Search results for 'Epistemology, perception, Snowdon' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Paul F. Snowdon (2005). The Formulation of Disjunctivism: A Response to Fish. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):129-141.
    Fish proposes that we need to elucidate what 'disjunctivism' stands for, and he also proposes that it stands for the rejection of a principle about the nature of experience that he calls the decisiveness principle. The present paper argues that his first proposal is reasonable, but then argues, in Section II, that his positive suggestion does not draw the line between disjunctivism and non-disjunctivism in the right place. In Section III, it is argued that disjunctivism is (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  2. Paul F. Snowdon (1990). The Objects of Perceptual Experience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:121-50.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  3. Paul Snowdon (2007). G. E. Moore on Sense Data and Perception. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes From G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics. Clarendon Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Paul F. Snowdon (1992). How to Interpret Direct Perception. In The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5. Paul F. Snowdon (1998). Strawson on the Concept of Perception. In The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court
  6.  12
    P. Snowdon, G. E. Moore and Sense Data.
    Book description: * G. E. Moore is a key figure in analytic philosophy * Sixteen specially written essays reflect the current resurgence of interest in Moore 's work * Superb international line-up of contributors * A valuable resource for anyone working in epistemology or ethics These sixteen original essays, whose authors include some of the world's leading philosophers, examine themes from the work of the Cambridge philosopher G. E. Moore, and demonstrate his considerable continuing influence on philosophical debate. Part I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  35
    Walter Horn (2012). Note on Two Snowdon Criticisms of the Causal Theory of Perception. Acta Analytica 27 (4):441-447.
    Two arguments Paul Snowdon has brought against the causal theory of perception are examined. One involves the claim that, based on the phenomenology of perceptual situations, it cannot be the case that perception is an essentially causal concept. The other is a reductio , according to which causal theorists’ arguments imply that a proposition Snowdon takes to be obviously non-causal ( A is married to B ) can be analyzed into some sort of indefinite ‘spousal connection’ plus a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Paul F. Snowdon (1980). Perception, Vision, and Causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81:175-92.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  9. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2013). Disjunctivism: Disjunctive Accounts in Epistemology and in the Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
    Does perception provide us with direct and unmediated access to the world around us? The so-called 'argument from illusion ' has traditionally been supposed to show otherwise: from the subject's point of view, perceptual illusions are often indistinguishable from veridical perceptions; hence, perceptual experience, as such, cannot provide us with knowledge of the world, but only with knowledge of how things appear to us. Disjunctive accounts of perceptual experience, first proposed by John McDowell and Paul Snowdon in the early (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2012). Disjunctivism: Disjunctive Accounts in Epistemology and in the Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
    Does perception provide us with direct and unmediated access to the world around us? The so-called 'argument from illusion ' has traditionally been supposed to show otherwise: from the subject's point of view, perceptual illusions are often indistinguishable from veridical perceptions; hence, perceptual experience, as such, cannot provide us with knowledge of the world, but only with knowledge of how things appear to us. Disjunctive accounts of perceptual experience, first proposed by John McDowell and Paul Snowdon in the early (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Nicholas Silins (forthcoming). Cognitive Penetration and the Epistemology of Perception. Blackwell Compass.
    In cases of cognitive penetration, the way you see the world is shaped by your prior expectations or other cognitive states. But what is cognitive penetration exactly? What are the consequences for epistemology if it sometimes happens? What are the consequences for epistemology if it never happens? This paper surveys answers to these questions and argues that cognitive penetration has implications for epistemology whether it ever happens or not.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  66
    Thomas Sturm (2011). Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment. Erkenntnis 75 (3):303-324.
    This essay aims to sharpen debates on the pros and cons of historical epistemology, which is now understood as a novel approach to the study of knowledge, by comparing it with the history of epistemology as traditionally pursued by philosophers. The many versions of both approaches are not always easily discernable. Yet, a reasoned comparison of certain versions can and should be made. In the first section of this article, I argue that the most interesting difference involves neither the subject (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Susanna Siegel & Nicholas Silins (2015). The Epistemology of Perception. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford
    An overview of the epistemology of perception, covering the nature of justification, immediate justification, the relationship between the metaphysics of perceptual experience and its rational role, the rational role of attention, and cognitive penetrability. The published version will contain a smaller bibliography, due to space constraints in the volume.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  51
    Daniel OBrien, The Epistemology of Perception. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  15.  14
    Alan H. Goldman (1981). Epistemology and the Psychology of Perception. American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (January):43-51.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  22
    Max O. Hocutt (1968). The Difference Between the Psychology and the Epistemology of Perception. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 17:61-81.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  34
    Michel Weber (2006). Whitehead's Onto-Epistemology of Perception and its Significance for Consciousness Studies. New Ideas in Psychology 24 (2):117-132.
  18. William P. Alston (1997). Chisholm on the Epistemology of Perception. In The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court
  19.  38
    F. H. George (1957). Epistemology and the Problem of Perception. Mind 66 (October):491-506.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  19
    Harold N. Lee (1964). Perception and Epistemology. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 13:27-43.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  10
    Peter K. Smith (1991). On The Objects of Perceptual Experience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:191-196.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  12
    John A. Taber (2005). A Hindu Critique of Buddhist Epistemology: Kumārila on Perception: The "Determinatin of Perception" Chapter of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa's Ślokavārttika. Routledgecurzon.
    This is a translation of the chapter on perception by Kumarilabhatta's magnum opus, the Slokavarttika , which is one of the central texts of the Hindu response to the criticism of the logical-epistemological school of Buddhist thought. It is crucial for understanding the debates between Hindus and Buddhists about metaphysical, epistemological and linguistic questions during the classical period. In an extensive commentary, the author explains the course of the argument from verse to verse and alludes to other theories of classical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  9
    Michael Lacewing (2015). Emotion, Perception, and the Self in Moral Epistemology. Dialectica 69 (3):335-355.
    In this paper, I argue against a perceptual model of moral epistemology. We should not reject the claim that there is a sense in which, on some occasions, emotions may be said to be perceptions of values or reasons. But going further than this, and taking perception as a model for moral epistemology is unhelpful and unilluminating. By focusing on the importance of the dispositions and structures of the self to moral knowledge, I bring out important disanalogies between moral epistemology (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  93
    Jeremy Randel Koons (2011). Plantinga on Properly Basic Belief in God: Lessons From the Epistemology of Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):839-850.
    Plantinga famously argues against evidentialism that belief in God can be properly basic. But the epistemology of cognitive faculties such as perception and memory which produce psychologically non-inferential beliefs shows that various inferentially justified theoretical beliefs are epistemically prior to our memory and perceptual beliefs, preventing the latter from being epistemically basic. Plantinga's analogy between the sensus divinitatis and these cognitive faculties suggests that the deliverances of the sensus divinitatis cannot be properly basic either. Objections by and on (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  18
    Jonardon Ganeri (2007). Review of Epistemology of Perception: Gaṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi, Jewel of Reflection on the Truth (About Epistemology): The Perception Chapter (Pratyakṣa-Khaṇḍa) Transliterated Text, Translation, and Philosophical Commentary. [REVIEW] Journal of the American Oriental Society 127 (3):349-354.
    The article reviews the book "Epistemology of Perception: Gaṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi, Jewel of Reflection on the Truth (About Epistemology): The Perception Chapter (Pratyakṣa-khaṇḍa) Transliterated Text, Translation, and Philosophical Commentary," by Stephen H. Phillips and N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  8
    Thomas Sturm (2011). Historical Epistemology or History of Epistemology? The Case of the Relation Between Perception and Judgment: Dedicated to Günther Patzig on His 85th Birthday. Erkenntnis 75 (3):303 - 324.
    This essay aims to sharpen debates on the pros and cons of historical epistemology, which is now understood as a novel approach to the study of knowledge, by comparing it with the history of epistemology as traditionally pursued by philosophers. The many versions of both approaches are not always easily discernable. Yet, a reasoned comparison of certain versions can and should be made. In the first section of this article, I argue that the most interesting difference involves neither the subject (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Ernest Sosa & Enrique Villanueva (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Issues, the Epistemology of Perception. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This is a collection of papers on the epistemology of perception, very broadly conceived. It contains cutting-edge work by some of the most important contributors in the field.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Sonam Thakchoe (2012). Candrakīrti’s Theory of Perception: A Case for Non-Foundationalist Epistemology in Madhyamaka. Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 11 (1):93-125.
    Some argue that Candrakīrti is committed to rejecting all theories of perception in virtue of the rejection of the foundationalisms of the Nyāya and the Pramāṇika. Others argue that Candrakīrti endorses the Nyāya theory of perception. In this paper, I will propose an alternative non-foundationalist theory of perception for Candrakīriti. I will show that Candrakrti’s works provide us sufficient evidence to defend a typical Prāsagika’s account of perception that, I argue, complements his core non-foundationalist ontology.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Celia Wolf-Devine (1993). Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception. Southern Illinois University.
    In this first book-length examination of the Cartesian theory of visual perception, Celia Wolf-Devine explores the many philosophical implications of Descartes’ theory, concluding that he ultimately failed to provide a completely mechanistic theory of visual perception. Wolf-Devine traces the development of Descartes’ thought about visual perception against the backdrop of the transition from Aristotelianism to the new mechanistic science—the major scientific paradigm shift taking place in the seventeenth century. She considers the philosopher’s work in terms of its background in Aristotelian (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30.  34
    Michael Hagner (2012). Perception, Knowledge and Freedom in the Age of Extremes: On the Historical Epistemology of Ludwik Fleck and Michael Polanyi. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):107-120.
    This paper deals with Ludwik Fleck’s theory of thought styles and Michael Polanyi’s theory of tacit knowledge. Though both concepts have been very influential for science studies in general, and both have been subject to numerous interpretations, their accounts have, somewhat surprisingly, hardly been comparatively analyzed. Both Fleck and Polanyi relied on the physiology and psychology of the senses in order to show that scientific knowledge follows less the path of logical principles than the path of accepting or rejecting (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  45
    Nicholas Silins (2016). Cognitive Penetration and the Epistemology of Perception. Philosophy Compass 11 (1):24-42.
    If our experiences are cognitively penetrable, they can be influenced by our antecedent expectations, beliefs, or other cognitive states. Theorists such as Churchland, Fodor, Macpherson, and Siegel have debated whether and how our cognitive states might influence our perceptual experiences, as well as how any such influences might affect the ability of our experiences to justify our beliefs about the external world. This article surveys views about the nature of cognitive penetration, the epistemological consequences of denying (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. John A. Taber & Kumåarila Bhaòtòta (2004). A Hindu Critique of Buddhist Epistemology Kumarila on Perception.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Jadunath Sinha (1969). Indian Epistemology of Perception. Calcutta, Sinha Pub. House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Thomas D. Senor, Perception, Evidence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement.
    In this paper I argue for a version of the Total Evidence view according to which the rational response to disagreement depends upon one's total evidence. I argue that perceptual evidence of a certain kind is significantly weightier than many other types of evidence, including testimonial. Furthermore, what is generally called "The Uniqueness Thesis" is actually a conflation of two distinct principles that I dub "Evidential Uniqueness" and "Rationality Uniqueness." The former principle is likely true but the latter almost certainly (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. William C. Fish (2005). Disjunctivism and Non-Disjunctivism: Making Sense of the Debate. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):119-127.
    During the 'What is Realism?' symposium at the 2001 Joint Session, Professor Ayers raised a number of objections to the disjunctive theory of perception. However in his reply, Professor Snowdon protested that Ayers had failed to adequately engage with the disjunctivist's position. This apparent lack of engagement suggests that the terms of this debate are not as clear as they might be. In the light of this, the current paper offers a way in which we might shed light on (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  23
    Dallas Willard (1989). Space, Color, Sense Perception and the Epistemology of Logic. The Monist 72 (1):117-133.
  37. W. C. Charton (1997). Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception-Celia Wolf-Devine. International Philosophical Quarterly 37:486-487.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Margaret Wilson, Karl Schuhmann, Nicholas Fox, John Stephens & Ralph Walker (1997). ((Review of Celia Wolf-Devine, Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception , ISBN 0-8093-1838-5); Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, with Selected Variants Front the Latin Edition of 1668, Ed. With Introduction and Notes, by Edwin Curley , ISBN 0-87220-178-3 , 0-87220-177-5 ; Allison Coudert, Leibniz and the Kabbalah , ISBN 0-7923-3114-1; Richard Price, The Correspondence, Ed. D. O. Thomas and W. Bernard Peach, Vol. III. February 1786-February 1791, Ed. W. Bernard Peach. , ISBN 0-8223-1327-8; Henry Allison, Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy , ISBN 0-521-48295-X , 0-521-48337-9 ; Terry Pinkard, Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason , ISBN 0-521-45300-3); Mary Anne Perkins, Coleridge's Philosophy, The Logos as Unifying Principle , ISBN 0-19-824075-9; Elzbieta Ettinger, Hannah Arendt - Martin Heidegger , ISBN 0-300-06407-1; Dana R. Villa, Arendt and Heidegger - The Fate of the Political ISBN 0-691-04400-7. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (2):415-445.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  9
    Jack Weir (1989). Moral Perception and Moral Epistemology. Southwest Philosophy Review 5 (2):1-8.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    Stephen Gaukroger (1996). Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception. Philosophical Books 37 (1):36-38.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    A. Smith (1996). Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception. (Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series by Celia Wolf-Devine). [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 87:169-170.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. P. C. Dodwell (1985). Theories of Perception as Experimental Epistemology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):291.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. J. Heffner (1987). Causal Relations in Visual Perception in Naturalistic Epistemology: A Symposium of Two Decades. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 100:193-214.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Pierre Manent (2012). Machine Generated Contents Note: Introduction / Eve Grace and Christopher Kelly; Part I. Politics and Economics: 1. Rousseau and the Illustrious Montesquieu / Christopher Kelly; 2. Political Economy and Individual Liberty / Ryan Patrick Hanley; Part II. Science and Epistemology: 3. The Presence of Sciences in Rousseau's Trajectory and Works / Bruno Bernardi and Bernadette Bensaud-Vincent; 4. Epistemology and Political Perception in the Case of Rousseau / Terence Marshall; Part III. The Modern or Classical, Theological or Philosophical, Foundations of Rousseau's System: 5. On the Intention of Rousseau / Leo Strauss; 6. On Strauss on Rousseau / Victor Gourevitch; 7. Built on Sand: Moral Law in Rousseau's Second Discourse / Victor Gourevitch; 8. Rousseau and Pascal / Matthew W. Maguire; Part IV. Rousseau as Educator and Legislator: 9. The Measure of the Possible: Imagination in Rousseau's Philosophical Pedagogy / Richard Velkley; 10. Rousseau's French Revolution / Pamela K. Jensen; 11. Ro. [REVIEW] In Eve Grace & Christopher Kelly (eds.), The Challenge of Rousseau. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Stephen R. Napier (2004). Motivated Cognition in Perception, Memory and Testimony: In Defense of a Responsibilist Version of Virtue Epistemology. Dissertation, Saint Louis University
    There is debate among virtue epistemologists concerning what is the nature of an intellectual virtue. Linda Zagzebski in Virtues of the Mind , for instance, argues that an intellectual virtue has both a success and motivational component. Furthermore, Zagzebski defines knowledge with reference to acts of intellectual virtue. An agent S knows p iff S performs an act of intellectual virtue in forming the belief that p. This means that Zagzebski is committed to the counter-intuitive claim that low-grade knowledge requires (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Stephen H. Phillips (2004). Epistemology of Perception: Ganṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi: Jewel of Reflection on the Truth (About Epistemology), the Perception Chapter (Pratyakṣa-Khaṇḍa). American Institute of Buddhist Studies.
  47. A. Raftopoulos & J. Zeimbekis (eds.) (2015). Cognitive Influences on Perception: Implications for Philosophy of Mind, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Action. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Joseph Thomas Tolliver (1979). Reasons, Perception, and Information: An Outline of an Information-Theoretic Epistemology. Dissertation, The Ohio State University
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. G. Vedaparayana (1997). Philosophy as the Perception of Truth-A Comment On" Epistemology of J. Krishnamurti". Indian Philosophical Quarterly 24:413-424.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  97
    Jack Lyons, Epistemological Problems of Perception.
    An introductory overview of the main issues in the epistemology of perception.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000