13 found
Sort by:
  1. Frank I. Michelman (2012). The Property Clause Question. Constellations 19 (2):152-163.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Frank I. Michelman (2009). 18 Law as Premise. In Francis J. Mootz (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press 151.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Frank I. Michelman (2005). Brennan and Democracy. Princeton University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Frank I. Michelman (2002). Postmodernism, Proceduralism, and Constitutional Justice: A Comment on van der Walt and Botha. Constellations 9 (2):246-262.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Frank I. Michelman (2001). Morality, Identity and "Constitutional Patriotism". Ratio Juris 14 (3):253-271.
    In a modern, plural society, there can be no settled agreement on the concrete legal content of a country's constitution. The idea of the constitution is nonetheless pivotal in contemporary, liberal‐minded theories of political justification, such as the ones advanced by Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls. Justification in these theories depends finally on “constitutional patriotism,” a consciously shared sentiment arising from an ethical assessment of their country by the country's people, according to which the country credibly pursues a certain regulative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Frank I. Michelman (2000). Human Rights and the Limits of Constitutional Theory. Ratio Juris 13 (1):63-76.
    The question of what is truly just in the matter of a country's currently established human-rights interpretations appears not to be the same as the question of what it is morally right to do by way of coercively effectuating a given set of such interpretations. There are grounds for contending that acts of support for a coercive political regime can be justified morally on the condition that the regime's prevailing human-rights interpretations are made continuously available to effective, democratic critical re-examination. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Frank I. Michelman (1997). Must Constitutional Democracy Be "Responsive"?:Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management. Robert C. Post. Ethics 107 (4):706-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Frank I. Michelman (1997). How Can the Poeple Ever Make the Law? Modern Schoolman 74 (4):311-330.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Frank I. Michelman (1997). Review: Must Constitutional Democracy Be "Responsive"? [REVIEW] Ethics 107 (4):706 - 723.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Frank I. Michelman (1996). Between Facts and Norms by Jürgen Habermas. Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307-315.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Frank I. Michelman (1996). Can Constitutional Democrats Be Legal Positivists? Or Why Constitutionalism? Constellations 2 (3):293-308.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Frank I. Michelman (1996). Parsing "a Right to Have Rights". Constellations 3 (2):200-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Frank I. Michelman (1992). Legalism and Humankind. Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (02):190-.
    Prescriptive political and moral theories contain ideas about what human beings are like and about what, correspondingly, is good for them. Conceptions of human “nature” and corresponding human good enter into normative argument by way of support and justification. Of course, it is logically open for the ratiocinative traffic to run the other way. Strongly held convictions about the rightness or wrongness, goodness or badness, of certain social institutions or practices may help condition and shape one's responses to one or (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation