42 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: F.A. Muller (Erasmus University of Rotterdam)
  1. F. A. Muller (2014). The Relativity of Simultaneity is Not a Temporal Illusion. Analysis 74 (2):232-233.
    In this journal, Brogaard and Marlow recently argued that the relativity of simultaneity is an illusion. We claim their argument is fallacious.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Øystein Linnebo & F. A. Muller (2013). On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary Particles. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1133-1142.
    In the context of discussions about the nature of ‘identical particles’ and the status of Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles in Quantum Mechanics, a novel kind of physical discernibility has recently been proposed, which we call witness-discernibility. We inquire into how witness-discernibility relates to known kinds of discernibility. Our conclusion will be that for a wide variety of cases, including the intended quantum-mechanical ones, witness-discernibility collapses extensionally to absolute discernibility, that is, to discernibility by properties.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. F. A. I. Buekens & F. A. Muller (2012). Intentionality Versus Constructive Empiricism. Erkenntnis 76 (1):91-100.
    By focussing on the intentional character of observation in science, we argue that Constructive Empiricism—B.C. van Fraassen’s much debated and explored view of science—is inconsistent. We then argue there are at least two ways out of our Inconsistency Argument, one of which is more easily to square with Constructive Empiricism than the other.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. F. A. Muller (2012). Circular Discernment in Completely Extensive Structures and How to Avoid Such Circles Generally. Studia Logica 100 (5):947-952.
    In this journal (Studia Logica), D. Rizza [2010: 176] expounded a solution of what he called “the indiscernibility problem for ante rem structuralism”, which is the problem to make sense of the presence, in structures, of objects that are indiscernible yet distinct, by only appealing to what that structure provides. We argue that Rizza’s solution is circular and expound a different solution that not only solves the problem for completely extensive structures, treated by Rizza, but for nearly (but not) all (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. F. A. Muller (2011). Cantor-Von Neumann Set-Theory. Logique Et Analyse 213.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. F. A. Muller (2011). How to Defeat Wüthrich's Abysmal Embarrassment Argument Against Space-Time Structuralism. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1046-1057.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. F. A. Muller (2011). Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183 (1):87-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. F. A. Muller (2011). Review of Paul Dicken, Constructive Empiricism. Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (2).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. F. A. Muller (2011). Withering Away, Weakly. Synthese 180 (2):223 - 233.
    One of the reasons provided for the shift away from an ontology for physical reality of material objects & properties towards one of physical structures & relations (Ontological Structural Realism: OntSR) is that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of similar elementary particles entails they are indiscernible. As material objects, they 'whither away', and when they wither away, structures emerge in their stead. We inquire into the question whether recent results establishing the weak discernibility of elementary particles pose a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. F. A. Muller (2010). The Characterisation of Structure: Definition Versus Axiomatisation. In. In F. Stadler, D. Dieks, W. Gonzales, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. 399--416.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. F. A. Muller, The Insidiously Enchanted Forest.
    Essay Review of B.C. van Fraassen's *Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective* (2008).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. F. A. Muller (2009). The Insidiously Enchanted Forrest. Essay Review of 'Scientific Representation' by Bas C. Van Fraassen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (3):268-272.
  13. F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck (2009). Discerning Elementary Particles. Philosophy of Science 76 (2):179-200.
    We maximally extend the quantum‐mechanical results of Muller and Saunders ( 2008 ) establishing the ‘weak discernibility’ of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in finite‐dimensional Hilbert spaces. This confutes the currently dominant view that ( A ) the quantum‐mechanical description of similar particles conflicts with Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII); and that ( B ) the only way to save PII is by adopting some heavy metaphysical notion such as Scotusian haecceitas or Adamsian primitive thisness. We (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. F. A. Muller & Simon Saunders (2008). Discerning Fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499-548.
    We demonstrate that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in all their admissible states, mixed or pure, for all finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, is not in conflict with Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII). We discern the fermions by means of physically meaningful, permutation-invariant categorical relations, i.e. relations independent of the quantum-mechanical probabilities. If, indeed, probabilistic relations are permitted as well, we argue that similar bosons can also be discerned in all (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. F. A. Muller (2008). In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell's Master Argument and Aberrant Theories. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (1):131 - 156.
    Over the past years, in books and journals (this journal included), N. Maxwell launched a ferocious attack on B. C. van Fraassen’s view of science called Constructive Empiricism (CE). This attack has been totally ignored. Must we conclude from this silence that no defence is possible and that a fortiori Maxwell has buried CE once and for all? Or is the attack too obviously flawed as not to merit exposure? A careful dissection of Maxwell’s reasoning will make it clear that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. F. A. Muller, Whither Away, Weakly.
    One of the reasons provided for the shift away from an ontology, for physical reality, of material objects & properties towards one of physical structures & relations (Ontological Structural Realism: OntSR) is that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of similar elementary particles entails they are indiscernible. As material objects, they ‘whither away’. We inquire into the question whether recent results esta- blishing the weak discernibility of elementary particles pose a threat for this quantum-mechanical reason for OntSR, because precisely (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. F. A. Muller & B. C. Van Fraassen (2008). How to Talk About Unobservables. Analysis 68 (3):197 - 205.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. F. A. Muller & B. C. van Fraassen (2008). How to Talk About Unobservables. Analysis 68 (299):197–205.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Simon Saunders & F. A. Muller (2008). Discerning Fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499 - 548.
    We demonstrate that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in all their admissible states, mixed or pure, for all finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, is not in conflict with Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII). We discern the fermions by means of physically meaningful, permutation-invariant categorical relations, i.e. relations independent of the quantum-mechanical probabilities. If, indeed, probabilistic relations are permitted as well, we argue that similar bosons can also be discerned in all (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. F. A. Muller (2007). Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics? Philosophy of Science 74 (2):253-277.
    In a recent issue of this journal, M. Frisch claims to have proven that classical electrodynamics is an inconsistent physical theory. We argue that he has applied classical electrodynamics inconsistently. Frisch also claims that all other classical theories of electromagnetic phenomena, when consistent and in some sense an approximation of classical electrodynamics, are haunted by “serious conceptual problems” that defy resolution. We argue that this claim is based on a partisan if not misleading presentation of theoretical research in classical electrodynamics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck (2007). Is Standard Quantum Mechanics Technologically Inadequate? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):595 - 604.
    In a recent issue of this journal, P.E. Vermaas ([2005]) claims to have demonstrated that standard quantum mechanics is technologically inadequate in that it violates the 'technical functions condition'. We argue that this claim is false because based on a 'narrow' interpretation of this technical functions condition that Vermaas can only accept on pain of contradiction. We also argue that if, in order to avoid this contradiction, the technical functions condition is interpreted 'widely' rather than 'narrowly', then Vermaas, argument for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. F. A. Muller (2006). De denkbewegingen van Harry Mulisch. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 98:33-56.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck, Is Quantum Mechanics Technologically Inadequate?
    In a recent issue of the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2005), P.E. Vermaas claims to have demonstrated that standard quantum mechanics is technologically inadequate in that it violates the `technical functions condition'. We argue that this claim is false because based on a `narrow' interpretation of this technical functions condition that Vermaas can only accept on pain of contradiction. We also argue that if, in order to avoid this contradiction, the technical functions condition is interpreted `widely' rather (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. F. A. Muller (2005). Deflating Skolem. Synthese 143 (3):223--53.
    . Remarkably, despite the tremendous success of axiomatic set-theory in mathematics, logic and meta-mathematics, e.g., model-theory, two philosophical worries about axiomatic set-theory as the adequate catch of the set-concept keep haunting it. Having dealt with one worry in a previous paper in this journal, we now fulfil a promise made there, namely to deal with the second worry. The second worry is the Skolem Paradox and its ensuing Skolemite skepticism. We present a comparatively novel and simple analysis of the argument (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. F. A. Muller (2005). The Deep Black Sea: Observability and Modality Afloat. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):61-99.
    In the spirit of B. C. van Fraassen's view of science called Constructive Empiricism, we propose a scientific criterion to decide whether a concrete object is observable, as well as a coextensive scientific-philosophical definition of observability, and we sketch a rigorous account of modal language occurring in science. We claim that our account of observability solves three problems to which current accounts of observability, notably van Fraassen's own accounts, give rise. We further claim that our account of modal propositions (subjunctive (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. F. A. Muller (2004). Erratum. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):635-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. F. A. Muller (2004). Can a Constructive Empiricist Adopt the Concept of Observability? Philosophy of Science 71 (1):80-97.
    Alan Musgrave, Michael Friedman, Jeffrey Foss, and Richard Creath raised different objections against the Distinction between observables and unobservables when drawn within the confines of Bas C. van Fraassen's Constructive Empiricism (CE), to the effect that the Distinction cannot be drawn there coherently. Van Fraassen has only responded to Musgrave but Musgrave claimed not to understand van Fraassen's succinct response. I argue that van Fraassen's response is not enough. What remains in the end is an unsolved problem which CE cannot (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. F. A. Muller (2004). Maxwell's Lonely War. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (1):109-119.
    Essay Review of two books of A.N. Maxwell, last of the Neo-Popperians: The Comprehensibility of the Universe (1998) and The Human World in the Physical Universe (2001).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. F. A. Muller (2004). The Implicit Definition of the Set-Concept. Synthese 138 (3):417 - 451.
    Once Hilbert asserted that the axioms of a theory `define` theprimitive concepts of its language `implicitly''. Thus whensomeone inquires about the meaning of the set-concept, thestandard response reads that axiomatic set-theory defines itimplicitly and that is the end of it. But can we explainthis assertion in a manner that meets minimum standards ofphilosophical scrutiny? Is Jané (2001) wrong when hesays that implicit definability is ``an obscure notion''''? Doesan explanation of it presuppose any particular view on meaning?Is it not a scandal (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. F. A. Muller, In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Metaphpysics Versus Science.
    A defence of constructive empiricism against an attack of N. Maxwell by means of his pet-thesis that science implicitly and permanently accepts a metaphysical thesis about the nature of the universe. We argue that Maxwell's attack can be beaten off; that his arguments do not establish what Maxwell believes they establish; and that we can draw a number of valuable lessons from these attacks about the nature of science and of the libertatian nature of constructive empiricism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. F. A. Muller (2001). Margaret Morrison, Critical Discussion of Unifying Scientific Theories. Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures. Erkenntnis 55 (1):132-143.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. F. A. Muller (2001). Sets, Classes, and Categories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.
    This paper, accessible for a general philosophical audience having only some fleeting acquaintance with set-theory and category-theory, concerns the philosophy of mathematics, specifically the bearing of category-theory on the foundations of mathematics. We argue for six claims. (I) A founding theory for category-theory based on the primitive concept of a set or a class is worthwile to pursue. (II) The extant set-theoretical founding theories for category-theory are conceptually flawed. (III) The conceptual distinction between a set and a class can be (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. F. A. Muller (1999). The Equivalence Myth of Quntum Mechanics (Addendum). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (4):543-545.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. F. A. Muller (1999). The Locality Scandal of Quantum Mechanics. In. In Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara (ed.), Language, Quantum, Music. 241--248.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. F. A. Muller (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics —Part I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (1):35-61.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. F. A. Muller (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics—Part II. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):219-247.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. F. A. Muller (1994). Philosphy of Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):505-509.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. F. A. Muller (1994). Philosphy of Physics: Lawrence Sklar,(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), Xi+ 246 Pp. ISBN 0-19-875.138-9. Pbk.£ 11.95. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):505-509.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. F. A. Muller & Jeremy Butterfield (1994). Is Algebraic Lorentz-Covariant Quantum Field Theory Stochastic Einstein Local? Philosophy of Science 61 (3):457-474.
    The general context of this paper is the locality problem in quantum theory. In a recent issue of this journal, Redei (1991) offered a proof of the proposition that algebraic Lorentz-covariant quantum field theory is past stochastic Einstein local. We show that Redei's proof is either spurious or circular, and that it contains two deductive fallacies. Furthermore, we prove that the mentioned theory meets the stronger condition of stochastic Haag locality.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation