Search results for 'Entrenchment' (try it on Scholar)

128 found
Order:
  1.  12
    Hans Rott (1992). Preferential Belief Change Using Generalized Epistemic Entrenchment. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):45-78.
    A sentence A is epistemically less entrenched in a belief state K than a sentence B if and only if a person in belief state K who is forced to give up either A or B will give up A and hold on to B. This is the fundamental idea of epistemic entrenchment as introduced by Gärdenfors (1988) and elaborated by Gärdenfors and Makinson (1988). Another distinguishing feature of relations of epistemic entrenchment is that they permit particularly simple (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  2.  15
    Sten Lindström & Wlodek Rabinowicz (1991). Epistemic Entrenchment with Incomparabilities and Relational Belief Revision. In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer
    In earlier papers (Lindstrrm & Rabinowicz, 1989. 1990), we proposed a generalization of the AGM approach to belief revision. Our proposal was to view belief revision as a relation rather thanas a function on theories (or belief sets). The idea was to allow for there being several equally reasonable revisions of a theory with a given proposition. In the present paper, we show that the relational approach is the natural result of generalizing in a certain way an approach to belief (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  3.  88
    Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2009). Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):259 - 276.
    W. V. Quine famously argues that though all knowledge is empirical, mathematics is entrenched relative to physics and the special sciences. Further, entrenchment accounts for the necessity of mathematics relative to these other disciplines. Michael Friedman challenges Quine’s view by appealing to historicism, the thesis that the nature of science is illuminated by taking into account its historical development. Friedman argues on historicist grounds that mathematical claims serve as principles constitutive of languages within which empirical claims in physics and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  5
    Thomas Andreas Meyer, Willem Adrian Labuschagne & Johannes Heidema (2000). Refined Epistemic Entrenchment. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (2):237-259.
    Epistemic entrenchment, as presented by Gärdenfors and Makinson (1988) and Gärdenfors (1988), is a formalisation of the intuition that, when forced to choose between two beliefs, an agent will giveup the less entrenched one. While their formalisation satisfactorilycaptures the intuitive notion of the entrenchment of beliefs in a number ofaspects, the requirement that all wffs be comparable has drawn criticismfrom various quarters. We define a set of refined versions of theirentrenchment orderings that are not subject to the same (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  20
    Horacio Arló-Costa & Isaac Levi (2006). Contraction: On the Decision-Theoretical Origins of Minimal Change and Entrenchment. Synthese 152 (1):129 - 154.
    We present a decision-theoretically motivated notion of contraction which, we claim, encodes the principles of minimal change and entrenchment. Contraction is seen as an operation whose goal is to minimize loses of informational value. The operation is also compatible with the principle that in contracting A one should preserve the sentences better entrenched than A (when the belief set contains A). Even when the principle of minimal change and the latter motivation for entrenchment figure prominently among the basic (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  13
    Alessandro Ferrara (2011). Ferrajoli's Argument for Structural Entrenchment. Res Publica 17 (4):377-383.
    This paper engages with Ferrajoli’s contribution to the philosophical debate on constitutional democracy and in particular his conception of ‘structural entrenchment’, or the basis upon which one can defend the normativity of the Constitution as ‘higher law’, which can trump or limit legislation, without infringing democratic principles. Ferrajoli’s own understanding of ‘structural entrenchment’ is compared to Rawls’s and Dworkin’s arguments in support of it. Ferrajoli’s position is neither grounded on a philosophy of history, as in Rawls, nor on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  14
    Alexander Bochman (2002). Entrenchment Versus Dependence: Coherence and Foundations in Belief Change. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):3-27.
    We describe the relation between coherence and foundations approaches to belief change in terms of a correspondence between epistemic entrenchment relations(Gärdenfors and Makinson, 1988; Rott, 1992) and dependence consequence relations from Bochman (1999, 2000a).The general conclusion of the study is that dependence consequence relations are sufficiently expressive to subsume the notion of an epistemic entrenchment and its generalizations.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  24
    Abhaya C. Nayak (1994). Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment. Erkenntnis 41 (3):353-390.
    In this paper it is argued that, in order to solve the problem of iterated belief change, both the belief state and its input should be represented as epistemic entrenchment (EE) relations. A belief revision operation is constructed that updates a given EE relation to a new one in light of an evidential EE relation. It is shown that the operation in question satisfies generalized versions of the Gärdenfors revision postulates. The account offered is motivated by (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  9.  15
    Hans Rott (2003). Basic Entrenchment. Studia Logica 73 (2):257 - 280.
    In contrast to other prominent models of belief change, models based on epistemic entrenchment have up to now been applicable only in the context of very strong packages of requirements for belief revision. This paper decomposes the axiomatization of entrenchment into independent modules. Among other things it is shown how belief revision satisfying only the ‘basic’ postulates of Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson can be represented in terms of entrenchment.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  10.  26
    Jeffrey C. Schank & William C. Wimsatt (1986). Generative Entrenchment and Evolution. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:33 - 60.
    The generative entrenchment of an entity is a measure of how much of the generated structure or activity of a complex system depends upon the presence or activity of that entity. It is argued that entities with higher degrees of generative entrenchment are more conservative in evolutionary changes of such systems. A variety of models of complex structures incorporating the effects of generative entrenchment are presented and we demonstrate their relevance in analyzing and explaining a variety of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  11.  27
    Abhaya C. Nayak, Paul Nelson & Hanan Polansky (1996). Belief Change as Change in Epistemic Entrenchment. Synthese 109 (2):143 - 174.
    In this paper, it is argued that both the belief state and its input should be represented as epistemic entrenchment (EE) relations. A belief revision operation is constructed that updates a given EE relation to a new one in light of an evidential EE relation, and an axiomatic characterization of this operation is given. Unlike most belief revision operations, the one developed here can handle both multiple belief revision and iterated belief revision.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12.  79
    William C. Wimsatt (2006). Generative Entrenchment and an Evolutionary Developmental Biology for Culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):364-366.
    Mesoudi et al.'s new synthesis for cultural evolution closely parallels the evolutionary synthesis of Neo-Darwinism. It too draws inspiration from population genetics, recruits other fields, and, unfortunately, also ignores development. Enculturation involves many serially acquired skills and dependencies that allow us to build a rich cumulative culture. The newer synthesis, evolutionary developmental biology, provides a key tool, generative entrenchment, to analyze them. (Published Online November 9 2006).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  15
    Horacio Arló-Costa & Isaac Levi (2006). Contraction: On the Decision-Theoretical Origins of Minimal Change and Entrenchment. Synthese 152 (1):129-154.
    Horacio Arlo-Costa and Issac Levi. Contraction: On the Decision Theoretical Origins of Minimal Change and Entrenchment.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  6
    Eduardo Fermé & Maurício D. L. Reis (2013). Epistemic Entrenchment-Based Multiple Contractions. Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):460-487.
    In this article we present a new class of multiple contraction functionswhich are a generalization of the epistemic entrenchment-based contractions (Grdenfors & Makinson, 1988) to the case of contractions by (possibly nonsingleton) sets of sentences and provide an axiomatic characterization for that class of functions. Moreover, we show that the class of epistemic entrenchment-based multiple contractions coincides with the class of system of spheres-based multiple contractions introduced in Fermé & Reis (2012).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  15
    Robert Klee (2000). Problems with Formal Models of Epistemic Entrenchment as Applied to Scientific Theories. Synthese 122 (3):313 - 320.
    Formal models of theory contraction entered the philosophicalliterature with the prototype model by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors,and Makinson (Alchourrón et al. 1985). One influential modelinvolves theory contraction with respect to a relation calledepistemic entrenchment which orders the propositions of a theoryaccording to their relative degrees of theoretical importance.Various postulates have been suggested for characterizingepistemic entrenchment formally. I argue here that threesuggested postulates produce inappropriately bizarre results whenapplied to scientific theories. I argue that the postulates callednoncovering, continuing up, and continuing down, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Catherine Caldwell-Harris & Shimon Edelman, Tracks in the Mind: Differential Entrenchment of Common and Rare Liturgical and Everyday Multiword Phrases in Religious and Secular Hebrew Speakers.
    We tested the hypothesis that more frequent exposure to multiword phrases results in deeper entrenchment of their representations, by examining the performance of subjects of different religiosity in the recognition of briefly presented liturgical and secular phrases drawn from several frequency classes. Three of the sources were prayer texts that religious Jews are required to recite on a daily, weekly, and annual basis, respectively; two others were common and rare expressions encountered in the general secular Israeli culture. As expected, (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  30
    Johannes Lenhard & Eric Winsberg (2010). Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (3):253-262.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  18.  76
    William C. Wimsatt (1986). Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment, and the Innate-Acquired Distinction. In William Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. 185--208.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   51 citations  
  19.  2
    Sten Lindström & Wlodzimierz Rabinowicz (1991). Epistemic Entrenchment with Incomparabilities and Relational Belief Revision. In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer 93--126.
  20. Johannes Lenhard & Eric Winsberg (2010). Holism, Entrenchment, and the Future of Climate Model Pluralism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (3):253-262.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  85
    Kenneth Friedman (1973). Son of Grue: Simplicity Vs. Entrenchment. Noûs 7 (4):366-378.
  22.  15
    Hans Rott (1992). Modellings for Belief Change: Prioritization and Entrenchment. Theoria 58 (1):21-57.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  23.  52
    Michael A. Slote (1974). Entrenchment and Validity. Analysis 34 (6):204 - 207.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  18
    R. J. Bertolet (1976). On the Merits of Entrenchment. Analysis 37 (1):29 - 31.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  54
    Johannes Lenhard & Eric Winsberg (2011). Holism and Entrenchment in Climate Model Validation. In M. Carrier & A. Nordmann (eds.), Science in the Context of Application. Springer 115--130.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. David Lyons (2008). The Legal Entrenchment of Illegality. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  7
    Hans-Jörg Schmid (2010). Does Frequency in Text Instantiate Entrenchment in the Cognitive System. In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches. De Gruyter Mouton 101--133.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  8
    William C. Wimsatt (1999). Generativity, Entrenchment, Evolution, and Innateness: Philosophy, Evolutionary Biology, and Conceptual Foundations of Science. In V. Harcastle (ed.), Where Biology Meets Psychology. 137--179.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  22
    Howard Kahane (1965). Nelson Goodman's Entrenchment Theory. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):377-383.
  30.  12
    Catherine Caldwell-Harris & Shimon Edelman, Measuring Mental Entrenchment of Phrases with Perceptual Identification, Familiarity Ratings, and Corpus Frequency Statistics.
    Word recognition is the Petri dish of the cognitive sciences. The processes hypothesized to govern naming, identifying and evaluating words have shaped this field since its origin in the 1970s. Techniques to measure lexical processing are not just the back-bone of the typical experimental psychology laboratory, but are now routinely used by cognitive neuroscientists to study brain processing and increasingly by social and clinical psychologists (Eder, Hommel, and De Houwer 2007). Models developed to explain lexical processing have also aspired to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Jon Wheatley (1967). Entrenchment and Engagement. Analysis 27 (4):119 - 127.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  3
    Arturo Hernandez, Ping Li & Brian MacWhinney (2005). Competition, Resonance, Parasitism and Entrenchment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (5):220-225.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  3
    Charles Nussbaum (1996). Majoritarianism, Autonomy, and 'Entrenchment'. Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (1):85-102.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Peter Miller (1998). Entrenchment and Vision in Canadian Forest Policy. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 17 (1/2):29-45.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  2
    Shimon Edelman (2012). Measuring Mental Entrenchment of Phrases with Perceptual Identification, Familiarity Ratings, and Corpus Frequency Statistics Catherine Caldwell-Harris, Jonathan Berant And. In Dagmar Divjak & Stefan Thomas Gries (eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Representation. De Gruyter Mouton 2--165.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. B. Grunstra (1969). The Plausibility of the Entrenchment Concept. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 3:100-127.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  8
    Richard Creath (1978). A Query on Entrenchment. Philosophy of Science 45 (3):474-477.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  5
    C. Caldwellharris & A. Morris (2008). Fast Pairs: A Visual Word Recognition Paradigm for Measuring Entrenchment, Top-Down Effects, and Subjective Phenomenology☆. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1063-1081.
    When word pairs having a familiar order are sequentially flashed on a computer in their non-familiar order, , observers have a strong phenomenology of seeing them in familiar order . Reversal errors remained frequent even when participants obtained perceptual experience of reverse-display items by beginning with a block of longer-duration trials. A forced-choice order-detection procedure reduced but did not eliminate reversal errors, showing that “fast pairs” is a robust perceptual illusion. Even adjective + noun pairs showed reversal errors, and reversal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Robert Ackermann (1966). Discussion: Howard Kahane's Entrenchment Theory. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Corey Brettschneider (2008). This Book Provocatively Inquires Into Whether Some Aspects of Law Should Be Regarded as Beyond the Purview of Dem-Ocratic Procedures. On Melissa Schwartzberg's Account,“Entrenchment,”—Her Term for Those Aspects of Law Thought. ARGUMENT 6 (2):363.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2009). Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):259-276.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Johan van Benthem, Alice ter Meulen & Heinrich Wansing (1992). Thomas Andreas Meyer, Willem Adrian Labuschagne, and Johannes Heidema/Refined Espistemic Entrenchment 237-259. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 9 (2):139.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Konstantinos Georgatos (1999). To Preference Via Entrenchment. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96 (1--3):141--155.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  15
    Ben Ambridge (2013). How Do Children Restrict Their Linguistic Generalizations? An (Un‐)Grammaticality Judgment Study. Cognitive Science 37 (3):508-543.
    A paradox at the heart of language acquisition research is that, to achieve adult-like competence, children must acquire the ability to generalize verbs into non-attested structures, while avoiding utterances that are deemed ungrammatical by native speakers. For example, children must learn that, to denote the reversal of an action, un- can be added to many verbs, but not all (e.g., roll/unroll; close/*unclose). This study compared theoretical accounts of how this is done. Children aged 5–6 (N = 18), 9–10 (N = (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. Jonathan Y. Tsou (2010). Putnam's Account of Apriority and Scientific Change: Its Historical and Contemporary Interest. Synthese 176 (3):429-445.
    In the 1960s and 1970s, Hilary Putnam articulated a notion of relativized apriority that was motivated to address the problem of scientific change. This paper examines Putnam’s account in its historical context and in relation to contemporary views. I begin by locating Putnam’s analysis in the historical context of Quine’s rejection of apriority, presenting Putnam as a sympathetic commentator on Quine. Subsequently, I explicate Putnam’s positive account of apriority, focusing on his analysis of the history of physics (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  10
    Jani Raerinne (2015). Evolutionary Contingency, Stability, and Biological Laws. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):45-62.
    The contingency of biological regularities—and its implications for the existence of biological laws—has long puzzled biologists and philosophers. The best argument for the contingency of biological regularities is John Beatty’s evolutionary contingency thesis, which will be re-analyzed here. First, I argue that in Beatty’s thesis there are two versions of strong contingency used as arguments against biological laws that have gone unnoticed by his commentators. Second, Beatty’s two different versions of strong contingency are analyzed in terms of two different stabilities (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  21
    John Cantwell (1998). Resolving Conflicting Information. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):191-220.
    Information received from different sources can be inconsistent. Even when the sources of information can be ordered on the basis of their trustworthiness, it turns out that extracting an acceptable notion of support for information is a non-trivial matter, as is the question what information a rational agent should accept. Here it is shown how a support ordering on the information can be generated and how it can be used to decide what information to accept and what not to accept. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  6
    Yin-Hua Yeh, Tsun-Siou Lee & Pei-Gi Shu (2008). The Agency Problems Embedded in Firm's Equity Investment. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1/2):151 - 166.
    We find that agency problems are embedded in firm's excess and abnormal equity investments that are mainly dictated by controlling shareholder's motives and ethical choices manifested in ownership and board structure. The excess equity investment is gauged with respect to industry average. The abnormal equity investment is specifically referred to the number of nominal investment companies that are fully controlled by the controlling owners while subject to little governance. Our empirical evidences of 345 Taiwanese non-financial listed firms show that firm's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  16
    Wlodek Rabinowicz & Sten Lindström (1994). How to Model Relational Belief Revision. In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Kluwer
    This is a short version of Lindström & Rabinowicz 1991.In earlier papers, we proposed a generalization of the AGM approach to belief revision. The proposal was to view belief revision as a relation rather than as a function on theories (or belief sets). Going relational means that one allows for several equally reasonable revisions of a theory with a given proposition. In the present paper, we show that the relational approach is the natural result of generalizing in a certain way (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  9
    Pavlos Peppas (2012). Comparative Possibility in Set Contraction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):53-75.
    In a recent article, Zhang and Foo generalized the AGM postulates for contraction to include infinite epistemic input. The new type of belief change is called set contraction. Zhang and Foo also introduced a constructive model for set contraction, called nicely ordered partition, as a generalization of epistemic entrenchment. It was shown however that the functions induced from nicely ordered partitions do not quite match the postulates for set contraction. The mismatch was fixed with the introduction of an extra (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 128