12 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Frederick S. Ellett [10]Frederick S. Ellett Jr [2]
  1. Frederick S. Ellett Jr & David P. Erickson (2010). Motivation and Learning. In Richard Bailey (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Sage Publication
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Frederick S. Ellett (2010). Leonard J. Waks (Ed): Leaders in Education: Intellectual Self-Portraits. Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (3):315-320.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Frederick S. Ellett (2002). Why Aren't Philosophers and Educators Speaking to Each Other? Some Reasons for Hope. Educational Theory 52 (3):315-325.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Frederick S. Ellett & David P. Ericson (1997). In Defense of Public Reason: On the Nature of Historical Rationality. Educational Theory 47 (2):133-161.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David P. Ericson & Frederick S. Ellett (1987). Teacher Accountability and the Causal Theory of Teaching. Educational Theory 37 (3):277-293.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Frederick S. Ellett (1986). Research on Emotion: How Can It Be Done? Educational Theory 36 (2):115-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Frederick S. Ellett & David P. Ericson (1986). Correlation, Partial Correlation, and Causation. Synthese 67 (2):157-173.
    Philosophers and scientists have maintained that causation, correlation, and partial correlation are essentially related. These views give rise to various rules of causal inference. This essay considers the claims of several philosophers and social scientists for causal systems with dichotomous variables. In section 2 important commonalities and differences are explicated among four major conceptions of correlation. In section 3 it is argued that whether correlation can serve as a measure of A's causal influence on B depends upon the conception of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Frederick S. Ellett Jr & David P. Ericson (1985). Causal Laws and Laws of Association. Noûs 19 (4):537 - 549.
    In her paper entitled "Causal Laws and Effective Strategies" (1979), Cartwright sets out to establish the connection between laws of association and causal laws. In part Cartwright is trying to show the sense in which a cause increases the probability of its effect, and to explain what causal laws assert by giving an account of how causal laws are related to certain kinds of statistical laws. In section II we explicate the essential features of Cartwright's for- mulation and in section (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Frederick S. Ellett (1985). Psychological Terms, Logical Positivism, and Realism: Issues Related to Construct Validation. Educational Theory 35 (3):273-284.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Frederick S. Ellett (1984). Bayesian Confirmation and Interpretation. Educational Theory 34 (2):175-182.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Frederick S. Ellett (1983). On Reichenbach's Principle of the Common Cause. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (4):330.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Frederick S. Ellett & David P. Ericson (1983). The Logic of Causal Methods in Social Science. Synthese 57 (1):67-82.
    Two kinds of causal inference rules which are widely used by social scientists are investigated. Two conceptions of causation also widely used are explicated — the INUS and probabilistic conceptions of causation. It is shown that the causal inference rules which link correlation, a kind of partial correlation, and a conception of causation areinvalid. It is concluded anew methodology is required for causal inference.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation