7 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Gábor Á Zemplén [5]Gábor A. Zemplén [2]
  1. Gábor Kutrovátz & Gábor Á Zemplén (2011). Experts in Dialogue: An Introduction. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (3):275-283.
    Different approaches to expertise and argumentation are discussed. After introducing the problem of expertise and its present day significance in a historical context, various connections with the study of arguments are highlighted. The need for and potential of argumentation analysis to contribute to existing research in social epistemology, science studies, and cognitive science, is discussed, touching on the problems of reasoning and argumentation, embodiment, tacit knowledge, expert context versus public context, expert disagreement, persuasion versus justification, and argument analysis as meta-expertise. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Tamás Demeter & Gábor Á Zemplén (2010). Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis. The Monist 93 (4):640-656.
    Current philosophical reflections on science have departed from mainstream history of science with respect to both methodology and conclusions. The article investigates how different approaches to reconstructing commitments can explain these differences and facilitate a mutual understanding and communication of these two perspectives on science. Translating the differences into problems pertaining to principles of charity, the paper offers a platform for clarification and resolution of the differences between the two perspectives. The outlined contextual approach occupies a middle ground between mainstream (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gábor Á Zemplén & Tamás Demeter (2010). Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies. The Monist 93 (4):640-656.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gabor A. Zemplen (2009). Controversies on, in, Around, and About the Subject. Argumentation 23 (1):115-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gábor Á Zemplén (2007). Conflicting Agendas: Critical Thinking Versus Science Education in the International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge Course. Science and Education 16 (2):167-196.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gábor Á Zemplén (2006). The Development of the Neurath Principle: Unearthing the Romantic Link. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):585-609.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gábor A. Zemplén (2004). Newton's Colour Circle and Palmer's “Normal” Colour Space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):166-168.
    Taking the real Newtonian colour circle – and not the one Palmer depicts as Newton's – we don't have to wait 300 years for Palmer to say no to the Lockean aperçu about the inverted spectrum. One of the aims of this historical detour is to show that one's commitment about the “topology” of the colour space greatly affects Palmer's argument.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation