9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Felix Thiele [6]F. Thiele [3]
  1. Felix Thiele (2013). Bio-Policy and the Place of Institutionalised Ethics in Political Decision Making. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (2):29 - 31.
    Questions concerning moral problems caused by the lifesciences and concerning the adequate methods and instruments to solve these are timely and urgent; especially in the face of intense debates on the acceptability of research on human embryonic stem cells and preimplantation diagnostics, to name only two applications developed from research in the life-sciences. Unfortunately, the constant and accusing demand that life-scientists must behave morally does not give us a clue on how ethics may help in establishing guidelines for moral behaviour. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. F. Thiele (2009). Reinhard Merkel, Willensfreiheit Und Rechtliche Schuld ( Freedom of the Will and Legal Culpability ). Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):575-576.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Felix Thiele & Barbara Hawellek (2008). The Impact of Current Developments in the Neurosciences on the Concept of Psychiatric Diseases. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):1-2.
    The impact of current developments in the neurosciences on the concept of psychiatric diseases Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10202-008-0054-2 Authors Felix Thiele, Europäische Akademie zur Erforschung von Folgen wissenschaftlich-technischer Entwicklungen Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler Germany Barbara Hawellek, Universität Bonn Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bonn Germany Journal Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science Online ISSN 1615-6617 Print ISSN 1615-6609 Journal Volume Volume 6 Journal Issue Volume 6, Numbers 1-2.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Felix Thiele (2005). Human Nature and the Sciences. Current Challenges in a Franco-German Perspective. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):155-155.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. F. Thiele (2004). Bioethics. Its Foundation and its Application in Political Decisionmaking. In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. 256--274.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Felix Thiele (2004). Its Foundation and Application in Political Decision Making. In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. 25--256.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Felix Thiele (2003). Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
    An increasing number of genetic tests are available as an early spin-off from human genetic research. Beyond their application in the context of medical diagnosis there are other possible domains of use: e.g. in the testing of individuals asking for life or health insurance. It is claimed that individuals with an increased genetic risk might have to pay higher premiums or, worse, might be unable to obtain insurance coverage at all. The main question discussed in this paper will be whether (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Felix Thiele (2002). A Moral Argument Against Human Germline Therapy? Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):160-164.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. C. F. Gethmann & F. Thiele (2001). Moral Arguments Against the Cloning of Humans. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):35-46.
    Since the cloned sheep Dolly was born, reproductive cloning of humans (i.e. the cloning of complete human individuals) has seemed to be – at least in principle – achievable. The technical possibility of reproductive cloning leaves the question unanswered of whether the actual production of a clone would be morally acceptable. Considering several arguments against reproductive cloning – which claim that the moral status of a cloned individual and its clone respectively renders it morally objectionable to carry out cloning – (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation