18 found
Order:
  1.  42
    Eric Oberheim (2007). Feyerabend's Philosophy. De Gruyter.
    This book reconstructs Feyerabend's pluralistic conceptions of knowledge and philosophy as they developed from the late 1940s through to his infamous Against ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2.  39
    Eric Oberheim (2005). On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend's Assault on Conceptual Conservatism. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2):363-90.
    This paper investigates the historical origins of the notion of incommensurability in contemporary philosophy of science. The aim is not to establish claims of priority, but to enhance our understanding of the notion by illuminating the various issues that contributed to its development. Kuhn developed his notion of incommensurability primarily under the influence of Fleck, Polanyi, and Köhler. Feyerabend, who had developed his notion more than a decade earlier, drew directly from Duhem, who had developed a notion of incommensurability in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  3.  6
    Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene, 'The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories'. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  4.  86
    Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1997). Incommensurability, Realism, and Meta-Incommensurability. Theoria 12 (3):447-465.
    The essay begins with a detailed consideration of the introduction of incommensurability by Feyerabend in 1962 which exposes several historically inaccurate claims about incommensurability. Section 2 is a coneise argument against causal theories of reference as used as arguments against incommensurability. We object to this strategy because it begs the question by presupposing realism. Section 3 introduces and discusses a hypothesis that w'e call meta-incommensurability which provides the reason for the wide-spread accusation of question-begging and use of circular argumentation among (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  5.  30
    Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Eric Oberheim (2009). Reference, Ontological Replacement and Neo-Kantianism: A Reply to Sankey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):203-209.
    Contrary to Sankey’s central assumption, incommensurability does not imply incomparability of content, nor threaten scientific realism by challenging the rationality of theory comparison. Moreover, Sankey equivocates between reference to specific entities by statements used to test theories and reference to kinds by theories themselves. This distinction helps identify and characterize the genuine threat that incommensurability poses to realism, which is ontological discontinuity as evidenced in the historical record: Successive theories reclassify objects into mutually exclusive sets of kinds to which they (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Daniel Sirtes & Eric Oberheim (2006). Einstein, Entropy, and Anomalies. AIP Conference Proceedings 861:1147-1154.
    This paper strengthens and defends the pluralistic implications of Einstein's successful, quantitative predictions of Brownian motion for a philosophical dispute about the nature of scientific advance that began between two prominent philosophers of science in the second half of the twentieth century (Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend). Kuhn promoted a monistic phase-model of scientific advance, according to which a paradigm driven `normal science' gives rise to its own anomalies, which then lead to a crisis and eventually a scientific revolution. Feyerabend (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  4
    Eric Oberheim (forthcoming). Rediscovering Einstein's Legacy: How Einstein Anticipates Kuhn and Feyerabend on the Nature of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  41
    Eric Oberheim, Hanne Andersen & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  9.  19
    Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Eric Oberheim & Hanne Andersen (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  10.  25
    Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2000). Feyerabend's Early Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):363-375.
  11.  7
    George Couvalis, Gonzalo Munévar, Eric Oberheim & Paul Hoyningen-Huehne (1999). Radical Fallibilism Vs Conceptual Analysis: The Significance of Feyerabend's Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] Metascience 8 (2):206-233.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Eric Oberheim (2005). On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s Assault on Conceptual Conservativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (2):363-390.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  34
    Eric Oberheim (2005). Book Review Feyerabend and Scientific Values. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):514-517.
  14.  12
    Eric Oberheim (1997). Bibliographie Paul Feyerabends. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (1):211-232.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  10
    Eric Oberheim (1998). Barry Gower, Scientific Method. An Historical and Philosophical Introduction Marta Feher, Changing Tools. Case Studies in the History of Scientific Methodology. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 49 (1):127-135.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  3
    Eric Oberheim (2014). Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis, Eds.Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” Revisited. New York: Routledge, 2012. Pp. 259. $125.00. [REVIEW] Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (1):157-161.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Aristides Baltas & Eric Oberheim (2008). Nonsense and Paradigm Change. Commentary. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 255:47-83.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Eric Oberheim (2001). Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being by Paul Feyerabend. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 92:597-598.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography