Search results for 'Evaluation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Inge De Jong & Claire Jackson (2001). An Evaluation Approach for a New Paradigm - Health Care Integration. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):71-79.score: 27.0
    This paper explores an approach to the implementation and evaluation of integrated health service delivery. It identifies the key issues involved in integration evaluation, provides a framework for assessment and identifies areas for the development of new tools and measures. A proactive role for evaluators in responding to health service reform is advocated.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ronald C. Kessler & Daniel K. Mroczek (1996). Some Methodological Issues in the Development of Quality of Life Measures for the Evaluation of Medical Interventions. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):181-191.score: 27.0
    This paper discusses a series of important methodological issues in developing targeted health-related quality of life measures in studies of the effects of medical interventions. Such measures cannot be developed unless the evaluator understands the life domains that medical interventions affect. Qualitative discovery methods are needed to obtain this understanding. Once domains are targeted for measurement, careful and systematic laboratory pilot work should be used to select initial scale items. Psychometric evaluation of response patterns in subsequent field tests is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Barry Bozeman & Daniel Sarewitz (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva 49 (1):1-23.score: 24.0
    Here we present the framework of a new approach to assessing the capacity of research programs to achieve social goals. Research evaluation has made great strides in addressing questions of scientific and economic impacts. It has largely avoided, however, a more important challenge: assessing (prospectively or retrospectively) the impacts of a given research endeavor on the non-scientific, non-economic goals—what we here term public values —that often are the core public rationale for the endeavor. Research programs are typically justified in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Eveline T. Feteris (2000). A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.score: 24.0
    In this paper, the author describes a dialogical approach tolegal argumentation from the perspective of argumentationtheory. In a pragma-dialectical approach of legalargumentation, the argumentation is considered to be part of acritical discussion aimed at the rational resolution of thedispute. The author describes how a pragma-dialecticalanalysis and evaluation of legal argumentation can be carriedout.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eveline T. Feteris (2002). A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.score: 24.0
    This paper answers the question how pragmatic argumentation which occurs in a legal context, can be analyzed and evaluated adequately. First, the author surveys various ideas taken from argumentation theory and legal theory on the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation. Then, on the basis of these ideas, she develops a pragma-dialectical instrument for analyzing and evaluating pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Finally she demonstrates how this instrument can be used by giving an exemplary analysis and evaluation (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Carlos León & Pablo Gervás (2010). The Role of Evaluation-Driven Rejection in the Successful Exploration of a Conceptual Space of Stories. Minds and Machines 20 (4):615-634.score: 24.0
    Evaluation processes are a basic component of creativity. They guide not only the pure judgement about a new artefact but also the generation itself, as creators constantly evaluate their own work. This paper proposes a model for automatic story generation based on the evaluation of stories. A model of how quality in stories is evaluated is presented, and two possible implementations of the generation guided by this evaluation are shown: exhaustive space exploration and constrained exploration. A theoretical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Göran Hermerén (2007). Challenges in the Evaluation of Nanoscale Research: Ethical Aspects. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (3):223-237.score: 24.0
    The purpose of the present paper is: (1) to outline a conceptual framework useful for the analysis of ethical issues raised by goal-directed activities, (2) to apply this framework to nanoscale research, (3) identify some of the main challenges in the evaluation of such research, and (4) exemplify what is needed for a positive answer to the question “How can nanoscale research improve the quality of life?” A basic idea of the paper is that nanoscale research can improve the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. José Salazar, Bryan W. Husted & Markus Biehl (2012). Thoughts on the Evaluation of Corporate Social Performance Through Projects. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):175-186.score: 24.0
    Corporate social performance (CSP) has become a widely applied concept, discussed in most large firms’ corporate reports and the academic literature alike. Unfortunately, CSP has largely been employed as a way of demonstrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) in practice, or to justify the business case for CSR in academia by relating some measure of CSP to some measure of financial performance. In this article, we discuss multiple shortcomings to these approaches. We argue that (1) CSR activities need to be managed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Skaidra Trilupaityte (2007). Totalitarianism and the Problem of Soviet Art Evaluation: The Lithuanian Case. Studies in East European Thought 59 (4):261 - 280.score: 24.0
    By taking into account dissident/political and art historical interpretations of Soviet art, I analyze how polemics about totalitarianism in the West, which generally corresponded with Cold War debates and Eastern European dissident thought, shaped the post-Soviet evaluations of national artistic legacies. It is argued that the political relationship with the totalitarian past, like in many post-socialist areas where the immediate past was subjected to radical re-evaluation, affected Lithuanian artists’ and critics’ attitude towards local Soviet art. Because of an obvious (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Shiu-Wan Hung & Shih-Chang Tseng (2010). A New Framework Integrating Environmental Effects Into Technology Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):543 - 556.score: 24.0
    This study aims to propose a framework considering both economic issues and environmental effects in technology evaluation in order to provide firms' decision makers a useful reference in adopting technologies that will enable them to fulfill corporate social responsibilities and get competitive advantages at the same time. Recently, the demands for technology evaluation have increased with the flourishing development of technology licensing, technology transaction or joint venture on the one hand and with the pressing needs of environmental protection (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ronald N. Kostoff (1997). Use and Misuse of Metrics in Research Evaluation. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):109-120.score: 24.0
    This paper addresses some critical issues in the applicability of quantitative performance measures (including bibliometric, economic, and co-occurrence measures) to the assessment of basic research. The strengths and weaknesses of metrics applied as research performance measures are examined. It is concluded that metrics have a useful role to play in the evaluation of research. Each metric employed, whether bibliometric, economic, co-occurrence, or others, brings a new dimension of potential insight to the complex problem of research assessment. However, when used (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Meagan E. Brock, Andrew Vert, Vykinta Kligyte, Ethan P. Waples, Sydney T. Sevier & Michael D. Mumford (2008). Mental Models: An Alternative Evaluation of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):449-472.score: 24.0
    In spite of the wide variety of approaches to ethics training it is still debatable which approach has the highest potential to enhance professionals’ integrity. The current effort assesses a novel curriculum that focuses on metacognitive reasoning strategies researchers use when making sense of day-to-day professional practices that have ethical implications. The evaluated trainings effectiveness was assessed by examining five key sensemaking processes, such as framing, emotion regulation, forecasting, self-reflection, and information integration that experts and novices apply in ethical decision-making. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Leo Obrst, Werner Ceusters, Inderjeet Mani, Steve Ray & Barry Smith (2006). The Evaluation of Ontologies: Toward Improved Semantic Interoperability. In Chris Baker & Kei H. Cheung (eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences. Springer. 139-158.score: 24.0
    Recent years have seen rapid progress in the development of ontologies as semantic models intended to capture and represent aspects of the real world. There is, however, great variation in the quality of ontologies. If ontologies are to become progressively better in the future, more rigorously developed, and more appropriately compared, then a systematic discipline of ontology evaluation must be created to ensure quality of content and methodology. Systematic methods for ontology evaluation will take into account representation of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Kevin A. Kerber & A. Mark Fendrick (2010). The Evidence Base for the Evaluation and Management of Dizziness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (1):186-191.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Tineke A. Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy A. M. Widdershoven (2009). Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation. Health Care Analysis 17 (3):217-235.score: 24.0
    Recently, moral deliberation within care institutions is gaining more attention in medical ethics. Ongoing dialogues about ethical issues are considered as a vehicle for quality improvement of health care practices. The rise of ethical conversation methods can be understood against the broader development within medical ethics in which interaction and dialogue are seen as alternatives for both theoretical or individual reflection on ethical questions. In other disciplines, intersubjectivity is also seen as a way to handle practical problems, and methodologies have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Endla Lõhkivi, Katrin Velbaum & Jaana Eigi (2013). Epistemic Injustice in Research Evaluation: A Cultural Analysis of the Humanities and Physics in Estonia. Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (2):108-132.score: 24.0
    This paper explores the issue of epistemic injustice in research evaluation. Through an analysis of the disciplinary cultures of physics and humanities, we attempt to identify some aims and values specific to the disciplinary areas. We suggest that credibility is at stake when the cultural values and goals of a discipline contradict those presupposed by official evaluation standards. Disciplines that are better aligned with the epistemic assumptions of evaluation standards appear to produce more "scientific" findings. To restore (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Juandre Peacock, Lauren N. Harkrider, Zhanna Bagdasarov, Shane Connelly, James F. Johnson, Chase E. Thiel, Alexandra E. MacDougall, Michael D. Mumford & Lynn D. Devenport (2013). Effects of Alternative Outcome Scenarios and Structured Outcome Evaluation on Case-Based Ethics Instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1283-1303.score: 24.0
    Case-based instruction has been regarded by many as a viable alternative to traditional lecture-based education and training. However, little is known about how case-based training techniques impact training effectiveness. This study examined the effects of two such techniques: (a) presentation of alternative outcome scenarios to a case, and (b) conducting a structured outcome evaluation. Consistent with the hypotheses, results indicate that presentation of alternative outcome scenarios reduced knowledge acquisition, reduced sensemaking and ethical decision-making strategy use, and reduced decision ethicality. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Markus Sohlenkamp, Wolfgang Prinz & Ludwin Fuchs (2000). PoliawaC: Design and Evaluation of an Awareness-Enhanced Groupware Client. [REVIEW] AI and Society 14 (1):31-47.score: 24.0
    waC provides a variety of different graphical notification mechanisms which can be coupled to specific working situations using the AREA model. We also report on the evaluation of the system under real-life conditions in a German federal ministry.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Helena Valve (2012). Qualified for Evaluation? A GM Potato and the Orders of Rural Worth. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):315-331.score: 24.0
    This paper examines a small-scale attempt to support collective evaluation of a transgenic potato variety. By mobilizing Laurent Thevénot’s ideas on the connectedness of the ontological and normative, it investigates how the controversial object was associated with coordinating perspectives or orders of worth in two focus groups. In these groups, the GM potato qualified for evaluation in relation to deterministic market forces. However, it was unclear whether the potato would operate as a beneficial market asset or merely as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Siti Asma Mohammed & Maryati Mohd Yusof (2013). Towards an Evaluation Framework for Information Quality Management (IQM) Practices for Health Information Systems – Evaluation Criteria for Effective IQM Practices. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (2):379-387.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Helen Best & Tim Newton (2005). Evaluation of the Personal Dental Services (Wave 1) for Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Primary Care Trusts – Part 2: Retrospective Analyses of Treatment and Other Dental Record Data. [REVIEW] Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (3):229-236.score: 24.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jochen W. L. Cals, Andre J. H. A. Ament, Kerenza Hood, Christopher C. Butler, Rogier M. Hopstaken, Geert F. Wassink & Geert‐Jan Dinant (2011). C‐Reactive Protein Point of Care Testing and Physician Communication Skills Training for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in General Practice: Economic Evaluation of a Cluster Randomized Trial. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1059-1069.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Joan M. Eakin & Eric Mykhalovskiy (2003). Reframing the Evaluation of Qualitative Health Research: Reflections on a Review of Appraisal Guidelines in the Health Sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):187-194.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mark G. Edwards & Nin Kirkham (2013). Situating 'Giving Voice to Values': A Metatheoretical Evaluation of a New Approach to Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):1-19.score: 24.0
    The evaluation of new theories and pedagogical approaches to business ethics is an essential task for ethicists. This is true not only for empirical and applied evaluation but also for metatheoretical evaluation. However, while there is increasing interest in the practical utility and empirical testing of ethical theories, there has been little systematic evaluation of how new theories relate to existing ones or what novel conceptual characteristics they might contribute. This paper aims to address this lack (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Yvonna S. Lincoln, Laurie G. Thorp & Craig Russon (2003). The Storied Nature of Agriculture and Evaluation: A Conversation. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 20 (3):267-276.score: 24.0
    This paper is a report on aconversation held between the authors andcentered on their shared interest inalternative methods of inquiry and evaluationin agriculture. The conversation was initiatedat the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and has evolvedthrough a series of long distanceconversations. Though not a verbatim transcriptof our conversations, this paper represents acomposite of both the face-to-face conversationand our stream of dialogue over the past year.Central to our discussion is an exploration ofthe parallels between the paradigm shift thatoccurred in evaluation in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Davide Mazzi (2010). “This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):373-385.score: 24.0
    The centrality of argumentation in the judicial process is an age-old acquisition of research on legal discourse. Notwithstanding the deep insights provided by legal theoretical and philosophical works, only recently has judicial argumentation been tackled in its linguistic dimension. This paper aims to contribute to the development of linguistic studies of judicial argumentation, by shedding light on evaluation as a prominent aspect in the construction of the judge’s argumentative position. Evaluation as a deep structure of judicial argumentation is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Effie Amanatidou, Paul Cunningham, Abdullah Gök & Ioanna Garefi (forthcoming). Using Evaluation Research as a Means for Policy Analysis in a 'New' Mission-Oriented Policy Context. Minerva:1-20.score: 24.0
    Grand challenges stress the importance of multi-disciplinary research, a multi-actor approach in examining the current state of affairs and exploring possible solutions, multi-level governance and policy coordination across geographical boundaries and policy areas, and a policy environment for enabling change both in science and technology and in society. The special nature of grand challenges poses certain needs in evaluation practice: (a) the need for learning at the operational, policy and, especially, system level; and (b) the importance of a wider (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Petra Barchfeld & Beate Sodian (2009). Differentiating Theories From Evidence: The Development of Argument Evaluation Abilities in Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Informal Logic 29 (4):396-416.score: 24.0
    An argument evaluation inventory distinguishing between different levels of theory-evidence differentiation was designed corresponding to the levels of argument observed in argument generation tasks. Five scenarios containing everyday theories about a social problem, and arguments to support those theories were presented to 170 participants from two age groups (15 and 22 years) and different educational tracks. Participants had to rate the validity of arguments proposed by a story figure, to support the theory, to choose the best argument, and to (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Adrian Edwards & Glyn Elwyn (2004). Involving Patients in Decision Making and Communicating Risk: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Doctors' Attitudes and Confidence During a Randomized Trial. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (3):431-437.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.score: 24.0
    In this article the author develops a framework for a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Ideas taken from legal theory are integrated in a pragma-dialectical model for analyzing and evaluating argumentation, thus providing a more systematic and elaborate framework for assessing the quality of teleological arguments in a legal context. Teleological argumentation in a legal context is approached as a specific form of pragmatic argumentation. The legal criteria that are relevant for the evaluation of teleological (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mick P. Fleming, Colin R. Martin, Jeremy Miles & John Atkinson (2009). The Utility of the Illness Perception Questionnaire in the Evaluation of Mental Health Practitioners' Perspectives on Patients with Schizophrenia. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (5):826-831.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Reidun Førde, Reidar Pedersen & Victoria Akre (2008). Clinicians' Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Consultations in Norway: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):17-25.score: 24.0
    Clinical ethics committees have existed in Norway since 1996. By now all hospital trusts have one. An evaluation of these committees’ work was started in 2004. This paper presents results from an interview study of eight clinicians who evaluated six committees’ deliberations on 10 clinical cases. The study indicates that the clinicians found the clinical ethics consultations useful and worth while doing. However, a systematic approach to case consultations is vital. Procedures and mandate of the committees should be known (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Helen Hancock, Hilary Lloyd, Steve Campbell, Chris Turnock & Stephen Craig (2007). Exploring the Challenges and Successes of the Lecturer Practitioner Role Using a Stakeholder Evaluation Approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):758-764.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. C. Harstall, P. Taenzer, N. Zuck, D. K. Angus, C. Moga & N. A. Scott (2013). Adapting Low Back Pain Guidelines Within a Multidisciplinary Context: A Process Evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):773-781.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Elaine Hogard & Roger Ellis (2010). An Evaluation of a Managed Clinical Network for Personality Disorder: Breaking New Ground or Top Dressing? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1147-1156.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Sugan C. Jain, Dilip Kumar Sen, Muinuddin Khan & Swapan Kumar Bala (2007). An Analytical Study on Social Responsibility Performance Evaluation as an Accounting Measure of Management Efficiency. AI and Society 21 (3):251-266.score: 24.0
    This paper is a portrayal of how social responsibility performance evaluation can act as an accounting measure of management efficiency. In fact, it has given much importance to socio-economic and socio-human obligations to others. The paper attempts to show that these days there is a great need to emphasise more clearly social responsibility, which the corporate sector can and should undertake. The theme of the paper is that the scope of corporate social responsibility encompasses not only economic well-being but (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Matthew J. Leach & David Gillham (2008). Evaluation of the Evidence‐Based Practice Attitude and Utilization SurvEy for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):792-798.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Cristiane Rufino Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho Macedo, Maria Regina Torloni & Álvaro Nagib Atallah (2013). Evaluation of a National Evidence‐Based Health Care Course Via Teleconference in a Developing Country. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):713-719.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Douglas W. Oard, Jason R. Baron, Bruce Hedin, David D. Lewis & Stephen Tomlinson (2010). Evaluation of Information Retrieval for E-Discovery. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (4):347-386.score: 24.0
    The effectiveness of information retrieval technology in electronic discovery (E-discovery) has become the subject of judicial rulings and practitioner controversy. The scale and nature of E-discovery tasks, however, has pushed traditional information retrieval evaluation approaches to their limits. This paper reviews the legal and operational context of E-discovery and the approaches to evaluating search technology that have evolved in the research community. It then describes a multi-year effort carried out as part of the Text Retrieval Conference to develop (...) methods for responsive review tasks in E-discovery. This work has led to new approaches to measuring effectiveness in both batch and interactive frameworks, large data sets, and some surprising results for the recall and precision of Boolean and statistical information retrieval methods. The paper concludes by offering some thoughts about future research in both the legal and technical communities toward the goal of reliable, effective use of information retrieval in E-discovery. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Arif Rajpura, Su Sethi & Martin Taylor (2007). An Evaluation of Two Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics in Central Lancashire, UK. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):326-336.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Heide B. Schneider & Hagen Sandholzer (2008). Shared Decision Making: Evaluation of German Medical Students' Preferences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (3):435-438.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nicola Stanhope, Margaret Crowley‐Murphy, Charles Vincent, Anne M. O'Connor & Sally E. Taylor‐Adams (1999). An Evaluation of Adverse Incident Reporting. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (1):5-12.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mia Svantesson, Jan Karlsson, Pierre Boitte, Jan Schildman, Linda Dauwerse, Guy Widdershoven, Reidar Pedersen, Martijn Huisman & Bert Molewijk (2014). Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the Development of an Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Ethics Support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):30.score: 24.0
    Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Marleen van de Kerkhof, Annemarie Groot, Marien Borgstein & Leontien Bos-Gorter (2010). Moving Beyond the Numbers: A Participatory Evaluation of Sustainability in Dutch Agriculture. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 27 (3):307-319.score: 24.0
    Environmental pollution, animal diseases, and food scandals have marked the agricultural sector in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the 1990s. The sector was high on the political and societal agenda and plans were developed to redesign the sector into a more sustainable direction. Generally, monitoring of the agricultural sector is done by means of quantitative indicators to measure social, ecological, and economic performance. To give more attention to the normative character of sustainable development, the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Harm Veling, Henk Aarts & Wolfgang Stroebe (2013). Stop Signals Decrease Choices for Palatable Foods Through Decreased Food Evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology 4:875.score: 24.0
    The present study explores whether presenting specific palatable foods in close temporal proximity of stop signals in a go/no-go task decreases subsequent evaluations of such foods among participants with a relatively high appetite. Furthermore, we tested whether any decreased evaluations could mediate subsequent food choice. Participants first received a go/no-go task in which palatable foods were consistently linked to go cues or no-go cues within participants. Next, evaluation of the palatable foods was measured as well as food choice. Replicating (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. E. M. M. Adang, A. Ament & C. D. Dirksen (1996). Medical Technology Assessment and the Role of Economic Evaluation in Health Care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (4):287-294.score: 24.0
  47. Andrea Armstrong & Douglas Jackson-Smith (2013). Forms and Levels of Integration: Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Team-Building Project. Journal of Research Practice 9 (1):Article M1.score: 24.0
    Team science models are frequently promoted as the best way to study complex societal and environmental problems. Despite increasing popularity, there is relatively little research on the processes and mechanisms that facilitate the emergence of integration of interdisciplinary teams. This article evaluates a suite of recent team-building and grant-writing activities designed to address water management in the Western U.S. We use qualitative methods to document the emergence of integrative capacity at the individual, group, and institutional levels, with particular attention to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Helen Best & Tim Newton (2005). Evaluation of the Personal Dental Services (Wave 1) for Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Primary Care Trusts – Part 1: Retrospective Analyses of Registration Data and Access Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (3):219-227.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Thomas Bürkle, Elske Ammenwerth, Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch & Joachim Dudeck (2001). Evaluation of Clinical Information Systems. What Can Be Evaluated and What Cannot? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4):373-385.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Leslie L. Buckley, Paula Goering, Sagar V. Parikh, Dale Butterill & Emily K. H. Foo (2003). Applying a 'Stages of Change' Model to Enhance a Traditional Evaluation of a Research Transfer Course. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (4):385-390.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000