Search results for 'Fer-Jan de Vries' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  5
    Jan Van Eijck & Fer-Jan De Vries (1995). Reasoning About Update Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):19 - 45.
    Logical frameworks for analysing the dynamics ofinformation processing abound [4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 20, 22]. Some of these frameworks focus on the dynamics of the interpretation process, some on the dynamics of the process of drawing inferences, and some do both of these. Formalisms galore, so it is felt that some conceptual streamlining would pay off. This paper is part of a larger scale enterprise to pursue the obvious parallel between information processing and imperative programming. We demonstrate that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  17
    Willem De Vries (1983). Professor Willem De Vries Review of Craford Elder's Appropriating Hegel. The Owl of Minerva 14 (3):8-9.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    Jan Eijck & Fer-Jan Vries (1992). Dynamic Interpretation and HOARE Deduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):1-44.
    In this paper we present a dynamic assignment language which extends the dynamic predicate logic of Groenendijk and Stokhof [1991: 39–100] with assignment and with generalized quantifiers. The use of this dynamic assignment language for natural language analysis, along the lines of o.c. and [Barwise, 1987: 1–29], is demonstrated by examples. We show that our representation language permits us to treat a wide variety of donkey sentences: conditionals with a donkey pronoun in their consequent and quantified sentences with donkey pronouns (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    Beste Jan & Beste Hans (forthcoming). De fmale vraag. Idee.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. van der Heiden & Gerrit Jan (2012). De Stem van de Doden: Hermeneutiek Als Spreken Namens de Ander. Vantilt.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Hent de Vries (1993). Das Schibboleth der Ethik. Derrida und Celan. In Jean-Michel Rabaté & Michael Wetzel (eds.), Ethik der Gabe: Denken Nach Jacques Derrida. De Gruyter 57-80.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Jan Van Eijck & Fer-Jan De Vries (1992). Dynamic Interpretation and Hoare Deduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):1-44.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8.  21
    Jan van Eijck & Fer-Jan de Vries (1995). Reasoning About Update Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):19-45.
    Logical frameworks for analysing the dynamics of information processing abound [4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 20, 22]. Some of these frameworks focus on the dynamics of the interpretation process, some on the dynamics of the process of drawing inferences, and some do both of these. Formalisms galore, so it is felt that some conceptual streamlining would pay off.This paper is part of a larger scale enterprise to pursue the obvious parallel between information processing and imperative programming. We demonstrate that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Ida H. Stamhuis (2003). The Reactions on Hugo de Vries's "Intracellular Pangenesis"; The Discussion with August Weismann. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (1):119-152.
    In 1889 Hugo de Vries published "Intracellular Pangenesis " in which he formulated his ideas on heredity. The high expectations of the impression these ideas would make did not come true and publication was negated or reviewed critically. From the reactions of his Dutch colleagues and the discussion with the famous German zoologist August Weismann we conclude that the assertion that each cell (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  2
    Malcolm J. Kottler (2006). Hugo de Vries and the Rediscovery of Mendel's Laws. Annals of Science 36 (5):517-538.
    Hugo de Vries claimed that he had discovered Mendel's laws before he found Mendel's paper. De Vries's first ratios, published in 1897, for the second generation of hybrids were 2/3:1/3 and 80%:20%. By 1900, both of these ratios had become 3:1. These changing ratios suggest that as late as 1897 de Vries had not discovered the laws, although he asserted, from 1900 on, that he had found the laws in 1896. An Appendix details de Vries's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  4
    Onno G. Meijer (1985). Hugo de Vries No Mendelian? Annals of Science 42 (3):189-232.
    It is argued that Hugo de Vries's conversion to Mendelism did not agree with his previous theoretical framework. De Vries regarded the number of offspring expressing a certain character as a hereditary quality, intrinsic to the state of the pangene involved. His was a shortlived conversion since after the ‘rediscovery’ he failed to unify his older views with Mendelism. De Vries was never very much of a Mendelian. The usual stories of the Dutch ‘rediscovery’ need, therefore, a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  12.  2
    Peter J. Bowler (2006). Hugo De Vries and Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Mutation Theory and the Spirit of Darwinism. Annals of Science 35 (1):55-73.
    A great deal is known about the technical issues surrounding the introduction of Hugo De Vries's mutation theory and the subsequent development of the modern genetical theory of natural selection. But so far little has been done to relate these events to the wider issues of the time. This article suggests that extra-scientific factors played a significant role, and substantiates this by comparing De Vries's respect for the original Darwinian spirit with Thomas Hunt Morgan's use of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  4
    Bert Theunissen (1994). Closing the Door on Hugo de Vries' Mendelism. Annals of Science 51 (3):225-248.
    Recent studies have shown that Hugo de Vries did not rediscover Mendel's laws independently and that the classical story of the rediscovery of Mendel is largely a myth. Until now, however, no satisfactory account has been provided of the background and development of de Vries' views on heredity and evolution. The basic tenets of de Vries' Mutationstheorie and his conception of Mendelism are still insufficiently understood. It has been suggested that de Vries failed to assimilate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  1
    Margaret Campbell (2006). Did de Vries Discover the Law of Segregation Independently? Annals of Science 37 (6):639-655.
    It is argued that de Vries did not see Mendel's paper until 1900, and that, while his own theory of inheritance may have incorporated the notion of independent units, this pre-Mendelian formulation was not the same as Mendel's since it did not apply to paired hereditary units. Moreover, the way in which the term ‘segregation’ has been applied in the secondary literature has blurred the distinction between what is explained and the law which facilitates explanation.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  6
    Garland E. Allen (1969). Hugo De Vries and the Reception of the "Mutation Theory". Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1):55 - 87.
    De Vries' mutation theory has not stood the test of time. The supposed mutations of Oenothera were in reality complex recombination phenomena, ultimately explicable in Mendelian terms, while instances of large-scale mutations were found wanting in other species. By 1915 the mutation theory had begun to lose its grip on the biological community; by de Vries' death in 1935 it was almost completely abandoned. Yet, as we have seen, during the first decade of the present century it achieved (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16.  29
    Raymond De Vries Iii (2009). Raymond De Vries Replies. Hastings Center Report 39 (4):4-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  5
    Conway Zirkle (1968). The Role of Liberty Hyde Bailey and Hugo de Vries in the Rediscovery of Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology 1 (2):205 - 218.
    The almost simultaneous and overlapping discoveries of Mendel's forgotten work by Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erik von Tschermak gave rise to an intense rivalry, some jealousy, and more than a little illfeeling. De Vries, the first to announce the discovery, has been subjected to the charge that he wished to conceal his discovery and to obtain for himself the credit for having discovered what we now call Mendelism. This charge involves the statement that de (...) gave credit to Mendel only after he had found that others had also read Mendel's papers. The evidence on which this charge is based is sketchy, and we can now show that at least that portion of it that is based on supposed alteration in the proof of de Vries' paper in the Berichte is without foundation. Unfortunately, de Vries gave three different accounts of how he was led to Mendel's work. Two of these involve Liberty Hyde Bailey.Bailey had listed Mendel's papers in a bibliography that he published in 1892 in The Rural Library. Bailey did not include this bibliography in the first edition (1895) of Plant Breeding or in its reprinting in 1896 and 1897. He did include the bibliography in the second edition (1902), but this was after de Vries and others had called attention to Mendel. In 1899, both Bailey and de Vries gave papers at the Hybrid Conference held at Chiswick, England, but we have no record of their having discussed Mendel. What evidence we have indicates that, at this time, neither of them had read Mendel's papers.De Vries wrote to Bailey that it was Bailey's listing of Mendel in the bibliography published in The Rural Library that led to his discovery of Mendel. Later, de Vries wrote to H. F. Roberts that he had first found a reference to Mendel in Bailey's Plant Breeding of 1895, where the bibliographic reference to Mendel's papers was not published. Finally, de Vries told Th. J. Stomps, who succeeded him at the University of Amsterdam, that he had first learned of Mendel early in 1900 from a reprint of Mendel's paper sent him by his friend Professor M. W. Beyerinck. Our present evidence favors Stomp's account as it shows that de Vries had not read Mendel's papers in 1899 but had early in 1900.Attempts to pinpoint de Vries' discovery of Mendel are aided in part, and in part confused, by the fact that he published five relevant papers in 1900. These papers were in press simultaneously, and some of them were altered in proof. Further confusion is due to the fact that at least three of them were published in the reverse order of their acceptance for publication. Unfortunately we do not have the crucial dates for all of the papers.J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 24: 69–75. A definitely pre-Mendelian paper given on 11 July 1899, and published in 1900 (possibly in April). The evidence for an alteration in proof after de Vries had read Mendel is shown by the fact that de Vries described a ratio of 99 to 54 as a 3 to 1 ratio.Rev. gén. botan. 12: 129–137. A Mendelian paper, giving the 3 to 1 ratio in the F2 generation of a cross between starchy and sugary corn. The paper is not dated by de Vries but it was published in the volume, 128 pages ahead of a paper de Vries dated 19 March. In a footnote, de Vries cites a paper by Correns that was published on 25 January, so we can tell that it was written or corrected in proof after this date. Here Correns showed de Vries that he had already read Mendel's paper. Any attempt by de Vries to ignore Mendel or get credit for Mendelism after 25 January would have been senseless. This date was nearly two months before de Vries' Berichte paper was submitted for publication.Ber. deut. botan. Ges. 18: 83–90. Accepted for publication 14 march, published 25 April. This paper gives Mendel full credit and stimulated the publications of Correns and von Tschermak. As de Vries was aware that Correns already knew of Mendel when the paper was first submitted, there was no occasion to alter it in proof.Rev. gén. botan. 12: 257–271. Dated by de Vries 19 March, but the proof was read after June. De Vries cites von Tschermak's paper in the Berichte that was published in June. The Revue paper is a Mendelian paper, and Mendel is cited on the last page.C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 130: 845–847. Accepted for publication 26 March 1900. Reprint received by Correns 21 April. Mendel is not mentioned but de Vries' use of terms told Correns that de Vries had read Mendel's paper. First of the papers to be published, it caused Correns to assume that de Vries wanted the credit that was due Mendel.The three discoverers of Mendel did not form a mutual admiration society. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  7
    O. Cornejo-Pérez, J. Negro, L. M. Nieto & H. C. Rosu (2006). Traveling-Wave Solutions for Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers Equations Through Factorizations. Foundations of Physics 36 (10):1587-1599.
    Traveling-wave solutions of the standard and compound form of Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers equations are found using factorizations of the corresponding reduced ordinary differential equations. The procedure leads to solutions of Bernoulli equations of non-linearity 3/2 and 2 (Riccati), respectively. Introducing the initial conditions through an imaginary phase in the traveling coordinate, we obtain all the solutions previously reported, some of them being corrected here, and showing, at the same time, the presence of interesting details of these solitary waves that have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Erik Zevenhuizen (2000). Keeping and Scrapping: The Story of a Mendelian Lecture Plate of Hugo de Vries. Annals of Science 57 (4):329-352.
    One of the lecture plates in the collection of the Museum of the University of Amsterdam, generally believed to be used by the Dutch botanist Hugo de Vries, has aroused much discussion in relation to the question of whether or not de Vries knew Mendel's laws before he published his rediscovery of them in 1900. The plate suggests that de Vries observed Mendelian segregation ratios in 1895 and 1896 in the progeny of a cross of two (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Lindley Darden (1985). Hugo de Vries's Lecture Plates and the Discovery of Segregation. Annals of Science 42 (3):233-242.
    This note discusses lecture plates at the Hugo de Vries Laboratorium that may be relevant to Hugo de Vries's claim to have independently discovered Mendel's law of segregation. Dating when the plates were made is problematic.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  13
    Barr Clingan & P. Nicolaas (2011). Hent de Vries and the Other of Reason. The European Legacy 15 (5):549-563.
    The Dutch philosopher of religion Hent de Vries has explored and complicated the boundaries between religion and modern thought in order to create the space for an innovative “minimal theology.” This article reconstructs de Vries's interpretation of the changes in Theodor W. Adorno's thought between Dialectic of Enlightenment and Negative Dialectics in order to demonstrate its fecundity for a philosophical account of otherness. It also examines and defends de Vries's own rhetorical mode of reading texts as an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Willem De Vries (1983). Professor Willem De Vries Review of Craford Elder's Appropriating Hegel. [REVIEW] The Owl of Minerva 14 (3):8-9.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  2
    William Gay, Bing‐Yu Zhang & Ning Zhong (2001). Computability of Solutions of the Korteweg‐de Vries Equation. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (1):93-110.
    In this paper we study computability of the solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation ut + uux + uxxx = 0. This is one of the open problems posted by Pour-El and Richards [25]. Based on Bourgain's new approach to the initial value problem for the KdV equation in the periodic case, we show that the periodic solution u of the KdV equation is computable if the initial data is computable.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Paul Schuurman (2007). Continuity and Change in the Empiricism of John Locke and Gerardus de Vries (1648–1705). History of European Ideas 33 (3):292-304.
