Search results for 'F. Kauffmann-Muller' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  18
    F. Max Müller (1892). A Comment by Prof. F. Max Müller Concerning the Discussion on Evolution and Language. The Monist 2 (2):286-286.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. F. Max Müller (1907). Thoughts on Life and Religion an Aftermath From the Writings of the Right Honourable Professor F. Max Müller. A. Constable & Co.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Immanuel Kant & Max Muller (1896). Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Tr. By F.M. Müller.
  4. Immanuel Kant, Max Muller & Ludwig Noiré (1881). Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Tr. By F.M. Müller, with an Historical Intr. By L. Noiré.
  5.  73
    F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck (2009). Discerning Elementary Particles. Philosophy of Science 76 (2):179-200.
    We maximally extend the quantum‐mechanical results of Muller and Saunders ( 2008 ) establishing the ‘weak discernibility’ of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in finite‐dimensional Hilbert spaces. This confutes the currently dominant view that ( A ) the quantum‐mechanical description of similar particles conflicts with Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII); and that ( B ) the only way to save PII is by adopting some heavy metaphysical notion such as Scotusian haecceitas or Adamsian primitive thisness. We (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  6. F. Max Müller (1864/1987). Max Müller's Encyclopaedia of Language: A Collection of Lectures by Max Müller Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain. Cosmo Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Christian Müller (2011). The Haram Al-Šarīf Collection of Arabic Legal Documents in Jerusalem: A Mamluk Court Archive? Al-Qantara: Revista de Estudios Árabes 32 (2):435-459.
    Este artículo analiza el corpus de 900 documentos del Haram al-�ari-f desde la perspectiva de la conservación de archivos. En su mayoría, estos documentos están relacionados con el juez de Jerusalén �araf al-Di-n ?I-sa- b. Ga-nim y con el periodo en el que se mantuvo en el cargo, entre 793/1391 y 797/1395. La muestra de documentos estudiada, sobre todo inventarios de bienes, pero también documentos relacionados con otras áreas del derecho que pertenecen a la competencia del qa-di-, contradicen la hipótesis (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Gerhard Müller (1974). Peter F. Barton: Um Luthers Erbe. Studien und Texte zur Spätreformation. Tilemann Heshusius (1527-1559) (Untersuchungen zur Kirchengeschichte, Bd. 6), Luther-Verlag, Witten 1972, 261 pp. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 26 (3):287-288.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  3
    Gert H. Muller (1966). Review: P. S. Novikov, Leo F. Boron, R. L. Goodstein, Elements of Mathematical Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):672-672.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    Gert H. Muller (1958). Review: F. Waismann, How I See Philosophy; William Kneale, The Province of Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (2):209-210.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    Gert H. Müller (1997). Novikov PS. Elements of Mathematical Logic. English Translation of XXX 356 by Boron Leo F., with a Preface and Notes by Goodstein RL. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh and London, and Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Mass., Palo Alto, and London, 1964, Xi+ 296 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):672-672.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. J. Müller (1953). Crowley Th. O. F. M.: Roger Bacon. The Problem of the Soul in his Philosophical Commentaries. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 31:97.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. G. L. Müller (1986). F. A. SULLIVAN, Die Charismatische Erneuerung. [REVIEW] Theologie Und Philosophie 61 (2):305.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. G. L. Müller (1985). F. HEIDLER, Die biblische Lehre von der Unsterblichkeit der Seele. [REVIEW] Theologie Und Philosophie 60 (4):616.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. G. L. Müller (1982). F. W. KANTZENBACH, Einheitsbestrebungen im Wandel der Kirchengeschichte. [REVIEW] Theologie Und Philosophie 57 (2):301.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. J. P. Müller (1944). M. Mückshoff O. F. M. Cap.: Die Quaestiones disputatae de fide des Bartholomäus von Bologna O. F. M. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 22:127.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. W. Müller (1985). Marxistko-leninskaja teorija istoritscheskogo prozessa. Band I und II. Red. kollegija: F. W. Konstantinow, J. K. Pletnikow. [REVIEW] Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 33 (9):848.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. J. P. Müller (1950). Nuyens F.: L'évolution de la psychologie d'Aristote. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 28:119.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. J. Müller (1947). Ph. Böhner O. F. M.: The Tractus De Successivis Attributed to William Ockham. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 25:364.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. J. P. Müller (1940). Van Steenberghen, F. - Les oeuvres et la doctrine de siger de Brabant. [REVIEW] Scientia 34 (67):161.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. P. Müller (1952). Zavalloni R. O. F. M.: Richard de Mediavilla et la controverse sur la pluralité des formes. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 30:505.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Hermann J. Muller (1961). The Future of Man by P. B. Medawar, F.R.S. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 4 (3):377-380.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  3
    F. Max Mueller & F. Max Müller (1891). On Thought and Language. A Lecture Delivered Before the Philosophical Society of Glasgow, on Jan. 21, 1891. The Monist 1 (4):572 - 589.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  51
    F. A. Muller & Simon Saunders (2008). Discerning Fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499-548.
    We demonstrate that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in all their admissible states, mixed or pure, for all finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, is not in conflict with Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII). We discern the fermions by means of physically meaningful, permutation-invariant categorical relations, i.e. relations independent of the quantum-mechanical probabilities. If, indeed, probabilistic relations are permitted as well, we argue that similar bosons can also be discerned in all (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  25.  48
    Simon Saunders & F. A. Muller (2008). Discerning Fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499 - 548.
    We demonstrate that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of an arbitrary number of similar fermions in all their admissible states, mixed or pure, for all finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, is not in conflict with Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII). We discern the fermions by means of physically meaningful, permutation-invariant categorical relations, i.e. relations independent of the quantum-mechanical probabilities. If, indeed, probabilistic relations are permitted as well, we argue that similar bosons can also be discerned in all (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  26. F. A. Muller (2011). Withering Away, Weakly. Synthese 180 (2):223 - 233.
    One of the reasons provided for the shift away from an ontology for physical reality of material objects & properties towards one of physical structures & relations (Ontological Structural Realism: OntSR) is that the quantum-mechanical description of composite physical systems of similar elementary particles entails they are indiscernible. As material objects, they 'whither away', and when they wither away, structures emerge in their stead. We inquire into the question whether recent results establishing the weak discernibility of elementary particles pose a (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  27. F. A. Muller (2011). Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford. Synthese 183 (1):87-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  28.  37
    F. A. Muller (2007). Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics? Philosophy of Science 74 (2):253-277.
    In a recent issue of this journal, M. Frisch claims to have proven that classical electrodynamics is an inconsistent physical theory. We argue that he has applied classical electrodynamics inconsistently. Frisch also claims that all other classical theories of electromagnetic phenomena, when consistent and in some sense an approximation of classical electrodynamics, are haunted by “serious conceptual problems” that defy resolution. We argue that this claim is based on a partisan if not misleading presentation of theoretical research in classical electrodynamics.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  29.  15
    Alex Mesoudi, Simon Blanchet, Anne Charmantier, Étienne Danchin, Laurel Fogarty, Eva Jablonka, Kevin N. Laland, Thomas J. H. Morgan, Gerd B. Müller, F. John Odling-Smee & Benoît Pujol (2013). Is Non-Genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Biological Theory 7 (3):189-195.
    What role does non-genetic inheritance play in evolution? In recent work we have independently and collectively argued that the existence and scope of non-genetic inheritance systems, including epigenetic inheritance, niche construction/ecological inheritance, and cultural inheritance—alongside certain other theory revisions—necessitates an extension to the neo-Darwinian Modern Synthesis (MS) in the form of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES). However, this argument has been challenged on the grounds that non-genetic inheritance systems are exclusively proximate mechanisms that serve the ultimate function of calibrating organisms (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  30.  10
    F. A. Muller (2015). The Rise of Relationals. Mind 124 (493):201-237.
    I begin by criticizing an elaboration of an argument in this journal due to Hawley , who argued that, where Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles faces counterexamples, invoking relations to save PII fails. I argue that insufficient attention has been paid to a particular distinction. I proceed by demonstrating that in most putative counterexamples to PII , the so-called Discerning Defence trumps the Summing Defence of PII. The general kind of objects that do the discerning in all cases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31. Øystein Linnebo & F. A. Muller (2013). On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary Particles. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1133-1142.
    In the context of discussions about the nature of ‘identical particles’ and the status of Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles in Quantum Mechanics, a novel kind of physical discernibility has recently been proposed, which we call witness-discernibility. We inquire into how witness-discernibility relates to known kinds of discernibility. Our conclusion will be that for a wide variety of cases, including the intended quantum-mechanical ones, witness-discernibility collapses extensionally to absolute discernibility, that is, to discernibility by properties.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  63
    F. A. Muller (2005). The Deep Black Sea: Observability and Modality Afloat. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):61-99.
    We propose a rigourous criterion for observability and claim it solves three problems that extant accounts of observability, including Van Fraassen's one, do not solve. We also give a rigourous verions of Van Fraassen's own sketchy account of modality without relying on `inflationary metaphycis'.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  33.  20
    F. A. Muller (2011). How to Defeat Wüthrich's Abysmal Embarrassment Argument Against Space-Time Structuralism. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1046-1057.
    In his 2009 PSA Recent Ph.D. Award winning contribution to the bi-annual PSA Conference at Pittsburgh in 2008, C. Wu ̈thrich mounted an argument against struc- turalism about space-time in the context of the General Theory of Relativity, to the effect that structuralists cannot discern space-time points. An “abysmal embarrass- ment” for the structuralist, Wu ̈thrich judged. Wu ̈thrich’s characterisation of space-time structuralism is however incorrect. We demonstrate how, on the basis of a correct char- acterisation of space-time structuralism, it (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34.  14
    F. A. Muller (2008). In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell's Master Argument and Aberrant Theories. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):131-156.
    Over the past years, in books and journals , N. Maxwell launched a ferocious attack on B. C. van Fraassen's view of science called Constructive Empiricism . This attack has been totally ignored. Must we conclude from this silence that no defence is possible and that a fortiori Maxwell has buried CE once and for all? Or is the attack too obviously flawed as not to merit exposure? A careful dissection of Maxwell's reasoning will make it clear that neither is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  35.  15
    F. A. Muller & B. C. Van Fraassen (2008). How to Talk About Unobservables. Analysis 68 (3):197 - 205.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  36.  37
    F. A. Muller (2014). The Relativity of Simultaneity is Not a Temporal Illusion. Analysis 74 (2):232-233.
    In this journal, Brogaard and Marlow recently argued that the relativity of simultaneity is an illusion. We claim their argument is fallacious.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  8
    F. A. Muller (1999). The Equivalence Myth of Quntum Mechanics (Addendum). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (4):543-545.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  38. F. A. Muller (2004). Can a Constructive Empiricist Adopt the Concept of Observability? Philosophy of Science 71 (1):80-97.
    Alan Musgrave, Michael Friedman, Jeffrey Foss, and Richard Creath raised different objections against the Distinction between observables and unobservables when drawn within the confines of Bas C. van Fraassen's Constructive Empiricism, to the effect that the Distinction cannot be drawn there coherently. Van Fraassen has only responded to Musgrave but Musgrave claimed not to understand van Fraassen's succinct response. I argue that van Fraassen's response is not enough. What remains in the end is an unsolved problem which CE cannot afford (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39.  16
    F. A. Muller (2010). The Characterisation of Structure: Definition Versus Axiomatisation. In F. Stadler, D. Dieks, W. Gonzales, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer 399--416.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40. F. A. Muller (2009). The Insidiously Enchanted Forrest. Essay Review of 'Scientific Representation' by Bas C. Van Fraassen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (3):268-272.
  41.  66
    F. A. Muller (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics —Part I. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (1):35-61.
    The author endeavours to show two things: first, that Schrödingers (and Eckarts) demonstration in March (September) 1926 of the equivalence of matrix mechanics, as created by Heisenberg, Born, Jordan and Dirac in 1925, and wave mechanics, as created by Schrödinger in 1926, is not foolproof; and second, that it could not have been foolproof, because at the time matrix mechanics and wave mechanics were neither mathematically nor empirically equivalent. That they were is the Equivalence Myth. In order to make the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  42.  62
    F. A. Muller (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics—Part II. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):219-247.
    The author endeavours to show two things: first, that Schrödingers (and Eckarts) demonstration in March (September) 1926 of the equivalence of matrix mechanics, as created by Heisenberg, Born, Jordan and Dirac in 1925, and wave mechanics, as created by Schrödinger in 1926, is not foolproof; and second, that it could not have been foolproof, because at the time matrix mechanics and wave mechanics were neither mathematically nor empirically equivalent. That they were is the Equivalence Myth. In order to make the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  43.  42
    F. A. Muller (2008). In Defence of Constructive Empiricism: Maxwell's Master Argument and Aberrant Theories. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):131 - 156.
    Over the past years, in books and journals (this journal included), N. Maxwell launched a ferocious attack on B. C. van Fraassen’s view of science called Constructive Empiricism (CE). This attack has been totally ignored. Must we conclude from this silence that no defence is possible and that a fortiori Maxwell has buried CE once and for all? Or is the attack too obviously flawed as not to merit exposure? A careful dissection of Maxwell’s reasoning will make it clear that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  75
    F. A. Muller (2001). Sets, Classes, and Categories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.
    This paper, accessible for a general philosophical audience having only some fleeting acquaintance with set-theory and category-theory, concerns the philosophy of mathematics, specifically the bearing of category-theory on the foundations of mathematics. We argue for six claims. (I) A founding theory for category-theory based on the primitive concept of a set or a class is worthwile to pursue. (II) The extant set-theoretical founding theories for category-theory are conceptually flawed. (III) The conceptual distinction between a set and a class can be (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  45.  21
    F. A. Muller (2004). The Implicit Definition of the Set-Concept. Synthese 138 (3):417 - 451.
    Once Hilbert asserted that the axioms of a theory 'define' the primitive concepts of its language 'implicitly'. Thus when someone inquires about the meaning of the set-concept, the standard response reads that axiomatic set-theory defines it implicitly and that is the end of it. But can we explain this assertion in a manner that meets minimum standards of philosophical scrutiny? Is Jané (2001) wrong when he says that implicit definability is "an obscure notion"? Does an explanation of it presuppose any (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46. F. A. I. Buekens & F. A. Muller (2012). Intentionality Versus Constructive Empiricism. Erkenntnis 76 (1):91-100.
    By focussing on the intentional character of observation in science, we argue that Constructive Empiricism—B.C. van Fraassen’s much debated and explored view of science—is inconsistent. We then argue there are at least two ways out of our Inconsistency Argument, one of which is more easily to square with Constructive Empiricism than the other.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  32
    F. A. Muller (2004). The Implicit Definition of the Set-Concept. Synthese 138 (3):417 - 451.
    Once Hilbert asserted that the axioms of a theory `define` theprimitive concepts of its language `implicitly''. Thus whensomeone inquires about the meaning of the set-concept, thestandard response reads that axiomatic set-theory defines itimplicitly and that is the end of it. But can we explainthis assertion in a manner that meets minimum standards ofphilosophical scrutiny? Is Jané (2001) wrong when hesays that implicit definability is ``an obscure notion''''? Doesan explanation of it presuppose any particular view on meaning?Is it not a scandal (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  48.  24
    F. A. Muller (2004). Can a Constructive Empiricist Adopt the Concept of Observability? Philosophy of Science 71 (1):80-97.
    Several arguments to the effect that the distinction between observables and unobservables cannot be drawn coherently within the confines of Constructive Empiricism are analysed and confuted. One argument, due to A. Musgrave, raises a problem that CE must but cannot solve, unless CE extends its epistemic policy, or so we argue.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  94
    F. A. Muller & B. C. van Fraassen (2008). How to Talk About Unobservables. Analysis 68 (299):197–205.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  27
    F. Max Muller (1891). On Thought and Language. The Monist 1 (4):572-589.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000