5 found
Sort by:
  1. Frank Lovett (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice. OUP Oxford.
    In all societies, past and present, many persons and groups have been subject to domination. Properly understood, domination is a great evil, the suffering of which ought to be minimized so far as possible. Surprisingly, however, political and social theorists have failed to provide a detailed analysis of the concept of domination in general. This study aims to redress this lacuna. It argues first, that domination should be understood as a condition experienced by persons or groups to the extent that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Frank Lovett (2010). Cultural Accommodation and Domination. Political Theory 38 (2):243 - 267.
    When should burdened social practices be granted special accommodation? One issue of concern—raised by Okin and others—is that some social practices involve domination, and so the accommodation of those practices might (inadvertently, perhaps) support social injustice. Suppose one wants to take this concern very seriously. Starting from the assumption that freedom from domination is an especially important value, this article examines whether cultural accommodation would ever be advisable. Approaching the problem of multicultural accommodation from this point of view greatly clarifies (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Frank Lovett, Republicanism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Frank Lovett (2007). Consent and the Legitimacy of Punishment: Response to Brettschneider. Political Theory 35 (6):806 - 810.
    In his paper, "The Right of the Guilty," Corey Brettschneider aims to develop and defend a theory of punishment within the framework of a liberal-contractarian conception of political legitimacy. My response argues that this attempt to extend the liberal-contractarian theory reveals, in a particularly clear and striking manner, deep and ultimately insurmountable conceptual difficulties for that theory.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Frank Lovett (2004). Can Justice Be Based on Consent? Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):79–101.