21 found
Sort by:
  1. Gunnar Andersson (2013). Is Experience a Reason for Accepting Basic Statements? In Christer Svennerlind, Jan Almäng & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Johanssonian Investigations. Ontos Verlag. 5--42.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. G. Andersson (2009). Book Review: Catton, P., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.). (2004). Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals. London: Routledge. Pp. Xii + 235. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.
  3. G. Andersson (2009). Book Review: Keuth, H. (2005). The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):324-332.
  4. Gunnar Andersson (2009). Critical Rationalism and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. 21--30.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gunnar Andersson (2009). Review of Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals, Ed. By Philip Catton and Graham Macdonald. London: Routledge. Pp. Xii+ 235. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.
  6. G. Andersson, Die Wissenschaft Als Objektive Erkenntnis & In E. Agazzi (2001). Incommensurability Bibliography. In Paul Hoyningen-Huene & Howard Sankey (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters. Kluwer. 303.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Martin Garwicz & Gert Andersson (1997). Is the Tidal Wave Necessary? Is It Likely? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):250-250.
    The main assumptions on which the tidal wave hypothesis rests will be questioned. First, since focal synchronous mossy fibre input is sufficient to ensure spread of activity along the parallel fibres, the tidal wave is redundant. Second, spatial and temporal characteristics of mossy fibre input make spatio-temporal sequences appropriate for setting up a tidal wave unlikely in the behaving animal.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gunnar Andersson (1994). Criticism and the History of Science: Kuhn's, Lakatos's, and Feyrabend's Criticisms of Critical Rationalism. E.J. Brill.
    In "Criticism and the History of Science" Karl Popper's falsificationist conception of science is developed and defended against criticisms raised by Thomas ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gunnar Andersson (1991). The Tower Experiment and the Copernican Revolution. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.
    Abstract During the Copernican revolution the supporters of the Ptolemaic theory argued that the tower experiment refuted the Copernican hypothesis of the (diurnal) motion of the earth, but was in agreement with the Ptolemaic theory. In his defence of the Copernican theory Galileo argued that the experiment was in agreement both with Copernican and Ptolemaic theory. The reason for these different views of the same experiment was not that the two theories were incommensurable, as Paul Feyerabend argues, but that Galileo (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gunnar Andersson, Hardy Bouillon & Gerard Radnitzky (1991). Wissenschaftstheorie Und Wissenschaften Festschrift Für Gerard Radnitzky Aus Anlass Seines 70. Geburtstages. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gunnar Andersson (1988). Kritik Und Wissenschaftsgeschichte Kuhns, Lakatos' Und Feyerabends Kritik des Kritischen Rationalismus. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gunnar Andersson (1986). II. Lakatos and Progress and Rationality in Science: A Reply to Agassi. Philosophia 16 (2):239-243.
  13. Gunnar Andersson (1984). Enunciados básicos e inconmensurabilidad. Teorema 14 (1-2):79-90.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gunnar Andersson (1984). Rationality in Science and Politics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gunnar Andersson (1982). Naive and Critical Falsificationism. In Karl R. Popper & Paul Levinson (eds.), In Pursuit of Truth: Essays on the Philosophy of Karl Popper on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday. Harvester Press. 50--63.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeremy Shearmur, Gerard Radnitzky & Gunnar Andersson (1982). The Structure and Development of Science. Philosophical Quarterly 32 (128):289.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Susan Haack, Gerard Radnitzky & Gunnar Andersson (1980). Progress and Rationality in Science. Philosophical Quarterly 30 (119):174.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gunnar Andersson (1978). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):389-392.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gunner Andersson (1978). HALMERS, A. F.: "What is This Thing Called Science"? [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29:389.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. G. Andersson & G. Radnitzky (1976). Le Progrès de la Connaissance: Où En Sont les Théories de la Science? Archives de Philosophie 39 (4):619-628.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gunnar Andersson, Jan Bärmark, Aant Elzinga, Johan Lindström, Gerard Radnitzky, Håkan Törnebohm, Göran Wallén, Theodore Kisiel & Gert König (1971). The Chronicle Section. Man and World 4 (2):230-240.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation