35 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Eva Erman (Uppsala Universitet)
  1. Eva Erman (forthcoming). Legitimacy in the Global Normative Order: Moral, Political and Democratic Justificatory Practices in the Space of Reasons. In S. Gupta (ed.), Politics in the Global Age: Critical Reflections on Cosmopolitanism. Routledge.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eva Erman (forthcoming). Review Essay: Discourse Theory, Intercultural Dialogue, and Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 36 (4).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Eva Erman (forthcoming). The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy. Constellations.
  4. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (forthcoming). Brandom and Political Philosophy. Journal of Political Philosophy.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (forthcoming). What Not to Expect From the Pragmatic Turn in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory:1474885114537635.
    The central ideas coming out of the so-called pragmatic turn in philosophy have set in motion what may be described as a pragmatic turn in normative political theory. It has become commonplace among political theorists to draw on theories of language and meaning in theorising democracy, pluralism, justice, etc. The aim of this paper is to explore attempts by political theorists to use theories of language and meaning for such normative purposes. Focusing on Wittgenstein's account, it is argued that these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (forthcoming). Why Political Realists Should Not Be Afraid of Moral Values. Journal of Philosophical Research.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Eva Erman (2014). The Boundary Problem and the Right to Justification. In D. Owen (ed.), Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification. Bloomsbury Academic.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (2014). Debate: Brandom and Political Philosophy. Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Eva Erman (2013). In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance. European Journal of International Relations 19 (4).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Eva Erman (2013). Political Equality and Legitimacy in a Global Context. In E. Erman & S. Näsström (eds.), Political Equality in Transnational Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Eva Erman (2013). The Recognitive Practices of Declaring and Constituting Statehood. International Theory 5 (1).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (2013). Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political. British Journal of Political Science.
  13. Eva Erman & Niklas Möller (2013). Three Failed Charges Against Ideal Theory. Social Theory and Practice 39 (1):19-44.
    An intensified discussion on the role of normative ideals has re-emerged in several debates in political philosophy. What is often referred to as “ideal theory,” represented by liberal egalitarians such as John Rawls, is under attack from those that stress that political philosophy at large should take much more seriously the nonideal circumstances consisting of relations of domination and power under which normative ideals, principles, and ideas are supposed to be applied. While the debate so far has mainly been preoccupied (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Eva Erman & Sofia Näsström (2013). Political Equality in Transnational Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Eva Erman (2012). Book Review: The Crisis of the European Union, by Jürgen Habermas. European Political Science 11.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Eva Erman (2012). 'Democratic Agents' and 'Agents of Democracy'in Multilayered Governance. In Eva Erman & Ludvig Beckman (eds.), Territories of Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan. 60.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Eva Erman (2012). Review Essay: On Forst's the Right to Justification. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eva Erman (2012). Review Essay: The Right to Justification : Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    The Right to Justification : Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Eva Erman (2012). The Right to Have Rights' to the Rescue: From Human Rights to Global Democracy. In M. Goodale (ed.), Human Rights at the Crossroads. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Eva Erman & Ludvig Beckman (eds.) (2012). Territories of Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Eva Erman & Andreas Follesdal (2012). Multiple Citizenship: Normative Ideals and Institutional Challenges. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302.
    Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Eva Erman (2011). Freedom as Non-Domination or How to Throw the Agent Out of the Space of Reasons. Journal of Power 3 (1).
    This paper analyzes agency in Pettit’s republican conception of freedom. By understanding freedom intersubjectively in terms of agency, Pettit makes an important contribution to the contemporary debate on negative liberty. At the same time, some of the presumptions about agency are problematic. The paper defends the thesis that Pettit is not able to provide the sufficient conditions for freedom as non-domination that he sets out to do. In order to show why this is the case and how we can address (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Eva Erman (2011). Freedom as Non-Domination. In V. Flocke & H. Schoneville (eds.), Differenz und Dialog. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Eva Erman (2011). Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):463.
    On most accounts of global democracy, human rights are ascribed a central function. Still, their conceptual role in global democracy is often unclear. Two recent attempts to remedy this deficiency have been made by James Bohman and Michael Goodhart. What is interesting about their proposals is that they make the case that under the present circumstances of politics, global democracy is best conceptualized in terms of human rights. Although the article is sympathetic to this ‘human rights approach’, it defends the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Eva Erman (2010). Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave Macmillan.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Eva Erman (2010). Democratic Requirements and Trade-Offs in a Transnational Context. In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave macmillan.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Eva Erman (2010). Why Adding Democratic Values is Not Enough For Global Democracy. In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave Macmillan.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Eva Erman & Anders Uhlin (eds.) (2010). Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-Examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Eva Erman (2009). What is Wrong with Agonistic Pluralism?: Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (9):1039-1062.
    During the last couple of decades, concurrently with an increased awareness of the complexity of ethical conflicts, political theorists have directed attention to how constitutional democracy should cope with a fact of incommensurable doctrines. Poststructuralists such as Chantal Mouffe claim that ethical conflicts are fundamentally irreconcilable, which is indeed a view shared by many liberal theorists. The question of whether ethical conflicts are in principle irreconcilable is an important one since the answer has implications for what democratic institutions are desirable. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Eva Erman & Sofia Näsström (2009). One World, Many Worlds? Ethics and Global Politics 2 (4).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Eva Erman (2008). On Goodhart's Global Democracy: A Critique. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4).
  32. Eva Erman (2007). Conflict and Universal Moral Theory: From Reasonableness to Reason-Giving. Political Theory 35 (5):598 - 623.
    The solutions to moral problems offered by contemporary moral theories largely depend on how they understand pluralism. This article compares two different kinds of universal moral theories, liberal impartiality theory and discourse ethics. It defends the twofold thesis that (1) a dialogical theory such as discourse ethics is better equipped to give an account of pluralism than impartiality theory due to a more correct understanding of the nature of conflict, but that (2) discourse ethics cannot, contrary to what Jürgen Habermas (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Eva Erman (2006). Rethinking Accountability in the Context of Human Rights. Res Publica 12 (3):249-275.
    Within liberal democratic theory, ‘democratic accountability’ denotes an aggregative method for linking political decisions to citizens’ preferences through representative institutions. Could such a notion be transferred to the global context of human rights? Various obstacles seem to block such a transfer: there are no ‘world citizens’ as such; many people in need of human rights are not citizens of constitutional democratic states; and the aggregative methods that are supposed to sustain the link are often used in favour of nation-state strategic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eva Erman (2006). Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition: Thickening the ‘Inter’ of Intersubjectivity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):377-400.
    There is an underlying idea of symmetry involved in most notions of rationality. From a dialogical philosophical standpoint, however, the symmetry implied by social contract theories and so-called Golden Rule thinking is anchored to a Cartesian subject–object world and is therefore not equipped to address recognition – at least not if recognition is to be understood as something happening between subjects. For this purpose, the dialogical symmetry implied by Habermas' communicative action does a much better job. Still, it is insufficient (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Eva Erman (2005). Human Rights and Democracy: Discourse Theory and Human Rights Institutions. Ashgate.
    This volume explores the relationship between human rights and democracy within both the theoretical and empirical field.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation