Search results for 'Eva Rimbau-Gilabert' (try it on Scholar)

996 found
Sort by:
  1. Pablo Gilabert (2013). Response to My Critics. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 8 (2):121-132.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Pablo Gilabert (2008). Global Justice and Poverty Relief in Nonideal Circumstances. Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):411-438.score: 30.0
  3. Pablo Gilabert (2010). Global Justice. In Mark Bevir (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Theory. Sage.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Pablo Gilabert (2007). Contractualism and Poverty Relief. Social Theory and Practice 33 (2):277-310.score: 30.0
  5. Pablo Gilabert (2006). Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.score: 30.0
    Are positive duties to help others in need mere informal duties of virtue or can they also be enforceable duties of justice? In this paper I defend the claim that some positive duties (which I call basic positive duties) can be duties of justice against one of the most important prin- cipled objections to it. This is the libertarian challenge, according to which only negative duties to avoid harming others can be duties of justice, whereas positive duties (basic or nonbasic) (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Pablo Gilabert (2005). The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537 - 550.score: 30.0
    In World Poverty and Human Rights, Thomas Pogge argues that the global rich have a duty to eradicate severe poverty in the world. The novelty of Pogges approach is to present this demand as stemming from basic commands which are negative rather than positive in nature: the global rich have an obligation to eradicate the radical poverty of the global poor not because of a norm of beneficence asking them to help those in need when they can at little cost (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Pablo Gilabert (2012). Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):39-56.score: 30.0
    What should our theorizing about social justice aim at? Many political philosophers think that a crucial goal is to identify a perfectly just society. Amartya Sen disagrees. In The Idea of Justice, he argues that the proper goal of an inquiry about justice is to undertake comparative assessments of feasible social scenarios in order to identify reforms that involve justice-enhancement, or injustice-reduction, even if the results fall short of perfect justice. Sen calls this the “comparative approach” to the theory of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Pablo Gilabert (2011). Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. Political Theory 39 (4):439-467.score: 30.0
    This essay explores the relation between two perspectives on the nature of human rights. According to the "political" or "practical" perspective, human rights are claims that individuals have against certain institutional structures, in particular modern states, in virtue of interests they have in contexts that include them. According to the more traditional "humanist" or "naturalistic" perspective, human rights are pre-institutional claims that individuals have against all other individuals in virtue of interests characteristic of their common humanity. This essay argues that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Pablo Gilabert & Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). Political Feasibility. A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies 60 (4):809-825.score: 30.0
  10. Pablo Gilabert (2010). Kant and the Claims of the Poor. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):382-418.score: 30.0
  11. Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice? International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.score: 30.0
    In his important new book National responsibility and global justice, David Miller presents a systematic challenge to existing theories of global justice. In particular, he argues that cosmopolitan egalitarianism must be rejected. Such views, Miller maintains, would place unacceptable burdens on the most productive political communities, undermine national self-determination, and disincentivize political communities from taking responsibility for their fate. They are also impracticable and quite unrealistic, at least under present conditions. Miller offers an alternative account that conceives global justice in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Pablo Gilabert (2011). Feasibility and Socialism. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (1):52-63.score: 30.0
  13. Pablo Gilabert (2009). The Feasibility of Basic Socioeconomic Human Rights: A Conceptual Exploration. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):659-681.score: 30.0
    To be justifiable, the demands of a conception of human rights and global justice must be such that (a) they focus on the protection of important human interests, and (b) their fulfilment is feasible. I discuss the feasibility condition. I present a general account of the relation between moral desirability, feasibility and obligation within a conception of justice. I analyse feasibility, a complex idea including different types, domains and degrees. It is possible to respond in various ways if the fulfilment (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Arash Abizadeh & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Is There a Genuine Tension Between Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism and Special Responsibilities? Philosophical Studies 138 (3):349 - 365.score: 30.0
    Samuel Scheffler has recently argued that some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable; that such relationships give rise to “underived” special responsibilities; that there is a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities; and that we must consequently strike a balance between the two. We argue that there is no such tension and propose an alternative approach to the relation between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. First, while some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable, no relationship is unconditionally valuable. Second, whether such relationships (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Pablo Gilabert (2007). Comentarios Sobre la Concepcion de la Justicia Global de Pogge. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (2):205-222.score: 30.0
    This paper presents a reconstruction of and some constructive comments on Thomas Pogge’s conception of global justice. Using Imre Lakatos’s notion of a research program, the paper identifies Pogge’s “hard core” and “protective belt” claims regarding the scope of fundamental principles of justice, the object and structure of duties of global justice, the explanation of world poverty, and the appropriate reforms to the existing global order. The paper recommends some amendments to Pogge’s program in each of the four areas.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Pablo Gilabert (2012). From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford University Press, UK.score: 30.0
    Machine generated contents note: -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction: The complexity of the debate on global justice -- Part I: Beyond Global Poverty -- 2. Basic positive duties of justice: A contractualist defense -- 3. Negative duties and the libertarian challenge -- 4. The feasibility of global poverty eradication in nonideal circumstances -- Part II: Toward Global Equality -- 5. Humanist versus associativist accounts of global equality -- 6. A humanist defense of global equality -- 7. The feasibility of global (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Pablo Gilabert (2012). Cohen on Socialism, Equality and Community. Socialist Studies 8 (1):101-121.score: 30.0
  18. Pablo Gilabert (forthcoming). Reflections on Human Rights and Power. In Adam Etinson (ed.), Human Rights: Moral or Political? Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Human rights are particularly relevant in contexts in which there are significant asymmetries of power, but where these asymmetries exist the human rights project turns out to be especially difficult to realize. The stronger can use their disproportionate power both to threaten others’ human rights and to frustrate attempts to secure their fulfillment. They may even monopolize the international discussion as to what human rights are and how they should be implemented. This paper explores this tension between the normative ideal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Pablo Gilabert (2011). Cosmopolitan Overflow. The Monist 94 (4):584-592.score: 30.0
  20. Pablo Gilabert (2010). The Importance of Linkage Arguments for the Theory and Practice of Human Rigths. A Response to James Nickel. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2):425-438.score: 30.0
  21. Pablo Gilabert (forthcoming). Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Power. In Rowan Cruft, Matthew Liao & Massimo Renzo (eds.), The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    This paper explores the connections between human rights, human dignity, and power. The idea of human dignity is omnipresent in human rights discourse, but its meaning and point is not always clear. It is standardly used in two ways, to refer to (a) a normative status of persons that makes their treatment in terms of human rights a proper response, and (b) a social condition of persons in which their human rights are fulfilled. This paper pursues three tasks. First, it (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Pablo Gilabert (2006). Global Justice, Democracy and Solidarity. Res Publica 12 (4):435-443.score: 30.0
  23. Pablo Gilabert (2006). Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories of Kant and Habermas. Kant-Studien 97 (2):210-227.score: 30.0
    In what follows I will consider Kant's and Habermas's conceptions of moral validity in a comparative and critical way. First, I will reconstruct Habermas's discursive or deliberative reformulation of Kant's moral theory (sec.1). And, second, I will introduce some comparative critical considerations (2). I will contend that, though much is gained with Habermas's intersubjectivist reformulation of Kant's moral philosophy, some problems emerge that could be treated with the help of certain Kantian insights. I will focus on Kant's and Habermas's strictly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Pablo Gilabert (2013). The Capability Approach and the Debate Between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey. Human Rights Review 14 (4):299-325.score: 30.0
    This paper provides a critical exploration of the capability approach to human rights (CAHR) with the specific aim of developing its potential for achieving a synthesis between “humanist” or “naturalistic” and “political” or “practical” perspectives in the philosophy of human rights. Section II presents a general strategy for achieving such a synthesis. Section III provides an articulation of the key insights of CAHR (its focus on actual realizations given diverse circumstances, its pluralism of grounds, its emphasis on freedom of choice, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Pablo Gilabert (2005). Should Discourse Ethics Do Without a Principle of Universalization? Philosophical Forum 36 (2):183–191.score: 30.0
  26. Pablo Gilabert (2005). The Substantive Dimension of Deliberative Practical Rationality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (2):185-210.score: 30.0
    The aim of this paper is to propose a model for understanding the relation between substance and procedure in discourse ethics and deliberative democracy capable of answering the common charge that they involve an ‘empty formalism’. The expressive-elaboration model introduced here answers this concern by arguing that the deliberative practical rationality presupposed by discourse ethics and deliberative democracy involves the creation of a practical medium in which certain general basic ideas of solidarity, equality and freedom are expressed and elaborated in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Pablo Gilabert (2005). A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3):405 – 437.score: 30.0
    This paper presents a substantivist construal of discourse ethics, which claims that we should see our engagement in public deliberation as expressing and elaborating a substantive commitment to basic moral ideas of solidarity, equality, and freedom. This view is different from Habermas's standard formalist defence of discourse ethics, which attempts to derive the principle of discursive moral justification from primarily non-moral presuppositions of rational argumentation as such. After explicating the difference between the substantivist and the formalist construal, I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Pablo Gilabert (2010). Book Review of C. Beitz and R. Goodin Eds., *Global Basic Rights*. [REVIEW] Ethics 121 (1):178-182.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Pablo Gilabert (2007). La Justice Globale, le Multiculturalisme et les Revendications des Immigrants. Philosophiques 34 (1):41-60.score: 30.0
  30. Pablo Gilabert (2005). Two Sets of Concerns About Heath's Pragmatic Theory of Convergence. Dialogue 44 (2):383-390.score: 30.0
  31. P. Gilabert (2012). Review of Gillian Brock, Global Justice. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (3):333-338.score: 30.0
  32. Hedfors Eva (2007). Medical Ethics in the Wake of the Holocaust: Departing From a Postwar Paper by Ludwik Fleck. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Pablo Gilabert (2012). Is There a Human Right to Democracy? A Response to Joshua Cohen. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia Politica / Latin American Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (2):1-37.score: 30.0
  34. John Paley & Gail Eva (2005). Narrative Vigilance: The Analysis of Stories in Health Care. Nursing Philosophy 6 (2):83-97.score: 30.0
    The idea of narrative has been widely discussed in the recent health care literature, including nursing, and has been portrayed as a resource for both clinical work and research studies. However, the use of the term 'narrative' is inconsistent, and various assumptions are made about the nature (and functions) of narrative: narrative as a naive account of events; narrative as the source of 'subjective truth'; narrative as intrinsically fictional; and narrative as a mode of explanation. All these assumptions have left (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Pablo Gilabert (2008). Rawls's Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):640-647.score: 30.0
  36. Pablo Gilabert (2013). How Should We Think About the Relation Between Principles and Agency? Ethics and Global Politics 6 (2):75-83.score: 30.0
  37. Luiz A. A. Eva (2006). Sobre as afinidades entre a filosofia de Francis Bacon e o ceticismo. Kriterion 47 (113):73-97.score: 30.0
  38. Luiz Eva (2013). Michel de Montaigne: la culminación del escepticismo en el Renacimiento. By Manuel Bermúdez Vásquez. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (2):145-149.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Luiz Eva (2013). Montaigne et les Academica de Cicéron. Astérion 11 (11).score: 30.0
    Dans le présent article, il s’agit de reconsidérer le rapport entre pyrrhonisme et scepticisme académicien dans Les Essais de Montaigne, en posant l’hypothèse que le philosophe aurait, dès le début de sa réflexion, perçu ces deux tendances sceptiques comme des philosophies très proches, voire compatibles, malgré leurs divergences importantes. Son intérêt croissant pour les Academica de Cicéron, dans les versions postérieures des Essais, le conduirait donc non seulement à transformer son propre scepticisme (qu’il découvre de plus en plus proche de (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Luiz Eva (2012). Montaigne, leitor de sexto empírico: a crítica da filosofia moral. Kriterion 53 (126):397-419.score: 30.0
    O objetivo deste artigo é examinar como Montaigne retoma, na sua crítica das filosofias morais e, especialmente, da existência de leis naturais, a proposta por Sexto Empírico acerca do mesmo tema ao final das Hipotiposes Pirronianas. Pretendo mostrar que, para além das consideráveis similaridades, o modo como Montaigne relaciona razão, natureza e costume, confere um perfil próprio à sua reconstrução do pirronismo, particularmente visível na sua compreensão da oposição entre critério de verdade e critério de ação. Igualmente, sustento que essa (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Szigeti Andras, Buddeberg Eva & Vesper Achim (2013). Verantwortung und Sanktion. In Buddeberg Eva & Vesper Achim (eds.), Moral Und Sanktion. Campus.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Luiz Eva (2013). Montaigne Et les Academica de CicéronMontaigne and Cicero's Academica. Astérion 11.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Luiz Eva (2012). Montaigne, Reader of Sextus Empiricus: Moral Philosophy Critique. Kriterion-Revista de Filosofia 53 (126):397-419.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Luiz Eva (2009). Montaigne's Radical Skepticism. In Maia Neto, José Raimundo, Gianni Paganini & John Christian Laursen (eds.), Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin. Brill.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. L. A. A. Eva (1992). O fideísmo cético de Montaigne. Kriterion 86:42-59.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Luiz Aa Eva (2006). On the Affinities Between Bacon's Philosophy and Skepticism. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 2 (SE):0-0.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Mark Felton, Merce Garcia-Mila & Sandra Gilabert (2009). Deliberation Versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom. Informal Logic 29 (4):417-446.score: 30.0
    Researchers in science education have converged on the view that argumentation can be an effective intervention for promoting knowledge construction in science classrooms. However, the impact of such interventions may be mediated by individuals’ task goals while arguing. In argumentative discourse, one can distinguish two overlapping but distinct kinds of activity: dispute and deliberation. In dispute the goal is to defend a conclusion by undermining alternatives, whereas in deliberation the goal is to arrive at a conclusion by contrasting alternatives. In (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Brendan Gillespie & Dave Eva (1982). And Ron Johnston. In Barry Barnes & David O. Edge (eds.), Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Mit Press. 303.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Pablo Gilabert (2010). Beitz , Charles , and Goodin , Robert , Eds. Global Basic Rights . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. 272. $85.00. [REVIEW] Ethics 121 (1):178-182.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. J. J. Gilabert (1983). Cervantes, Locke y Hobbes: Pioneros de Pensamiento Político Moderno. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 10:217-228.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 996