    Locke has often been hailed as the father of an empiricism that provided a philosophical basis to natural science in the Age of Enlightenment. In this article his empiricism is compared with that of the little known Dutch Aristotelian professor Gerardus de Vries. There are striking parallels between Locke's brand of mechanist empiricism and the pragmatic and flexible Aristotelianism of De Vries. These parallels put strictures on both the archaic character of the Aristotelianism embraced by De Vries (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  3
    Ángel Enrique Garrido Maturano (2009). Cuando la eternidad hace historia: observaciones acerca de la relación entre historia, existencia y eternidad a partir de la filosofía de la historia de Jan Patocka. Revista de filosofía (Chile) 34 (2):139-156.
    El artículo desarrolla una hermenéutica fenomenológica de las relaciones entre historia, sentido, existencia y eternidad en la filosofía de la historia de Jan Pato¹ka. Primero determina las nociones de sentido e historia. Luego explicita en qué medida la existencia humana constituye la condición de posibilidad de un sentido problemático y concurrente de la historia. Finalmente analiza la �existencia en la verdad� como resultado de una correlación entre existencia y eternidad y comprende la interpelación de la eternidad como origen del sentido.
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  9
    Iván Ortega Rodríguez (2013). Existencia humana, mundo y responsabilidad en la fenomenologia de Jan Patočka. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas: Anuario de la Sociedad Española de Fenomenología:247-264.
    In this paper we seek to take notice of the evolution and continuity of Jan Patočka’s phenomenology on the topic of the world and human existence’s relationship with it. We believe that this problem underlies and stimulates Patočka’s whole phenomenological research and we think that it is a key element to understand the ensemble of his thought.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  8
    Clélia Van Lerberghe (2009). Les Fondements d'Une Phénoménologie de la Littérature Selon Jan Patočka. The European Legacy 14 (6):697-711.
    Le phénoménologue tchèque Jan Pato?ka, auteur d?une phénoménologie asubjective défendant la thèse d?un procès asubjectif de l?apparaître (d?une autonomie du phénomène par rapport à l?ego), a accordé au problème des relations nécessaires et difficiles que la philosophie entretient en son sein même avec la littérature une attention particulière qui l?a conduit à poser les fondements d?une phénoménologie de la littérature centrée autour de l?idée d?un asubjectivisme de l?écrivain. Nous suivrons ici deux axes de réflexion connexes: premièrement, nous montrerons pourquoi et (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  8
    Dragos Duicu (2010). La phénoménologie asubjective de Jan Pato?ka, une phénoménologie non intentionnelle ? Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (8: Questions d'intentionnalité ().
    L?intention de cet article est de présenter la critique et le remaniement de l?intentionnalité qu?implique l?élaboration d?une phénoménologie asub­jective chez Jan Pato?ka. À cette fin, nous exposerons d?abord les raisons qui amènent Pato?ka à prendre ses distances par rapport au subjectivisme de la phénoménologie husserlienne, et les conséquences de ce dépassement de l?horizon transcendantal de la subjectivité. Et dans un deuxième temps nous tâcherons de suivre les implications de cette destitution du subjectivisme relativement au statut et au sens de l?intentionnalité. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Yvonne Knibiehler (2001). Marie-Françoise CHARRIER et Élise FELLER (dir.), Aux origines de l'Action sociale. L'invention des services sociaux aux chemins de fer, Éditions Eres, 2001, 276 p. [REVIEW] Clio 2:24-24.
    Il y a comme un hiatus entre le titre et le sous-titre de ce livre. Le titre, Aux origines de l'action sociale, annonce une intention modeste ; en effet l'ouvrage, composé de touches successives, ne se présente pas comme une synthèse historique organisée. Par contre le sous-titre indique un projet précis et construit, un projet d'histoire : L'invention des services sociaux aux chemins de fer. Dans le texte tout se passe comme si les auteurs n'avaient pas voulu (pas su ?) (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  4
    Gerhard Müller (1973). Konrad Algermissen: Konfessionskunde. 8. Auflage neu bearbeitet von Heinrich Fries, Wilhelm de Vries SJ, Erwin Iserloh, Laurentius Klein OSB, Kurt Keinath. Bomfacius-Druckerei Paderborn 1969, XXVIII und 886 pp. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 25 (1):81-82.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  6
    Roger Hancock (1960). Book Review:Die Erkenntnistheorie des Dialektischen Materialismus. Joseph de Vries. [REVIEW] Ethics 70 (3):251-.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Robert Feys (1958). Review: Josef De Vries, Urteilsanalyse und Seinserkenntnis; Alfons Winkelmann, Die Stellung der Formalen Logik im Sovjetssystem. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (1):88-88.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. André de Muralt (1962). Joseph de Vries: La pensée et l'être. Une épistémologie. [REVIEW] Studia Philosophica 22:257.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Robert Feys (1947). Review: Josef de Vries, Logistische Zeichensprache und Philosophie. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):24-24.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. E. Hartmann (1938). De Vries, J., S. J., Denken und Sein. - Critica. [REVIEW] Philosophisches Jahrbuch 51:385-386.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Iván Ortega Rodríguez (2005). El Movimiento de la Existencia Humana, de Jan Patocka. Daimon: Revista de Filosofia 36:159-168.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  4
    Jérôme Laurent (2006). Fil d'or et fils de fer. Archives de Philosophie 3 (3):461-473.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Chloé Belard (2012). Les ceintures de l’'ge du Fer en Champagne : genre et archéologie'. Clio 2 (36):183-190.
    Pour appréhender le costume en archéologie protohistorique européenne, il faut le plus souvent se satisfaire des accessoires vestimentaires métalliques conservés dans les sépultures, tels que les fibules et les éléments de ceinture. Cette nature instable des vestiges limite notre compréhension de l’implication du costume dans la construction sociale des différences entre les individus des ensembles funéraires. Néanmoins, l’examen des éléments métalliques de ceinture permet d’avoir une image dynamique de l’emploi de ces objets dans la représentation et la création de ces (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Francesc Fernández & Jan Patocka (1996). Jan Patocka, la Filosofia En Temps de Lluita.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  11
    J. Tate (1950). 'Play' in Plato G. J. De Vries: Spel Bij Plato. Pp. 391. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Mij., 1949. Cloth, Fl. 9.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (3-4):111-112.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  6
    Lindley Darden (1976). Reasoning in Scientific Change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries, and the Discovery of Segregation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (2):127-169.
  42.  8
    A. Souter (1929). Bijdrage tot de Psychologie van Tertullianus … door Gerrit Jacob de Vries. Pp. vi + 77. Utrecht: Kemink en Zoon N.V., 1929. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (06):243-244.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Murray Greene (1991). Willem A. De Vries, "Hegel's Theory of Mental Activity". [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):130.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  11
    Albert R. Jonsen (1982). Comments on Andre de Vries' Reflections on a Medical Ethics for the Future. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):135-137.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  11
    Kenneth Wellesley (1969). The Codex Agricolae Tacitus, Annales (Xi–Xvi) Et Historiae: Codex Leidensis Bibliothecae Publicae Latinos 16B (Codex Agricolae): Praefatus Est C. W. Mendell, Addenda Ad Praefationem Adiecit E. Hulshoff Pol. (Codices Graeci Et Latini Photographice Depicti Duce Scatone de Vries Et Post Eum G. I. Lieftinck.) Pp. V+192+5. Leiden: Sijthoff, 1966. Cloth, Fl. 330. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (03):299-300.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  7
    Françoise Coissard (2001). Battre le fer – Jeu de la chaîne. Les rêveries de la femme sauvage d'Hélène Cixous. Rue Descartes 2 (2):87-94.
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  4
    Robinson Ellis (1891). De Vries' Studies in Palaeography Exercitationes Palaeographicas in Bibliotheca Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae Itervm Indicit S. G. De Vries. Leyden: Brill. 1890. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (1-2):38-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    A. Souter (1936). Jakob Jan De Jong: Apologetiek En Christendom in den Octavius van Minucius Felix, with a Summary in English. Pp. Viii + 132. Maastricht: Boosten En Stols, 1935. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):39-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  21
    Edward B. Rackley (2001). Hent de Vries and Samuel Weber: Violence, Identity, and Self-Determination. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (1):95-102.
  50.  8
    J. H. Wright (1893). De Vries's Ethopoiia in Lysias Ethopoiia. A Rhetorical Study of the Types of Character in the Orations of Lysias. By William Levering De Vries. [Johns Hopkins Doctor-Dissertation.] Baltimore, 1892. Pp. 48. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 7 (1-2):64-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000