Search results for 'Ernesto Rosen Velásquez' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Ernesto Rosen Velásquez (2011). Is the 'Common-Bundle View'of Ethnicity Problematic? Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):325-344.score: 870.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert & Ernesto Rosen Velásquez (2011). Latino/a Identity and the Search for Unity : Alcoff, Corlett, and Gracia. In Jorge J. E. Gracia (ed.), Forging People: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in Hispanic American and Latino/a Thought. University of Notre Dame Press.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert Rosen (2006). Autobiographical Reminiscences of Robert Rosen. Axiomathes 16 (1-2):1-23.score: 180.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stanley Rosen & Nalin Ranasinghe (eds.) (2006). Logos and Eros: Essays Honoring Stanley Rosen. St. Augustine's Press.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael Rosen (1982). Hegel's Dialectic and its Criticism. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Hegel's philosophy has often been compared to a circle of circles: an ascending spiral to its admirers, but a vortex to its critics. The metaphor reflects Hegel's claim to offer a conception of philosophical reason so comprehensive as to include all others as partial forms of itself. It is a claim which faces the writer on Hegel with peculiar difficulties. Criticism, it would appear, can always be outflanked; criticism of the system can be turned back into criticism within the system. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Allen D. Rosen (1993). Kant's Theory of Justice. Cornell University Press.score: 60.0
    'Rosen covers so much of the Kantian corpus so succinctly that the book is almost a handbook... A nice addition to all philosophy collections.' --Choice.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Frederick Rosen (2013). Mill. Oup Oxford.score: 60.0
    Frederick Rosen presents an original study of John Stuart Mill's moral and political philosophy. He explores a range of key themes across the breadth of Mill's works, and considers Mill's complex relationships with his contemporary thinkers; the traditional sources on which he drew; and his influence on major thinkers of recent centuries.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. F. Rosen (1992). Bentham, Byron, and Greece: Constitutionalism, Nationalism, and Early Liberal Political Thought. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Exploring the connection between Bentham and Byron forged by the Greek struggle for independence, this book focuses on the activities of the London Greek Committee, supposedly founded by disciples of Jeremy Bentham, which mounted the expedition on which Lord Byron ultimately met his death in Greece. Rosen's penetrating study provides a new assessment of British philhellenism and examines for the first time the relationship between Bentham's theory of constitutional government and the emerging liberalism of the 1820s. Breaking new ground (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stanley Rosen (1987). Hermeneutics as Politics. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Combining exemplary scholarship and analytic precision, Stanley Rosen illuminates the underpinnings of post-modernist thought, providing valuable insight as he pursues two arguments: first, that post-modernism, which regards itself as an attack upon the Enlightenment, is in fact the penultimate stage of the Enlightenment itself; and second, that the extraordinary contemporary emphasis upon hermeneutics is the latest consequence of the triumph of history over mathematics within the unstable essence of the Enlightenment. Hermeneutics is consequently at bottom a political phenomenon. In (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Steven M. Rosen (1986). On Whiteheadian Dualism: A Reply to Professor Griffin. Journal of Religion and Psychical Research 9 (1):11-17.score: 60.0
    In this article, the author defends his claim that a subtle form of metaphysical dualism can be found in Alfred North Whitehead's central notion of the "actual occasion." Rosen contends that phenomenological philosophers such as Martin Heidegger go further than Whitehead in challenging traditional dualism.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Charles Rosen (1994). The Frontiers of Meaning: Three Informal Lectures on Music. Hill & Wang.score: 60.0
    In three lucid and entertaining essays, Charles Rosen explores the true meaning of music and how this meaning changes from performer to performer, as well as audience to audience.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stanley Rosen (1995). The Mask of Enlightenment: Nietzsche's Zarathustra. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    The Mask of Enlightenment is the most detailed textual and thematic study of Nietzsche's most important but least understood works: Thus Spake Zarathustra. In this book Nietzsche was laying the groundwork for a fundamental philosophical and political revolution on a global scale. One of the difficulties that the text poses is Nietzsche's prophetic style; Stanley Rosen unweaves the complex threads that form the rhetorical voices of the work, and so explains the style in an accessible manner. He rejects recent (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Cian Dorr & Gideon Rosen (2002). Composition as a Fiction. In Richard Gale (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Metaphysics. Blackwell. 151--174.score: 30.0
    Region R Question: How many objects — entities, things — are contained in R? Ignore the empty space. Our question might better be put, 'How many material objects does R contain?' Let's stipulate that A, B and C are metaphysical atoms: absolutely simple entities with no parts whatsoever besides themselves. So you don't have to worry about counting a particle's top half and bottom half as different objects. Perhaps they are 'point-particles', with no length, width or breadth. Perhaps they are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gideon Rosen (1990). Modal Fictionalism. Mind 99 (395):327-354.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gideon Rosen (2004). Skepticism About Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):295–313.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gideon Rosen (2007). The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Reflections on Chapter 6 of Fear of Knowledge. Episteme 4 (1):10-29.score: 30.0
    According to one sort of epistemic relativist, normative epistemic claims (e.g., evidence E justifies hypothesis H) are never true or false simpliciter, but only relative to one or another epistemic system. In chapter 6 of Fear of Knowledge, Paul Boghossian objects to this view on the ground that its central notions cannot be explained, and that it cannot account for the normativity of epistemic discourse. This paper explores how the dogged relativist might respond.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gideon Rosen (2008). Kleinbart the Oblivious and Other Tales of Ignorance and Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):591-610.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gideon Rosen (2009). Might Kantian Contractualism Be the Supreme Principle of Morality? Ratio 22 (1):78-97.score: 30.0
    According to Parfit, the best version of Kantian ethics takes as its central principle Kantian Contractualism: the thesis that everyone ought to follow the principles whose universal acceptance everyone could rationally will. This paper examines that thesis, identifies a class of annoying counterexamples, and suggests that when Kantian Contractualism is modified in response to these examples, the resulting principle is too complex and ad hoc to serve as the 'supreme principle of morality'.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gideon Rosen (2002). Culpability and Ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.score: 30.0
    When a person acts from ignorance, he is culpable for his action only if he is culpable for the ignorance from which he acts. The paper defends the view that this principle holds, not just for actions done from ordinary factual ignorance, but also for actions done from moral ignorance. The question is raised whether the principle extends to action done from ignorance about what one has most reason to do. It is tentatively proposed that the principle holds in full (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Nicholas J. J. Smith & Gideon Rosen (2004). Worldly Indeterminacy: A Rough Guide. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):185 – 198.score: 30.0
    This paper defends the idea that there might be vagueness or indeterminacy in the world itself--as opposed to merely in our representations of the world--against the charges of incoherence and unintelligibility. First we consider the idea that the world might contain vague properties and relations ; we show that this idea is already implied by certain well-understood views concerning the semantics of vague predicates (most notably the fuzzy view). Next we consider the idea that the world might contain vague objects (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Steven M. Rosen (2008). Quantum Gravity and Phenomenological Philosophy. Foundations of Physics 38 (6):556-582.score: 30.0
    The central thesis of this paper is that contemporary theoretical physics is grounded in philosophical presuppositions that make it difficult to effectively address the problems of subject-object interaction and discontinuity inherent to quantum gravity. The core objectivist assumption implicit in relativity theory and quantum mechanics is uncovered and we see that, in string theory, this assumption leads into contradiction. To address this challenge, a new philosophical foundation is proposed based on the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Martin Heidegger. Then, through (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gideon Rosen (2001). Brandom on Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):611-23.score: 30.0
  23. Gideon Rosen, Abstract Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
  24. Gideon Rosen (1994). What is Constructive Empiricism? Philosophical Studies 74 (2):143 - 178.score: 30.0
    Van Fraassen defines constructive empiricism as the view that science aims to produce empirically adequate theories. But this account has been misunderstood. Constructive empiricism in not, as it seems, a description of the intentional features of scientific practice, nor is it a normative prescription for their revision. It is rather a fiction about the practice of science that van Fraassen displays in the interests of a broader empiricism. The paper concludes with a series of arguments designed to show that constructive (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Gideon Rosen (1995). Modal Fictionalism Fixed. Analysis 55 (2):67-73.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Gideon Rosen (1998). Blackburn's Essays in Quasi-Realism (New York: Oxford University Press). Noûs 32 (3):386–405.score: 30.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John P. Burgess & Gideon A. Rosen (1997). A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Numbers and other mathematical objects are exceptional in having no locations in space or time or relations of cause and effect. This makes it difficult to account for the possibility of the knowledge of such objects, leading many philosophers to embrace nominalism, the doctrine that there are no such objects, and to embark on ambitious projects for interpreting mathematics so as to preserve the subject while eliminating its objects. This book cuts through a host of technicalities that have obscured previous (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Gideon Rosen (2010). Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction. In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 109--36.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Gideon Rosen (2010). Kamm on Collaboration. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):681-693.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Gideon Rosen (2001). Nominalism, Naturalism, Epistemic Relativism. Noûs 35 (s15):69 - 91.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gideon Rosen (2002). The Case for Incompatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):699-706.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Steven M. Rosen (2004). Dimensions of Apeiron: A Topological Phenomenology of Space, Time, and Individuation. Editions Rodopi, Value Inquiry Book Series.score: 30.0
    As we saw in the Preface, pre-Socratic philosophy viewed nature in the raw as apeiron, the Greek word meaning "limitless," "boundless" or "indeterminate. ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Gideon Rosen (1998). Blackburn's Essays in Quasi-Realism. Noûs 32 (3):386-405.score: 30.0
  34. Stanley Rosen (2001). The Identity of, and the Difference Between, Analytical and Continental Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):341 – 348.score: 30.0
    This paper intends to invoke the spirit of Hegel as the éminence grise behind analytical and continental philosophy. Both movements can be seen to originate in, or to receive a strong impetus in their development from, a repudiation of Hegel. Even Russell's quest for a systematic logical analysis of language may be seen as an attempt at a quasi- or anti-Hegelian systematicity. The collapse of this systematicity has led to the celebration of difference in both the analytical and continental schools. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Steven M. Rosen (1988). A Neo-Intuitive Proposal for Kaluza-Klein Unification. Foundations of Physics 18 (11):1093-1139.score: 30.0
    This paper addresses a central question of contemporary theoretical physics: Can a unified account be provided for the known forces of nature? The issue is brought into focus by considering the recently revived Kaluza-Klein approach to unification, a program entailing dimensional transformation through cosmogony. First it is demonstrated that, in a certain sense, revitalized Kaluza-Klein theory appears to undermine the intuitive foundations of mathematical physics, but that this implicit consequence has been repressed at a substantial cost. A fundamental reformulation of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David Lewis & Gideon Rosen (2003). Postscript to ”Things Qua Truthmakers': Negative Existentials. In Hallvard Lillehammer & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.), Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor. Routledge. 39-42.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Gideon Rosen (1995). The Shoals of Language. Mind 104 (415):599-609.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Manuel G. Velasquez (1983). Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1-18.score: 30.0
    Properly speaking, the corporation, considered as an entity distinct from its members, cannot be morally responsible for wrongful corporate acts. Setting aside (in this abstract) acts brought about through negligence or omissions, we may say that moral responsibility for an act attaches to that agent (or agents) in whom the act "originates" in this sense: (1) the agent formed the (mental) intention or plan to bring about that act (possibly with the help of others) and (2) the act was intentionally (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Gideon Rosen (1993). The Refutation of Nominalism (?). Philosophical Topics 21 (2):141--86.score: 30.0
  40. Steven M. Rosen (2006). Topologies of the Flesh: A Multidimensional Exploration of the Lifeworld. Ohio University Press, Series in Continental Thought.score: 30.0
    Topologies of the Flesh is an original blend of continental thought and mathematical imagination.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Steven M. Rosen (2004). What is Radical Recursion? SEED Journal 4 (1):38-57.score: 30.0
    Recursion or self-reference is a key feature of contemporary research and writing in semiotics. The paper begins by focusing on the role of recursion in poststructuralism. It is suggested that much of what passes for recursion in this field is in fact not recursive all the way down. After the paradoxical meaning of radical recursion is adumbrated, topology is employed to provide some examples. The properties of the Moebius strip prove helpful in bringing out the dialectical nature of radical recursion. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Manuel G. Velasquez (1983). Abstract of “Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do”. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (4):99-99.score: 30.0
    Properly speaking, the corporation, considered as an entity distinct from its members, cannot be morally responsible for wrongful corporate acts. Setting aside (in this abstract) acts brought about through negligence or omissions, we may say that moral responsibility for an act attaches to that agent (or agents) in whom the act "originates" in this sense: (1) the agent formed the (mental) intention or plan to bring about that act (possibly with the help of others) and (2) the act was intentionally (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Steven M. Rosen (2000). Focusing on the Flesh: Merleau-Ponty, Gendlin, and Lived Subjectivity. Lifwynn Correspondence 5 (1):1-14.score: 30.0
  44. Steven M. Rosen (2008). The Self-Evolving Cosmos: A Phenomenological Approach to Nature's Unity-in-Diversity. World Scientific Publishing, Series on Knots and Everything.score: 30.0
    He explores what might be called the metaphysics of physics, or maybe just its geometry: as the series title might suggest, topology plays a major role in the ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Gideon Rosen (1993). A Problem for Fictionalism About Possible Worlds. Analysis 53 (2):71 - 81.score: 30.0
    Fictionalism about possible worlds is the view that talk about worlds in the analysis of modality is to be construed as ontologically innocent discourse about the content of a fiction. Versions of the view have been defended by D M Armstrong (in "A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility") and by myself (in "Modal Fictionalism', "Mind" 99, July 1990). The present note argues that fictionalist accounts of modality (both Armstrong's version and my own) fail to serve the fictionalists ontological purposes because they (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gideon Rosen (2002). Review: Peacocke on Modality. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):641 - 648.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Steven M. Rosen (1997). Wholeness as the Body of Paradox. Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (4):391-423.score: 30.0
    This essay is written at the crossroads of intuitive holism, as typified in Eastern thought, and the discursive reflectiveness more characteristic of the West. The point of departure is the age-old human need to overcome fragmentation and realize wholeness. Three basic tasks are set forth: to provide some new insight into the underlying obstacle to wholeness, to show what would be necessary for surmounting this blockage, and to take a concrete step in that direction. At the outset, the question of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Mark Israelit & Nathan Rosen (1996). A Weyl-Dirac Geometric Particle. Foundations of Physics 26 (5):585-594.score: 30.0
    A spherically symmetric entity with the Weyl-Dirac geometry holding in its interior is investigated. The structure is determined by the presence of the Dirac gauge function, which creates a mass density. Two models are obtained, one that can describe a cosmic body, the other an elementary particle.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mark Israelit & Nathan Rosen (1992). Weyl-Dirac Geometry and Dark Matter. Foundations of Physics 22 (4):555-568.score: 30.0
    Weyl proposed a geometry that differed from Riemannian geometry, which underlies general relativity, in that it contained a vector that could be interpreted as describing the electromagnetic field. Dirac modified this geometry to remove certain difficulties and based it on a variational principle which gave satisfactory field equations for gravitation and electromagnetism. However, by changing the value of a parameter appearing in his variational principle one gets, instead of electromagnetism, a field of massive particles of spin 1, which can be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Gideon Rosen (2003). Platonism, Semiplatonism and the Caesar Problem. Philosophical Books 44 (3):229-244.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000