Search results for 'Errol Walrond' (try it on Scholar)

186 found
Sort by:
  1. Seetharaman Hariharan, Ramesh Jonnalagadda, Errol Walrond & Harley Moseley (2006). Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Healthcare Ethics and Law Among Doctors and Nurses in Barbados. BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9.score: 240.0
    Background The aim of the study is to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices among healthcare professionals in Barbados in relation to healthcare ethics and law in an attempt to assist in guiding their professional conduct and aid in curriculum development. Methods A self-administered structured questionnaire about knowledge of healthcare ethics, law and the role of an Ethics Committee in the healthcare system was devised, tested and distributed to all levels of staff at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Barbados (a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. E. R. Walrond (2005). Ethical Practice in Everyday Health Care. University of the West Indies Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alex Gerbaz (2009). Direct Address, Ethical Imagination and Errol Morris's Interrotron. Film-Philosophy 12 (2).score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Leslie (1993). Book Review:Cosmos and Anthropos: A Philosophical Interpretation of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle Errol E. Harris. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 60 (4):667-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Gadd (1975). Salvation From Despair: A Reappraisal of Spinoza's Philosophy. By Errol E. Harris. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. Pp. Xix, 270. Fl. 59.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 14 (04):719-723.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ninian Smart (1959). Book Review:Revelation Through Reason. Errol E. Harris. [REVIEW] Ethics 70 (1):81-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Tigran W. Eldred (2013). A Review of Errol Morris, A Wilderness of Error. [REVIEW] Legal Ethics 16 (2):390-408.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rena Selya (2005). Book Reviews: Errol C. Friedberg, The Writing Life of James Watson (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005), Xvii +193 Pp., Illus., $25. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):385-386.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Alan Gewirth (1950). Book Review:The Survival of Political Man. Errol E. Harris. [REVIEW] Ethics 61 (1):74-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. M. Ritchie (1959). Descartes' Rules for the Direction of the Mind. H. H. Joachim. Ed. Errol E. Harris. (George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Pp. 122. Price 10s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 34 (130):257-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. D. A. Rees (1957). Nature, Mind and Modern Science. By Errol E. Harris. (London: George Allen and Unwin, New York: The Macmillan Company. 1954. (Mnirhead Library of Philosophy.) Pp. Xvi + 455 Price 35s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 32 (120):73-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. E. L. Mascall (1972). Hypothesis and Perception. The Roots of Scientific Method. By Errol E. Harris. (Muirhead Library of Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin. New York: Humanities Press. 1970. Pp. 396. £5.00). [REVIEW] Philosophy 47 (180):176-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Scott Kim (2009). Remembering Errol Harris. The Owl of Minerva 41 (1-2):9-11.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Manfred Kuehn (1996). Harris, Errol E. The Substance of Spinoza. Review of Metaphysics 50 (1):156-158.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ronald W. Hepburn (1960). Revelation Through Reason. By Errol E. Harris. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1959. Pp. 123. Price 15s.). Philosophy 35 (135):364-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeffrey Carr (2000). Errol G. Katayama, Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (3):193-194.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Lewis S. Ford (1969). Can Science Provide the Foundations for Metaphysics? A Comment on Errol E. Harris's Project. Modern Schoolman 46 (2):148-153.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Brian Hebblethwaite (1979). Errol E. Harris. Atheism and Theism. Pp. 157 (Tulane Studies in Philosophy, Volume Xxvi. Tulane University: New Orleans, 1977). $6.50. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 15 (4):558.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James Mclachlan (2008). "I've Loved You Since the Beginning of Time": The Problem of the Person in Boehme, Schelling, Dostoevsky, Errol Flynn, and Jan Olof Bengtsson. The Pluralist 3 (2):81 - 99.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Louis O. Mink (1967). "The Foundations of Metaphysics in Science," by Errol E. Harris. Modern Schoolman 44 (2):179-181.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. A. Andrew Apathy (1979). Tulane Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 26: "Atheism and Theism," by Errol E. Harris. Modern Schoolman 56 (2):183-183.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. P. J. Bagley (1999). The Hidden Message: Errol Harris's The Substance of Spinoza. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7:225-242.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John Burbidge (1989). Philip T. Grier, Ed., Dialectic and Contemporary Science: Essays in Honor of Errol E. Harris Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (12):486-487.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. E. L. Mascall (1965). The Foundations of Metaphysics in Science. By Errol E. Harris. (Muirhead Library of Philosophy.) (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1965. Pp. 512. Price 63s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 40 (154):361-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Philip T. Grier (1989). Dialectic and Contemporary Science: Essays in Honor of Errol E. Harris. University Press of America.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Philip T. Grier (forthcoming). Errol E. Harris, 1908-2009. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Philip T. Grier (2009). In Memoriam: Errol E. Harris (1908-2009). Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):297 - 298.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. E. T. Grier (1990). Moder N Ethical Theory and Newtonian Science. Comments on Errol Harris. In Phillip Bricker & R. I. G. Hughes (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science. Mit Press. 232--234.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. A. Nordmann (1990). Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature as Introduction to the Study of This Science Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, Trans. Errol E. Harris and Peter Heath, Intro. Robert Stern (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989: Originally 1797; Second Edition 1803), Xxvi + 294 Pp., $49.50, Cloth; $15.95, Paper. [REVIEW] History of European Ideas 12 (4):566-568.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Frederick Sontag (1994). Errol E. Harris., Cosmos and Theos. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):136-137.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Errol Lord (2013). From Independence to Conciliationism: An Obituary. Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2):1-13.score: 3.0
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 92, Issue 2, Page 365-377, June 2014.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Errol Lord (2010). Having Reasons and the Factoring Account. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):283 - 296.score: 3.0
    It’s natural to say that when it’s rational for me to φ, I have reasons to φ. That is, there are reasons for φ-ing, and moreover, I have some of them. Mark Schroeder calls this view The Factoring Account of the having reasons relation. He thinks The Factoring Account is false. In this paper, I defend The Factoring Account. Not only do I provide intuitive support for the view, but I also defend it against Schroeder’s criticisms. Moreover, I show that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Errol Lord (forthcoming). Acting for the Right Reasons, Abilities, and Obligation. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 10. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
    Objectivists about obligation hold that obligations are determined by all of the normatively relevant facts. Perspectivalists, on the other hand, hold that only facts within one's perspective can determine what we are obligated to do. In this paper I argue for a perspectivalist view. On my view, what you are obligated to do is determined by the normative reasons you possess. My argument for my view is anchored in the thought that our obligations have to be action-guiding in a certain (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Errol Lord (2011). Violating Requirements, Exiting From Requirements, and the Scope of Rationality. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):392-399.score: 3.0
    It is generally agreed that many types of attitudinal incoherence are irrational, but there is controversy about why they are. Some think incoherence is irrational because it violates certain wide-scope conditional requirements, others (‘narrow-scopers’) that it violates narrow-scope conditional requirements. In his paper ‘The Scope of Rational Requirements’, John Brunero has offered a putative counter-example to narrow-scope views. But a narrow-scoper should reject a crucial assumption which Brunero makes, namely, the claim that we always violate conditional narrow-scope requirements when we (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Errol Lord (2014). The Coherent and the Rational. Analytic Philosophy 54 (4):151-175.score: 3.0
  36. Errol E. Harris (1957). Political Power. Ethics 68 (1):1-10.score: 3.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. M. Losonsky (2001). Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):445.score: 3.0
    Book Information Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle. By Errol G. Katayama. State University of New York Press. Albany. 1999. Pp. xiii + 202. Paperback.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Errol E. Harris (1957). Time and Change. Mind 66 (262):233-241.score: 3.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Errol Lord (2008). Dancy on Acting for the Right Reason. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (3):1-7.score: 3.0
    It is a truism that agents can do the right action for the right reason. To put the point in terms more familiar to ethicists, it is a truism that one’s motivating reason can be one’s normative reason. In this short note, I will argue that Jonathan Dancy’s preferred view about how this is possible faces a dilemma. Dancy has the choice between accounting for two plausible constraints while at the same time holding an outlandish philosophy of mind by his (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Errol Lord (2013). The Importance of Being Rational. Dissertation, Princeton Universityscore: 3.0
    My dissertation is a systematic defense of the claim that what it is to be rational is to correctly respond to the reasons you possess. The dissertation is split into two parts, each consisting of three chapters. In Part I--Coherence, Possession, and Correctly Responding--I argue that my view has important advantages over popular views in metaethics that tie rationality to coherence (ch. 2), defend a novel view of what it is to possess a reason (ch. 3), and defend a novel (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Errol Lord (2013). The Real Symmetry Problem(s) for Wide-Scope Accounts of Rationality. Philosophical Studies:1-22.score: 3.0
    You are irrational when you are akratic. On this point most agree. Despite this agreement, there is a tremendous amount of disagreement about what the correct explanation of this data is. Narrow-scopers think that the correct explanation is that you are violating a narrow-scope conditional requirement. You lack an intention to x that you are required to have given the fact that you believe you ought to x. Wide-scopers disagree. They think that a conditional you are required to make true (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Errol Lord (forthcoming). Epistemic Reasons, Evidence, and Defeaters. In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
    The post-Gettier literature contained many views that tried to solve the Gettier problem by appealing to the notion of defeat. Unfortunately, all of these views are false. The failure of these views greatly contributed to a general distrust of reasons in epistemology. However, reasons are making a comeback in epistemology, both in general and in the context of the Gettier problem. There are two main aims of this paper. First, I will argue against a natural defeat based resolution of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jennifer Ann Bates (2014). Hegel and the Concept of Extinction. Philosophy Compass 9 (4):238-252.score: 3.0
    Part I discusses what kind of ‘advances’ occur in Hegel's works, particularly his Philosophy of Nature. I then discuss evolution and extinction in relation to these advances. I summarize Errol Harris' view that Hegel's advances are consistent with current evolutionary theory and then critique this view using articles by Cinzia Ferinni and Alison Stone. I discuss an alternative, post-Kantian Hegelianism which dialectically unites the nature of our cognition with us as subjects that cognize (spirit). For that, I draw on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Randall R. Dipert, Two Unjustly Neglected Aspects of C.S. Peirce's Philosophy of Mind.score: 3.0
    Few philosophers today know much about Charles Peirce’s metaphysics, although a great many know something about his epistemology, philosophy of science, and logic. Indeed, few Peirce experts have written much on his metaphysics or made it the focus of their research. To an extent, this is understandable. Peirce’s writings were left in a disastrously disorganized state (mostly unpublished), and the crucial papers on metaphysics from his later years have not yet been republished in the first-rate chronological edition, the incomplete Writings (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. B. A. O. Williams & Errol Bedford (1959). Symposium: Pleasure and Belief. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33:57 - 92.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Errol E. Harris (1984). Hegel's Dialectic and its Criticism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):383-385.score: 3.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Errol E. Harris (1977). Kant's Refutation of the Ontological Proof. Philosophy 52 (199):90 - 92.score: 3.0
  48. Errol E. Harris (1959). Teleology and Teleological Explanation. Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):5-25.score: 3.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Errol E. Harris (1957). Collingwood's Theory of History. Philosophical Quarterly 7 (26):35-49.score: 3.0
1 — 50 / 186