Works by Fred L. Bookstein ( view other items matching `Fred L. Bookstein`, view all matches )

7 found
Sort by:
  1. Fred L. Bookstein (2009). How Quantification Persuades When It Persuades. Biological Theory 4 (2):132-147.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Fred L. Bookstein (2009). Measurement, Explanation, and Biology: Lessons From a Long Century. Biological Theory 4 (1):6-20.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Katrin Schaefer, Philipp Mitteroecker, Bernhard Fink & Fred L. Bookstein (2009). Psychomorphospace—From Biology to Perception, and Back: Towards an Integrated Quantification of Facial Form Variation. Biological Theory 4 (1):98-106.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Fred L. Bookstein (2006). Commentary: Please Acknowledge That Biology Is Not an Exact Science. Biological Theory 1 (4):335-337.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Fred L. Bookstein (2006). My Unexpected Journey in Applied Biomathematics. Biological Theory 1 (1):67-77.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Fred L. Bookstein (2000). From Reductionism to Reductionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):534-534.
    Neural organization attempts to thwart, at least in part, modern neuroscientists' tendency to focus reductionistically on ever smaller microsystems. But although emphasizing higher levels of systems organization, the authors end up enforcing reductionisms of their own, principally the reduction of their domain to the study of invariable normal functioning, without explicit modeling of the deviations that constitute disease states or aging. This reductionism seriously weakens the authors' claims about the truth of their quantitative models.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Fred L. Bookstein (1998). Statistical Significance Testing Was Not Meant for Weak Corroborations of Weaker Theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-196.
    Chow sets his version of statistical significance testing in an impoverished context of “theory corroboration” that explicitly excludes well-posed theories admitting of strong support by precise empirical evidence. He demonstrates no scientific usefulness for the problematic procedure he recommends instead. The important role played by significance testing in today's behavioral and brain sciences is wholly inconsistent with the rhetoric he would enforce.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation