Search results for 'Faith and reason' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Joseph A. Buijs (2013). Faith, Reason, and Worldviews. Sophia 52 (4):701-709.score: 174.0
    This critical review of Responses to the Enlightenment focuses on the relationship between faith and reason as advanced by Hendrick Hart and William Sweet, respectively. It does so in the context of Enlightenment critique of faith, from which both Hart and Sweet seek to salvage religious faith. While faith as trust is admitted to be performative (Hart), faith is also belief with cognitive content (Sweet). However, faith and reason, as I contend, stand (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. George F. McLean (2000). Faith, Reason, and Philosophy: Lectures at the Al-Azhar, Qum, Tehran, Lahore, and Beijing. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.score: 162.0
    INTRODUCTION In considering the relation of faith and reason it is important to appreciate that the issue generally is viewed from the perspective of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ed L. Miller (1970). Classical Statements on Faith and Reason. New York,Random House.score: 150.0
    Athens or Jerusalem? By Tertullian.--Philosophy the handmaid of theology, by Clement of Alexandria.--Faith in search of understanding, by St. Augustine.--Revelation and analogy, by St. Thomas Aquinas.--The mystic way, by M. Eckhart.--The darkened intellect, by J. Calvin.--The reasons of the heart, by B. Pascal.--Faith, reason, and enthusiasm, by J. Locke.--Miracles and the skeptic, by D. Hume.--The limits of reason, by I. Kant.--Truth and subjectivity, by S. Kierkegaard.--In justification of faith, by W. James.--Religion as poetry, by G. (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard Swinburne (1981). Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 144.0
    "Faith and Reason is the final volume of a trilogy on philosophical theology.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul Helm (ed.) (1999). Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 144.0
    Faith and Reason displays in historical perspective some of the rich dialogue between religion and philosophy over two millennia, beginning with Greek reflections about God and the gods and ending with twentieth-century debate about faith in a world which tends to reserve its reverence for science. Paul Helm uses as a case study the question of whether the world is eternal or whether it was created out of nothing, following this theme from Plato through medieval thought to (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Antonio Sabetta (2012). Faith and Reason: Historical Analysis and Perspectives for the Present. Davies Group, Publishers.score: 144.0
    Faith and reason in the Church Magisterium from Pius IX to Fides et ratio -- Pius IX (1846-1878) between the Qui pluribus and the syllabus -- Faith and reason in the First Vatican Council -- From the syllabus to the First Vatican Council -- Constitution Dei filius -- Leo XIII and the Aeterni patris -- Faith and reason in the light of Fides et ratio -- Fides et ratio after Dei filius and Aeterni patris: (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Paul (ed.) (1999/1998). Encyclical Letter, Fides Et Ratio, of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul Ii: To the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason. United States Catholic Conference.score: 144.0
    Introduction: "Know yourself" -- The revelation of God's wisdom -- Credo ut intellegam -- Intellego ut credam -- The relationship between faith and reason -- The interventions of the Magisterium in philosophical matters -- The interaction between philosophy and theology -- Current requirements and tasks -- Conclusion.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Nicolas G. Mertens (2000). An Essay on Faith, Reason, and Human Nature. Nova Science Publishers.score: 138.0
    Discusses questions such as, what is knowledge, what qualifies as knowledge, and what does not; what does it mean to say, "I know, I understand," what is truth, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Mulhall (1994). Faith & Reason. Duckworth.score: 138.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Michah Gottlieb (2013). Faith, Reason, Politics: Essays on the History of Jewish Thought. Eurospan [Distributor].score: 138.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John J. Heaney (1961). Faith, Reason, and the Gospels. Westminster, Md.,Newman Press.score: 138.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Alexander Hutchison (1956). Faith, Reason, and Existence. New York, Oxford University Press.score: 138.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Paul Helm (2000). Faith with Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 132.0
    Paul Helm investigates what religious faith is and what makes it reasonable.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James Swindal, Faith and Reason. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 132.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Francisco José Moreno (1977). Between Faith and Reason: An Approach to Individual and Social Psychology. New York University Press.score: 132.0
  16. Donald A. Crosby (2011). Faith and Reason: Their Roles in Religious and Secular Life. State University of New York Press.score: 126.0
    Initial sketch of a concept of faith -- Facets of faith -- Faith and knowledge -- Faith and scientific knowledge -- Faith and morality -- Secular forms of faith -- Crises of faith -- My personal journey of faith.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Merold Westphal (2011). Kierkegaard on Faith, Reason, and Passion. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):82-92.score: 126.0
    Religious faith is often critiqued as irrational either because its beliefs do not rise to the level of knowledge as defined by some philosophical theory or be­cause it rests on emotion rather than knowledge. Or both. Kierkegaard helps us to see how these arguments rest on a misunderstanding of all three terms: faith, reason, and emotion.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Steven M. Duncan, Having Faith in Reason.score: 120.0
    An Address delivered to the Seattle G. K. Chesterton Society at the University of Washington Newman Center, May 2, 2013.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Maria Rosa Antognazza (2011). The Conformity of Faith with Reason in the “Discours Préliminaire” of the Theodicy. In Paul Rateau (ed.), Lectures et interprétations des Essais de théodicée de G. W. Leibniz. [Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhefte 40]. Steiner. 231-245.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William P. Alston & Marcus B. Hester (eds.) (1992). Faith, Reason, and Skepticism: Essays. Temple University Press.score: 120.0
    INTRODUCTION William Alston opens this dialogue on faith, reason, and skepticism by arguing that if the belief-forming processes of a typical Christian are ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Aidan Nichols (2009/2011). The Conversation of Faith and Reason: Modern Catholic Thought From Hermes to Benedict Xvi. Hildenbrand Books.score: 120.0
    A Kantian beginning : Georg Hermes -- A Catholic Hegel? Anton Günther -- The response of fideism : Louis Bautain -- Magisterial interventions : Gregory XVI and Pius IX -- Return to the schoolmen : Joseph Kleutgen and Leo XIII -- Embodying the Leonine project : Etienne Gilson -- The philosophy of action : Maurice Blondel -- The dispute over apologetics : from Blondel to Balthasar -- A synthetic outcome? John Paul II's letter Fides et ratio -- From Cracow to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Terence Penelhum (1995). Reason and Religious Faith. Westview Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Pierre Bayle (1963). The Great Contest of Faith and Reason. New York, Ungar.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Joachim D'Souza (1973). William of Alnwick and the Problem of Faith and Reason: Excerptum E Dissertatione Ad Lauream. [S.N.].score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nels F. S. Ferré (1971). Faith and Reason. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Laurence Paul Hemming & Susan Frank Parsons (eds.) (2002/2003). Restoring Faith in Reason: With a New Translation of the Encyclical Letter, Faith and Reason of Pope John Paul Ii: Together with a Commentary and Discussion. University of Notre Dame.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Laurence Paul Hemming & Susan Frank Parsons (eds.) (2007). Redeeming Truth: Considering Faith and Reason. University of Notre Dame Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. William H. Jennings (2009). God's Advocate and the Trial of Faith Versus Reason. Pacific Southwest Consulting Group.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Anthony Kenny (1983). Faith and Reason. Columbia University Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Amiẏa Kumāra Majumadāra (ed.) (1999). Faith and Reason: The Indian Scene and Experience. Asiatic Society.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jeffrey Mallinson (2003). Faith, Reason, and Revelation in Theodore Beza: (1519-1605). OUP Oxford.score: 120.0
    Faith, Reason, and Revelation in the Thought of Theodore Beza investigates the direction of religious epistemology under a chief architect of Calvinism (1519-1605). Mallinson contends that Beza consolidated his tradition by balancing the subjective and objective aspects of faith and knowledge. Making use of new editions of Beza's class notes and correspondence, and examining the theological ideas found in Beza's long-neglected New Testament annotations, this study clarifies the thought of Calvin's successor. The nature of Protestant scholasticism and (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Basil Mitchell (1990/1991). How to Play Theological Ping-Pong: And Other Essays on Faith and Reason. W.B. Eerdmans.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Francis H. Parker (1971). Reason and Faith Revisited. Milwaukee,Marquette University Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. James Deotis[from old catalog] Roberts (1962). Faith and Reason. Boston, Christopher Pub. House.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Karl C. Sandberg (1966). At the Crossroads of Faith and Reason. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Joseph Sarachek (1935/1970). Faith and Reason. New York,Hermon Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Timothy L. Smith (ed.) (2001). Faith and Reason: The Notre Dame Symposium 1999. St. Augustine's Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. F. Russell Sullivan (2010). Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard. University Press of America.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John F. Wippel (1995). Mediaeval Reactions to the Encounter Between Faith and Reason. Marquette University Press.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. D. Holwerda (1983). Faith, Reason, and the Resurrection. In Alvin Plantinga & Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.), Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. University of Notre Dame Press. 265--316.score: 114.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Charles Taylor (2011). Reason, Faith, and Meaning. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):5-18.score: 102.0
    There are two connected illusions which have become very common today. The first consists in marking a very sharp distinction between reason and faith—even to the point of defining faith as believing without good reason! The second is to take as a model of rationality what we might call “disengaged” reason. One illusion exaggerates the capacities of “reason alone” (allusion to Kant intended); the second sees reason as essentially “dispassionate.” Moreover, the two are (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John Cottingham (2011). Sceptical Detachment or Loving Submission to the Good? Reason, Faith, and the Passions in Descartes. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):44-53.score: 102.0
    The paper begins by challenging a received view of Descartes as preoccupied with scepticism and setting out entirely on his own to build up everything from scratch. In reality, his procedure in the Meditations presupposes trust in the mind’s reliable powers of rational intuition. God, the source of those powers, is never fully eclipsed by the darkness of doubt. The second section establishes some common links between the approach taken by Descartes in the Meditations and the ‘faith seeking understanding’ (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. A. N. Williams (2007). Faith, Reason, and the Existence of God. Philosophical Review 116 (2):297-300.score: 102.0
    Denys Turner argues that there are reasons of faith why the existence of God should be thought rationally demonstrable and that it is worthwhile revisiting the theology of Thomas Aquinas to see why. The proposition that the existence of God is demonstrable by rational argument is doubted by nearly all philosophical opinion today and is thought by most Christian theologians to be incompatible with Christian faith. Turner's robust challenge to the prevailing orthodoxies will be of interest to believers (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Karen L. Carr (1996). The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):236-251.score: 102.0
    This essay considers and rejects both the irrationalist and the supra-rationalist interpretations of Kierkegaard, arguing that a new category---Kierkegaard as “anti-rationalist”---is needed. The irrationalist reading overemphasizes the subjectivism of Kierkegaard’s thought, while the suprarationalist reading underemphasizes the degree of tension between human reason (as corrupted by the will’s desire to be autonomous and self-sustaining) and Christian faith. An anti-rationalist reading, I argue, is both faithful to Kierkegaard’s metaphysical and alethiological realism, on the one hand, and his emphasis on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. David B. Burrell (2003). Faith, Culture, and Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:1-11.score: 102.0
    This paper examines how the faith/reason discussion can be expanded by means of culture and analogous language. The author argues that rationaldialogue can occur between different faith traditions, and without having to raise reason to the ideal of enlightenment objectivity or having to jettison reasonthrough some form of relativism. He argues that cultural shifts effect alterations in our very “criteria of rationality” so that our efforts to grasp others’ practices inmatters that challenge our presumed categories often (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John E. Thiel (2000). Faith, Reason, and the Specter of the Enlightenment. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):25-31.score: 102.0
    A nonfoundationalist reading of Fides et Ratio, both in its negative regard for Enlightenment reasoning and its implicit understanding of the philosophical task of justifying belief, enables an appreciation of the encyclical as a particular kind of post-Enlightenment Roman Catholic stance. A nonfoundationalist perspective, understood as a philosophical position on the justification of belief, can be instructive in the encyclical’s articulation of Credo ut intelligam. Fides et Ratio offers a contextualized understanding of justification in its treatment of universality that can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Denys Turner (2004). Faith, Reason, and the Existence of God. Cambridge University Press.score: 102.0
    Denys Turner argues that there are reasons of faith why the existence of God should be thought rationally demonstrable and that it is worthwhile revisiting the theology of Thomas Aquinas to see why. The proposition that the existence of God is demonstrable by rational argument is doubted by nearly all philosophical opinion today and is thought by most Christian theologians to be incompatible with Christian faith. Turner's robust challenge to the prevailing orthodoxies will be of interest to believers (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Alvin Plantinga (1991). When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible. Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):8-32.score: 96.0
    My question is simple: how shall we Christians deal with apparent conflicts between faith and reason, between what we know as Christians and what we know in other ways, between teaching of the Bible and the teachings of science? As a special case, how shall we deal with apparent conflicts between what the Bible initially seems to tell us about the origin and development of life, and what contemporary science seems to tell us about it? Taken at face (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Alfred Freddoso, Ontological Reductionism and Faith Versus Reason: A Critique of Adams on Ockham.score: 96.0
    The purpose of this essay is to take issue with two aspects of Marilyn Adams's monumental work William Ockham . Part I deals with Ockham's ontology, arguing (i) that Adams does not sufficiently appreciate the use Ockham makes of the prinicple of ontological parsimony in his attempt to refute the thesis that there are extramental universals or common natures and (ii) that she sets an implausibly high standard of success for Ockham's project of showing that the only singular entities are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Gary M. Hamburg & Randall Allen Poole (eds.) (2010). A History of Russian Philosophy 1830-1930: Faith, Reason, and the Defense of Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press.score: 96.0
    Machine generated contents note: List of contributors; Acknowledgments; Introduction: the humanist tradition in Russian philosophy G. M. Hamburg and Randall A. Poole; Part I. The Nineteenth Century: 1. Slavophiles, Westernizers, and the birth of Russian philosophical humanism Sergey Horujy; 2. Alexander Herzen Derek Offord; 3. Materialism and the radical intelligentsia: the 1860s Victoria S. Frede; 4. Russian ethical humanism: from populism to neo-idealism Thomas Nemeth; Part II. Russian Metaphysical Idealism in Defense of Human Dignity: 5. Boris Chicherin and human dignity (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000