Search results for 'Figure Ground Discrimination' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Birgitta Dresp-Langley & Adam Reeves (2014). Effects of Saturation and Contrast Polarity on the Figure-Ground Organization of Color on Gray. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (1136):1-9.
    Poorly saturated colors are closer to a pure grey than strongly saturated ones and, therefore, appear less “colorful”. Color saturation is effectively manipulated in the visual arts for balancing conflicting sensations and moods and for inducing the perception of relative distance in the pictorial plane. While perceptual science has proven quite clearly that the luminance contrast of any hue acts as a self-sufficient cue to relative depth in visual images, the role of color saturation in such figure-ground organization (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  66
    Birgitta Dresp-Langley & Adam Reeves (eds.) (2014). Color and Figure-Ground: From Signals to Qualia. Routledge.
    The laws which predict how the perceptual quality of figure-ground can be extracted from the most elementary visual signals were discovered by the Gestaltists, and form an essential part of their movement (see especially Metzger, 1930, and Wertheimer, 1923 translated and re-edited by Lothar Spillmann, 2009 and 2012, respectively). Distinguishing figure from ground is a prerequisite for perception of both form and space (the relative positions, trajectories, and distances of objects in the visual field. The human (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  29
    Rolf Reber & Norbert Schwarz (2001). The Hot Fringes of Consciousness: Perceptual Fluency and Affect. Consciousness and Emotion 2 (2):223-231.
    High figure-ground contrast usually results in more positive evaluations of visual stimuli. This may either reflect that high figure-ground contrast per se is a desirable attribute or that this attribute facilitates fluent processing. In the latter case, the influence of high figure-ground contrast should be most pronounced under short exposure times, that is, under conditions where the facilitative influence on perceptual fluency is most pronounced. Supporting this hypothesis, ratings of the prettiness of visual stimuli (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  2
    Christina Bermeitinger, Michael Kuhlmann & Dirk Wentura (2012). Reading a Standing Wave: Figure-Ground-Alternation Masking of Primes in Evaluative Priming. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1109-1121.
    We propose a new masking technique for masking word stimuli. Drawing on the phenomena of metacontrast and paracontrast, we alternately presented two prime displays of the same word with the background color in one display matching the font color in the other display and vice versa. The sequence of twenty alterations was sandwich-masked by structure masks. Using this masking technique, we conducted evaluative priming experiments with positive and negative target and prime words. Significant priming effects were found – for primes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  3
    Stanley Coren (1969). Brightness Contrast as a Function of Figure-Ground Relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):517.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  6.  11
    R. Schafer & G. Murphy (1943). The Role of Autism in a Visual Figure-Ground Relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (4):335.
  7.  8
    Lawrence T. Alexander (1951). The Influence of Figure-Ground Relationships in Binocular Rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):376.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  6
    L. T. Alexander & P. D. Bricker (1952). Figure-Ground Contrast and Binocular Rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (6):452.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  6
    Martin S. Lindauer & Judith G. Lindauer (1970). Brightness Differences and the Perception of Figure-Ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):291.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  2
    Julian E. Hochberg (1950). Figure-Ground Reversal as a Function of Visual Satiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):682.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  6
    Bernard Weitzman (1963). A Threshold Difference Produced by a Figure-Ground Dichotomy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):201.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    Henry G. Cornwell (1964). Effect of Training on Figure-Ground Organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (1):108.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  3
    W. Ehrenstein (1940). The Region of the Vision-Field, Within Which Arbitrary Reversion of Ambivalent Figure-Ground Patterns is Possible. Journal of Experimental Psychology 27 (6):699.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Irvin Rock & Frederick S. Fleck (1950). A Re-Examination of the Effect of Monetary Reward and Punishment on Figure-Ground Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):766.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    Henry G. Cornwell (1963). Prior Experience as a Determinant of Figure-Ground Organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):156.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Tadasu Oyama (1960). Figure-Ground Dominance as a Function of Sector Angle, Brightness, Hue, and Orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (5):299.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. G. L. Mangan (1959). The Role of Punishment in Figure-Ground Reorganization. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):369.
  18. Oliver W. Layton, Ennio Mingolla & Arash Yazdanbakhsh (2014). Neural Dynamics of Feedforward and Feedback Processing in Figure-Ground Segregation. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Rüdiger von der Heydt (2015). FigureGround Organization and the Emergence of Proto-Objects in the Visual Cortex. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  9
    W. Todd DeKay, Martie G. Haselton & Lee A. Kirkpatrick (2000). Reversing Figure and Ground in the Rationality Debate: An Evolutionary Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):670-671.
    A broad evolutionary perspective is essential to fully reverse figure and ground in the rationality debate. Humans' evolved psychological architecture was designed to produce inferences that were adaptive, not normatively logical. This perspective points to several predictable sources of errors in modern laboratory reasoning tasks, including inherent, systematic biases in information-processing systems explained by Error Management Theory.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Stephen Grossberg (1997). Cortical Dynamics of Three-Dimensional Figure-Ground Perception of Two-Dimensional Pictures. Psychological Review 104 (3):618-658.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  22.  17
    Lawrence D. Roberts (1986). The Figure-Ground Model for the Explanation of the Determination of Indexical Reference. Synthese 68 (3):441 - 486.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23. Shaun P. Vecera, Edward K. Vogel & Geoffrey F. Woodman (2002). Lower Region: A New Cue for Figure-Ground Assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (2):194-205.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  5
    Mary A. Peterson & Bradley S. Gibson (1991). The Initial Identification of Figure-Ground Relationships: Contributions From Shape Recognition Processes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):199-202.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  3
    E. Kim, J. Lee & W. Jung (2004). The Effect of Figure-Ground Segregation on Visual Search and Implicit Learning. In Robert Schwartz (ed.), Perception. Malden Ma: Blackwell Publishing 137-137.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Martin S. Lindauer (1989). Expectation and Satiation Accounts of Ambiguous Figure-Ground Perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (3):227-230.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Jan C. Bouman (1968). The Figure-Ground Phenomenon in Experimental and Phenomenological Psychology. Solna, Seelig.
  28. Stephen Grossberg (2016). Cortical Dynamics of Figure-Ground Separation in Response to 2D Pictures and 3D Scenes: How V2 Combines Border Ownership, Stereoscopic Cues, and Gestalt Grouping Rules. [REVIEW] Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Shannon Ross-Sheehy, Sammy Perone, Shaun P. Vecera & Lisa M. Oakes (2016). The Relationship Between Sitting and the Use of Symmetry As a Cue to Figure-Ground Assignment in 6.5-Month-Old Infants. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Ko Sakai, Shouhei Matsuoka, Ken Kurematsu & Yasuhiro Hatori (2015). Perceptual Representation and Effectiveness of Local FigureGround Cues in Natural Contours. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Nobuhiko Wagatsuma, Megumi Oki & Ko Sakai (2013). Feature-Based Attention in Early Vision for the Modulation of FigureGround Segregation. Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  3
    H. E. King, C. Landis & J. Zubin (1944). Visual Subliminal Perception Where a Figure is Obscured by the Illumination of the Ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (1):60.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  9
    Patrick A. Cabe & Margaret L. Healey (1979). Figure-Background Color Differences and Transfer of Discrimination From Objects to Line Drawings with Pigeons. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (3):124-126.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Barbara Johnson (1989). Is Female to Male as Ground is to Figure? In Richard Feldstein & Judith Roof (eds.), Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Cornell University Press 255--67.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35.  5
    Elan Barenholtz & Jacob Feldman (2006). Determination of Visual Figure and Ground in Dynamically Deforming Shapes. Cognition 101 (3):530-544.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  9
    Phil Turner (2014). The Figure and Ground of Engagement. AI and Society 29 (1):33-43.
  37.  5
    Elizabeth Moignard (1994). J. H. Oakley: Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, USA Fasc. 28. The Walters Art Gallery, Baltimore, Maryland: Attic Red-Figure and White-Ground Vases. (CVA.) Pp. X+81; 18 Figs., 60 Plates. Baltimore, MD: The Walters Art Gallery/Union Académique Internationale, 1992. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 44 (01):228-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Lucilla Burn, Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, I. Wehgartner & J. H. Oakley (1994). Deutschland, 62. Berlin, Antikenmuseum Ehemals Antiquarium, 8USA, 28.1. The Walters Art Gallery, Baltimore. Attic Red-Figure and White-Ground Vases. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 114:227.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Barry T. Jones (2012). Relational and Absolute Discrimination Learning by Squirrel Monkeys: Establishing a Common Ground with Human Cognition. In David McFarland, Keith Stenning & Maggie McGonigle (eds.), The Complex Mind. Palgrave Macmillan 12.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    Ronald E. Shor (1979). Application of a Phenomenological Method To the Faces-Goblet Stimulus Display: I. Initiating the Inquiry and Defining Figure and Ground. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 10 (2):189-231.
    "I don't want to hurry it ... When you want to hurry something, that means you no longer care about it and want to get on to other things. I just want to get at it slowly, but carefully and thoroughly, with the same attitude I remember was present just before . It is that attitude that found it, nothing else.".
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West, W. T. DeKay, M. G. Haselton & La Kirkpatrick (2000). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Reversing Figure and Ground in the Rationality Debate: An Evolutionary Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):670-670.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. A. L. Towe (1955). Visual Figure Discrimination and the Mediation of Equivalence Responses. Psychological Review 62 (4):287-289.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  5
    P. Wurtz, R. RebeR & T. Zimmermann (2008). The Feeling of Fluent Perception: A Single Experience From Multiple Asynchronous Sources☆. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):171-184.
    Zeki and co-workers recently proposed that perception can best be described as locally distributed, asynchronous processes that each create a kind of microconsciousness, which condense into an experienced percept. The present article is aimed at extending this theory to metacognitive feelings. We present evidence that perceptual fluency—the subjective feeling of ease during perceptual processing—is based on speed of processing at different stages of the perceptual process. Specifically, detection of briefly presented stimuli was influenced by figure-ground contrast, but not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  44.  20
    Giovanni Bruno Vicario (2003). On Simultaneous Masking in the Visual Field. Axiomathes 13 (3-4):399-432.
    The concept of simultaneous masking in visual field is discussed, in the light of classical examples, of the various kinds of the phenomenon, of a modal completion, of the figure/ground phenomenon, of ambiguous and reversible figures, of mimicry and camouflage and eventually of the complexity of the stimulus. There is some reference to masking in auditory field. The “reality” of the masked configuration is discussed, drawing the conclusion that it is perceptually unreal. The fact that the masking phenomenon (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  12
    Giovanni Bruno Vicario (2002). On Simultaneous Masking in the Visual Field. Axiomathes 13 (3/4):399-432.
    The concept of simultaneous masking in visual field is discussed, in the light of classical examples, of the various kinds of the phenomenon, of a modal completion, of the figure/ground phenomenon, of ambiguous and reversible figures, of mimicry and camouflage and eventually of the complexity of the stimulus. There is some reference to masking in auditory field. The reality of the masked configuration is discussed, drawing the conclusion that it is perceptually unreal. The fact that the masking phenomenon (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  32
    Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi (2003). Sfondo e figura. Rivista di Estetica 43 (24):38-40.
    A dialogue between a figure and its background, illustrating that the perceptual conditions that determine which is which are not as clear as standard Gestalt theory dictates.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  81
    Santiago Echeverri (2016). Object Files, Properties, and Perceptual Content. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (2):283-307.
    Object files are mental representations that enable perceptual systems to keep track of objects as numerically the same. How is their reference fixed? A prominent approach, championed by Zenon Pylyshyn and John Campbell, makes room for a non-satisfactional use of properties to fix reference. This maneuver has enabled them to reconcile a singularist view of reference with the intuition that properties must play a role in reference fixing. This paper examines Campbell’s influential defense of this strategy. After criticizing it, a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  48.  24
    Dominic Smith (2015). On Technological Ground: The Art of Torsten Lauschmann. Evental Aesthetics 4 (2):138-170.
    This essay considers the relationship between the work of contemporary artist Torsten Lauschmann and themes in a growing area of research: philosophy of technology. Themes considered include relations between technology and contemporary urban dwelling, technology and the “everyday,” and Heidegger’s problematic but canonical understanding of technology not as a set of “mere means” but as a “way of revealing.” I argue that Lauschmann’s art renders these themes relevant for our increasingly technologically mediated forms of everyday experience by engaging in a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    Stephen Grossberg (1983). The Quantized Geometry of Visual Space: The Coherent Computation of Depth, Form, and Lightness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):625.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   53 citations  
  50.  43
    Shaun P. Vecera (2000). Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention. Brain and Mind 1 (3):353-384.
    Because the visual system cannot process all of the objects, colors, and features present in a visual scene, visual attention allows some visual stimuli to be selected and processed over others. Most research on visual attention has focused on spatial or location-based attention, in which the locations occupied by stimuli are selected for further processing. Recent research, however, has demonstrated the importance of objects in organizing (or segregating) visual scenes and guiding attentional selection. Because of the long history of spatial (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000