61 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Evan Fales [60]Evan M. Fales [2]
See also:
Profile: Evan Fales (University of Iowa)
  1. Evan Fales, Review of Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature by Larry Arnhart. [REVIEW]
    It has become something of a leitmotif among evangelical apologetes to argue that morality can have no objective foundation if there is no God. Using a strategy that appeals to many people's strong intuitions that there are objective rights and wrongs, they claim seek to convict atheists of being intellectually committed to moral relativism, subjectivism, or nihilism. Those are, of course, ethical positions that have been advocated by some atheists. But others share the intuition that there are objective moral norms, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Evan Fales (2014). Turtle Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 169 (2):339-354.
    In “Justification Without Awareness”, Michael Bergmann divides internalist epistemologies into those with a strong awareness requirement and those with a weak awareness requirement; he presents a dilemma, hoisting the “strongs” on one horn, and the “weaks” on the other. Here I reply on behalf of the strong-awareness view, presenting what I take to be a more satisfactory, and more fundamental, reply to Bergmann than I believe has been offered by his other critics, and in particular by Rogers and Matheson in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Evan Fales (2013). Is a Science of the Supernatural Possible? In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. 247.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Evan Fales (2011). Is Middle Knowledge Possible? Almost. Sophia 50 (1):1-9.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Evan Fales (2010). Divine Commands and Moral Obligation. Philo 13 (2):151 - 166.
    A popular proof for the existence of God assumes that there are objective moral duties, arguing that this can only be explained by there being a supreme law-giver, namely God. The upshot is either a Divine command theory (DCT) -- or something similar -- or a natural-law theory. I discuss two prominent theories, Robert Adams’s DCT and Stephen Evans’s hybrid DCT/natural-law theory. I argue that they suffer from fatal difficulties. Natural-law theories are plausible, if God exists, but can’t be used (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Evan Fales (2010). Divine Intervention: Metaphysical and Epistemological Puzzles. Routledge.
    Introduction -- How does God do things? -- Divine governance and the laws of nature -- Trouble with time -- Eternal God as author of nature -- What can God know? -- Healed hearts, inspired minds -- Mystical revelations -- Is science a mystic's friend? -/- Divine Intervention is a new look at the question how God can act upon the world, and whether the world can affect God. What, exactly, are miracles, and can God perform them? If so, how? (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Evan Fales (2009). Darwin's Doubt, Calvin's Calvary. In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press. 309.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Evan Fales (2009). Review of Stewart Goetz, Freedom, Teleology, and Evil. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Evan Fales, Despair, Optimism, and Rebellion. Internet Infidels, Modern Library.
    I will make all my goodness pass before you, and will proclaim before you my name 'the LORD'; and I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy. But ... you cannot see my face; for man shall not see me and live. Exodus 33:19-20, RSV..
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Evan Fales (2007). Naturalism and Physicalism. In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Evan Fales (2005). The Road to Damascus. Faith and Philosophy 22 (4):442-459.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Evan Fales (2005). World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):494-497.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Evan Fales (2004). Do Mystics See God? In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub.. 145--148.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Evan Fales (2004). Proper Basicality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):373–383.
    Foundationalist epistemologies, whether internalist or externalist, ground noetic structures in beliefs that are said to be foundational, or properly basic. It is essential to such epistemologies that they provide clear criteria for proper basicality. This proves, I argue, to be a thorny task, at least insofar as the goal is to provide a psychologically realistic reconstruction of our actual doxastic practices. I examine some of the difficulties, and suggest some implications, in particular for the externalist epistemology of Alvin Plantinga.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Evan Fales (2004). Review of John Foster, The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (9).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Evan Fales (2003). Alvin Plantinga's Warranted Christian Belief. Noûs 37 (2):353–370.
    This critical study of the third book of Plantinga's trilogy on proper-function epistemology begins by denying that classical foundationalism proposes a deontic conception of justification. Nor is it subject to Gettier counterexamples, as, I show, Plantinga's fallibilism is and must be. Plantinga's central thesis is that there's no way of attacking the rationality of central Christian beliefs without attacking their truth. That, I argue, is not so on several grounds, e.g., because one can demand independent evidence for the existence of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Lewis Vaughn, Austin Dacey & Evan Fales (2003). The Case for Humanism: An Introduction. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The Case for Humanism is the premier textbook to introduce and help students think critically about the 'big ideas' of Western humanism—secularism, rationalism, materialism, science, democracy, individualism, and others—all powerful themes that run through Western thought from the ancient Greeks and the Enlightenment to the present day.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Evan Fales (2002). Mystical Experience of God: A Philosophical Inquiry, by Jerome Gellman. [REVIEW] Ars Disputandi 2.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Evan Fales (2001). Reformed Epistemology and Biblical Hermeneutics. Philo 4 (2):169-184.
    Literal-minded Christians are enjoying resurgent respectability in intellectual circles. Darwin isn’t the only target: also under attack is the application of modern historiography to Scripture According to Reformed epistemologists, ordinary Christians can directly know that, e.g., Jesus rose from the dead, and evidential concerns can be dismissed. This reversion to a sixteenth century hermeneutic deserves response.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Evan Fales (2001). Successful Defense?: A Review of In Defense of Miracles. [REVIEW] Philosophia Christi 3 (1):7-35.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Evan Fales, Are the Gods Apolitical? Philo.
    The attraction between religion and politics is perennial. Sometimes, in its long and checkered history, it has led to an adulterous affair. I want to ask what lies at the heart of this attraction, and whether that can shed any light on the current religious/political scene. But the romance metaphor is at bottom not a good one. I shall argue that, in their originary condition, religion and politics are "closer," both ontologically and in their motivation, than woman and man, closer (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Evan Fales (1999). Can Science Explain Mysticism? Religious Studies 35 (2):213-227.
    Jerome Gellman has recently disputed my claim that a naturalistic explanation for mystical experiences is available, a better explanation than any current attempt to show that God is sometimes perceived in those experiences. Gellman argues (i) that some mystics do not 'fit' the sociological explanation of I. M. Lewis; (ii) that the sociological analysis of tribal mysticism cannot properly be extended to theistic experiences; and (iii) that mystical experiences merit prima facie credence, so the burden of proof falls on the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Evan Fales (1998). David Ray Griffin, Parapsychology, Philosophy, and Spirituality: A Postmodern Exploration. (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.) Pp. XIV+339, US $59.50 Hb., $19.95 Pk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 34 (1):103-114.
  24. Evan Fales (1998). Parapsychology, Philosophy, and Spirituality: A Postmodern Exploration. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 34 (1):103-114.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Evan Fales (1997). Divine Intervention. Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):170-194.
    Some philosophers deny that science can investigate the supernatural - specifically, the nature and actions of God. If a divine being is atemporal, then, indeed, this seems plausible - but only, I shall argue, because such a being could not causally interact with anything. Here I discuss in detail two major attempts, those of Stump and Kretzmann, and of Leftow, to make sense of theophysical causation on the supposition that God is eternal. These views are carefully worked out, and their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Evan Fales (1996). A Defense of the Given. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
    The Doctrine of the Given The Myth of the Given A Methodological Problem To a convinced foundationalist, the project of establishing the existence of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Evan Fales (1996). Mystical Experience as Evidence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (1):19 - 46.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Evan Fales (1996). Plantinga's Case Against Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):432-451.
    In Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga claims that metaphysical naturalism, when joined to a naturalized epistemology, is self-undermining. Plantinga argues that naturalists are committed to a neoDarwinian account of our origins, and that the reliability of our cognitive faculties is improbable or unknown relative to that theory. If the theory is true, then we are in no position to know that, whereas theism, if true, underwrites cognitive reliability. I seek to turn the tables on Plantinga, showing that neoDarwinism provides (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Evan Fales (1996). Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences: II. The Challenge to Theism. Religious Studies 32 (3):297 - 313.
    In Part I of this paper, I argued that the mystical experiences of Teresa of Avila are well explained by the anthropological theory of I. M. Lewis. In Part II, I discuss how the causal gap between the social circumstances identified by Lewis and individual phenomenology can be filled in. I then show that Lewis's theory, thus supplemented, is a genuine competitor to the theistic understanding of mystical experience, and that it is much more strongly confirmed by the available (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Evan Fales (1996). Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences, Part I: The Case of St. Teresa. Religious Studies 32 (2):143 - 163.
    Several writers have argued for the implausibility of there being naturalistic explanations of mystical experience. These writers recognize that the evidential significance of mystical experiences for theism depends upon whether explanations that exclude supernatural agency can be discounted; but they seem unaware of some of the best scientific work done in this area. Part I of the present paper introduces the theory of I. M. Lewis, an anthropologist, and tests it against the case of St Teresa. I use (...) because of her prominence, and because we have considerable biographical data for her. I conclude that Lewis's approach, suitably supplemented, is strikingly successful in explaining this case. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Evan Fales (1996). Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences: Evan Fales. Religious Studies 32 (3):297-313.
    In Part I of this paper, I took up a challenge posed by Alston , Wainwright , Yandell , and other theists who hold the rather natural view that mystical experiences provide perceptual contact with God, roughly on a par with the access sense experience affords to the natural world. These theists recognize, at the same time, that the plausibility of this view would be significantly compromised by the possibility of scientifically explaining mystical experiences – especially if a scientific explanation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Evan Fales (1995). Causes and Coincidences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):465-468.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Evan Fales (1994). Are Christians Obliged to Be Pacifists? Faith and Philosophy 11 (2):298-301.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Evan Fales (1994). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Mind 103 (411):391-395.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Evan M. Fales (1994). Divine Freedom and the Choice of a World. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 35 (2):65 - 88.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Evan Fales, Susan C. Lawrence & Robert F. Weir (1994). Genes and Human Self-Knowledge Historical and Philosophical Reflections on Modern Genetics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Evan Fales (1993). Are Causal Laws Contingent? In John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong. Cambridge Up.
    It has been nearly a decade and a half since Fred Dretske, David Armstrong and Michael Tooley, having each rejected the Regularity theory, independently proposed that natural laws are grounded in a second-order relation that somehow binds together universals.' (l shall call this the ‘DTA theory’). In this way they sought to overcome the major - and notorious — shortcomings of every version of the Regularity theory: how to provide truth conditions for laws that lack instances; how to distinguish laws (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Evan Fales (1992). Should God Not Have Created Adam? Faith and Philosophy 9 (2):193-209.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Evan Fales & Edward A. Wasserman (1992). Causal Knowledge: What Can Psychology Teach Philosophers. Journal of Mind and Behavior 13 (1):1-28.
    Theories of how organisms learn about cause-effect relations have a history dating back at least to the associationist/mechanistic hypothesis of David Hume. Some contemporary theories of causal learning are descendants of Hume's mechanistic models of conditioning, but others impute principled, rule-based reasoning. Since even primitive animals are conditionable, it is clear that there are built-in mechanical algorithms that respond to cause/effect relations. The evidence suggests that humans retain the use of such algorithms, which are surely adaptive when causal judgments must (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. E. J. Lowe, Evan Fales, Galen Strawson & Michael Tooley (1991). Causation and Universals.The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume.Causation: A Realist Approach. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):494.
  41. Evan Fales (1990). "Causation: A Realist Approach" by Michael Tooley. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (3):605.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Evan Fales (1990). Causation and Universals. Routledge.
    Then, adopting the view of Armstrong and others that causation is grounded in a second-order relation between universals, he explores a range of topics for ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Evan Fales (1989). Antediluvian Theodicy. Faith and Philosophy 6 (3):320-329.
    This paper is a discussion of Eleonore Stump’s “The Problem of Evil.” Stump, I argue, has attempted a theodicy with several desirable features; among them, an effort to provide a positive account of the compatibility of natural evils with God’s goodness that makes use of specifically Christian doctrines. However, the doctrines Stump makes use of---and, in particular, her conception of hell and her interpretation of original sin---raise, I suggest, more problems than they solve.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Evan Fales (1989). Michael Luntley, Language, Logic, and Experience: The Case for Anti-Realism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (11):448-451.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Evan Fales (1988). How to Be a Metaphysical Realist. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):253-274.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Evan Fales (1986). Essentialism and the Elementary Constituents of Matter. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):391-402.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Evan Fales (1984). Causation and Induction. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):113-134.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Evan Fales (1984). Davidson's Compatibilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):227-246.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Evan Fales (1983). "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature" by Richard Rorty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13 (4):524.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 61