for the Existence of God: One That Works, Well, Sort Of. In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer. 85--103.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard M. Gale (1963). A Reply to Smart, Mayo and Thalberg on "Tensed Statements". Philosophical Quarterly 13 (53):351-356.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Gale (1999). Review. Fama Deum. Lucre et les raisons du mythe. A Gigandet. The Classical Review 49 (2):381-383.score: 360.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard M. Gale (1964). A Reply on the Alleged Futurity of Yesterday. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):421-422.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. Gale (1997). Notice. Lucretius: On the Nature of Things: De Rerum Natura. A Esolen. The Classical Review 47 (1):203-204.score: 360.0
  33. Catherine S. E. Bale, Nicholas J. McCullen, Timothy J. Foxon, Alastair M. Rucklidge & William F. Gale (forthcoming). Modeling Diffusion of Energy Innovations on a Heterogeneous Social Network and Approaches to Integration of Real-World Data. Complexity:n/a-n/a.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ken Gale (2010). Between the Two: A Nomadic Inquiry Into Collaborative Writing and Subjectivity. Cambridge Scholars.score: 360.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. George Gale (1998). Idealization in Cosmology: A Case Study. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63:165-182.score: 360.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. George Gale (1997). Is Leibniz Really a Rationalist? Synthesis Philosophica 12:391-402.score: 360.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. R. Gale (1993). On the Nature and Existence of God-a Reply. Religious Studies 29 (2):257-263.score: 360.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Monica R. Gale (1995). R. Heinze: Virgiľs Epic Technique. Translated by H. And D. Harvey, and F. Robertson, with a Preface by A. Wlosok. Pp. Xiv+396. London: Bristol Classical Press, 1993 (Originally Published in German, Third Edn 1915). Cased, £35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):163-.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Richard M. Gale (1968). The Philosophy of Time: A Collection of Essays. London, Macmillan.score: 360.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard M. Gale (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge University Press.score: 300.0
    There has been in recent years a plethora of defenses of theism from analytical philosophers such as Plantinga, Swinburne, and Alston. Richard Gale's important book is a critical response to these writings. New versions of cosmological, ontological, and religious experience arguments are critically evaluated, along with pragmatic arguments to justify faith on the grounds of its prudential or moral benefits. A special feature of the book is the discussion of the atheological argument that attempts to deduce a contradiction from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard M. Gale (2005/2004). The Philosophy of William James: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 300.0
    This is an accessible introduction to the full range of the philosophy of William James. It portrays that philosophy as containing a deep division between a Promethean type of pragmatism and a passive mysticism. The pragmatist James conceives of truth and meaning as a means to control nature and make it do our bidding. The mystic James eschews the use of concepts in order to penetrate to the inner conscious core of all being, including nature at large. Richard Gale (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Richard M. Gale, C. Douglas McGee & Frank A. Tillman (1964). Ryle on “Use,” “Usage,” and “Utility”. Philosophical Studies 15 (4):57 - 60.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. A. Gale & R. Downey (2001). On Genericity and Ershov's Hierarchy. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (2):161-182.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Dott Maurizio Farinelli, A. L. B. Gale & A. J. B. Robertson (1974). Ambrogio Fusinieri and the Adsorption Theory of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Annals of Science 31 (1):19-20.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. R. M. Gale & A. Pruss (1999). JJC Smart and JJ Haldane: Atheism and Theism. Faith and Philosophy 16:106-113.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Noel H. Gale & Zofia A. Stos-Gale (1991). Lead Isotope Studies in the Aegean (the British Academy Project). Proceedings of the British Academy 77:63-108.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Richard A. Gale (1999). Santayana's Bifurcationist Theory of Time. Overheard in Seville 17 (17):1-13.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. R. Pruss & Richard M. Gale (2005). Cosmological and Design Arguments. In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. 116--137.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Larry A. Greene (1996). A Gale in the Zeitgeist: A Bell Curve or a Bean Ball? Telos 1996 (106):165-178.score: 174.0
    Into the not so tranquil atmosphere of American race relations blew Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray's The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life proclaiming the emergence of a New Class of the “cognitive elite” and an underclass of the cognitively unfit. Public response has been both extensive and contradictory. Russell Jacoby and Naomi Glauberman have compiled the most comprehensive anthology of these responses, which they appropriately describe as a “gale in the Zeitgeist.” Many of the selections (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Christopher McHugh (2003). A Refutation of Gale's Creation-Immutability Arguments. Philo 6 (1):5-9.score: 144.0
    In this paper, it is shown that Richard Gale’s creation-immutability arguments are unsound. I argue that God’s act of willing the physical universe to begin to exist a finite time ago does not necessarily require any change in God’s intentions. I also argue that an immutable God is capable of answering prayer and having two-way interactions with His creatures.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 128