13 found
Sort by:
  1. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (forthcoming). The Big Concepts Paper: A Defence of Hybridism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
    The renewed interest in concepts and their role in psychological theorizing is partially motivated by Machery’s claim that concepts are so heterogeneous that they have no explanatory role. Against this, pluralism argues that there is multiplicity of different concepts for any given category, while hybridism argues that a concept is constituted by a rich common representation. This paper aims to advance the understanding of the hybrid view of concepts. First, we examine the main arguments against hybrid concepts, and conclude that, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Fernando Martinez-Manrique & Agustin Vicente (2013). What is Said by a Metaphor: The Role of Salience and Conventionality. Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (2):304-328.
    Contextualist theorists have recently defended the views (a) that metaphor-processing can be treated on a par with other meaning changes, such as narrowing or transfer, and (b) that metaphorical contents enter into “what is said” by an utterance. We do not dispute claim (a) but consider that claim (b) is problematic. Contextualist theorists seem to leave in the hands of context the explanation about why it is that some meaning changes are directly processed, and thus plausibly form part of “what (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martinez-Manrique (2013). The Influence of Language in Conceptualization: Three Views. Protosociology 20:89-106.
    Different languages carve the world in different categories. They also encode events in different ways, conventionalize different metaphorical mappings, and differ in their rule-based metonymies and patterns of meaning extensions. A long-standing, and controversial, question is whether this variability in the languages generates a corresponding variability in the conceptual structure of the speakers of those languages. Here we will present and discuss three interesting general proposals by focusing on representative authors of such proposals. The proposals are the following: first, that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2011). Inner Speech: Nature and Functions. Philosophy Compass 6 (3):209-219.
    We very often discover ourselves engaged in inner speech. It seems that this kind of silent, private, speech fulfils some role in our cognition, most probably related to conscious thinking. Yet, the study of inner speech has been neglected by philosophy and psychology alike for many years. However, things seem to have changed in the last two decades. Here we review some of the most influential accounts about the phenomenology and the functions of inner speech, as well as the methodological (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2010). On the Distinction Between Semantic and Conceptual Representation. Dialectica 64 (1):57-78.
    I address the problem of the distinction between semantic and conceptual representations from general considerations about how to distinguish a representational kind. I consider three different ways of telling representational kinds apart – in terms of structure, processing and content – and I examine if semantic representations may constitute a distinct kind with respect to each of them. I argue that the best options for semantic representation to be regarded as a distinct representational kind with respect to each of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Fernando Martínez-Manrique & Agustin Vicente (2010). What The...! The Role of Inner Speech in Conscious Thought. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10):141-67.
    Abstract: Introspection reveals that one is frequently conscious of some form of inner speech, which may appear either in a condensed or expanded form. It has been claimed that this speech reflects the way in which language is involved in conscious thought, fulfilling a number of cognitive functions. We criticize three theories that address this issue: Bermúdez’s view of language as a generator of second-order thoughts, Prinz’s development of Jackendoff’s intermediate-level theory of consciousness, and Carruthers’s theory of inner speech as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2010). Lexical Concepts: From Contextualism to Concept Decompositionalism. In Erich Rast & Luiz Carlos Baptista (eds.), Meaning and Context. Peter Lang.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martinez-Manrique (2010). On Relevance Theory's Atomistic Commitments. In Belen Soria & Esther Romero (eds.), Explicit Communication: Essays on Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Palgrave McMillan.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Agustin Vicente & Fernando Martinez-Manrique, Semantic Minimalism. Oxford Bibliographies On-Line.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Fernando Martinez-Manrique & Agustin Vicente (2009). On the Psychological Reality of the Minimal Proposition. In Philippe de Brabanter & Mikhail Kissine (eds.), Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. Emmerald Publishers. 1.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2008). Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
    This article deals with the relationship between language and thought, focusing on the question of whether language can be a vehicle of thought, as, for example, Peter Carruthers has claimed. We develop and examine a powerful argument—the "argument from explicitness"—against this cognitive role of language. The premises of the argument are just two: (1) the vehicle of thought has to be explicit, and (2) natural languages are not explicit. We explain what these simple premises mean and why we should believe (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2004). Explicitness and Nonconnectionist Vehicle Theories of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):302-303.
    O'Brien & Opie's connectionist vehicle theory of consciousness is heavily dependent on their notion of explicitness as (1) structural and (2) necessary and sufficient for consciousness. These assumptions unnecessarily constrain their position: the authors are forced to find an intrinsic property of patterns that accounts for the distinction between conscious and unconscious states. Their candidate property, stability, does not capture this distinction. Yet, I show that we can drop assumptions (1) and (2) and still develop a vehicle theory of consciousness. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2000). Radu J. Bogdan, Minding Minds: Evolving A Reflexive Mind by Interpreting Others Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (6):392-394.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation