44 found
Order:
  1.  7
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2015). Philosophers in the “Republic”: Plato's Two Paradigms. Philosophical Review 124 (4):571-575.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricœur and H.G. Gadamer. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345.
    The present paper uses the theme of dialectic and dialogue to begin unraveling the similarities and differences between the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur and H.G. Gadamer. Ricoeur is shown to distance himself from Heidegger by insisting on a dimension of explanation and distanciation (which he sometimes identifies with Plato's `descending dialectic') that cannot be reduced to, or absorbed by, understanding and appropriation. This same move, however, leads him to reject Platonic dialogue, with the attendant prioritizing of oral conversation over the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Francisco J. González (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato's Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Northwestern University Press.
    _Dialectic and Dialogue_ seeks to define the method and the aims of Plato's dialectic in both the "inconclusive" dialogues and the dialogues that describe and practice a method of hypothesis. Departing from most treatments of Plato, Gonzalez argues that the philosophical knowledge at which dialectic aims is nonpropositional, practical, and reflexive. The result is a reassessment of how Plato understood the nature of philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  44
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2009). Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Introduction: What is to be gained from a confrontation between Plato and Heidegger? -- Heidegger's critical reading of Plato in the 1920s -- Dialectic, ethics, and dialogue -- Heidegger's critique of dialectic in the 1920s --Ethics and ontology -- Ethics in Plato's sophist -- Heidegger and dialogue -- Logos and being -- The tensions in Heidegger's critique -- The guiding perspective of Plato as undermining the ontic/ontological distinction -- Heidegger on Plato's forms -- Conclusion: The relation between being and Heidegger (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Hayden W. Ausland, Eugenio Benitez, Ruby Blondell, Lloyd P. Gerson, Francisco J. Gonzalez, J. J. Mulhern, Debra Nails, Erik Ostenfeld, Gerald A. Press, Gary Alan Scott, P. Christopher Smith, Harold Tarrant, Holger Thesleff, Joanne Waugh, William A. Welton & Elinor J. M. West (2000). Who Speaks for Plato?: Studies in Platonic Anonymity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In this international and interdisciplinary collection of critical essays, distinguished contributors examine a crucial premise of traditional readings of Plato's dialogues: that Plato's own doctrines and arguments can be read off the statements made in the dialogues by Socrates and other leading characters. The authors argue in general and with reference to specific dialogues, that no character should be taken to be Plato's mouthpiece. This is essential reading for students and scholars of Plato.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  9
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (1996). Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic 5. Phronesis 41 (3):245-275.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  11
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (1998). Nonpropositional Knowledge in Plato. Apeiron 31 (3):235-284.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  26
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (1995). Plato's Lysis: An Enactment of Philosophical Kinship. Ancient Philosophy 15 (1):69-90.
  9.  65
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (1997). On the Way to Sophia: Heidegger on Plato's Dialectic, Ethics, and Sophist. Research in Phenomenology 27 (1):16-60.
  10.  9
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2015). I Have to Live in Eros. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):217-240.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Silvia Benso, Anne-Marie Bowery, Lloyd P. Gerson, Francisco J. Gonzalez, David P. Hunt, Drew A. Hyland, David Roochnik, Kenneth M. Sayre, Allan Silverman, Joanne B. Waugh & Lisa A. Wilkinson (eds.) (2003). Plato's Forms: Varieties of Interpretation. Lexington Books.
    Plato's Forms: Varieties of Interpretation is an ambitious work that brings together, in a single volume, widely divergent approaches to the topic of the Forms in Plato's dialogues.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  38
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Whose Metaphysics of Presence? Heidegger's Interpretation ofEnergeiaandDunamisin Aristotle. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):533-568.
    In the recently published 1924 course, Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie, Martin Heidegger offers a detailed interpretation of Aristotle’s definition of kinesis in the Physics. This interpretation identifies entelecheia with what is finished and present-at-an-end and energeia with being-at-work toward this end. In arguing against this interpretation, the present paper attempts to show that Aristotle interpreted being from the perspective of praxis rather than poiesis and therefore did not identify it with static presence. The paper also challenges later variations of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2014). The Virtue of Dialogue, Dialogue as Virtue in Plato's Protagoras. Philosophical Papers 43 (1):33-66.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  44
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2008). And the Rest is Sigetik: Silencing Logic and Dialectic in Heidegger's Beiträge Zur Philosophie. Research in Phenomenology 38 (3):358-391.
    Faced with the impossibility of saying Being directly given that all language is language of beings, Heidegger proposes an overcoming of logic in favor of what he calls Sigetik: a way of addressing Being in and through silence, i.e., without asserting anything of Being. After considering what such a Sigetik actually involves and how it is possible, this paper asks why Heidegger rejects the alternative of that indirect saying of Being that he identifies with dialectic. It is then argued both (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  25
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2004). Beautiful City. Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):475-480.
  16.  13
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2008). Plato's Lysis. Ancient Philosophy 15 (1):69 - 90.
  17.  39
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (1991). Aristotle on Pleasure and Perfection. Phronesis 36 (2):141 - 159.
  18.  18
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2011). Plato's Philosophers. Ancient Philosophy 31 (2):405-412.
  19.  20
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). Dialogue Discontinued: Heidegger on a Few Pages of Plato's Theaetetus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):371-392.
    According to Heidegger’s own testimony, his 1940 essay, “Plato’s Doctrine of Truth,” is derived from a course he first delivered in 1931/32. Yet, while an interpretation of the Theaetetus is central to the argument in 1931/32, this dialogue is not so much as mentioned in the 1940 essay. The reason is that Heidegger’s own careful and insightful reading of the Theaetetus simply does not support his thesis regarding Plato’s “doctrine of truth.” But then the real interest of this reading is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  17
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2005). Form in Aristotle. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26 (2):179-198.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Gail Fine, Francisco J. Gonzalez, Verity Harte, Tim O'Keefe, Tad Brennan, T. H. Irwin & Bob Sharples (1996). Brill Online Books and Journals. Phronesis 41 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  17
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2005). Amistat I Unitat En El Lisis de Plató. Ancient Philosophy 25 (1):173-179.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  20
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2002). PLATO'S THINKING M. Dixsaut: Platon Et la Question de la Pensée . (Études Platoniciennes 1.) Pp. 330. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2000. Paper, Frs. 170. ISBN: 2-7116-1466-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (01):48-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  13
    Francisco J. González (1998). Form and Argument in Late Plato (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (2):311-313.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    Francisco J. González (1994). Die Unwissenheit des Philosophen, oder, warum hat Plato die "ungeschriebene Lehre" nicht geschrieben? Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (3):483-484.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  13
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). Dialogue Discontinued. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):371-392.
    According to Heidegger’s own testimony, his 1940 essay, “Plato’s Doctrine of Truth,” is derived from a course he first delivered in 1931/32. Yet, while an interpretation of the Theaetetus is central to the argument in 1931/32, this dialogue is not so much as mentioned in the 1940 essay. The reason is that Heidegger’s own careful and insightful reading of the Theaetetus simply does not support his thesis regarding Plato’s “doctrine of truth.” But then the real interest of this reading is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2013). Temps Discontinu, Souvenir Et Oubli : Les Stratégies Narratives du Banquet. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 80 (4):477.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  16
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2005). Die Idee des Guten in Platons Politeia: Beobachtungen zu den mittleren Buchern (review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (3):354-355.
    Francisco J. Gonzalez - Die Idee des Guten in Platons Politeia: Beobachtungen zu den mittleren Buchern - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43:3 Journal of the History of Philosophy 43.3 354-355 Thomas A. Szlezák. Die Idee des Guten in Platons Politeia: Beobachtungen zu den mittleren Büchern. Sankt Augustin: Academia, 2003. Pp. viii + 160. Cloth, € 24,50. The first part of this book consists of a series of lectures delivered at the University of Macerata in April 2000. These lectures (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  6
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2007). ""How is the Truth of Beings in the Soul? Interpreting" Anamnesis" in Plato. Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 28 (2):275-302.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  8
    Francisco J. González (1999). Method and Politics in Plato's Statesman (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):159-160.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  12
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2009). Socrates (M.) Trapp (Ed.) Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. (The Centre for Hellenic Studies, King's College London, Publications 10.) Pp. Xxii + 235, Ills. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007. Cased, £50.00, US$99.95. ISBN: 978-0-7546-4123-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (01):281-.
  32.  12
    Francisco J. Gonzalez (2000). Scrivere nell'anima: verita, dialettica e persuasione in Platone, and: Oralita e scrittura in Platone (review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):269-271.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  7
    Francisco J. González (1996). Sokrates als Pythagoreer und die Anamnesis in Platons "Phaidon". Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):452-454.
    45~ JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY 34:3 JULY 1996 text" , and an element of "oralism" remains in all of Plato's written works. Nonetheless, Robb's "speculations" on the Platonic dialogues are certainly worth reading. Robb is quite aware that his book stirs up controversial issues, and some of these are briefly stated and discussed in his concluding chapter, "Homer, the Alphabet, and the Progress of Greek Literacy and Paideia." And yet in the very notions of "literacy" and "progress," some (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Walter Brogan & Francisco J. Gonzalez (1997). Brill Online Books and Journals. Research in Phenomenology 27 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Fernando Prats Palazuelo & Francisco Javier González (2008). Radiografía del uso del suelo en España: la urgencia de reformular los modelos urbanos. Critica 58 (951):46-51.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  36
    Catherine Collobert, Pierre Destrée & Francisco J. Gonzalez (eds.) (2012). Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Brill.
    Through the contributions of specialists in the field, this volume addresses the still open question of the role and status of myth in Plato’s dialogues and thereby speaks to the broader problem of the relation between philosophy and ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Francisco J. Gonzalez (1999). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):159.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2012). Combating Oblivion: The Myth of Er as Both Philosophy's Challenge and Inspiration. In Catherine Collobert, Pierre Destrée & Francisco J. Gonzalez (eds.), Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Brill
  39. Francisco Javier Alvarez González (1977). Dos Ensayos Sobre Spinoza. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 42:331-362.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2003). How to Read a Platonic Prologue: Lysis 203a–207d. In Ann N. Michelini (ed.), Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Brill 22--36.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2011). Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. Penn State University Press.
    In a critique of Heidegger that respects his path of thinking, Francisco Gonzalez looks at the ways in which Heidegger engaged with Plato’s thought over the course of his career and concludes that, owing to intrinsic requirements of Heidegger’s own philosophy, he missed an opportunity to conduct a real dialogue with Plato that would have been philosophically fruitful for us all. Examining in detail early texts of Heidegger’s reading of Plato that have only recently come to light, Gonzalez, in parts (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2010). Plato's Dialectical Ethics, or Taking Gadamer at His Word. In Christopher Gill & François Renaud (eds.), Hermeneutic Philosophy and Plato: Gadamer's Response to the Philebus. Academia
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2000). Scrivere nell' anima/Oralita e scrittura in Platone. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):269.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Hayden W. Ausland, Eugenio Benitez, Ruby Blondell, Lloyd P. Gerson, Francisco J. Gonzalez, J. J. Mulhern, Debra Nails, Erik Ostenfeld, Gerald A. Press, Gary Alan Scott, P. Christopher Smith, Harold Tarrant, Holger Thesleff, Joanne Waugh, William A. Welton & Elinor J. M. West (2000). Who Speaks for Plato?: Studies in Platonic Anonymity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In this international and interdisciplinary collection of critical essays, distinguished contributors examine a crucial premise of traditional readings of Plato's dialogues: that Plato's own doctrines and arguments can be read off the statements made in the dialogues by Socrates and other leading characters. The authors argue in general and with reference to specific dialogues, that no character should be taken to be Plato's mouthpiece. This is essential reading for students and scholars of Plato.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography