9 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Friedrich Reinmuth (Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald)
  1. Moritz Cordes & Friedrich Reinmuth, A Speech Act Calculus. A Pragmatised Natural Deduction Calculus and its Meta-Theory.
    Building on the work of Peter Hinst and Geo Siegwart, we develop a pragmatised natural deduction calculus, i.e. a natural deduction calculus that incorporates illocutionary operators at the formal level, and prove its adequacy. In contrast to other linear calculi of natural deduction, derivations in this calculus are sequences of object-language sentences which do not require graphical or other means of commentary in order to keep track of assumptions or to indicate subproofs. (Translation of our German paper "Ein Redehandlungskalkül. Ein (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Moritz Cordes & Friedrich Reinmuth, Ein Redehandlungskalkül. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkül des natürlichen Schließens nebst Metatheorie.
    Building on the work of Peter Hinst and Geo Siegwart, we develop a pragmatised natural deduction calculus, i.e., a natural deduction calculus that incorporates illocutionary operators at the formal level, and prove its adequacy. In contrast to other linear calculi of natural deduction, derivations in this calculus are sequences of object-language sentences which do not require graphical or other means of commentary in order to keep track of assumptions or to indicate subproofs.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Friedrich Reinmuth (2014). Hermeneutics, Logic and Reconstruction. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 17:152–190.
    Using a short excerpt from Anselm's Responsio as an example, this paper tries to present logical reconstruction as a special type of exegetical interpretation by paraphrase that is subject to (adapted) hermeneutic maxims and presumption rules that govern exegetical interpretation in general. As such, logical reconstruction will be distinguished from the non-interpretative enterprise of formalization and from the development of theories of logical form, which provide a framework in which formalization and reconstruction take place. Yet, even though logical reconstruction is (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Friedrich Reinmuth (2014). Logische Rekonstruktion. Ein hermeneutischer Traktat. Dissertation, University of Greifswald
    The thesis aims at a methodological reflection of logical reconstruction and tries to develop this method in detail, especially with regard to the reconstruction of natural language arguments. First, the groundwork for the thesis is laid by presenting and, where necessary, adapting its foundations with regard to the philosophy of language and the theory of argument. Subsequently, logical reconstruction, especially the logical reconstruction of arguments, is presented as a hermeneutic method and as a tool for the application of (formal) logic (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Friedrich Reinmuth, Geo Siegwart & Christian Tapp (2014). Theory and Practice of Logical Reconstruction – Anselm as a Model Case. Introduction. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 17:13–21.
  6. Friedrich Reinmuth, Geo Siegwart & Christian Tapp (eds.) (2014). Theory and Practice of Reconstruction: Anselm as a Model Case. Mentis.
  7. Moritz Cordes & Friedrich Reinmuth, Ein Redehandlungskalkül: Folgern in einer Sprache. XXII. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie.
  8. Moritz Cordes, Jens Glatzer, Friedrich Reinmuth & Geo Siegwart (2010). Deduktive Begründung. Zu einem Explikationsvorschlag von Reinhard Kleinknecht. Conceptus. Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie Salzburg 39 (95):31-60.
    In his paper "Deduktive Begründung und deduktive Ableitung" Reinhard Kleinknecht offers an explication of the concepts of deduetive reason and deductive argument respectively. To this end, he provides seven conditions that he sees as individually necessary and jointly sufficient for being a deductive reason. We argue that some of his conditions are far too restrictive and that his concept of deductive argument is therefore to narrow to capture the usual practice of deductively establishing propositions as true. We also show that (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Friedrich Reinmuth (2010). Mark Vorobej: A Theory of Argument. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 73 (1):141-144.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation