Search results for 'Frans Plank' (try it on Scholar)

558 found
Order:
  1.  27
    Jerold A. Edmondson & Frans Plank (1978). Great Expectations: An Intensive Self Analysis. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3):373 - 413.
  2.  16
    Frans Plank (1984). Verbs and Objects in Semantic Agreement: Minor Differences Between English and German That Might Suggest a Major One. Journal of Semantics 3 (4):305-360.
    Even though not boasting overt and systematically used noun classifiers of the variety known as classificatory verbs, languages may still have predicates (co-)signalling particular categories of nominal classification (outside syntactic agreement). Standard examples are English verbs such as to bark/neigh/gallop requiring subjects which refer to particular animals, or otherwise classify their subject referents a being in the relevant respects comparable to the animals in question. I hope to demonstrate in this paper that semantic agreement of this kind, which has often (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Michael Shortland (1993). Bernd Naumann, Frans Plank and Gottfried Hofbauer , Language and Earth: Elective Affinities Between the Emerging Sciences of Linguistics and Geology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin, 1992. Pp. Xvi + 445. ISBN 90-272-4553-3. Dfl. 200.00. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 26 (1):100.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  27
    Robert Landeros & Richard E. Plank (1996). How Ethical Are Purchasing Management Professionals? Journal of Business Ethics 15 (7):789 - 803.
    The primary purpose of this study was to assess the ethics of purchasing management professionals. A multidimensional scale of ethics was used to measure their predispositions to act morally. The ethics measure from this scale was correlated to a series of ethical vignettes specific to the purchasing function to further assess the value of the scale. In addition, the consistency of values as rationale for decision making was also examined. The findings of the study indicate that purchasing professionals appear to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  5.  2
    Katarina Plank, Elisabeth Raddock & Peter Selander (2016). The Temple Mount of Fredrika—Translocality and Fractured Transnationalism of a Visionary Thai Buddhist Retreat Centre. Contemporary Buddhism 17 (2):405-426.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Erik Weber & Joachim Frans (forthcoming). Is Mathematics a Domain for Philosophers of Explanation? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie:1-18.
    In this paper we discuss three interrelated questions. First: is explanation in mathematics a topic that philosophers of mathematics can legitimately investigate? Second: are the specific aims that philosophers of mathematical explanation set themselves legitimate? Finally: are the models of explanation developed by philosophers of science useful tools for philosophers of mathematical explanation? We argue that the answer to all these questions is positive. Our views are completely opposite to the views that Mark Zelcer has put forward recently. Throughout this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Joachim Frans & Laszlo Kosolosky (2014). Revisiting the Reliability of Published Mathematical Proofs: Where Do We Go Next? Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 29 (3):345.
    Mathematics seems to have a special status when compared to other areas of human knowledge. This special status is linked with the role of proof. Mathematicians all too often believe that this type of argumentation leaves no room for errors or unclarity. In this paper we take a closer look at mathematical practice, more precisely at the publication process in mathematics. We argue that the apparent view that mathematical literature is also more reliable is too naive. We will discuss several (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  14
    S. Delarivière & J. Frans (2015). Computational Explanation in Cognitive Sciences: The Mechanist Turn. Constructivist Foundations 10 (3):426-429.
    Upshot: The computational theory of mind has been elaborated in many different ways throughout the last decades. In Explaining the Computational Mind, Milkowski defends his view that the mind can be explained as computational through his defense of mechanistic explanation. At no point in this book is there explicit mention of constructivist approaches to this topic. We will, nevertheless, argue that it is interesting for constructivist readers.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  22
    Joachim Frans & Erik Weber (2014). Mechanistic Explanation and Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 22 (2):231-248.
    Although there is a consensus among philosophers of mathematics and mathematicians that mathematical explanations exist, only a few authors have proposed accounts of explanation in mathematics. These accounts fit into the unificationist or top-down approach to explanation. We argue that these models can be complemented by a bottom-up approach to explanation in mathematics. We introduce the mechanistic model of explanation in science and discuss the possibility of using this model in mathematics, arguing that using it does not presuppose a Platonist (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  27
    J. Frans (2012). The Game of Fictional Mathematics: Review of M. Leng, Mathematics and Reality. [REVIEW] Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):126-128.
    Upshot: Leng attacks the indispensability argument for the existence of mathematical objects. She offers an account that treats the role of mathematics in science as an indispensable and useful part of theories, but retains nonetheless a fictionalist position towards mathematics. The result is an account of mathematics that is interesting for constructivists. Her view towards the nominalistic part of science is, however, more in conflict with radical constructivism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    P. J. Watson & Betty J. Plank (1991). Diminished Ingestive Behavior of Fischer 344 Rats Following Treatment with Polyethylene Glycol. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):237-239.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    Horner Victoria, E. Bonnie Kristin & B. M. Frans (2005). Identifying the Motivations of Chimpanzees: Culture and Collaboration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5).
  13.  6
    Joachim Frans (2012). The Game of Fictional Mathematics. Review of “Mathematics and Reality” by Mary Leng. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):126-128.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    Steven E. Plank (1982). A Seventeenth-Century Franciscan Opera: Music for a Chigi Princess. Franciscan Studies 42 (1):180-189.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Lou Hodges, Barbara K. Petersen, Doug Newsom, Patrick Jackson, Betsy Plank & Cornelius B. Pratt (1993). Cases and Commentaries. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (4):246-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Owen Lattimore, A. M. Pozdneyev, John Roger Shaw, Dale Plank & John R. Krueger (1973). Mongolia and the Mongols. Journal of the American Oriental Society 93 (4):647.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Steven Plank (2013). [Uno] Miracolo da Far Stupire: Transformation and Il Guercino’s “St. Francis in Ecstasy with St. Benedict”. Franciscan Studies 71 (1):445-461.
    In a 1617 letter, the Bolognese artist, Ludovico Carraci described the young painter, Guercino, as a “miracle who stupefies those who see his works.”1 Interestingly then, those who view Guercino’s altarpiece “St. Francis in Ecstasy with St. Benedict,”2 will perhaps find their own stupefication to be a dynamic echo of the mystical transformation of the pictured saints themselves, an echo repeated in various tropes of transformation that engage notions of angelic presence, musical response, the lives of St. Francis and St. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    María G. Navarro (2009). Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory' by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW] Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
    Since the first volume appeared in 2005, the collection Controversies has brought together pieces of work related to the field of argumentation, giving particular attention to those that are concerned with theoretical and practical problems connected with discursive controversy and confrontation. Authors such as P. Barrotta, M. Dascal, S. Frogel, H. Chang and D. Walton had already either edited or written previous editions to the present volume (volume six) of the collection. F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (the former (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Massimo Pigliucci (2007). Primates, Philosophers and the Biological Basis of Morality: A Review of Primates and Philosophers by Frans de Waal, Princeton University Press, 2006, 200 Pp. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):611-618.
    Philosophical inquiries into morality are as old as philosophy, but it may turn out that morality itself is much, much older than that. At least, that is the main thesis of prima- tologist Frans De Waal, who in this short book based on his Tanner Lectures at Princeton, elaborates on what biologists have been hinting at since Darwin’s (1871) book The Descent of Man and Hamilton’s (1963) studies on the evolution of altruism: morality is yet another allegedly human characteristic (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  34
    Manfred Kienpointner (2010). Review Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. [REVIEW] Argumentation 24 (4):519-524.
    Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study Content Type Journal Article Pages 519-524 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9182-7 Authors Manfred Kienpointner, Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 4.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  13
    Dale Hample (2010). Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules Content Type Journal Article Pages 375-381 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6 Authors Dale Hample, University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 3.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  2
    Kaitlyn Haynal (2016). Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Editors Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015; Pp. 289. $139.00 eBook, $179.00 Hardcover. [REVIEW] Informal Logic 36 (1):92-96.
    Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. Pp. xiv, 1-293. ISBN 978-3-319-21102-2. eBook US$139.00, €118,99; Hardcover US$179.00, €147,69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  9
    Mark Aakhus (2014). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies. Argumentation 28 (4):489-492.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  4
    Fernando Leal (2014). Frans H. Van Eemeren (2012): Maniobras Estratégicas En El Discurso Argumentativo. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas & Editorial Plaza y Valdés (Series “Theoria Cum Praxi”, No. 9). Spanish Translation, by Cristián Santibáñez and María Elena Molina, Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren (2010): Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam (Series “Argumentation in Context”, No. 2). [REVIEW] Argumentation 28 (1):129-132.
    Each one of the five books authored or co-authored by Frans van Eemeren which have so far been translated into Spanish clearly fulfills a different role. Following the chronological order, we first have Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984; Spanish translation 2013), a book that contains the theoretical spadework in the field of pragmatics on which the whole edifice of pragma-dialectics is erected. Then follows Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1992; Spanish translation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  9
    Peter C. Sonderen (1996). Beauty and Desire: Frans Hemsterhuis' Aesthetic Experiments. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (2):317 – 345.
    (1996). Beauty and desire: Frans hemsterhuis’ Aesthetic experiments. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 317-345. doi: 10.1080/09608789608570944.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    Annette de Vries (2010). The Hand of the Artist: Reflections on the Notion of Technê in Some Antwerp Gallery Paintings by Frans II Francken and His Circle. Intellectual History Review 20 (1):79-101.
    This paper explores and highlights the value given to craftsmanship or technê in the community of liefhebbers and artists associated with the pictures of collections genre. Taking as its case study a group of gallery interiors by the probable inventor and leading light of the genre, Frans II Francken, it places pictures of collections within the reform of attitudes towards manual dexterity and the mechanical arts that took place in the Early Modern period. Antwerp gallery interiors exemplify the intellectual (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  16
    F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) (2006). Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.) (2006). Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  17
    Paul van den Hoven (2012). E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
  30.  26
    Tim Ingold (2006). Walking the Plank : Meditations on a Process of Skill. In John R. Dakers (ed.), Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an Epistemological Framework. Palgrave Macmillan 65--80.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  4
    Paul den Hoven (2012). E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. M. Eliade (1955). Mythology and the History of Religions: Mitie E Leggende by Raffaele Pettazzoni Vol. I, Africa-Australia; Vol. III, America Settentrionale. Turin: Unione Tipografica Editrice Torinese, 1948, 1953. Pp. XXVII+480; XVIII + 576. La Religion Dans la Grece Antique, Des Origine a Alexandre le Grand by Raffaele Pettazzoni Translated by Jean Gouillard. Paris: Payot, 1953. Pp. 268. (Original Edition: La Religione Nella Grecia Antica Fino Ad Alessandro. Bologna, Zanichelli, 1921. Pp. XII + 416.) La Religion Populaire Dans la Grece Antique by Martin P. Nilsson Translated by Frans Durif. Paris: Plon, 1954. Pp. 245. (Original Edition: Greek Popular Religion. New York: Columbia University Press, 1940. Pp. XVII + 166.) Cenese de L'Odyssee. Le Fantastique Et le Sacre by Gabriel Germain Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954. Pp. 700. [REVIEW] Diogenes 3 (9):96-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  8
    Fernando Leal (2016). Review Of: Frans H. Van Eemeren : Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham , Springer , 880 Pp. [REVIEW] Argumentation 30 (4):527-532.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    Bert Theunissen (2013). Frans Verdoorn – Biohistorie. Studium 6 (3):292.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    Michael J. Wreen (1994). Look, Ma! No Frans! Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 2 (2):285-306.
    This paper criticizes the pragma-dialectical conception of a fallacy, according to which a fallacy is an argumentative speech act which violates one or more of the rules of 'rational discussion'. That conception is found to be neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for committing a fallacy. It is also found wanting in several other respects.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  70
    Zed Adams (2007). Frans de Waal, Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved:Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Ethics 117 (3):552-555.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  51
    Eddo Rigotti (2011). Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  7
    Ton van Haaften (2016). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW] Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  60
    Adrian Heathcote (2003). Quantum Heterodoxy: Realism at the Plank Length. Science and Education 12 (5):513-529.
  40.  6
    Francis J. Beckwith (1999). Disagreement Without Debate: The Republican Party Platform and the Human Life Amendment Plank. Nexus 4:113.
  41.  3
    Claire Oakes Finkelstein (2001). Two Men and a Plank. Legal Theory 7 (3):279-306.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  15
    Manfred Kienpointner (1998). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Et Alia, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments. [REVIEW] Argumentation 12 (1):127-133.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  10
    Robert W. Binkley (1998). Johan van Benthem, Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (Eds.), Logic and Argumentation. Argumentation 12 (4):508-512.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Lilian Bermejo-Luque (2015). Frans H. van Eemeren .Maniobras Estratégicas en el Discurso Argumentativo. Plaza y Valdés-CSIC, seriestudia/monografías-Theoria cum Praxi. [REVIEW] Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (2):240-242.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  15
    Christopher Tindale (2012). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation by Frans H. Van Eemeren. Informal Logic 32 (3):364-372.
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  21
    Andrea Falcon (2007). Aristotle's on Generation and Corruption I, Edited by Frans de Haas and Jaap Mansfeld. Ancient Philosophy 27 (1):200-205.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  24
    Tomislav Bracanović (2007). Building Blocks in Search of a Theory: Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved, Frans de Waal . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006, (209 Pp; $22.95 Hbk; ISBN 0691124477). [REVIEW] Biological Theory 2 (4):422-424.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  22
    Harry Weger (2011). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  5
    Nigel M. De S. Cameron, Scott E. Daniels, Barbara J. White & Edward S. Casey (2001). Sharon Anderson-Gold, Unnecessary Evil. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2000, 138 Pp.(Index). ISBN 0-7914-4820-7, $16.95 (Pb). Filippo Aureli and Frans BM De Waal, Eds., Natural Conflict Resolution. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2000, 409 Pp.(Index). ISBN 0-520-22346-2, $24.95 (Pb). [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 35:587-590.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  7
    R. H. Johnson (2004). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW] Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 558