Search results for 'Evaluation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
  1.  5
    Ronald C. Kessler & Daniel K. Mroczek (1996). Some Methodological Issues in the Development of Quality of Life Measures for the Evaluation of Medical Interventions. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):181-191.
    This paper discusses a series of important methodological issues in developing targeted health-related quality of life measures in studies of the effects of medical interventions. Such measures cannot be developed unless the evaluator understands the life domains that medical interventions affect. Qualitative discovery methods are needed to obtain this understanding. Once domains are targeted for measurement, careful and systematic laboratory pilot work should be used to select initial scale items. Psychometric evaluation of response patterns in subsequent field tests is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Inge De Jong & Claire Jackson (2001). An Evaluation Approach for a New Paradigm - Health Care Integration. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):71-79.
    This paper explores an approach to the implementation and evaluation of integrated health service delivery. It identifies the key issues involved in integration evaluation, provides a framework for assessment and identifies areas for the development of new tools and measures. A proactive role for evaluators in responding to health service reform is advocated.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Carmel M. Martin & Jan Kasperski (2010). Developing Interdisciplinary Maternity Services Policy in Canada. Evaluation of a Consensus Workshop. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (1):238-245.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  20
    Tineke A. Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy A. M. Widdershoven (2009). Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation. Health Care Analysis 17 (3):217-235.
    Recently, moral deliberation within care institutions is gaining more attention in medical ethics. Ongoing dialogues about ethical issues are considered as a vehicle for quality improvement of health care practices. The rise of ethical conversation methods can be understood against the broader development within medical ethics in which interaction and dialogue are seen as alternatives for both theoretical or individual reflection on ethical questions. In other disciplines, intersubjectivity is also seen as a way to handle practical problems, and methodologies have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  5. Barry Bozeman & Daniel Sarewitz (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva 49 (1):1-23.
    Here we present the framework of a new approach to assessing the capacity of research programs to achieve social goals. Research evaluation has made great strides in addressing questions of scientific and economic impacts. It has largely avoided, however, a more important challenge: assessing (prospectively or retrospectively) the impacts of a given research endeavor on the non-scientific, non-economic goals—what we here term public values —that often are the core public rationale for the endeavor. Research programs are typically justified in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  6.  21
    Meagan E. Brock, Andrew Vert, Vykinta Kligyte, Ethan P. Waples, Sydney T. Sevier & Michael D. Mumford (2008). Mental Models: An Alternative Evaluation of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):449-472.
    In spite of the wide variety of approaches to ethics training it is still debatable which approach has the highest potential to enhance professionals’ integrity. The current effort assesses a novel curriculum that focuses on metacognitive reasoning strategies researchers use when making sense of day-to-day professional practices that have ethical implications. The evaluated trainings effectiveness was assessed by examining five key sensemaking processes, such as framing, emotion regulation, forecasting, self-reflection, and information integration that experts and novices apply in ethical decision-making. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  7. Leo Obrst, Werner Ceusters, Inderjeet Mani, Steve Ray & Barry Smith (2006). The Evaluation of Ontologies: Toward Improved Semantic Interoperability. In Chris Baker & Kei H. Cheung (eds.), Semantic Web: Revolutionizing Knowledge Discovery in the Life Sciences. Springer 139-158.
    Recent years have seen rapid progress in the development of ontologies as semantic models intended to capture and represent aspects of the real world. There is, however, great variation in the quality of ontologies. If ontologies are to become progressively better in the future, more rigorously developed, and more appropriately compared, then a systematic discipline of ontology evaluation must be created to ensure quality of content and methodology. Systematic methods for ontology evaluation will take into account representation of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    Juandre Peacock, Lauren N. Harkrider, Zhanna Bagdasarov, Shane Connelly, James F. Johnson, Chase E. Thiel, Alexandra E. MacDougall, Michael D. Mumford & Lynn D. Devenport (2013). Effects of Alternative Outcome Scenarios and Structured Outcome Evaluation on Case-Based Ethics Instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1283-1303.
    Case-based instruction has been regarded by many as a viable alternative to traditional lecture-based education and training. However, little is known about how case-based training techniques impact training effectiveness. This study examined the effects of two such techniques: (a) presentation of alternative outcome scenarios to a case, and (b) conducting a structured outcome evaluation. Consistent with the hypotheses, results indicate that presentation of alternative outcome scenarios reduced knowledge acquisition, reduced sensemaking and ethical decision-making strategy use, and reduced decision ethicality. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  9.  25
    David Botting (2016). The Logical Evaluation of Arguments. Argumentation 30 (2):167-180.
    In this paper I will defend the controversial thesis that all argumentation in natural language can be reconstructed, for the purposes of assessment, as a deductively valid argument. Evaluation of the argumentation amounts to evaluation of the logical coherence of the premises. I will be taking the pragma-linguistic theory of Bermejo-Luque as an initial starting point.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Helen Hancock, Hilary Lloyd, Steve Campbell, Chris Turnock & Stephen Craig (2007). Exploring the Challenges and Successes of the Lecturer Practitioner Role Using a Stakeholder Evaluation Approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):758-764.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  18
    José Salazar, Bryan W. Husted & Markus Biehl (2012). Thoughts on the Evaluation of Corporate Social Performance Through Projects. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):175-186.
    Corporate social performance (CSP) has become a widely applied concept, discussed in most large firms’ corporate reports and the academic literature alike. Unfortunately, CSP has largely been employed as a way of demonstrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) in practice, or to justify the business case for CSR in academia by relating some measure of CSP to some measure of financial performance. In this article, we discuss multiple shortcomings to these approaches. We argue that (1) CSR activities need to be managed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12.  5
    Reidun Førde, Reidar Pedersen & Victoria Akre (2008). Clinicians' Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Consultations in Norway: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):17-25.
    Clinical ethics committees have existed in Norway since 1996. By now all hospital trusts have one. An evaluation of these committees’ work was started in 2004. This paper presents results from an interview study of eight clinicians who evaluated six committees’ deliberations on 10 clinical cases. The study indicates that the clinicians found the clinical ethics consultations useful and worth while doing. However, a systematic approach to case consultations is vital. Procedures and mandate of the committees should be known (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  13.  8
    Marcin Selinger (2014). Towards Formal Representation and Evaluation of Arguments. Argumentation 28 (3):379-393.
    The aim of this paper is to propose foundations for a formal model of representation and numerical evaluation of a possibly broad class of arguments, including those that occur in natural discourse. Since one of the most characteristic features of everyday argumentation is the occurrence of convergent reasoning, special attention should be paid to the operation ⊕, which allows us to calculate the logical force of convergent arguments with an accuracy not offered by other approaches.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  15
    Douglas W. Oard, Jason R. Baron, Bruce Hedin, David D. Lewis & Stephen Tomlinson (2010). Evaluation of Information Retrieval for E-Discovery. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (4):347-386.
    The effectiveness of information retrieval technology in electronic discovery (E-discovery) has become the subject of judicial rulings and practitioner controversy. The scale and nature of E-discovery tasks, however, has pushed traditional information retrieval evaluation approaches to their limits. This paper reviews the legal and operational context of E-discovery and the approaches to evaluating search technology that have evolved in the research community. It then describes a multi-year effort carried out as part of the Text Retrieval Conference to develop (...) methods for responsive review tasks in E-discovery. This work has led to new approaches to measuring effectiveness in both batch and interactive frameworks, large data sets, and some surprising results for the recall and precision of Boolean and statistical information retrieval methods. The paper concludes by offering some thoughts about future research in both the legal and technical communities toward the goal of reliable, effective use of information retrieval in E-discovery. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  12
    Joan M. Eakin & Eric Mykhalovskiy (2003). Reframing the Evaluation of Qualitative Health Research: Reflections on a Review of Appraisal Guidelines in the Health Sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):187-194.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  16.  9
    David Pontille & Didier Torny (2015). From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review. Human Studies 38 (1):57-79.
    Born in the 17th century, journal peer review is an extremely diverse technology, constantly torn between two often incompatible goals: the validation of manuscripts conceived as a collective industrial-like reproducible process performed to assert scientific statements, and the dissemination of articles considered as a means to spur scientific discussion, raising controversies, and civically challenging a state of knowledge. Such a situation is particularly conducive to clarifying the processes of valuation and evaluation in journal peer review. In this article, such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  32
    Eveline T. Feteris (2002). A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
    This paper answers the question how pragmatic argumentation which occurs in a legal context, can be analyzed and evaluated adequately. First, the author surveys various ideas taken from argumentation theory and legal theory on the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation. Then, on the basis of these ideas, she develops a pragma-dialectical instrument for analyzing and evaluating pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Finally she demonstrates how this instrument can be used by giving an exemplary analysis and evaluation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  18.  5
    C. Harstall, P. Taenzer, N. Zuck, D. K. Angus, C. Moga & N. A. Scott (2013). Adapting Low Back Pain Guidelines Within a Multidisciplinary Context: A Process Evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):773-781.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  4
    Leslie L. Buckley, Paula Goering, Sagar V. Parikh, Dale Butterill & Emily K. H. Foo (2003). Applying a 'Stages of Change' Model to Enhance a Traditional Evaluation of a Research Transfer Course. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (4):385-390.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  20.  15
    Yongfeng Yuan & Shier Ju (2015). Rational Evaluation in Belief Revision. Synthese 192 (7):2311-2336.
    We introduce a new operator, called rational evaluation, in belief change. The operator evaluates new information according to the agent’s core beliefs, and then exports the plausible part of the new information. It belongs to the decision module in belief change. We characterize rational evaluation by axiomatic postulates and propose two functional constructions for it, based on the well-known constructions of kernel sets and remainder sets, respectively. The main results of the paper are two representation theorems with respect (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    Rodney C. Roberts (2016). Are Some of the Things Faculty Do to Maximize Their Student Evaluation of Teachers Scores Unethical? Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (2):133-148.
    This paper provides a philosophical analysis of some of the things faculty do to maximize their Student Evaluation of Teachers scores. It examines 28 practices that are claimed to be unethical methods for maximizing SET scores. The paper offers an argument concerning the morality of each behavior and concludes that 13 of the 28 practices suggest unethical behavior. The remaining 15 behaviors are morally permissible.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  14
    Karen L. Webb, David Pelletier, Audrey N. Maretzki & Jennifer Wilkins (1998). Local Food Policy Coalitions: Evaluation Issues as Seen by Academics, Project Organizers, and Funders. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 15 (1):65-75.
    Several different evaluation issuesare perceived as important by people involved withinnovative projects intended to improve local food andnutrition systems; particularly the establishment oflocal food policy coalitions. Several such coalitionshave been formed in North America, Europe, andAustralia with the goal of improving community foodsecurity and promoting sustainable local food systems.Pioneer coalitions have served as models, yet therehas been little systematic evaluation of thesemodels. A qualitative study was conducted to identifyfactors that may hinder evaluation efforts. In grouptelephone interviews, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  16
    Göran Hermerén (2007). Challenges in the Evaluation of Nanoscale Research: Ethical Aspects. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (3):223-237.
    The purpose of the present paper is: (1) to outline a conceptual framework useful for the analysis of ethical issues raised by goal-directed activities, (2) to apply this framework to nanoscale research, (3) identify some of the main challenges in the evaluation of such research, and (4) exemplify what is needed for a positive answer to the question “How can nanoscale research improve the quality of life?” A basic idea of the paper is that nanoscale research can improve the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  9
    Nicola Stanhope, Margaret Crowley‐Murphy, Charles Vincent, Anne M. O'Connor & Sally E. Taylor‐Adams (1999). An Evaluation of Adverse Incident Reporting. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (1):5-12.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  9
    Nick Sevdalis, Beverley Norris, Chris Ranger & Sue Bothwell (2009). Closing the Safety Loop: Evaluation of the National Patient Safety Agency's Guidance Regarding Wristband Identification of Hospital Inpatients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):311-315.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  10
    Davide Mazzi (2010). “This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):373-385.
    The centrality of argumentation in the judicial process is an age-old acquisition of research on legal discourse. Notwithstanding the deep insights provided by legal theoretical and philosophical works, only recently has judicial argumentation been tackled in its linguistic dimension. This paper aims to contribute to the development of linguistic studies of judicial argumentation, by shedding light on evaluation as a prominent aspect in the construction of the judge’s argumentative position. Evaluation as a deep structure of judicial argumentation is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  7
    Thomas Bürkle, Elske Ammenwerth, Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch & Joachim Dudeck (2001). Evaluation of Clinical Information Systems. What Can Be Evaluated and What Cannot? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4):373-385.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  17
    Shiu-Wan Hung & Shih-Chang Tseng (2010). A New Framework Integrating Environmental Effects Into Technology Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):543 - 556.
    This study aims to propose a framework considering both economic issues and environmental effects in technology evaluation in order to provide firms' decision makers a useful reference in adopting technologies that will enable them to fulfill corporate social responsibilities and get competitive advantages at the same time. Recently, the demands for technology evaluation have increased with the flourishing development of technology licensing, technology transaction or joint venture on the one hand and with the pressing needs of environmental protection (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  4
    Kiyoung Kim (2015). A Teacher and Researcher: A Scratch on the Science Community and Meaning of Evaluation with the Research Doctoral Programs Ranking. International Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):34.
    The epistemology and phenomenology of contemporary society tend to be deepened, and the philosophical challenges never are minimal that we may be called to face with the kind of post-modern chaos from the rapidly changing phenomena of the global community. The ballast held on the identity of faculty members as a teacher and researcher now turns due so as to be recast with our intrinsic of routine performance. I considered their quality as bent on the intellectual strife on the method (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  5
    Declan O'Neill, Andrew Miles & Andreas Polychronls (1996). Central Dimensions of Clinical Practice Evaluation: Efficiency, Appropriateness and Effectiveness ‐ I. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):13-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  15
    Adrian Edwards & Glyn Elwyn (2004). Involving Patients in Decision Making and Communicating Risk: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Doctors' Attitudes and Confidence During a Randomized Trial. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (3):431-437.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  5
    Sophie Doyon, Mélissa Perreault, Christopher Marquis, Josianne Gauthier, Denis Lebel, Benoit Bailey, Johanne Collin & Jean‐François Bussières (2009). Quantitative Evaluation of a Clinical Intervention Aimed at Changing Prescriber Behaviour in Response to New Guidelines. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1111-1117.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  9
    Matthew J. Leach & David Gillham (2008). Evaluation of the Evidence‐Based Practice Attitude and Utilization SurvEy for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):792-798.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  13
    Maarten van Wesel (2016). Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):199-225.
    Criteria for the evaluation of most scholars’ work have recently received wider attention due to high-profile cases of scientific misconduct which are perceived to be linked to these criteria. However, in the competition for career advancement and funding opportunities almost all scholars are subjected to the same criteria. Therefore these evaluation criteria act as ‘switchmen’, determining the tracks along which scholarly work is pushed by the dynamic interplay of interests of both scholars and their institutions. Currently one of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  2
    Ian D. Graham, Susan Beardall, Anne O. Carter, Jacqueline Tetroe & Barbara Davies (2003). The State of the Science and Art of Practice Guidelines Development, Dissemination and Evaluation in Canada. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):195-202.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  2
    Noëlle Junod Perron, Thomas Perneger, Véronique Kolly, Melissa Dominicé Dao, Johanna Sommer & Patricia Hudelson (2009). Use of a Computer‐Based Simulated Consultation Tool to Assess Whether Doctors Explore Sociocultural Factors During Patient Evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1190-1195.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  6
    Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
    In this article the author develops a framework for a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Ideas taken from legal theory are integrated in a pragma-dialectical model for analyzing and evaluating argumentation, thus providing a more systematic and elaborate framework for assessing the quality of teleological arguments in a legal context. Teleological argumentation in a legal context is approached as a specific form of pragmatic argumentation. The legal criteria that are relevant for the evaluation of teleological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  26
    Endla Lõhkivi, Katrin Velbaum & Jaana Eigi (2013). Epistemic Injustice in Research Evaluation: A Cultural Analysis of the Humanities and Physics in Estonia. Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (2):108-132.
    This paper explores the issue of epistemic injustice in research evaluation. Through an analysis of the disciplinary cultures of physics and humanities, we attempt to identify some aims and values specific to the disciplinary areas. We suggest that credibility is at stake when the cultural values and goals of a discipline contradict those presupposed by official evaluation standards. Disciplines that are better aligned with the epistemic assumptions of evaluation standards appear to produce more "scientific" findings. To restore (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    Kathleen S. Samu, Amanda Wheeler, Lanuola Asiasiga, Synthia M. Dash, Gail Robinson, Lucy Dunbar & Tamasailau Suaalii‐Sauni (2011). Towards Quality Pacific Services: The Development of a Service Self‐Evaluation Tool for Pacific Addiction Services in New Zealand. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1036-1044.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  20
    Ronald N. Kostoff (1997). Use and Misuse of Metrics in Research Evaluation. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):109-120.
    This paper addresses some critical issues in the applicability of quantitative performance measures (including bibliometric, economic, and co-occurrence measures) to the assessment of basic research. The strengths and weaknesses of metrics applied as research performance measures are examined. It is concluded that metrics have a useful role to play in the evaluation of research. Each metric employed, whether bibliometric, economic, co-occurrence, or others, brings a new dimension of potential insight to the complex problem of research assessment. However, when used (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  5
    Claudia Pagliari, Deborah Clark, Karen Hunter, Douglas Boyle, Scott Cunningham, Andrew Morris & Frank Sullivan (2003). DARTS 2000 Online Diabetes Management System: Formative Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (4):391-400.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  8
    Yvonna S. Lincoln, Laurie G. Thorp & Craig Russon (2003). The Storied Nature of Agriculture and Evaluation: A Conversation. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 20 (3):267-276.
    This paper is a report on aconversation held between the authors andcentered on their shared interest inalternative methods of inquiry and evaluationin agriculture. The conversation was initiatedat the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and has evolvedthrough a series of long distanceconversations. Though not a verbatim transcriptof our conversations, this paper represents acomposite of both the face-to-face conversationand our stream of dialogue over the past year.Central to our discussion is an exploration ofthe parallels between the paradigm shift thatoccurred in evaluation in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  4
    Sugan C. Jain, Dilip Kumar Sen, Muinuddin Khan & Swapan Kumar Bala (2007). An Analytical Study on Social Responsibility Performance Evaluation as an Accounting Measure of Management Efficiency. AI and Society 21 (3):251-266.
    This paper is a portrayal of how social responsibility performance evaluation can act as an accounting measure of management efficiency. In fact, it has given much importance to socio-economic and socio-human obligations to others. The paper attempts to show that these days there is a great need to emphasise more clearly social responsibility, which the corporate sector can and should undertake. The theme of the paper is that the scope of corporate social responsibility encompasses not only economic well-being but (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  1
    Ömer Dizdar, Ömer Karadağ, Umut Kalyoncu, Mevlüt Kurt, Zekeriya Ülger, Yeşm Çetinkaya Şardan & Serhat Ünal (2007). Appropriate Utilization of Hospital Beds in Internal Medicine: Evaluation in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):408-411.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  11
    Isabelle Berrebi-Hoffmann (2010). Évaluation et élitisme : d'une alliance à l'autre. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 128 (1):79.
    L’article développe la thèse suivante : le phénomène évaluatif, ses instruments et ses institutions nouvellement créées sont à la fois les révélateurs et les opérateurs d’une transformation des rapports entre deux institutions en crise : L’État et les professions. S’inspirant de la trilogie des pouvoirs de Freidson, l’auteur suggère d’analyser l’alliance actuelle entre marché et État tandis qu’une crise et une mutation des élites traditionnelles françaises fragilisent l’alliance entre professions et État caractéristique de la construction de l’État social à la (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  47
    Eveline T. Feteris (2000). A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
    In this paper, the author describes a dialogical approach tolegal argumentation from the perspective of argumentationtheory. In a pragma-dialectical approach of legalargumentation, the argumentation is considered to be part of acritical discussion aimed at the rational resolution of thedispute. The author describes how a pragma-dialecticalanalysis and evaluation of legal argumentation can be carriedout.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  7
    Helen Best & Tim Newton (2005). Evaluation of the Personal Dental Services (Wave 1) for Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham Primary Care Trusts – Part 1: Retrospective Analyses of Registration Data and Access Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (3):219-227.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  7
    Claudia Pagliari, Mhairi Gilmour & Frank Sullivan (2004). Electronic Clinical Communications Implementation (ECCI) in Scotland: A Mixed‐Methods Programme Evaluation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (1):11-20.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  11
    Mia Svantesson, Jan Karlsson, Pierre Boitte, Jan Schildman, Linda Dauwerse, Guy Widdershoven, Reidar Pedersen, Martijn Huisman & Bert Molewijk (2014). Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the Development of an Evaluation Instrument for Clinical Ethics Support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):30.
    Clinical ethics support, in particular Moral Case Deliberation, aims to support health care providers to manage ethically difficult situations. However, there is a lack of evaluation instruments regarding outcomes of clinical ethics support in general and regarding Moral Case Deliberation (MCD) in particular. There also is a lack of clarity and consensuses regarding which MCD outcomes are beneficial. In addition, MCD outcomes might be context-sensitive. Against this background, there is a need for a standardised but flexible outcome evaluation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  26
    Carlos León & Pablo Gervás (2010). The Role of Evaluation-Driven Rejection in the Successful Exploration of a Conceptual Space of Stories. Minds and Machines 20 (4):615-634.
    Evaluation processes are a basic component of creativity. They guide not only the pure judgement about a new artefact but also the generation itself, as creators constantly evaluate their own work. This paper proposes a model for automatic story generation based on the evaluation of stories. A model of how quality in stories is evaluated is presented, and two possible implementations of the generation guided by this evaluation are shown: exhaustive space exploration and constrained exploration. A theoretical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000