Search results for 'Eric R. Pedersen' (try it on Scholar)

22 found
Sort by:
  1. Eric R. Pedersen, Clayton Neighbors, Judy Tidwell & Ty W. Lostutter (2011). Do Undergraduate Student Research Participants Read Psychological Research Consent Forms? Examining Memory Effects, Condition Effects, and Individual Differences. Ethics and Behavior 21 (4):332 - 350.score: 870.0
    Although research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedical and forensic research, less is known about participants' attention to details in consent documents in psychological survey research. The present study used a randomized experimental design and found the majority of participants were unable to recall information from the consent form in both in-person and online formats. Participants were also relatively poor at recognizing important aspects of the consent form including risks to participants and confidentiality procedures. Memory effects (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Clayton Neighbors, Eric R. Pedersen, Debra Kaysen, Magdalena Kulesza & Theresa Walter (2011). What Should We Do When Participants Report Dangerous Drinking? The Impact of Personalized Letters Versus General Pamphlets as a Function of Sex and Controlled Orientation. Ethics and Behavior 22 (1):1 - 15.score: 870.0
    Research in which participants report potentially dangerous health-related behaviors raises ethical and professional questions about what to do with that information. Policies and laws regarding reportable behaviors vary across states and Institutional Review Boards (IRB). In alcohol research, IRBs often require researchers to respond to participants who report dangerous drinking practices. Researchers have little guidance regarding how best to respond in such cases. Personalized feedback or general nonpersonalized information may prove differentially effective as a function of gender and/or level of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Brad Pedersen (1993). Reviews : R. Eyerman and A. Jamison, Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach (Polity Press, 1991). Thesis Eleven 35 (1):123-127.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. R. Forde & R. Pedersen (2012). Evaluation of Case Consultations in Clinical Ethics Committees. Clinical Ethics 7 (1):45-50.score: 280.0
    If ethics consultation services influence medical decisions it is important to evaluate how ethical dilemmas are dealt with by clinical ethics committees (CECs). Such evaluation is rare. This study presents a feasible and practical method of evaluating case discussions in CECs and the results emerging from the use of this method. A written presentation of an end-of-life dilemma was sent to all Norwegian ethics committees. The committees were asked to deal with the case as they would do if it was (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eric S. Post, Christian Pedersen, Christopher C. Wilmers & Mads C. Forchhammer (2008). Phenological Sequences Reveal Aggregate Life History Response to Climatic Warming. In Carolyn Merchant (ed.), Ecology. Humanity Books. 363-370.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. P. Nortvedt, R. Pedersen, K. H. Grothe, M. Nordhaug, M. Kirkevold, A. Slettebo, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). Clinical Prioritisations of Healthcare for the Aged--Professional Roles. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):332-335.score: 240.0
    Background: Although fair distribution of healthcare services for older patients is an important challenge, qualitative research exploring clinicians’ considerations in clinical prioritisation within this field is scarce. Objectives: To explore how clinicians understand their professional role in clinical prioritisations in healthcare services for old patients. Design: A semi-structured interview-guide was employed to interview 45 clinicians working with older patients. The interviews were analysed qualitatively using hermeneutical content analysis. Participants: 20 physicians and 25 nurses working in public hospitals and nursing homes (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. R. Pedersen, S. A. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster & B. Molewijk (2010). The Development of a Descriptive Evaluation Tool for Clinical Ethics Case Consultations. Clinical Ethics 5 (3):136-141.score: 240.0
    There is growing interest in clinical ethics. However, we still have sparse knowledge about what is actually going on in the everyday practice of clinical ethics consultations. This paper introduces a descriptive evaluation tool to present, discuss and compare how clinical ethics case consultations are actually carried out. The tool does not aim to define ‘best practice’. Rather, it facilitates concrete comparisons and evaluative discussions of the role, function, procedures and ideals inherent in clinical ethics case consultation practices. The tool (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. R. Pedersen, V. Akre & R. Forde (2009). What is Happening During Case Deliberations in Clinical Ethics Committees? A Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):147-152.score: 240.0
    Background: Clinical ethics consultation services have been established in many countries during recent decades. An important task is to discuss concrete clinical cases. However, empirical research observing what is happening during such deliberations is scarce. Objectives: To explore clinical ethics committees’ deliberations and to identify areas for improvement. Design: A pilot study including observations of committees deliberating a paper case, semistructured group interviews, and qualitative analysis of the data. Participants: Nine hospital ethics committees in Norway. Results and interpretations: Key elements (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. Pedersen, P. Nortvedt, M. Nordhaug, A. Slettebo, K. H. Grothe, M. Kirkevold, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). In Quest of Justice? Clinical Prioritisation in Healthcare for the Aged. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):230-235.score: 240.0
  10. L. Lillemoen & R. Pedersen (2012). Ethical Challenges and How to Develop Ethics Support in Primary Health Care. Nursing Ethics 20 (1):0969733012452687.score: 240.0
    Ethics support in primary health care has been sparser than in hospitals, the need for ethics support is probably no less. We have, however, limited knowledge about how to develop ethics support that responds to primary health-care workers’ needs. In this article, we present a survey with a mixture of closed- and open-ended questions concerning: How frequent and how distressed various types of ethical challenges make the primary health-care workers feel, how important they think it is to deal with these (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Lynn Carol Miller, William C. Pedersen, Allison R. Johnson & Anila D. Putcha (2000). For the Short-Term: Are Women Just Looking for a Few Pair of Genes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):614-615.score: 240.0
    Although we find Gangestad & Simpson's argument intriguing, we question some of its underlying assumptions, including: (1) that fluctuating asymmetry (FA) is consistently heritable; (2) that symmetry is driving the effects; (3) that use of parametric tests with FA is appropriate; and (4) that a short-term mating strategy produces more offspring than a long-term strategy.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. R. Pedersen, P. Nortvedt, M. Nordhaug, Å Slettebø, K. H. Grøthe, M. Kirkevold, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). In Quest of Justice? Clinical Prioritisation in Healthcare for the Aged. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):230-235.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Doohwan Ahn, Sanda Badescu, Giorgio Baruchello, Raj Nath Bhat, Laura Boileau, Rosalind Carey, Camelia-Mihaela Cmeciu, Alan Goldstone, James Grieve, John Grumley, Grant Havers, Stefan Höjelid, Peter Isackson, Marguerite Johnson, Adrienne Kertzer, J.-Guy Lalande, Clinton R. Long, Joseph Mali, Ben Marsden, Peter Monteath, Michael Edward Moore, Jeff Noonan, Lynda Payne, Joyce Senders Pedersen, Brayton Polka, Lily Polliack, John Preston, Anthony Pym, Marina Ritzarev, Joseph Rouse, Peter N. Saeta, Arthur B. Shostak, Stanley Shostak, Marcia Landy, Kenneth R. Stunkel, I. I. I. Wheeler & Phillip H. Wiebe (2009). Null. The European Legacy 14 (6):731-771.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Casper Bruun Jensen, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, G. E. R. Lloyd, Martin Holbraad, Andreas Roepstorff, Isabelle Stengers, Helen Verran, Steven D. Brown, Brit Ross Winthereik, Marilyn Strathern, Bruce Kapferer, Annemarie Mol, Morten Axel Pedersen, Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Matei Candea, Debbora Battaglia & Roy Wagner (2011). Introduction: Contexts for a Comparative Relativism. Common Knowledge 17 (1):1-12.score: 240.0
    This introduction to the Common Knowledge symposium titled “Comparative Relativism” outlines a variety of intellectual contexts where placing the unlikely companion terms comparison and relativism in conjunction offers analytical purchase. If comparison, in the most general sense, involves the investigation of discrete contexts in order to elucidate their similarities and differences, then relativism, as a tendency, stance, or working method, usually involves the assumption that contexts exhibit, or may exhibit, radically different, incomparable, or incommensurable traits. Comparative studies are required to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. P. Nortvedt, R. Pedersen, K. H. Grøthe, M. Nordhaug, M. Kirkevold, Å Slettebø, B. S. Brinchmann & B. Andersen (2008). Clinical Prioritisations of Healthcare for the Aged—Professional Roles. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):332-335.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. K. Halvorsen, Å Slettebø, P. Nortvedt, R. Pedersen, M. Kirkevold, M. Nordhaug & B. S. Brinchmann (2008). Priority Dilemmas in Dialysis: The Impact of Old Age. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):585-589.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. M. H. Hem, R. Pedersen, R. Norvoll & B. Molewijk (forthcoming). Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review. Nursing Ethics.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. K. Halvorsen, A. Slettebo, P. Nortvedt, R. Pedersen, M. Kirkevold, M. Nordhaug & B. S. Brinchmann (2008). Priority Dilemmas in Dialysis: The Impact of Old Age. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):585-589.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael E. McCullough & Eric J. Pedersen (2013). The Evolution of Generosity: How Natural Selection Builds Devices for Benefit Delivery. Social Research: An International Quarterly 80 (2):387-410.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. F. Van den Berg, E. Pedersen, J. Bouma & R. Bakker (2008). Project WINDFARMperception: Visual and Acoustic Impact of Wind Turbine Farms on Residents. Final Report, FP6-2005. Science-and-Society 20.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. M. A. G. Cutter (1987). Henrik R. Wulff, Stig Andur Pedersen and Raben Rosenberg: 1986, Philosophy of Medicine: An Introduction, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 222 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (4):413-415.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Colin Allen, Marc Bekoff, George Lauder, F. R. Ankersmit, Tom L. Beauchamp, Carsten Bengt-Pedersen & Niels Thomassen (1998). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Agamben, Diorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Heller-Roazen, Daniel (Transl.), Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1998, Pp. 199,£ 30.00,£ 10.95. [REVIEW] Mind 107:428.score: 24.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation