Search results for 'Francis Jeffry Pelletier Nicholas Asher' (try it on Scholar)

997 found
Sort by:
  1. Francis Jeffry Pelletier Nicholas Asher, Generics and Defaults.score: 3870.0
    1: Linguistic and Epistemological Background 1 . 1 : Generic Reference vs. Generic Predication 1 . 2 : Why are there any Generic Sentences at all? 1 . 3 : Generics and Exceptions, Two Bad Attitudes 1 . 4 : Exceptions and Generics, Some Other Attitudes 1 . 5 : Generics and Intensionality 1 . 6 : Goals of an Analysis of Generic Sentences 1 . 7 : A Little Notation 1 . 8 : Generics vs. Explicit Statements of Regularities..
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Nicholas Asher, Generics and Defaults.score: 3810.0
    1: Linguistic and Epistemological Background 1 . 1 : Generic Reference vs. Generic Predication 1 . 2 : Why are there any Generic Sentences at all? 1 . 3 : Generics and Exceptions, Two Bad Attitudes 1 . 4 : Exceptions and Generics, Some Other Attitudes 1 . 5 : Generics and Intensionality 1 . 6 : Goals of an Analysis of Generic Sentences 1 . 7 : A Little Notation 1 . 8 : Generics vs. Explicit Statements of Regularities..
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carlson Greg & Pelletier Francis Jeffry (2002). The Average American has 2.3 Children. Journal of Semantics 19 (1).score: 846.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Pelletier Francis Jeffry (2003). Context Dependence and Compositionality. Mind and Language 18 (2).score: 846.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nicholas Denyer (1993). Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Parmenides, Plato and the Semantics of Not-Being Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (2):108-111.score: 588.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. R. W. Jordan (1986). Francis Jeffry Pelletier, John King-Farlow (Edd.): New Essays on Plato. (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. 9.) Pp. 183. Guelph, Ontario: Produced for the Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy by the University of Calgary Press, 1983. Paper, $13. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):142-.score: 432.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dennis A. Rohatyn (1980). Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. Edited by Francis Jeffry Pelletier. Modern Schoolman 57 (4):374-375.score: 432.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Donald Zeyl (1986). Francis Jeffry Pelletier and John King-Farlow, Eds., New Essays on Plato Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (2):79-81.score: 432.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Stack (1983). New Essays in Philosophy of Language Francis Jeffry Pelletier and Calvin G. Normore, Editors Guelph, Ontario: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, 1980. Pp. 223. $10.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 22 (04):725-727.score: 432.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Alex Lascarides & Nicholas Asher, The Interpretation of Questions in Dialogue.score: 300.0
    A semantic framework for interpreting dialogue should provide an account of the content that is mutually accepted by its participants. The acceptance by one agent of another’s contribution crucially involves the theory of what that contribution means; A’s acceptance of B’s contribution means that the content of B’s contribution must be integrated into A’s extant commitments.1 For assertions, traditionally assumed to express a proposition formalised as a set of possible worlds, it was clear how the integration should go: acceptance meant (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Nicholas Asher & Hajime Wada (1988). A Computational Account of Syntactic, Semantic and Discourse Principles for Anaphora Resolution. Journal of Semantics 6 (1):309-344.score: 300.0
    We present a unified framework for the computational implementation of syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and even “stylistic” constraints on anaphora. We build on our BUILDERS implementation of Discourse Representation (DR) Theory and Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) discussed in Wada & Asher (1986). We develop and argue for a semantically based processing model for anaphora resolution that exploits a number of desirable features: (1) the partial semantics provided by the discourse representation structures (DRSs) of DR theory, (2) the use of syntactic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Nicholas M. Asher (1988). Semantic Competence, Linguistic Understanding, and a Theory of Concepts. Philosophical Studies 53 (January):1-36.score: 240.0
  13. Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (2001). Indirect Speech Acts. Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.score: 240.0
    In this paper, we address several puzzles concerning speech acts,particularly indirect speech acts. We show how a formal semantictheory of discourse interpretation can be used to define speech actsand to avoid murky issues concerning the metaphysics of action. Weprovide a formally precise definition of indirect speech acts, includingthe subclass of so-called conventionalized indirect speech acts. Thisanalysis draws heavily on parallels between phenomena at the speechact level and the lexical level. First, we argue that, just as co-predicationshows that some words can (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Nicholas Asher, Ambiguity and Anaphora with Plurals in Discourse.score: 240.0
    We provide examples of plurals related to ambiguity and anaphora that pose problems or are counterexamples for current approaches to plurals. We then propose a dynamic semantics based on an extension of dynamic predicate logic (DPL+) to handle these examples. On our theory, different readings of sentences or discourses containing plurals don’t arise from a postulated ambiguity of plural terms or predicates applying to plural DPs, but follow rather from different types of dynamic transitions that manipulate inputs and outputs from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Nicholas Asher (2011). Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    This is a book about the meanings of words and how they can combine to form larger meaningful units, as well as how they can fail to combine when the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nicholas Asher, Josh Dever & Chris Pappas (2009). Supervaluations Debugged. Mind 118 (472):901-933.score: 240.0
    Supervaluational accounts of vagueness have come under assault from Timothy Williamson for failing to provide either a sufficiently classical logic or a disquotational notion of truth, and from Crispin Wright and others for incorporating a notion of higher-order vagueness, via the determinacy operator, which leads to contradiction when combined with intuitively appealing ‘gap principles’. We argue that these criticisms of supervaluation theory depend on giving supertruth an unnecessarily central role in that theory as the sole notion of truth, rather than (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nicholas Asher (1987). A Typology for Attitude Verbs and Their Anaphoric Properties. Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (2):125--197.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Nicholas Asher (2006). Things and Their Aspects. Philosophical Issues 16 (1):1–23.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Nicholas Asher (1992). A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (5):463 - 508.score: 240.0
  20. Nicholas Asher (1986). Belief in Discourse Representation Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (2):127 - 189.score: 240.0
    I hope I have convinced the reader that DR theory offers at least some exciting potential when applied to the semantics of belief reports. It differs considerably from other approaches, and it makes intuitively acceptable predictions that other theories do not. The theory also provides a novel approach to the semantics of other propsitional attitude reports. Further, DR theory enables one to approach the topic of anaphora within belief and other propositional attitude contexts in a novel way, thus combining the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (1998). Questions in Dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (3):237-309.score: 240.0
    In this paper we explore how compositional semantics, discourse structure, and the cognitive states of participants all contribute to pragmatic constraints on answers to questions in dialogue. We synthesise formal semantic theories on questions and answers with techniques for discourse interpretation familiar from computational linguistics, and show how this provides richer constraints on responses in dialogue than either component can achieve alone.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ruth Barcan Marcus, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman & Nicholas Asher (eds.) (1995). Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    Modality, morality and belief are among the most controversial topics in philosophy today, and few philosophers have shaped these debates as deeply as Ruth Barcan Marcus. Inspired by her work, a distinguished group of philosophers explore these issues, refine and sharpen arguments and develop new positions on such topics as possible worlds, moral dilemmas, essentialism, and the explanation of actions by beliefs. This 'state of the art' collection honours one of the most rigorous and iconoclastic of philosophical pioneers.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (2005). Free Choice Permission is Strong Permission. Synthese 145 (3):303 - 323.score: 240.0
    Free choice permission, a crucial test case concerning the semantics/ pragmatics boundary, usually receives a pragmatic treatment. But its pragmatic features follow from its semantics. We observe that free choice inferences are defeasible, and defend a semantics of free choice permission as strong permission expressed in terms of a modal conditional in a nonmonotonic logic.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Nicholas Asher, Information Dependency in Quantificational Subordination.score: 240.0
    The purpose of this paper is to (a) show that the received view of the problem of quantificational subordination (QS) is incorrect, and that, consequently, existing solutions do not succeed in explaining the facts, and (b) provide a new account of QS. On the received view of QS within dynamic semantic frameworks, determiners treated as universal quantifiers (henceforth universal determiners) such as all, every, and each behave as barriers to inter-sentential anaphora yet allow anaphoric accessibility in a number of situations. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1996). Prima Facie Obligation. Studia Logica 57 (1):19-45.score: 240.0
    This paper presents a nonmonotonic deontic logic based on commonsense entailment. It establishes criteria a successful account of obligation should satisfy, and develops a theory that satisfies them. The theory includes two conditional notions of prima facie obligation. One is constitutive; the other is epistemic, and follows nonmonotonically from the constitutive notion. The paper defines unconditional notions of prima facie obligation in terms of the conditional notions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1985). Situations and Events. Philosophical Studies 47 (1):57 - 77.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Alex Lascarides & Nicholas Asher (1993). Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (5):437 - 493.score: 240.0
    This paper presents a formal account of how to determine the discourse relations between propositions introduced in a text, and the relations between the events they describe. The distinct natural interpretations of texts with similar syntax are explained in terms of defeasible rules. These characterise the effects of causal knowledge and knowledge of language use on interpretation. Patterns of defeasible entailment that are supported by the logic in which the theory is expressed are shown to underly temporal interpretation.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (2011). Reasoning Dynamically About What One Says. Synthese 183 (S1):5-31.score: 240.0
    ’s glue logic for computing logical form dynamic. This allows us to model a dialogue agent’s understanding of what the update of the semantic representation of the dialogue would be after his next contribution, including the effects of the rhetorical moves that he is contemplating performing next. This is a pre-requisite for developing a model of how agents reason about what to say next. We make the glue logic dynamic by using a dynamic public announcement logic ( pal ). We (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Munindar P. Singh & Nicholas M. Asher (1993). A Logic of Intentions and Beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):513 - 544.score: 240.0
    Intentions are an important concept in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. We present a formal theory of intentions and beliefs based on Discourse Representation Theory that captures many of their important logical properties. Unlike possible worlds approaches, this theory does not assume that agents are perfect reasoners, and gives a realistic view of their internal architecture; unlike most representational approaches, it has an objective semantics, and does not rely on an ad hoc labeling of the internal states of agents. We (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nicholas Asher (1994). Problems with Persistence. Topoi 13 (1):37-49.score: 240.0
    A fundamental question in reasoning about change is, what information does a reasoning agent infer about later times from earlier times? I will argue that reasoning about change by an agent is to be modeled in terms of the persistence of the agent''s beliefs over time rather than the persistence of truth and that such persistence is explained by pragmatic factors about how agents acquire information from other agents rather than by general principles of persistence about states of the world. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Nicholas Asher & Pierre Sablayrolles (1995). A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion Verbs and Spatial PPs in French. Journal of Semantics 12 (2):163-209.score: 240.0
    In this paper we offer a semantic study of motion verbs and motion verb complexes determined by motion verbs and spatial prepositional phrase adjuncts. We propose a classification of motion verbs and of motion verb complexes. Unlike other semantic or syntactic studies, we build up the spatioremporal semantic properties of motion verb complexes compositionally, on the basis of the semantic properties of the verbs, their arguments and adjuncts. We show how to combine this lexical information with discourse information to determine (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Nicholas M. Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1985). How Extension Al is Extensional Perception? Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (2):203 - 228.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nicholas Asher & Anthony Gillies (2003). Common Ground, Corrections, and Coordination. Argumentation 17 (4):481-512.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Nicholas Asher (1985). The Trouble with Extensional Semantics. Philosophical Studies 47 (1):1 - 14.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (1995). Lexical Disambiguation in a Discourse Context. Journal of Semantics 12 (1):69-108.score: 240.0
    In this paper we investigate how discourse structure affects the meanings of words, and how the meanings of words affect discourse structure. We integrate three ingredients: a theory of discourse structure called SDRT, which represents discourse in terms of rhetorical relations that glue together the propositions introduced by the text segments; an accompanying theory of discourse attachment called DICE, which computes which rhetorical relations hold between the constituents, on the basis of the reader's background information; and a formal language for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Ruth M. Kempson, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher (eds.) (2012). Philosophy of Linguistics. North Holland.score: 240.0
    This groundbreaking collection, the most thorough treatment of the philosophy of linguistics ever published, brings together philosophers, scientists and historians to map out both the foundational assumptions set during the second half of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Nicholas Asher (1984). Meanings Don't Grow on Trees. Journal of Semantics 3 (3):229-247.score: 240.0
    In “Meanings don't grow on Trees” I investigate Lewis's proposal for using syntactical information to distinguish between intensions. Lewis's proposal, if it succeeds, would eliminate certain deficiencies in the predictions made by possible world semantics concerning synonymy. I provide two criteria for judging semantic theories: descriptive adequacy and explanatory adequacy. I argue that Lewis's proposal concerning synonymy fails on both counts. I then offer a different approach to problems with synonymy. Synonymy judgments involve two different kinds of meaning: truth conditional (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Nicholas Asher (1989). Belief, Acceptance and Belief Reports. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):327 - 361.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1987). Determiners and Resource Situations. Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (4):567 - 596.score: 240.0
  40. Alex Lascarides, Ted Briscoe, Nicholas Asher & Ann Copestake (1996). Order Independent and Persistent Typed Default Unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (1):1 - 90.score: 240.0
    We define an order independent version of default unification on typed feature structures. The operation is one where default information in a feature structure typed with a more specific type, will override default information in a feature structure typed with a more general type, where specificity is defined by the subtyping relation in the type hierarchy. The operation is also able to handle feature structures where reentrancies are default. We provide a formal semantics, prove order independence and demonstrate the utility (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nicholas Asher (2000). Events, Facts, Propositions, and Evolutive Anaphora. In Achille Varzi, James Higginbotham & Fabio Pianesi (eds.), Speaking of Events. Oxford University Press. 123--150.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Barbara Abbott, Nicholas Asher, Jay Atlas, Kent Bach, Chris Barker, Stephen Barker, Renate Bartsch, Jonathan Bennett, Steven Borr & David Braun (1992). Linguistics Managing Editor. Linguistics and Philosophy 15:679-680.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Nicholas Asher & Julie Hunter (2012). Aspectual Coercions in Content Composition. In L. Filipovic & K. M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition. John Benjamins. 55.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (1998). Bridging. Journal of Semantics 15 (1):83-113.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Nicholas Asher (1991). Discourse Representation Theory and Belief Dynamics. In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer. 282--321.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman & Nicholas Asher (eds.) (1994). Modality, Morality and Belief. Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Nicholas Asher (2012). Context in Content Composition. In Ruth M. Kempson, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics. North Holland. 229.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Nicholas Asher, Graciela De Pierris, Paul Gomberg, Robert E. Goodin, Charles W. Mills, Jordan Howard Sobel, Andrew Levine, Frank Cunningham, W. J. Waluchow & Wesley Cooper (1989). Tp [\ Canadian (Q\ JJJournal of£| Philosophy. Philosophy 19 (3).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Nicholas Asher & James Pustejovsky (forthcoming). The Metaphysics of Words in Context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Nicholas& Lascarides Asher (1998). Alex," Bridging. Journal of Semantics 15:1.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 997