Search results for 'G. A. Zweers' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  4
    S. A. (1887). Caesar, B. G. IV. Edited by Clement Bryans, M.A. 1s. 6d. The Classical Review 1 (08):233-234.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. B. A. B. A. (1962). BOCHENSKI J. M.- BLAKELEY T.- KUENG G.- LOBKOWICZ N.- DAHM H.- FLEISCHER H.- MUELLER S.- JORDAN Z.- VRTACIC L.- BUCHHOLZ A., "Studies in Soviet Thought". [REVIEW] Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 54:514.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. B. A. B. A. (1962). GRUBE G. M. A., "Plato's thought". Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 54:211.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. A. A. A. A. (1986). Giovanni Pico Della Mirandola, Symbol of His Age. Modern Interpretations of a Renaissance Philosopher. By William G. Craven. [REVIEW] History and Theory 25 (1):113.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. B. A. B. A. (1961). JACOBELLI A. M. ISOLDI, "G. B. Vico. La Vita e le opere". Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 53:210.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  65
    Nicholas Vrousalis (2010). G. A. Cohen's Vision of Socialism. Journal of Ethics 14 (3-4):185-216.
    This essay is an attempt to piece together the elements of G. A. Cohen's thought on the theory of socialism during his long intellectual voyage from Marxism to political philosophy. It begins from his theory of the maldistribution of freedom under capitalism, moves onto his critique of libertarian property rights, to his diagnosis of the “deep inegalitarian” structure of John Rawls' theory and concludes with his rejection of the “cheap” fraternity promulgated by liberal egalitarianism. The paper's exegetical contention is that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  17
    Michele Bocchiola & Federico Zuolo (2013). On Justice and Other Values: G.A. Cohen's Political Philosophy and the Problem of Trade-Offs. Philosophical Papers 42 (1):1 - 24.
    (2013). On Justice and Other Values: G.A. Cohen's Political Philosophy and the Problem of Trade-offs. Philosophical Papers: Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1-24. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2013.774721.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. David Rondel (2012). G.A. Cohen and the Logic of Egalitarian Congruence. Socialist Studies 8 (1):82-100.
    In this article, I argue that G. A. Cohen’s defense of the feminist slogan, “The personal is political”, his argument against Rawls’s restriction of principles of justice to the basic structure of society, depends for its intelligibility on the ability to distinguish—with reasonable but perhaps not perfect precision—between those situations in which what Nancy Rosenblum has called “the logic of congruence” is validly invoked and those in which it is not. More importantly, I suggest that the philosophical shape of Cohen’s (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Alexander Kaufman (ed.) (2014). Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen's Egalitarianism. Cambridge University Press.
    G. A. Cohen was one of the world's leading political theorists. He was noted, in particular, for his contributions to the literature of egalitarian justice. Cohen's classic writings offer one of the most influential responses to the currency of the egalitarian justice question - the question, that is, of whether egalitarians should seek to equalize welfare, resources, opportunity, or some other indicator of well-being. Underlying Cohen's argument is the intuition that the purpose of egalitarianism is to eliminate disadvantage for which (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  21
    Attila Tanyi (2015). G. A. Cohen Why Socialism? című könyvéről (On G. A. Cohen’s Why Socialism?). In Balázs Böcskei & Miklós Sebők (eds.), Ötven könyv, amelyet minden baloldalinak ismernie kell (Fifty Books Everyone on the Left Should Know About). Kossuth 266-271.
    This is a short, critical introduction to Cohen's book and argument: that socialism is justified on several grounds contrary to common opinion. I present Cohen's arguments together with some potential problems as well as responses to them.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  46
    Kyle Johannsen (2014). Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy G.A. Cohen; Edited by Jonathan Wolff Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014; V + 360 Pp. $35.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 53 (3):575-7.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. N. Vrousalis (2012). Jazz Bands, Camping Trips and Decommodification: G. A. Cohen on Community. Socialist Studies 8 (1):141-163.
  13.  58
    Kyle Johannsen (2011). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy G. A. Cohen; EDITED BY Michael Otsuka Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011, Xiv + 268 Pp., $24.95 (Paperback), $85.00 (Hardcover). [REVIEW] Dialogue 50 (4):783-5.
  14.  31
    Tom G. Palmer (1998). G. A. Cohen on Self‐Ownership, Property, and Equality. Critical Review 12 (3):225-251.
    Abstract G.A. Cohen has produced an influential criticism of libertarian?ism that posits joint ownership of everything in the world other than labor, with each joint owner having a veto right over any potential use of the world. According to Cohen, in that world rationality would require that wealth be divided equally, with no differential accorded to talent, ability, or effort. A closer examination shows that Cohen's argument rests on two central errors of reasoning and does not support his egalitarian conclusions, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  5
    Richard A. Epstein (1998). The Right Set of Simple Rules: A Short Reply to Frederick Schauer and Comment on G. A. Cohen. Critical Review 12 (3):305-318.
    Abstract In Simple Rules for a Complex World, I outlined a set of legal rules that facilitate just and efficient social interactions among individuals. Frederick Schauer's critique of my book ignores the specific implications of my system in favor of a general critique of simplicity that overlooks the dangers to liberty when complex rules confer vast discretion on public figures. He also does not refer to the nonlibertarian features of my system that allow for overcoming holdout positions. These ?take and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  4
    G. A. J. Rogers (1978). The Empiricism of Locke and Newton: G. A. J. Rogers. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 12:1-30.
    The relationship between John Locke and Isaac Newton, his co-founder of, in the apt phrase of one recent writer, ‘the Moderate Enlightenment’ of the eighteenth century, has many dimensions. There is their friendship, which began only after each had written his major work, and which had its stormy interlude. There is the difficult question of their mutual impact. In what ways did each draw intellectually on the other? That there was some debt of each to the other is almost certain, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Miriam Ronzoni & Laura Valentini (2008). On the Meta-Ethical Status of Constructivism: Reflections on G.A. Cohen's `Facts and Principles'. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):403-422.
    The Queen's College, Oxford, UK In his article `Facts and Principles', G.A. Cohen attempts to refute constructivist approaches to justification by showing that, contrary to what their proponents claim, fundamental normative principles are fact- in sensitive. We argue that Cohen's `fact-insensitivity thesis' does not provide a successful refutation of constructivism because it pertains to an area of meta-ethics which differs from the one tackled by constructivists. While Cohen's thesis concerns the logical structure of normative principles, constructivists ask how normative principles (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Jan Narveson (1998). Libertarianism Vs. Marxism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen's Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 2 (1):1-26.
    Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality is G.A. Cohens attempt to rescue something of the socialist outlook on society from the challenge of libertarianism, which Cohen identifies with the work of Robert Nozick in his famous book, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Sympathizing with the leading idea that a person must belong to himself, and thus be unavailable for forced redistribution of his efforts, Cohen is at pains to reconcile the two. This cannot be done – they are flatly contrary. Moreover, equality is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Peter Vallentyne (1998). Critical Notice of G.A. Cohen’s Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28:609-626.
    G.A. Cohen’s book brings together and elaborates on articles that he has written on selfownership, on Marx’s theory of exploitation, and on the future of socialism. Although seven of the eleven chapters have been previously published (1977-1992), this is not merely a collection of articles. There is a superb introduction that gives an overview of how the chapters fit together and of their historical relation to each other. Most chapters have a new introduction and often a postscript or addendum that (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Sean Sayers (1984). Marxism and the Dialectical Method: A Critique of G.A. Cohen. Radical Philosophy 36 (36):4-13.
    The dialectical method, Marx Insisted, was at the basis of his account of society. In 1858, in a letter to Engels, he wrote: In the method of treatment the fact that by mere accident I again glanced through Hegel's Logic has been of great service to me... If there should ever be the time for such work again, I would greatly like to make accessible to the ordinary human intelligence, in two or three printer's sheets, what is rational in the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  55
    Alistair M. Macleod (2010). G. A. Cohen on the Rawlsian Doctrine of the Basic Structure as Subject. Social Philosophy Today 26:153-163.
    In his recent book Rescuing Justice and Equality (Harvard University Press, 2008), G. A. Cohen returns to the defense of his critique of the Rawlsian doctrine of the “basic structure as subject.” This doctrine provides the centerpiece of what Rawls has to say about the domain of distributive justice—that is, about the sorts of things judgments of distributive justice are about and about the ways in which these judgments are interconnected. From the extensiveness of Cohen’s critique of this doctrine, it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  24
    Peter Mew (1986). G. A. Cohen on Freedom, Justice, and Capitalism. Inquiry 29 (1-4):305 – 313.
    This article offers certain criticisms of some of the main arguments and suggestions put forward by G. A. Cohen in his 1980 Isaac Deutscher Memorial Lecture. As against Cohen I argue: (i) that it is strategically irrelevant for committed socialists or Marxists to argue that capitalism is unjust; (ii) that the political quiescence of the proletariat has less to do with its sense of justice or other ideological factors than with non?ideological factors such as its realization that the struggle for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  15
    Ian Shapiro (1990). J. G. A. Pocock's Republicanism and Political Theory: A Critique and Reinterpretation. Critical Review 4 (3):433-471.
    A growing sense of the exhaustion of both liberalism and Marxism has fueled a revival of interest in civic republicanism among historians, political theorists, and social commentators. This turn is evaluated via an examination of the normative implications off. G. A. Pocock's account of civic republicanism. Arguing that what is at issue between liberals and republicans has been misunderstood by both sides in the debate, the author shows that the turn to republicanism fails to address the most vexing problems liberalism (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  17
    Matthew H. Kramer (1989). G. A. Cohen's Conception of Law: A Critique. Ratio Juris 2 (3):283-298.
    This note will challenge G. A. Cohen's view of the interaction between legal systems and economic structures; such interaction raises the so‐called problem of legality, which Cohen sets out to solve in the eighth chapter of Karl Marx's Theory of History . In the course of this note, we shall interrogate the presumed rigor of Cohen's theory of base/superstructure relations, to which his understanding of law is central. His approach will not be simply destroyed, but will be resituated in a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    J. Davis (2008). 'Epics Years': The English Revolution and J.G.A. Pocock's Approach to the History of Political Thought. History of Political Thought 29 (3):519-542.
    J.G.A. Pocock has been a dominant force in the history of political thought since his first major work, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law, was published in 1957. This article is focused on the contribution he has made to the study of the revolutions of seventeenth-century England and the extraordinary body of political discourse to which they gave rise. It begins with an examination of the ways in which ideas about continuity, innovation, institutions and historiography have shaped his approach (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  5
    Dana Simmons (2012). The Weight of the Moment: J. G. A. Pocock's Politics of History. History of European Ideas 38 (2):288-306.
    Summary One of the great intellectual productions of the postwar period, J. G. A. Pocock's The Machiavellian Moment was also an intervention in the American polity of the 1970s. The book's content, its rhetorical style, its methodology, and even its physical printed form were all designed to effectuate a political gesture. The crises of 1968 to 1973 invalidated the optimistic liberalism of Pocock's academic circle. The history of political language offered a refuge and a programmatic foundation for Pocock's pragmatic conservatism. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  5
    Mira L. Siegelberg (2013). Things Fall Apart: J. G. A. Pocock, Hannah Arendt, and the Politics of Time. Modern Intellectual History 10 (1):109-134.
    This article reconstructs J. G. A. Pocock's debt to Hannah Arendt's political philosophy in The Machiavellian Moment and argues that her presentation of classical politics in The Human Condition and her account of the secular nature of American foundation in On Revolution were important sources for Pocock's analysis of American liberal insecurity. However, a contextualization of The Machiavellian Moment within Pocock's immediate intellectual and professional milieu indicates that he placed himself in critical relation to Arendt's civic republican theory and located (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Kenneth Sheppard (2013). Telling Contested Stories: J. G. A. Pocock and Paul Ricoeur. History of European Ideas 39 (6):879-898.
    Summary This paper traces a mutually reinforcing set of arguments about the practice of history in the work of J. G. A. Pocock and Paul Ricoeur that responds to challenges posed to the autonomy of selves and their communities raised by both thinkers. It begins with their respective views on language, texts and actions, moves to the construction of narrative and historiography, and concludes with their account of selves and the communities to which they belong. Corresponding to these three considerations (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Paul Carus, G. A. Black & M. Lucien Arréat (1913). Problems of Pure Form: An Editorial Discussion with L. Arréat and G. A. Black. The Monist 23 (4):611-613.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Anton Leist (1982). G. A. Cohens Materialistische Geschichtstheorie. Einige Einwände - Überblick Zu Einer Diskussion. Analyse & Kritik 4 (2):131-158.
    During the last years Anglosaxon discussion about Marx and Marxism has been characterized by an intensified interest in historical materialism as a general theory of history. The most extensive, careful and analytically rigorous among several new treatments is the one by G. A. Cohen, which is the subject of four critical articles in the present issue of ANALYSE & KRITIK. To make these articles and Cohen's project understandable to the German reader, an attempt is made in the following to summarize (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. G. A. Rauche & Ratnamala Singh (eds.) (1986). Perspectives: A Collection of Essays in Honour of G.A. Rauche. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Durban-Westville.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  20
    Christine Sypnowich (ed.) (2006). The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen. OUP Oxford.
    Bringing together many of the world's leading political philosophers, this engaging volume reflects the wide-ranging themes in the work of G. A. Cohen. The volume contains essays on a number of key topics, united by questions of social justice, pluralism, equality, and moral duty.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Thomas A. Goudge, John G. Slater, Fred Wilson & L. W. Sumner (1981). Pragmatism and Purpose Essays Presented to Thomas A. Goudge /Edited by L.W. Sumner, John G. Slater, Fred Wilson. --. --. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  34
    Zbigniew Nerczuk (2002). Posłowie w: H.-G. Gadamer, Idea dobra w dyskusji między Platonem a Arystotelesem (Die Idee des guten zwischen Platon und Aristoteles). Wydawnictwo Antyk.
    This is the afterword in H.-G. Gadamer, Idea dobra w dyskusji między Platonem a Arystotelesem (Die Idee des guten zwischen Platon und Aristoteles).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  16
    Allen G. Debus, Paul Harold Theerman & Karen Hunger Parshall (eds.) (1997). Experiencing Nature: Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of Allen G. Debus. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    This volume, honoring the renowned historian of science, Allen G Debus, explores ideas of science - `experiences of nature' - from within a historiographical tradition that Debus has done much to define. As his work shows, the sciences do not develop exclusively as a result of a progressive and inexorable logic of discovery. A wide variety of extra-scientific factors, deriving from changing intellectual contexts and differing social millieus, play crucial roles in the overall development of scientific thought. These essays represent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Alastair Davidson (1983). Reviews : Gregor McLennan, Marxism and the Methodologies of History, (Verso, London, 1981), Pp. 272. Anthony Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, (MacMillan, London, 1981), Pp. 294. Raphael Samuel, Ed., People's History and Socialist Theory. History Workshop Series, (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1981), Pp. Vi + 417. G. Osborne and W. F. Mandle, Eds., New History Studying Australia Today, (George Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 1982), Pp. 216. [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 7 (1):171-175.
    Reviews : Gregor McLennan, Marxism and the Methodologies of History, , pp. 272. Anthony Giddens, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, , pp. 294. Raphael Samuel, ed., People's History and Socialist Theory. History Workshop Series, , pp. vi + 417. G. Osborne and W. F. Mandle, eds., New History Studying Australia Today, , pp. 216.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    G. A. Johnston (1933). Berkeley. By G. Dawes Hicks, M.A., Ph.D., Litt.D. (London: Ernest Benn, Ltd. 1932. Pp. Xii + 336. Price 12s. 6d.). Philosophy 8 (31):359-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. E. L. Allen, Francis E. Pollard & G. A. Sutherland (1947). The Case for Pacifism and Conscientious Objection: A Reply to Professor G. C. Field. Philosophy 22 (83):277-278.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  96
    Joly Agar (2003). G. A. Cohen's Functional Explanation: A Critical Realist Analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):291-310.
    Cohen employs in his book Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense in light of its recent republication. In recent years, Roy Bhaskar has provided a convincing critique of the empiricist philosophy of social science that Cohen employs, and this article tries to provide an assessment of his method from a Bhaskarian perspective. It begins with an exposition of functional explanation, followed by the Bhaskarian critique by demonstrating that functionalism is unworkable because it is dependent on an empiricist account of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  17
    David E. Packham (2003). G.A.T.S. And Universities: Implications for Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1):85-100.
    The likely impact of applying the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) to higher education are examined. GATS aims to “open up” services to competition: no preference can be shown to national or government providers. The consequences for teaching are likely to be that private companies, with degree-awarding powers, would be eligible for the same subsidies as public providers. Appealing to the inadequate recently introduced “benchmark” statements as proof of quality, they would provide a “bare bones” service at lower (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41. Helga Varden (2010). G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality - A Critical Engagement. Social Philosophy Today 26:175-189.
    This paper critically engages Cohen’s rejection, in Rescuing Justice and Equality, of Rawls’s conception of redistributive justice. I argue that Cohen’s reading of Rawls is flawed and that his suggested revisions to Rawls’s theory are no improvement. The better interpretation involves seeing Rawls’s project as closer to Kant’s than, as Cohen assumes, to libertarians and egalitarians of his own stripe. Once we interpret Rawls as providing a so-called “public right” account and we add Kant’s account of “private right”, Rawls escapes (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    A. M. Dale (1932). Classical Mythology A Handbook of Classical Mythology. By G. Howe and G. A. Harrer. Pp. Vii + 301. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1931. Cloth, 6s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (04):176-177.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  32
    A. W. Pickard-Cambridge (1939). G. A. Rizzo: Demostene, La seconda Olintiaca. Con Introduzione e Commento. Pp. xiv+94. Leghorn: R. Giusti, 1938. Paper, L. 7.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (04):145-146.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  45
    Amitrajeet A. Batabyal (2010). G. A. Cohen: Why Not Socialism? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):393-395.
  45.  13
    Nicholas Vrousalis (2014). G. A. Cohen on Exploitation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (2):151-164.
    This paper argues that Cohen’s early work on Marxism, and his work in political philosophy, entails commitment to a distributive paradigm, that is, the view that exploitation obtains only if distributive injustice obtains. Cohen’s early espousal of that paradigm is explicitly reaffirmed in his defence of luck egalitarianism. The paper argues that Cohen’s distributive paradigm is neither the only defensible theory of exploitation, nor indeed the most plausible. It also shows that Cohen himself had doubts about the distributive paradigm, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  19
    Xing Wen (2008). Wagner, Rudolf G., a Chinese Reading of the Daodejing : Wang Bi's Commentary on the Laozi, with Critical Text and Translation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):467-471.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  14
    Albert A. Mullin (1966). C. S. S. Peirce and E. G. A. Husserl on the Nature of Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (4):301-304.
  48.  8
    G. Boys-Stones (2002). G. A. Press (Ed.): Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity . Pp. Vi + 245. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. Paper, $23.95. ISBN: 0-8476-9219-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (01):173-.
  49.  1
    J. (1920). Selections From the Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense by G. A. Johnston. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 3:289-289.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    George Sarton (1923). Dani Opera Omnia by Tychonis Brahe; I. L. E. Dreyer; Ioannis Raeder; G. A. Hagemann. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 5:149-151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000