5 found
  1.  3
    Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Brenda Lobb, Graham Davies, Israel Nachson & Sheila Seelau (2002). International Variation in Ethics Committee Requirements: Comparisons Across Five Westernised Nations. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-8.
    Background Ethics committees typically apply the common principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice to research proposals but with variable weighting and interpretation. This paper reports a comparison of ethical requirements in an international cross-cultural study and discusses their implications. Discussion The study was run concurrently in New Zealand, UK, Israel, Canada and USA and involved testing hypotheses about believability of testimonies regarding alleged child sexual abuse. Ethics committee requirements to conduct this study ranged from nil in Israel to considerable (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  2.  1
    Felicity A. Goodyear-Smith, Tannis M. Laidlaw & Robert G. Large (1997). Memory Recovery and Repression: What is the Evidence? Health Care Analysis 5 (2):99-111.
  3.  23
    Felicity Goodyear-Smith & Stephen Buetow (2001). Power Issues in the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Health Care Analysis 9 (4):449-462.
    Power is an inescapable aspect of all socialrelationships, and inherently is neither goodnor evil. Doctors need power to fulfil theirprofessional obligations to multipleconstituencies including patients, thecommunity and themselves. Patients need powerto formulate their values, articulate andachieve health needs, and fulfil theirresponsibilities. However, both parties canuse or misuse power. The ethical effectivenessof a health system is maximised by empoweringdoctors and patients to develop `adult-adult'rather than `adult-child' relationships thatrespect and enable autonomy, accountability,fidelity and humanity. Even in adult-adultrelationships, conflicts and complexitiesarise. Lack of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  2
    Felicity A. Goodyear-Smith, Tannis M. Laidlaw & Robert G. Large (1998). Riposte. Health Care Analysis 6 (3):223-226.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5. Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Claire Jackson & Trisha Greenhalgh (2015). Co-Design and Implementation Research: Challenges and Solutions for Ethics Committees. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.
    BackgroundImplementation science research, especially when using participatory and co-design approaches, raises unique challenges for research ethics committees. Such challenges may be poorly addressed by approval and governance mechanisms that were developed for more traditional research approaches such as randomised controlled trials.DiscussionImplementation science commonly involves the partnership of researchers and stakeholders, attempting to understand and encourage uptake of completed or piloted research. A co-creation approach involves collaboration between researchers and end users from the onset, in question framing, research design and delivery, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography